“It’s not illegal to have a monopoly,” EFF’s @mitchstoltz told Vox about Google. “But it is illegal to leverage one’s monopoly power to maintain that monopoly, basically to stay a monopolist by means other than simply having the best product.” vox.com/technology/387375/goog…
https://mastodon.social/@eff/113528880389596742
https://www.vox.com/technology/387375/google-chrome-antitrust-privacy-android
@eff @mitchstoltz I'm just curious how they think this will help? Who is going to buy Chrome? Or Android? The latter, I suppose, has an income stream, but probably not a sustaining one. 🤔
@eff @mitchstoltz we need better browsers in general
@eff @mitchstoltz Show me a monopoly that has never broken the rules.
It's like saying that owning a gun is OK, but using it to shoot people is illegal. Come on, where there are guns, there […]
@eff shorturl.at/FM5Jb
@eff @mitchstoltz i use #lynx mostly and #duckduckgo when a site requires needless eye candy oops i mean java.
oh, and sometimes an RSS reader written in ".sh" bash scripting.
@eff
“But it is illegal to leverage one’s monopoly power to maintain that monopoly, basically to stay a monopolist by means other than simply having the best product.”
This actually sounds […]
2024-11-22 turbobob ┃ edited ┃ 4#️
@eff
“But it is illegal to leverage one’s monopoly power to maintain that monopoly, basically to stay a monopolist by means other than simply having the best product.”
This actually sounds […]
@eff
“But it is illegal to leverage one’s monopoly power to maintain that monopoly, basically to stay a monopolist by means other than simply having the best product.”
Actually sounds more […]
@eff
“But it is illegal to leverage one’s monopoly power to maintain that monopoly, basically to stay a monopolist by means other than simply having the best product.”
Actually sounds like a […]
────