522bv$spin 01-06-00 09:24:59 UNITED STATES REPORTS 522 OCT. TERM 1997 522bv$titl 01-06-00 09:27:06 UNITED STATES REPORTS VOLUME 522 CASES ADJUDGED IN THE SUPREME COURT AT OCTOBER TERM, 1997 Beginning of Term October 6, 1997, Through March 2, 1998 FRANK D. WAGNER reporter of decisions WASHINGTON : 2000 Printed on Uncoated Permanent Printing Paper For sale by the U. S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-9328 522BV$ Unit: $UII [02-01-00 10:03:28] PGT: FRT Errata 493 U. S. 168, line 6: "Hoffman-La Roche Inc." should be "Hoffmann-La Roche Inc." 520 U. S. 1185, line 17: "102 F. 3d 551" should be "112 F. 3d 787". ii 522BV$ Unit: UIII [01-06-00 18:52:00] PGT: FRT J USTICES of the SU PREM E COU RT during the time of these reports* WILLIAM H. REHNQUIST, Chief Justice. JOHN PAUL STEVENS, Associate Justice. SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR, Associate Justice. ANTONIN SCALIA, Associate Justice. ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, Associate Justice. DAVID H. SOUTER, Associate Justice. CLARENCE THOMAS, Associate Justice. RUTH BADER GINSBURG, Associate Justice. STEPHEN BREYER, Associate Justice. retired LEWIS F. POWELL, Jr., Associate Justice. WILLIAM J. BRENNAN, Jr., Associate Justice.1 BYRON R. WHITE, Associate Justice. HARRY A. BLACKMUN, Associate Justice. officers of the court JANET RENO, Attorney General. SETH P. WAXMAN, Solicitor General.2 WILLIAM K. SUTER, Clerk. FRANK D. WAGNER, Reporter of Decisions. DALE E. BOSLEY, Marshal. SHELLEY L. DOWLING, Librarian. *For notes, see p. iv. iii 522BV$ Unit: $UIV [01-06-00 18:52:37] PGT: FRT NOTES 1 Justice Brennan, who retired effective July 20, 1990 (498 U. S. vii), died on July 24, 1997. See post, p. vii. 2 The Honorable Seth P. Waxman, of the District of Columbia, was nomi- nated by President Clinton on September 9, 1997, to be Solicitor General; the nomination was confirmed by the Senate on November 7, 1997; he was commissioned and took the oath of office on November 13, 1997. He was presented to the Court as Acting Solicitor General on October 6, 1997. See post, p. ix. iv 522BV$ Unit: $$UV [01-06-00 18:53:02] PGT: FRT SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Allotment of Justices It is ordered that the following allotment be made of the Chief Justice and Associate Justices of this Court among the circuits, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 42, and that such allotment be entered of record, effective September 30, 1994, viz.: For the District of Columbia Circuit, William H. Rehnquist, Chief Justice. For the First Circuit, David H. Souter, Associate Justice. For the Second Circuit, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Associate Justice. For the Third Circuit, David H. Souter, Associate Justice. For the Fourth Circuit, William H. Rehnquist, Chief Justice. For the Fifth Circuit, Antonin Scalia, Associate Justice. For the Sixth Circuit, John Paul Stevens, Associate Justice. For the Seventh Circuit, John Paul Stevens, Associate Justice. For the Eighth Circuit, Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice. For the Ninth Circuit, Sandra Day O'Connor, Associate Justice. For the Tenth Circuit, Stephen Breyer, Associate Justice. For the Eleventh Circuit, Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice. For the Federal Circuit, William H. Rehnquist, Chief Justice. September 30, 1994. (For next previous allotment, and modifications, see 502 U. S., p. vi, 509 U. S., p. v, and 512 U. S., p. v.) v 522BV$ Unit: UVII [01-06-00 18:53:37] PGT: FRT DEATH OF JUSTICE BRENNAN Supreme Court of the United States MONDAY, OCTOBER 6, 1997 Present: Chief Justice Rehnquist, Justice Stevens, Justice O'Connor, Justice Scalia, Justice Kennedy, Justice Souter, Justice Thomas, Justice Ginsburg, and Justice Breyer. The Chief Justice said: As we open this morning, I note with sadness that our friend and colleague, William Joseph Brennan, Jr., a retired Justice of this Court, died on July 24, 1997, at Arlington, Virginia. Born in Newark, New Jersey, on April 25, 1906, William Brennan was the second of eight children born to Irish par- ents who emigrated to the United States in 1890. An out- standing student from an early age, he was an honor student of the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and graduated high in his class at Harvard Law School. Justice Brennan joined a prominent New Jersey law firm where he specialized in labor law. He was an Army officer during World War II and served on the staff of the Undersec- retary of War. Following a brief return to private practice after the war, he began his judicial career. He moved rap- idly from the state trial bench to the New Jersey Supreme Court. President Eisenhower nominated him to this Court in 1956. Justice Brennan authored many landmark opinions while on the bench of this Court. He became a champion of an expansive view of constitutional protection of individual vii 522BV$ Unit: UVII [01-06-00 18:53:37] PGT: FRT viii DEATH OF JUSTICE BRENNAN rights. Following his retirement in 1990 after 33 years on this bench, Justice Brennan often frequented the build- ing and continued a warm relationship with his former colleagues. The members of this Court will greatly miss Justice Bren- nan's wit and his friendly, buoyant spirit, and I speak for them in expressing our profound sympathy to Mrs. Brennan, to his daughter and two sons, and to all those whose lives were touched by this remarkable man. The recess the Court takes this month will be in his memory. At an ap- propriate time, the traditional memorial observance of the Court and the Bar of this Court will be held in this Courtroom. 522BV$ Unit: $UIX [01-06-00 18:51:27] PGT: FRT PRESENTATION OF THE ACTING SOLICITOR GENERAL Supreme Court of the United States MONDAY, OCTOBER 6, 1997 Present: Chief Justice Rehnquist, Justice Stevens, Justice O'Connor, Justice Scalia, Justice Kennedy, Justice Souter, Justice Thomas, Justice Ginsburg, and Justice Breyer. The Chief Justice said: I have the honor to announce, on behalf of the Court, that the October 1996 Term of the Supreme Court of the United States is now closed, and the October 1997 Term is now con- vened. The Court now recognizes the Attorney General, Janet Reno. The Attorney General said: Mr. Chief Justice, and may it please the Court. I have the honor to present to the Court the Acting Solicitor Gen- eral, Seth P. Waxman of the District of Columbia. The Chief Justice said: Mr. Acting Solicitor General, the Court welcomes you to the performance of the important office that you have as- sumed, to represent the government of the United States before this Court. We wish you well in your office. ix Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Note: All undesignated references herein to the United States Code are to the 1994 edition. Cases reported before page 801 are those decided with opinions of the Court or decisions per curiam. Cases reported on page 801 et seq. are those in which orders were entered. Page A. v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831 Aaron, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 910,979 Abbey v. Patent and Trademark Office Bd. of Patent Appeals & Interferences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 886 Abbondanzo v. Automatic Switch Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1137 Abbott; Bragdon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 991 Abbott Laboratories v. Huggins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1153 Abdul v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1036 Abdul-Akbar v. Delaware . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 890 Abdul-Akbar v. Delaware Dept. of Correction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 852 Abdullah v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 878 Abellan v. Fairmont Hotel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1036 A. B. R. v. Vermont Dept. of Social and Rehabilitation Services . 955 Abromson v. American Pacific Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1110 Aburahmah v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823 ACandS, Inc.; Jaques Admiralty Law Firm v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 816 Aceveda v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 905 Acevedo v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 975 Achiekwelu v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 901 Ackles v. Luttrell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 928 Acosta v. Diaz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 801 Acosta Aceveda v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 905 Acuna, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 815 Acuna v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1020 Adam v. Dickinson Place Charitable Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 916 Adame v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 878 Adams v. Cumberland Farms, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 808 Adams v. Department of Navy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1151 Adams v. Jersey City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 Adams v. New York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 852 xi Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) xii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Adams v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1096 Adams; Orand v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1116 Adams v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 901,1006,1152 Adams v. U. S. District Court . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 843 Adams Ford Belton, Inc. v. Missouri Motor Vehicle Comm'n . . . . 952 Adelphi Univ.; Rosano v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 810 Adeniyi v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 901 Adesanya v. Gunn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 853 Adewusi v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 959 ADIA Personnel Services; Hoang v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1094 Adkins v. Dixon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 937 Adkins v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 824 Administrative Office of U. S. Courts; Strable v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1151 Admiral Beverage Corp.; Wisland v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1112 Advance Reproduction Co. v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 951 AEDC Federal Credit Union v. First City Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1146 Agostini v. Felton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 803 AgriBank, FCB; Schaffer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823 Aguilera v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 883 Aguirre v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 931 Ahmed v. Greenwood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1148 Air Line Pilots v. Miller . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 991 Aizawa v. Japan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 Akpaeti, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 806 Akpaeti v. Florida District Court of Appeal, Third Dist. . . . . . . . 1092 Akpaeti v. Kentucky . