πŸ“£ Post by dansup

2024-11-16

Wow, I did not expect to see such a negative response to the potential for Bluesky federation in Pixelfed.
If it does ever happen, it will be opt-in, and we will be adding safety features to block bridges and other undesirable activities to empower admins to have total control!
#pixelfed #bluesky #federation

dansup

https://mastodon.social/@dansup/113492635103488426

Posts tagged #pixelfed

Posts tagged #bluesky

Posts tagged #federation

πŸ’¬ Replies

2024-11-16 LT14GJC

@dansup I like the idea.

2024-11-16 mcc

@dansup A penny's worth of thought you didn't ask for: If I were engineering something like PixelFed/Loops, I would build in Bluesky integration. I think it would be better if […]

2024-11-16 reiver ┃ edited

@dansup
I wonder if a poll might give you a different result.
[…]

2024-11-16 mintiefresh

@dansup I would prefer for Bluesky and the fediverse to play nice and make things work. So put me in the positive bin I guess.

2024-11-16 strght ┃ 1πŸ‘€

@dansup
Don’t underestimate Bluesky, Threads, Redit etc. The are driven by surveillance economy. They’ll allocate resources to suck data and enrich the profiles of every individual in their […]

2024-11-16 Distante

@dansup Perhaps it would be better if Bluesky support was at the protocol level, not a separate platform

2024-11-16 outwitplaylist

@dansup In that case, here is some positive response to that: I think it sounds like a very good idea. Bringing together those different protocols is something that I would like to see happen. […]

2024-11-16 celinho

@dansup this, leaves in the hands of the user who wanted or did not block other federations, this would be a better option.

────

πŸ“‘ Local feed

πŸ•οΈ Communities

πŸ”₯ Hashtags

πŸ”Ž Search posts

πŸ”‘ Sign in

πŸ“Š Status

πŸ›Ÿ Help