💾 Archived View for dioskouroi.xyz › thread › 24944065 captured on 2020-10-31 at 00:52:31. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
________________________________________________________________________________
Reminds me of this:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/frederickhess/2020/09/21/prince...
Another example of woke-ness going terribly wrong.
I shared this because I am honestly intrigued by it. Do the lawsuits have valid grounds? Where can we draw the line?
Try reading it reversed, i.e.:
Uber ditching delivery fees for category X
can be also read as:
Uber charging delivery fees for those not belonging to category X
The net effect is anyway that a same meal, with the same list price will arrive at your home with - say - 20% different (+ or -) cost due uniquely to the race of who prepared it.
Sure it is a form of discrimination, whether it is "good" and/or made in "good will" and for a "good cause" should be irrelevant for the Law, of course it has to be seen.