💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 001038.gmi captured on 2020-10-31 at 02:00:21. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2020-09-24)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
defdefred defdefred at protonmail.com
Mon May 25 14:26:23 BST 2020
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
+1
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐On Monday 25 May 2020 13:54, Felix Queißner <felix at masterq32.de> wrote:
Hey!
It just came to me that the specification for gemini is actually two
specifications intermixed, making it hard to work on only one of the two
components.
I propose to split the specification into either two documents or a
single document with a clear separation between text/gemini and the
gemini protocol.
This shouldn't change anything semantic-wise, but makes working with the
specifications easier as i don't have to skip-read over all text/gemini
stuff when writing the protocol implementation itself and vice-versa.
If that's already planned for one day: Cool, looking forward to that!
If not: Please consider to separate these two parts, even if they are
pretty close related
Regards
- xq