💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 000309.gmi captured on 2020-10-31 at 01:29:19. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2020-09-24)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Sean Conner sean at conman.org
Mon Jan 13 23:22:40 GMT 2020
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ``` It was thus said that the Great solderpunk once stated: > Happy 2020, Gemininauts! > > As I mentioned previously and briefly on this list, over at > https://tildegit.org/solderpunk/molly-brown I am working on a Gemini > server of my own, named (The Unsinkable) Molly Brown. Molly for > short is just fine! > > The server is written in Go and is intended to be a fully featured > server, implementing all aspects of the protocol. This is a very > deliberate decision to force me to be personally aware of the > implementation difficulty involved in everything that gets specced. I was looking over the code for CGI support and I notice we took two verydifferent approaches to it. I based my support upon RFC-3875, with somechanges to reflect Gemini (and support running existing web-based CGIprograms by mapping the return status codes), while you pretty much just runthe script. I would expect at the very least the QUERY_STRINGmeta-variable (as RFC-3875 calls it, or "environment variable" as everybodyelse calls them) to be set. But given that CGI wasn't specced for Gemini, I think both ourimplementations are compliant though. > Molly is also designed to function in a multi-user environment, such as > a public access unix server, where individual users have no access to > the main server configuration file and hence need some other way to > control features such as redirection or certificate requirements. None > of this is implemented yet, but I plan to use .molly files, similar to > the .htaccess files used by Apache. I'm very open to other ideas, > though, if anybody has any. I previous did this for GLV-1.12556 but removed the feature [1]. Someissues you will have to deal with: * Syntax errors in the config file and how to handle them. * Do you cache the configs? If you do, how do you get new changes? If you don't, you get a potential performance problem. * Do you support configs per directory? -spc [1] Only for authenticating certificates, and it was per-directory. This made it hard to support authentication for non-filesystem handlers (which I have a lot of) so I moved authentication to the primary config file.