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1080 Akpaeti v. Terranova Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1092 Aktepe v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1045 Alabama; Baker v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 839 Alabama; Brooks v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 893 Alabama; Buchanan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 985 Alabama; Bujan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 956 Alabama; Bush v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 969 Alabama; Click v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1001 Alabama; Cobb v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 847 Alabama; Gaddy v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1032 Alabama; Guthrie v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 848 Alabama; Magwood v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 836 Alabama; Myers v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1054 Alabama; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 957 Alabama; Stallworth v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1116 Alabama; Stanberry v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 853 Alabama; Trawick v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 Alabama; Ziglar v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 852 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED xiii Page Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd.; Hubbard v. . . . . . . . . . 920 Alabama Dept. of Corrections; Kirby v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 885,1085 Alabama Dept. of Environmental Management; Hagood v. . . . . . . 863 Alabama Gas Corp.; Barclay v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1029 Alabama State Bar; Miller v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 859 Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc.; Zimomra v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 948 Alaska; Distributel, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 862 Alaska v. Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government . . . . . . . . 520 Alaska v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1108 Alaska; Weiss v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 948 Albano Santos v. Immigration and Naturalization Service . . . . . . 824 Albright; Strawberry v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1147 Albuquerque v. Browner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 965 Alden Owners, Inc.; Bell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864 Alderman; Rutherford v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 Alexander; Prewitt v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 Alexander v. Roe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 898 Alexander v. Rush North Shore Medical Center . . . . . . . . . . . . . 811 Alexander v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 869 Alexander v. Whitman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 949 Alexander S. v. Boyd . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1090 Alfieri v. M. F. Smith & Associates, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1111 Alghanim & Sons, W. L. L.; Toys "R" Us, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1111 Ali v. U. S. District Court . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 Allen, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 964,1073 Allen v. Dilley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 826 Allen v. Gypsy Church of Northwest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 907 Allen v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921 Allen v. Michigan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 973 Allen v. Montgomery Hospital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 982 Allen; Muskogee v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1148 Allen v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 846 Allen; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1148 Allen v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958 Allen v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1022,1053 Allentown Mack Sales & Service, Inc. v. NLRB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 359 Allergan Medical Optics; Fry v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 952 Allison v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 987 Allred v. Moore & Peterson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1048 Allstate Ins. Co.; Williams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 832 Allustiarte v. Cooper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864 Almand v. DeKalb County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 966 Al-Matin v. Kuhlmann . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 910 Al-Mosawi v. Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 852 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) xiv TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Aloi v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 868 Alonso-Alonso v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1083 Alston v. Arizona ex rel. Houseworth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 857 Alston v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 838 Alston v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 999 Alta Bates Corp. v. National Labor Relations Bd. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1028 Alternative Pioneering Systems, Inc.; Aroma Mfg., Inc. v. . . . . 818,1008 Alton v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 976 Altosino v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1110 Altschul v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 884,897 Altschul v. Texas Bd. of Pardons and Paroles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1094 Alvarado v. El Paso Independent School Dist. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 868 Alvarado v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1152 Alvarez v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 829 Alvarez; Frillz, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 813 Alvarez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 853,939,1083 Alvarez v. Westmorland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1077 Alvarez-Machain; Berellez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 Alvarez Sotopaz v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1133 Alvin v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 904 Alvord v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1013 Amaya-Alvarado v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 Amaya-Ruiz v. Stewart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1130 Amaya-Sanchez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1153 Ambanc La Mesa Partnership v. Liberty National Enterprises . . 1110 Amcor Capital Corp. v. Goolkasian . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807 Amer v. Michigan Family Independence Agency . . . . . . . . . . . . . 999 Amer v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 904 American Airlines, Inc. v. Criales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 906 American Bar Assn.; Massachusetts School of Law at Andover v. 907 American Bible Society v. Richie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1011 American Citigas Co. v. Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease . . . . . . . 1016 American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc. v. Buckley . . . . . . 1113 American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc.; Buckley v. . . . . . 1107 American Council on Gift Annuities v. Richie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1011 American Express Tax & Business Services, Inc.; Stuart v. . . . . . 1076 American Harvest; Aroma Mfg., Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 818,1008 American Medical Assn.; Practice Mgmt. Information Corp. v. . . 933 American Medical International Inc.; Leath v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1147 American Medical Security, Inc.; Larsen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 965 American Motorists Ins. Co.; Brown v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 950 American National Red Cross; Lipin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1047 American Pacific Corp.; Abromson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1110 American President Lines, Ltd.; Gamma-10 Plastics, Inc. v. . . . . 908 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED xv Page American Relocation Network International v. Wal-Mart Stores 1116 American Transit Ins. Co.; Lloyd v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1030 America's Favorite Chicken Co.; Rabin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 820 Ameritech Corp. v. Federal Communications Comm'n . . . . . . 1089,1101 Ameritech Corp. v. Raczak . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1107 AmerSig Graphics, Inc. v. Widener's Estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1050 Amertex Enterprises, Ltd. v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1075 Amiri v. Rolex Watch U. S. A., Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1127 Amoco Oil Co.; Bellows v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1068 Amoco Production Co.; Avitts v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 977 Amor v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 906 Amundson; Sims v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1124 Anderson, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805 Anderson v. Commissioner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 948 Anderson; Derden v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 828 Anderson; Gibbs v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1127 Anderson v. Groose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 889 Anderson v. Hopkins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 930 Anderson; Howard v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 968 Anderson v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 889 Anderson; Jackson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1119 Anderson v. Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1048 Anderson; Lindgren v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1114 Anderson v. McKune . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958 Anderson; Moore v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1078 Anderson; Omawalli v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 Anderson v. Panos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 951 Anderson; Peeples v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055 Anderson; Phillips v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 839 Anderson v. Southern Stevedoring Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 954 Anderson; Stokes v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1134 Anderson; Thrower v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 850,1009 Anderson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 843,856 Andrade, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 967 Andrade v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 852 Andrews, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1026,1103 Andrews; Anne Arundel County v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1015 Andrews; Chadwick v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864 Andrews v. Los Angeles Cty. Dept. of Children & Fam. Servs. 