💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 001311.gmi captured on 2020-10-31 at 02:11:45. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2020-09-24)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

<-- back to the mailing list

approachabe & frugal & composable

Petite Abeille petite.abeille at gmail.com

Wed Jun 3 19:54:19 BST 2020

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
On Jun 3, 2020, at 03:28, Sean Conner <sean at conman.org> wrote:
Shouldn't that be: <tag://tools.ieft.org,1995-03-11:rfc2648>?

Not quite, no. Even though the IEFT could choose to use the tag uri for such purpose.

There is a dedicated URN Namespace for IETF Documents instead:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2648

So, urn:ietf:rfc:2648 is actually correct.

The original purpose of the tag URI is to allow anyone to mint unique identifiers, without bothering with a central authority:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tag_URI_schemehttps://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4151

Used to be popular in the syndication world (RSS/Atom/etc).