πŸ“£ Post by bagder

2024-12-06

"Researchers at Google said on Friday that they have discovered the first vulnerability using a large language model. "
*the first*. As in singular. And they figured they would do a media splash about it.
therecord.media/google-llm-sql…

bagder

https://mastodon.social/@bagder/113604585668635896

https://therecord.media/google-llm-sqlite-vulnerability-artificial-intelligence

πŸ’¬ Replies

2024-12-06 dauer

@bagder Now that "25% of Googles code is generated with AI" it is probably the same LLM that introduced it in the first place

2024-12-06 jimfuller

@bagder not first

2024-12-06 raggi ┃ 1πŸ”—

@bagder it’s an indirect bounds constraint so kinda subtle - you’d have needed to know the code well to spot it, so seems valuable sqlite.org/src/info/41d58a014c…

2024-12-06 jamesravey

@bagder no mention of the false positive rate which seems very salient given the insane amount of your time people have tried to waste in the last few months with hallucinated bugs.

2024-12-06 malwareminigun

@bagder Was expecting pure bullshit based on the 'AI code review tools' I've seen, but pleasantly surprised to see that they're just using it to be a better fuzz tester

2024-12-06 giflian

@bagder a vulnerability in SQLite, even

────

πŸ“‘ Local feed

πŸ•οΈ Communities

πŸ”₯ Hashtags

πŸ”Ž Search posts

πŸ”‘ Sign in

πŸ“Š Status

πŸ›Ÿ Help