959,1070 Andrews v. Matesanz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1151 Andrews; Wee v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1088 Angello v. Northern Mariana Islands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 826 Angelone; Bannan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1060 Angelone; Betts v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 840 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) xvi TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Angelone; Blake v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1065 Angelone; Buchanan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269 Angelone; Cross v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 Angelone; Henderson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 842 Angelone; Jamison v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 843 Angelone; Mackall v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1100 Angelone; Martin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1065,1154 Angelone; Neysmith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1065 Angelone; Peake v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 938,1022 Angelone; Riddick v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 847 Angelone; Roach v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1057 Angelone; Turner v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1031,1099 Angelone; Williams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 987 Anh Phan v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1109 Animal Legal Defense Fund; National Academy of Sciences v. . . 949 Anne Arundel County v. Andrews . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1015 Anne Arundel Medical Center; Barr v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 948 Anonymous v. Immigration and Naturalization Service . . . . . . . . 957 Anonymous v. Kaye . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1048 Anonymous v. Wilentz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1048 Ansari v. Pahlavi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 914 Ansin; River Oaks Furniture, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 818 Antonelli v. Foster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 834 Antonelli v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 851,896 Antonio-Cruz v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1064,1098 Antonov v. Los Angeles County Dept. of Public Social Services . 832 Anzaldo-Casillas v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1034 Anzivino v. Lewis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 847 A­1 Appliance v. Deutsche Financial Services Corp. . . . . . . . . . . 864 Aparo; Superior Court, Judicial Dist. of Hartford/New Britain v. 967 Apfel; Eastern Enterprises v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 931,1043,1105 Apfel; Forney v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1072,1088 Apfel; Weintraub v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1131 Appellate Div., Sup. Ct. of N. Y., First Jud. Dept.; Walker v. . . . . 837 Aqua-Marine Constructors, Inc.; Polaris Ins. Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . 933 Aquino-Chacon v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 931 Arce v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1053 Arch v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1019 Archer v. Methodist Hospital of Sacramento . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 936,1022 Archer v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 822 Archer v. Valley Health Care Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 936,1022 Arciniega v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 873 Arena; Chandross v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1076 Arguelles v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1062 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED xvii Page Argueta v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 826 Arias-Santos v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1062 Arizona; Alston v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 857 Arizona; Ceja v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1084 Arizona; Davis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1001 Arizona; Detrich v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 879 Arizona; Dickens v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 920 Arizona; Drake v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 827 Arizona; Hoke v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 832 Arizona; Jones v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1054 Arizona; Kit v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 Arizona; Libberton v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 Arizona; Mann v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 895 Arizona; McLamb v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 Arizona; McMurtrey v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 971 Arizona; Ochoa v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1083 Arizona; Rawlins v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 845 Arizona; Rogovich v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 829 Arizona; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 892 Arizona; Strickland v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 881 Arizona v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 806 Arizona v. Wright . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 Arizona; Zaman (Tahirkhaili) v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1148 Arizona Dept. of Corrections v. Hook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 Arizona Dept. of Revenue; Brush v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055 Arizona Mail Order; Casey v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 Arkansas; Brunson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 898 Arkansas; Edwards v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 950 Arkansas; Jones v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 Arkansas; Lee v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 Arkansas; Sales v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 827 Arkansas; Zawodniak v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 Arleaux v. Arleaux . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1112 Arlington County; Harris v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 863 Arlington County Bd.; Atherton v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 826 Arlington Heights; Ricci v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1038 Armendariz-Amaya v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 962 Armor v. Michelin Tire Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915 Arms Control and Disarmament Agency; Strang v. . . . . . . . . . . . 836 Armstead v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 922 Armstrong v. Shillinger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875 Armstrong v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1139 Arnett; Reiman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 894 Arnold v. Moore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1058 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) xviii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Arnold v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1064 Arnold Corp.; Baker Hughes Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 933 Arocho; Rivera v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 Aroma Mfg., Inc. v. Alternative Pioneering Systems, Inc. . . . . 818,1008 Aroma Mfg., Inc. v. American Harvest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 818,1008 Aroostook Medical Center; Benjamin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1016 Arpaio; Price v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 891 Arrest the Incinerator Remediation (A. I. R.), Inc. v. EPA . . . . . 1045 Arrieh v. Milwaukee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1092 Arron v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1029 Arroyo v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1063 Arteaga v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . 804,835,841,842,994,1022,1069,1085 Arteaga v. Santa Clara Dept. of Family and Children's Services 835,1085 Arteaga v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 988 Arteaga v. U. S. Court of Appeals . . . . . . . . . . . . 446,832,935,1010,1022 Arteaga v. Wilson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 446 Artero v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1133 Arthur v. Zapata Haynie Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 860 Artuz; Barrett v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 990 Artuz; Bethea v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1134 Artuz; Brown v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 Arvonio; Robinson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1032 Arzola-Anaya v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1006 Asam v. Hancock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 983 Asam v. Owens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 862 Asbestos Workers; Madden v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1077 Ash v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 962 Ashby v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 901 Ashker; Brodeur v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 863 Ashley v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 Ashmus; Calderon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1011 Ashton v. Department of Veterans Affairs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1047 Asibor v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 902 Association. For labor union, see name of trade. Association for Local Telecom. Services v. Iowa Utilities Bd. . 1089,1101 Aston v. Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 870 Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. New York . . . . . . . . . . 808 Aswegan v. Emmett . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 956 Atascosa County; Votion v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1091 Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co.; Lozano v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1111 Atherton v. Arlington County Bd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 826 Atkins; Healthpartners of Southern Ariz. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 824 Atkins v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 899 Atkins; Partners Health Plan of Ariz., Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 824 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED xix Page Atkins v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 975 Atlanta Public School System; Hall v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997 Atlantic Coast Demolition & Recycling; Essex County Util. Auth. v. 966 Atlantic Coast Demolition & Recycling; Shinn v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 966 Atlantic Mut. Ins. Co. v. Commissioner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 931 Atlantic States Legal Foundation, Inc.; Stroh Die Casting Co. v. 981 Atley v. Iowa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004 Attala County v. Teague . