@thesamesam @lanodan The difference is that with Debian/etc, the person committing the license violation is whoever applies the patch and builds the binary, which is not the end user. With Gentoo, the end user is applying the patch, so they are committing the license violation.
Of course, the brokenness of the AGPL affects everyone. I'm just describing how it doesn't affect end-users of binary distros, but it does end-users of source distros.
https://social.treehouse.systems/@marcan/113619089796751092
@marcan @lanodan I think one starts to get into interesting definitions of "application" there. I'm not convinced that it's somehow magically different because Debian did the building if I'm […]
────