Which one looks better to you? (vote in the reply post below)
In case you want to play a little with ascii art, here's the b64: /Td6WFoAAATm1rRGBMB/twIhARwAAAAAAAAAABRRctTgATYAd10AEAywBjpEIdYgPD0ux3egblK5hdy4Gknb8l+luoP75rCye2dmpqDQBJ2NCWEASohlZ3Emc5BgB8UtuNbOb2oX1KPr2SxzI0t4YfsFM+LjfMZpGAOFeFowffxmvzVi9ok1K0u+4wiy7HsoUef2th7SrbJCAZHqdgAAALNVE3AxoU2aAAGbAbcCAACgubUKscRn+wIAAAAABFla
https://infosec.exchange/@pancake/113555443097505047
@pancake Iād say the second and the fourth. The second makes it visually easier to track the col position through the rows. And the fourth just looks super clean š¤
2024-11-27 jonpalmisc ā 1š¬
@pancake are you sticking to strictly ASCII? I bet some of the Unicode box drawing characters could make this look nice
Maybe i can just priorize the lines of the selected bit group with the arrow keys, but i'm unsure about the the best choice for visualizing the instructions decomposed (the first at the top is [ā¦]
āāāā