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807 AT&T Co. v. Central Office Telephone, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1024 AT&T Co.; Central Office Telephone, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1036 AT&T Corp. v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1043,1089,1101 AT&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities Bd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1043,1089,1101 AT&T Family Federal Credit Union v. First Nat. Bank & Tr. Co. 479 Attorney General; Cammon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 987 Attorney General; Dixie v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 987 Attorney General; Godett v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1151 Attorney General; Joerger v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1146 Attorney General; TruServ Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1015,1099 Attorney General; Vander Zee v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 995 Attorney General of Ariz.; McDonnell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 844 Attorney General of Cal.; Del Rio v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 913 Attorney General of Fla.; Dennis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 836 Attorney General of Ga.; Echols v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 887 Attorney General of Ga.; Singleton v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 936 Attorney General of La. v. Causeway Medical Suite . . . . . . . . . . . 943 Attorney General of N. J.; Chez Sez VIII, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 Attorney General of N. J.; United Video v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 Attorney General of N. J. v. W. P. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1110 Attorney General of N. J.; W. P. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1109 Attorney General of Pa.; Gooding v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1017 Attorney General of Pa.; Hewlett v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1134 Attorney General of S. C.; Blackwell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 936 Attorney General of Tenn. v. Board of Comm'rs of Shelby County 1113 Attorney General of Tenn.; Riggs v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 982 Attorney General of Utah; Curiale v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1127 Attorney General of W. Va. v. Better Government Bureau, Inc. . . 1047 Attwood v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 887 Atuahene v. Immigration and Naturalization Service . . . . . . . . . . 973 Atuahene v. New Jersey Dept. of Transportation . . . . . . . . . . 1044,1120 ATX Telecommunication Services; Delor v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1019 Auburn Steel Co.; Self v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934 Aultman v. Stepanik . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 894 Austin Industrial, Inc.; Walter v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 888 Automatic Switch Co.; Abbondanzo v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1137 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) xx TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Automobile Workers; Caterpillar Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1042 Automobile Workers; Textron Lycoming Div., AVCO Corp. v. . 979,1088 Avaiteca, S. A. v. Roman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 952 Avery v. Brodeur . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 908 Avila v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 974 Avitts v. Amoco Production Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 977 Avrett v. Poly-America, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 Awofolu v. Los Angeles County Superior Court . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 Ayala v. New York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 Aybar v. Crispin-Reyes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1078 Aybar v. Drug Enforcement Administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 833 Ayers v. Fordice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1084 Ayers; McCarthy v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1120 Ayers v. Mitchell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 913 Aysisayh v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1094 Aziz v. Groose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 850 Aziz v. Slater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1118 Azorsky, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1041 Azubuko, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 806 B. v. Jerri Lynn C. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 802,936,1037 B. v. McDonald . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1048 Baade v. Columbia Hospital for Women . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1127 Baah v. Board of Trustees of Cal. State Univ. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1121 Babbitt; Feezor v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807 Babcock & Wilcox Co.; Foreman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1115 Babilonia v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1136 Bacon v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 843 Baddour v. Cary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1092 Baez, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805,1037 Baggett v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1133 Bagley v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1129 Bagley v. Tolle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1031 Baheth & Co. v. Schott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1092 Bailey; Harrison v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 828 Bailey v. Ignacio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 833 Bailey v. Snyder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958 Bailey v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 858 Bailey v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 850,889,896,927,1082 Bailie v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 965 Bainbridge; Wood v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1047 Baird v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 898 Bak v. Runyon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 952 Baker v. Alabama . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 839 Baker; Echols v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 887 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED xxi Page Baker v. General Motors Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222 Baker v. Indiana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1019 Baker v. Manville Trust . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 897 Baker; Singleton v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 936 Baker v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1051 Baker Hughes Inc. v. Jim Arnold Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 933 Baker, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Bd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1046 Bakhshekooei v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 856 Baki v. Wood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 857 Bakr v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1119 Baldauff, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 929 Baldor; Quevado v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 870,1010 Baldwin; Brinson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 922 Baldwin; May v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921 Baldwin; Ponder v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 840 Baldwin v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 825,960 Ball v. Maryland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1082 Ball v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1152 Ballam v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1141 Ball Corp.; Calhoun v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 955 Ballenger v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 817 Bally's Health & Tennis Corp.; Berkery v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 885 Balsys; United States v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1072 Balthazar v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 852 Bamonte v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 901 Banco Bilbao Vizcaya; Bonilla Montalvo v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915,1099 Bandag, Inc.; Hosch v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 842,1099 Banderas v. Doman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864,1071 Banderas Orthopaedic Clinic v. Doman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864,1071 Bandila Shipping Inc. v. Ghotra . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1107 Bandila Shipping Inc.; Ghotra v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1107 Bankers Trust Co.; Bestrom v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 950 Bank of America Ill.; Spartan Mills v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 969 Bank One, Lafayette, N. A.; Bell Brothers v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1113 Banks, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805,945,1037 Banks v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 851 Banks v. McCaughtry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1063 Banks v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1075 Banks v. U. S. District Court . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 840,1036 Bankston v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1067 Bannan v. Angelone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1060 Bannister, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 944 Banos v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1093 Barbara Parke Convalescent Center; Blankenship v. . . . . . . . . . . 1110 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) xxii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Barber v. Thomas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 Barber v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 988 Barbo; Royal v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1130 Barclay v. Alabama Gas Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1029 Barclift; James v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 854,1037 Bardsley v. Powell, Trachtman, Logan, Carrle & Bowman . . . . . . 802 Barfield v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 937 Barfield v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875 Barge v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997 Barker v. Gomez . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 Barker v. TCF Bank Savings FSB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 828 Barker v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 889 Barner v. Benson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1138 Barnes v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 903 Barnes v. Montgomery County Board of Ed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1028 Barnes v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 893 Barney v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 883 Barnthouse, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1040 Barocio v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1067 Barone; Lidman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871 Barone v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1021 Barr v. Anne Arundel Medical Center . