šŸ“£ Post by pancake

2024-11-27 ā”ƒ edited

Which one looks better to you? (vote in the reply post below)
In case you want to play a little with ascii art, here's the b64: /Td6WFoAAATm1rRGBMB/twIhARwAAAAAAAAAABRRctTgATYAd10AEAywBjpEIdYgPD0ux3egblK5hdy4Gknb8l+luoP75rCye2dmpqDQBJ2NCWEASohlZ3Emc5BgB8UtuNbOb2oX1KPr2SxzI0t4YfsFM+LjfMZpGAOFeFowffxmvzVi9ok1K0u+4wiy7HsoUef2th7SrbJCAZHqdgAAALNVE3AxoU2aAAGbAbcCAACgubUKscRn+wIAAAAABFla

pancake

https://infosec.exchange/@pancake/113555443097505047

https://media.infosec.exchange/infosec.exchange/media_attachments/files/113/555/483/451/639/422/original/46efd60d8ce1130f.png

šŸ”„ pancake

šŸ’¬ Replies

2024-11-27 i0null

@pancake Iā€™d say the second and the fourth. The second makes it visually easier to track the col position through the rows. And the fourth just looks super clean šŸ¤Œ

2024-11-27 jonpalmisc ā”ƒ 1šŸ’¬

@pancake are you sticking to strictly ASCII? I bet some of the Unicode box drawing characters could make this look nice

2024-11-27 pancake

Maybe i can just priorize the lines of the selected bit group with the arrow keys, but i'm unsure about the the best choice for visualizing the instructions decomposed (the first at the top is [ā€¦]

ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€

šŸ“” Local feed

šŸ•ļø Communities

šŸ”„ Hashtags

šŸ”Ž Search posts

šŸ”‘ Sign in

šŸ“Š Status

šŸ›Ÿ Help