πŸ’¬ Reply by kurtseifried

2024-12-15 ┃ RE: bagder

@bagder @joshbressers something to keep in mind is that the NVD/CISA take a worst-case scenario approach of it could be used this way or it could be vulnerable this way because across the entire federal government, I guarantee you somebody is using it in some legacy system in a truly horrific way that it was not meant to be used. The other side is the economics of it. If they under estimate the severity, they’ll get in trouble for saying the sky wasn’t falling if an attacker does end up using it. If they say it’s worse than it is, well that’s a you problem, not a me problem. So the cost of the false positive prediction is externalized and the cost of a false negative prediction is internalized. And since nobody likes getting chewed out, well here we are with bad severity estimates of vulnerabilities.

kurtseifried

https://infosec.exchange/@kurtseifried/113657936926679060

bagder

joshbressers

πŸ’¬ Replies

2024-12-15 bagder ┃ 1πŸ‘€ 1πŸ’¬

@kurtseifried @joshbressers yeah, there really is no easy solution or fix here...

────

View parent post

View first post in thread

────

πŸ“‘ Local feed

πŸ•οΈ Communities

πŸ”₯ Hashtags

πŸ”Ž Search posts

πŸ”‘ Sign in

πŸ“Š Status

πŸ›Ÿ Help