💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 002725.gmi captured on 2020-09-24 at 02:55:26. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2020-09-24)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Emma Humphries ech at emmah.net
Mon Sep 14 19:22:14 BST 2020
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
There's a couple of Bugzilla bugs to follow on that:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1385357 this looks like this got regressed as reported in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1629149.
I'll log in and update that.
-- Emma
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020, at 11:17, acdw wrote:
On 2020-09-14 (Monday) at 14:30, Leo <list at gkbrk.com> wrote:
Firefox has a hard-coded list of schemas that extensions are allowed to
handle without the web+
or webext+ prefix. I believe gopher can be handled this way.
Has anyone got in touch or created an issue to add gemini to this list?
While it defeats the purpose
of having a separate protocol and document format, it would be good to
make all the gemini:// links
work in Firefox.
Leo
I haven't, but I've come across this problem as well. Would it be
possible for an add-on to just add "web+" to all <a> tags with
href^=gemini:// ? Then define a protocol handler to web+gemini?
I was going to try this but my Javascript skills are sorely lacking.
--
~ acdw
acdw.net | breadpunk.club/~breadw