💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 000779.gmi captured on 2020-10-31 at 01:49:09. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2020-09-24)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Nicole Mazzuca nicole at strega-nil.co
Sun May 17 20:36:37 BST 2020
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ``` That seems like a mistake. Code highlighting is _really_ important for code gemlogs, imo. Nicole Sent from ProtonMail mobile -------- Original Message --------On May 17, 2020, 12:28, James Tomasino wrote: > On 5/17/20 6:43 PM, jan6 at tilde.ninja wrote: > > nothing is preventing me from making an alt-text saying something like "this | that - a poem", so it wouldn't exactly solve anything, other than making it slightly easier to parse (separating only on first space shouldn't be hard at all anyway) > > I'm really leaning toward the simplest of all things, which is no > special "type" at all. Just > > ```[optional whitespace][optional alt text] > > The art type is meaningless once we have an alt, so that's easy to > dismiss. The text type doesn't help tell me if the content should be > spidered or read aloud. Including a language property seems nice, but we > don't have a lang property on the whole document, so it's overkill in > this context. > > Really the only thing we're doing is codifying a bunch of extra rules > and enumeration so that we can specify code syntax languages. That leads > to clients being able to mark things up, which is fine and all, but > seems far less important than the plain accessibily goal. > > If this becomes cumbersome or fragile (space vs no space breaking > things) then people won't use it. I suggest the simpler approach here > will be better for gemini. > > If people want to use the alt text area to indicate code & language, > then that's a pattern we can toss into the best practices doc. If it > gets put into practice, clients can check for it if it matters to them.-------------- next part --------------An HTML attachment was scrubbed...URL: <https://lists.orbitalfox.eu/archives/gemini/attachments/20200517/d49f44e0/attachment.htm>