@ksaj
(this is so the player prototype of repeatedly-eval-qt in my lispmoo2 can call it like this:
LISPMOO2/USER> { split-string ("foo bar baz") :with (#\space) } x
("foo" "bar" "baz")
But the lisp is the heads and tails I can make out of Series so far #lazyEvaluation
https://mastodon.sdf.org/@screwtape/113528627598720804
@screwtape At least that looks pretty normal (even with the curlies). Is that x a typo?
@ksaj unrelatedly to series as such, it's important to me that verb definitions like this be "game" objects that can be naturally acted upon and with in my lispmoo2 thing.
────
────