💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 001594.gmi captured on 2020-09-24 at 01:46:41. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

<-- back to the mailing list

"Wide load" status code(s)?

solderpunk solderpunk at SDF.ORG

Fri Jun 12 20:11:33 BST 2020

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 02:29:15PM -0400, Matthew Graybosch wrote:

Not to disparage Petite Abeille's point about TLS fingerprinting and
blending in to avoid notice, but aren't we sticking out anyway by
listening on port 1965?

By default, yes, but if somebody wanted to host a server on port 443 inan attempt to "blend in", they could. How effectively they would blendin would then be a function of how typical their certificate looked.

But maybe there's not such a conflict here. Somebody wanting to run aserver in extreme stealth mode might just have to accept that thisinvolves sacrificing some efficiency and use fat certs.

Cheers,Solderpunk