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 948 Barrera, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1041,1103 Barrett v. Artuz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 990 Barrett v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 867,1141 Barrois v. Unidentified Party . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 920,1037 Barry v. Bergen County Probation Dept. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1136 Barry; Brooks v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 899 Barry K. Schwartz Partnership v. Sullivan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049 Bartlett; Braun v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 937 Bartley v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1062 Barton, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1145 Barton v. Norrod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934 Basile v. Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 883 Basile v. Southampton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 907 Basile v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 873 Basinski; Mumford v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 914 Bassett-Walker, Inc.; Derthick v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Batcheller; Rodriquez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1058 Bates, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1106,1107 Bates; Jones v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 804,928,1038 Bates v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,1053,1062 Batista v. Walker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 851 Baughman; Lorah v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1031 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED xxiii Page Bauhaus v. Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 920 Baxter; Thomas v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 968,1069 Baxter v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1097 Bay Area Laundry & Dry Cleaning Pens. Tr. v. Ferbar Corp. . . . 192 Bayliner; O'Hara v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 822 Baylor Univ.; Johnson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1115 Bazile v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 848,1009 BCF Engineering, Inc.; Martinez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 885 Beach v. Ocwen Federal Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 912 Beals v. Kiewit Pacific Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1108 Beaman v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1035 Beamon v. Maryland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1137 Beard v. Walsh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 966 Beardslee, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1074 Beargrass Corp.; Christian v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1051 Beaton v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 852 Beaven v. McBride . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1062 Beavers v. Pruett . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1023 Beaver Stairs Co.; Martinez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 881 Becerra v. Houston Independent School Dist. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 824 Bechara v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 843 Becht v. New York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 887 Beck v. U. S. Attorney for Dist. of Del. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 969 Beck v. Virginia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018 Becker v. Pen a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 813 Bedell, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 910,1039 Bedi v. Grondin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1050 Bedoya; Sampson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 870,1037 Beeler; Calderon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1099 Beeman v. Iowa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 846 Beggerly; United States v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1038 Behler v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 855 Behr; Burge v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049 Behr; Sanders v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 928,970 Beilein; Coleman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875 Bejarano-Ramirez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1067 Bell v. Alden Owners, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864 Bell v. Flores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 850,1069 Bell v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1123 Bell v. Michigan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 957 Bell; Morris v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1149 Bell v. New Jersey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866,1009 Bell v. New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection . . . . . . . 933,1010 Bell v. New Jersey Dept. of Transportation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866,1009 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) xxiv TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Bell; Palmer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 Bell v. Planned Parenthood League of Mass., Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Bell v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 827 Bell v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 984 Bell Brothers v. Bank One, Lafayette, N. A. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1113 Bellevue; Ino Ino, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1077 Bellflower; Masters v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871 Bellows v. Amoco Oil Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1068 BellSouth Business Systems; Riddle v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 953 BellSouth Telecom., Inc.; Barfield v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 937 BellSouth Telecom., Inc.; United States ex rel. McKenzie v. . . . . . 1077 Beloit Corp. v. Valmet Paper Machinery, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1028 Belshe v. Orthopaedic Hospital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1044 Beltram; Gordy v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1032 Beltran v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 852,922 Beltran-Bustamante v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 988 Bemis v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 976 Bender v. Messer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 918 Bendolph v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 939 Benjamin v. Aroostook Medical Center . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1016 Benjamin v. Bina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 968 Benjamin v. Equal Employment Opportunity Comm'n . . . . . . . . . 923 Benjamin v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 974 Bennett, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805,1044 Bennett v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831 Bennett v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 882 Benney v. Shaw Industries, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 909 Ben Oehrleins & Sons & Daughter, Inc. v. Hennepin County . . . . 1036 Ben Oehrleins & Sons & Daughter, Inc.; Hennepin County v. . . . 1029 Benson; Barner v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1138 Benson; Hanley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 882 Benson; Hodgson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 897 Bentley v. New York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 Bentley College; Kilcoyne v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1048 Benton v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 974 Benz; Munoz v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1093 Berellez v. Alvarez-Machain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 Berge v. Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 916 Bergen County Probation Dept.; Barry v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1136 Bergmann v. Candler County Dept. of Fam. & Children Servs. 1056,1154 Bergne v. Gomez . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1061 Berkeley; Darakshan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 950 Berkery v. Bally's Health & Tennis Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 885 Berkery v. Commissioner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 881 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED xxv Page Bernal v. Lytle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1151 Bernhardt; Turnmire v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1059,1154 Bernstein, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 993,1087,1103 Bernstein; Jones v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1135 Berry v. Georgia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 852 Bertsch; Jefferson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1147 Bertsch & Co.; Jefferson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1147 Bessinger; Hayes v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 Best v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 852,1033 Bestrom v. Bankers Trust Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 950 Bethea v. Artuz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1134 Bethel Park; Schwartz v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 895,977 Bethley v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 892 Better Government Bureau, Inc.; McGraw v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1047 Betts v. Angelone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 840 Beverly v. Walker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 883 Beverly Health and Rehabilitation Services, Inc. v. Feinstein . . . 816 Bexar County Adult Detention Center; Vasquez v. . . . . . . . . . . 971,1070 Bey v. Morton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1081 Bibbs v. MacDonald . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 920 Bigelow v. Dallas & Mavis Forwarding Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915 Biggins v. Hazen Paper Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 952 Bigsby v. Runyon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1118 Bilbao Vizcaya; Bonilla Montalvo v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1099 Billiot v. Louisiana in the Interest of Billiot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997 Bilzerian v. HSSM #7 Ltd. Partnership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 803 Bina; Benjamin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 968 Birbal v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 976 Birgel v. Board of Comm'rs of Butler County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1109 Biros v. Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 Bisel v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049 Bishop v. Georgia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1119 Bissell; Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Assn., Inc. v. . . . . 1109 Bjurman v. Transamerica Corp. Employees Health Care Plan . . . 865 Black v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934,1082 Black v. Zaring Homes, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 Blackburn; Rochon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1121 Blackburn; Sundstand Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997 Blackwell v. Condon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 936 Blackwell, Sanders, etc.; Kansas Pub. Employees Retirement Sys. v. 1068 Blagoue v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1135 Blair v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 901 Blair County Dept. of Costs and Fines; Brobst v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915 Blake v. Angelone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1065 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) xxvi TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Blakely Borough; Caterina v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 863,1069 Blakeney v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1061 Blandino v. Burns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 888 Blandino v. Nevada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1003 Blankenship v. Barbara Parke Convalescent Center . . . . . . . . . . . 1110 Blankenship v. Parke Care Centers, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1110 Blessing v. Blessing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1122 Blodgett; Simmons v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 892 Bloodworth, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1013 Bloomfield Hills Public Schools; Hudson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 822 Blount v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 874,1138 Blount v. Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1076 Blue Ash; Trout v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1048 Blue Cross Blue Shield of Kan., Inc.; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 811 Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Mich. v. BPS Clinical Laboratories 1153 Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Va., Inc.; Martin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1029 Blueprint Engines, Inc. v. Jadair Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998 Blue's Estate v. Los Angeles County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1111 Blue-Sky v. California Dept. of Corrections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1061 Blum v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1137 Blumeyer v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 938 BMW of Honolulu, Ltd.; Nelmida v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 858 Boardley v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 881 Board of Assessors of Raynham; Davis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 Board of Comm'rs of Butler County; Birgel v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1109 Board of Comm'rs of Shelby County; Walkup v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1113 Board of Dental Examiners; Wight v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 892 Board of Ed. for New York City; Gordon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 818,1036 Board of Ed. of Oak Park High School Dist. 200; Doe v. . . . . . . . . 998 Board of Ed. of Wappingers Central School Dist.; Praino v. . . . . . 888 Board of Governors, FRS; Cunningham v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 874 Board of Regents of Univ. of Tex. System; Travis v. . . . . . . . . . . 1148 Board of Review; Diaz-Cruz v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958 Board of Review of N. J.; Tricarico v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 892 Board of Supervisors, Prince William Cty., Va.; Omni Homes v. . . 813 Board of Trustees of Cal. State Univ.; Baah v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1121 Board of Trustees of Operating Engineers Local 825 Fund Service Facilities; International Fidelity Ins. Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 861 Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala.; United States ex rel. Berge v. 916 Boatwright v. Herman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 867 BOCA Appeals Bd. of Clarksburg; Lewis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 868 Boca Raton; Faragher v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 978,1088,1105 Boddie v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 909 Bogan v. Scott-Harris . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 980 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED xxvii Page Bogart v. California Coastal Comm'n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1015,1099 Bogdanoff v. Farmon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 853 Bogden; Vrettos v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 855 Bogle v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 938 Boharski v. Boharski . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 840 Bohnke, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 994 Boitnott v. Cascarano . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 803 Boley; Kaymark v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1109 Bolin v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 973 Bollman Hat Co.; Root v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 952 Bolton v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1035 Bomski v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1098 Bonanno v. Department of Labor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998 Bonat v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 874 Bond; Fritz v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1118 Bond v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 869 Bonds v. New York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 985 Bonhomme-Ardouin v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 898 Bonilla Montalvo v. Banco Bilbao Vizcaya . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915,1099 Bonneau Co. v. Magnivision, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1090 Bonner v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1065 Boodrow; Capital Communications Federal Credit Union v. . . . . . 1117 Booker v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831 Boomer's v. Marietta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 818 Boos v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1066 Booth v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 879 Booz, Allen & Hamilton, Inc.; Wainwright v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 973,1070 Booze v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1134 Borg; Montalvo v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875 Borg; Williams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 833,1009 Borland v. Emerson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 Bornkessel v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934 Borofsky, Lewis & Amodeo-Vickery; Lavertu v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 843 Borough. See name of borough. Borroto v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 889,1143 Borsick v. Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Erie County . . . . . . . 882 Boschetti v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1017 Bossier City; Kelly v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1148 Bottone v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 923,938,1071 Bouldin, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1145 Bounds v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1061 Bousley v. Brooks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 946,990,1042 Bouye v. South Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 822 Bovie v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1007 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) xxviii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Bow v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 849 Bowater Inc. and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1046 Bowe v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 Bowen v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1081 Bowers v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1137 Bowers v. Missouri Employees' Ret. System Bd. of Trustees . . . . 953 Bowers; Shahar v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049 Bowersox; Cooksey v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1027,1143 Bowersox; Flieger v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 877,1099 Bowersox; Griffin-El v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1082 Bowersox; Ivy v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1121 Bowersox; Lozano v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 886 Bowersox; Powell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055 Bowersox; Preston v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 943,1037 Bowersox; Weeks v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1093 Bowlen; Hammer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 887 Bowlin v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 982 Bowling v. Kentucky . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 Bowman v. Siefied . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1094 Bownds v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 969 Bowring v. Ellis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 857 Box; Taylor v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919,1070 Boyce v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 905 Boyd; Alexander S. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1090 Boyd v. Browner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 947 Boyd v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 835,872 BPS Clinical Laboratories; Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Mich. v. 1153 Brab v. Hill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 981 Bracewell v. Lobmiller . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 Brackett v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934 Braden v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 850 Bradford v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 953,1105 Bradford v. Louisiana State Univ. Medical Center . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 Bradford v. White . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 984 Bradley v. Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 953 Bradshaw v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1016 Brady v. Brady . