💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 002539.gmi captured on 2020-09-24 at 03:03:02. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2020-09-24)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Sean Conner sean at conman.org
Mon Aug 31 21:08:21 BST 2020
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
It was thus said that the Great Solderpunk once stated:
I think it goes without saying that at the absolute minimum a Gemini
client certificate ought to be a valid x509 certificate. I did look
into this at some stage and IIRC the Issuer needs to be non-empty but
the Subject does not.
I was unaware of this and (incorrectly) assumed that the issuer andsubject fields would always be present. Maybe mention somewhere in thespecification that servers could expect non-subject client certificates.
-spc