💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 001185.gmi captured on 2020-10-31 at 02:06:21. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2020-09-24)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

<-- back to the mailing list

More silly text/gemini spec proposals

plugd plugd at thelambdalab.xyz

Fri May 29 22:11:45 BST 2020

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

Jason McBrayer writes:

Can't we just say: "A spec-compliant client MUST NOT display data: URLs
inline; a client MAY treat data: URLs as links to media, to be opened
only on user request."?

While ideal, I think Postel's law will eventually bite you there -correctly formatted pages will render just fine without clientsforbidding data: URLS, while incorrectly formatted pages will only workon clients technically violating the spec.

How about this: it's a bit of a hack, but imagine if we explicitlyharnessed data URLs to do something vaguely useful?

e.g.

=

data://a%20person%20dancing``` \o/ | / \```

I know, I know, very silly - but _if_ there were a way to make data://URLs an indispensible part of text/gemini it would make it verydifficult to abuse them without breaking things, wouldn't it?

Tim-------------- next part --------------A non-text attachment was scrubbed...Name: signature.ascType: application/pgp-signatureSize: 487 bytesDesc: not availableURL: <https://lists.orbitalfox.eu/archives/gemini/attachments/20200529/07b7ee04/attachment-0001.sig>