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 841 Bragdon v. Abbott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 991 Bragg v. State Bar of Cal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1149 Bragg v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1062 Brand; Tanford v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 Brandt v. Shop `n Save Warehouse Foods, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1075 Branham; Flournoy v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018 Branson v. Los Angeles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1058 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED xxix Page Branson v. Martin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1126 Brantley v. Georgia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 985 Bratton; Maxwell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 813 Braun v. Bartlett . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 937 Braxton v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 874 Brazel v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 822 Breakley v. Hinkle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 842 Breest v. Brodeur . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 908 Brennan; Mountain v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 850 Brenson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 884 Brew; Edwards v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018 Brewer v. Compton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 Brewer v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1062 Brewer v. Marshall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1087,1151 Brewer v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 837 Briggs v. Ignacio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1095 Bright v. Caruso . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 Brigman v. CSX Transportation, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1090 Brigman; Russell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 937 Brill v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 895 Brimage v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 924 Brinson v. Baldwin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 922 Brintley v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 926 Bristol Bd. of Ed.; Cannon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 859 Bristow v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1065 Britt; Reshard v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 933,1085 Britton; Crawford-El v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 946,993 Broachwala v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 886,1010 Broaden v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 939 Broadwater v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1021 Broadwell v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 879 Brobst v. Blair County Dept. of Costs and Fines . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915 Brochu v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 811 Brock v. Carroll . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 924 Brock; Esteves v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 828 Brodeur v. Ashker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 863 Brodeur; Avery v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 908 Brodeur; Breest v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 908 Brodeur; Wellington v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1096 Brogan v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 398,804 Bronshtein v. Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 936 Brook Field v. Orlando . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1019 Brookline; Green v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 Brooks v. Alabama . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 893 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) xxx TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Brooks v. Barry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 899 Brooks; Bousley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 946,990,1042 Brooks v. Normandy Middle School . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 850 Brooks v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 839 Brooks v. Winston-Salem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 Brookshire; Papesh v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 895 Brookside Community, Inc.; Hall v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 Brotherhood. For labor union, see name of trade. Brow v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 852 Brown v. American Motorists Ins. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 950 Brown v. Artuz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 Brown; Fazon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 874 Brown v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 912 Brown v. Griffin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 Brown; Hudgins v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 860 Brown v. Kearney . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1062 Brown v. Koenick . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921,1022 Brown; Lumpkin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 995 Brown v. Maryland Dept. of Juvenile Justice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1096 Brown; McGinnis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 836,1036 Brown; Mendoza v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 937 Brown v. Mississippi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 849,1009 Brown v. New Mexico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 973 Brown v. New York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 833 Brown v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1028 Brown v. Rubin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1032 Brown v. Shalala . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 810 Brown; Soria v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958 Brown v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 940 Brown; Thompson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 825 Brown v. Uniroyal, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 933 Brown v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 843, 846, 895, 898, 905, 924, 956, 959, 960, 962, 975, 1105, 1113, 1120, 1130,1150 Brown v. Uphoff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 959 Brown v. Utah . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1031 Brown v. Virginia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1126 Brown v. Williams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Browne v. Nevada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 877 Browner; Albuquerque v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 965 Browner; Boyd v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 947 Brown Group, Inc.; Westowne Shoes, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 861 Browning v. Centinela Hospital Medical Center . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1017 Browning v. Mahan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1094 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED xxxi Page Browning v. United Parcel Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 891 Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. Sun Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1113 Bruce v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 838,940 Bruce Hardwood Floors; Industrial Workers v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 928 Brumley v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1028 Brundage; Scott v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1059 Brunell; Warren v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921 Brunson v. Arkansas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 898 Brunson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 905 Brunswick Corp.; Lewis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 978,1088 Brunswick Corp.; Lough v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 806 Brush v. Arizona Dept. of Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055 Brusstar; Washington v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 879,1022 Bryan v. Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 957 Bryan v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1024,1061,1105 Bryant v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1126 Buchanan v. Alabama . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 985 Buchanan v. Angelone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269 Buc-Hanan v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 886 Buchanan v. Marshall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 Buchbinder v. Commissioner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 868 Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc. . . . . . . 1107 Buckley; American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc. v. . . . . . 1113 Buckner v. Toro . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018 Buckom v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 973 Buffalo; First Mercury Syndicate, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1028 Bugh v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 853 Bujan v. Alabama . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 956 Bullock v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1066 Buraczewska v. New York City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 Burch v. Coca-Cola Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1084 Burch v. Maryland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1001 Bureau of Indian Affairs; King v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 900 Bureau of Prisons; Murphy v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 889 Bureau of Prisons; Perez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 930 Burge v. Behr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049 Burgess v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 999 Burgess v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1060,1121 Burk v. U. S. District Court . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 904 Burke v. Colorado . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 890 Burke; Fisher v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 872 Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1086,1106 Burlington N. R. Co. v. Red Wolf's Estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 801 Burlington N. & S. F. R. Co. v. Byrd . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 822 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) xxxii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Burlington N. & S. F. R. Co. v. Smith . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1107 Burnett v. Norris . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1093 Burns; Blandino v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 888 Burns v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1121 Burns v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 826,924 Burns; Wolford v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 838 Burnstine v. California Dept. of Motor Vehicles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 867 Burr; Ikelionwu v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 936 Burris v. Parke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 990 Burson; Riggs v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 982 Burt v. Rashad . