💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 000606.gmi captured on 2020-09-24 at 02:27:16. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
solderpunk solderpunk at SDF.ORG
Thu May 14 18:18:15 BST 2020
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ``` On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 09:58:13PM -0400, int 80h wrote: > On Wed May 13, 2020 at 2:27 PM EDT, Visiblink wrote: > > I have noticed that it does not work with *all* gemini servers (in > > particular the gemlog at 80h.dev). > > I haven't checked the code but I wonder if it's not set to use sni? I > had that problem with another client before. > Somebody just asked me about this on Mastodon earlier today. The spec so far does not mention SNI at all, which should definitely bechanged. It seems to me like servers really ought to be tolerant of it not beingused, which implies having a designated default host. But also thatclients really ought to be sending it. Are there good reasons not to make SNI mandatory for clients? If notthe spec could basically enforce Postel's law here, clients MUST use itand servers MUST tolerate its absence... Cheers,Solderpunk