I wrote a few days ago how the OSI's new "Open Source AI" definition is not open source (and that "open source AI" basically doesn't exist for larger systems) (tante.cc/2024/10/16/does-open-…)
Now OSI really wants to keep pushing it and started collecting corporate endorsers for this hollow definition whose only job is to enable "open washing" of proprietary systems. And personally I find it deeply disturbing that @nextcloud, and SUSE Linux - who both should know better - supported this. The fact that Mozilla does is just the next step in their intellectual collapse.
opensource.org/ai/endorsements
https://tldr.nettime.org/@tante/113384846743927151
https://tante.cc/2024/10/16/does-open-source-ai-really-exist/
https://opensource.org/ai/endorsements
2024-11-17 strypey ┃ 1🔗 2#️ 1👤
@tante
> the OSI's new "Open Source AI" definition is not open source (and that "open source AI" basically doesn't exist for larger systems)
Good to know I'm in good company. I wrote about […]
The OSI is not a fit steward for the Open Source Definition.
────