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1075 Burton; Kirby v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1019 Burton; Mims v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1058 Burton v. Silcox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1081 Burton v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1062 Bush v. Alabama . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 969 Bush v. Tennessee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 953 Bush v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1114,1141 Bush v. Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1078 Bush & Burchett, Inc. v. Herman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807 Bush Ranch, Inc.; E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . 906 Buskirk v. Georgia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 859 Bussey v. Vaughn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1094 Buster v. Greisen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 981 Butler; Fidelity Technologies Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 821 Butler v. General Motors Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 Butler v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1034 Butterworth; Dennis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 836 Byous v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1097 Byrd; Burlington N. & S. F. R. Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 822 Byrd v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 940,1020,1066 C.; Dwight B. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 802,936,1037 Caban v. Wisconsin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 927 Cabral v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1114 Cabrales; United States v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1072,1106 Cade, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 909 Cadle Co. v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 Cagle v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1032 Cain; Gibson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 920 Cain; Herbert v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 842,1009 Cain; Lewis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 985 Cain v. Stegall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018 Cain; Trest v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87,804 Calderon v. Ashmus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1011 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED xxxiii Page Calderon v. Beeler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1099 Calderon v. Gordon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 907 Calderon v. Thompson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 911,947,1014 Calderon v. U. S. District Court . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 907,1099 Calderon-Hernandez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1133 Caldwell v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 850,906,916 Calhoon v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 806,1037 Calhoun, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1040,1103 Calhoun v. Ball Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 955 Calhoun v. Oregon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1127 Calhoun v. Wood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 857 Calia v. Kemna . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 900 California; Alvarez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 829 California; Argueta v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 826 California; Arteaga v. . . . . . . . . . . . . 804,835,841,842,994,1022,1069,1085 California; AT&T Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1043,1089,1101 California; Bradford v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 953,1105 California; Buc-Hanan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 886 California; Callahan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1127 California; Carpenter v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1078 California v. Deep Sea Research, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 946 California; El Muhammad v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 918 California; Erwin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1122 California; Fafarman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 California; Federal Communications Comm'n v. . . . . . . . 1043,1089,1101 California; Flowers v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1150 California; Ford v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1057 California; Gardeley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 854 California; Gonzales Samayoa v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 California; Hammon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 California; Heng I v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 923 California; Hill v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 922 California; Hines v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1077 California; Holt v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1017 California; Hood v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1093 California; Hunter v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 California; Huor v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 923 California; Hutchinson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 896 California; Jafar v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 834 California; Johnson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1054,1154 California; Jones v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 955,1054 California; LaFayette v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 839 California; MacPhee v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 California; Magee v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) xxxiv TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page California; Marroquin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1150 California; Mayfield v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 839 California; MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . 1043,1089,1101 California; Medina v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1149 California; Monge v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1072,1106 California; Morales v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 901 California; Myers v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 918 California; O'Leary v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1111 California; Padron v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 833 California; Peterson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1080 California; Preuss v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 862 California; Pyle v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831 California; Rios v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 974 California; Salazar v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1096 California; Santos v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921 California; Sheppard v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 877 California v. Smith . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1147 California; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004,1080 California; Townsend v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1150 California; Tung v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 856,1069 California v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 806 California; Weber v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 878 California; Williams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1123,1150 California; Wright v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 918 California Attorney General; Woodson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1105 California Coastal Comm'n; Bogart v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1015,1099 California Coastal Comm'n; Ojavan Investors, Inc. v. . . . . . . . 1015,1099 California Dept. of Corrections; Blue-Sky v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1061 California Dept. of Corrections; Thomas v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 888 California Dept. of Motor Vehicles; Burstine v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 867 California Dept. of Social Services; Mel T. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 873 California Dept. of Social Services; Moller v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 872 California ex rel. Lungren; TruServ Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1015,1099 California Federal Bank; Siegel v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 835,1009 California Medical Facility; Kabede v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 894 California Water Resources Control Bd.; San Joaquin County v. 1048 Calkins; Sharp v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1017 Call v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1021 Callahan v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1127 Callahan; Shelton v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 925 Callahan; Vrettos v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 956 Calleja v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 849 Callithen; Schrott v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 852 Calloway v. Elo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED xxxv Page Calloway v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 925 Calo v. Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 Calton v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1098 Calvin v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 984 Camarano v. U. S. District Court . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 834 Cameron v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1092 Cammon v. Reno . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 987 Camoscio v. Massachusetts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 968 Camoscio v. Mulligan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 933 Camoscio v. Quiroga . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997 Campbell, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1104 Campbell v. Campbell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1076 Campbell v. Louisiana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1013,1026 Campbell County School System; Simpson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 885 Campfield v. Connecticut . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823 Canada v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875 Canady v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1134 Candler County Dept. of Fam. & Children Servs.; Bergmann v. 1056,1154 Canfield v. Van Atta Buick/GMC Truck, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1117 Cannon v. Bristol Bd. of Ed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 859 Cantillo v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1006 Cantley v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1137 Cantrell; Lowe v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 850 Cantu v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 994 Cape Cod Comm'n; Daddario v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1036 Capital Communications Federal Credit Union v. Boodrow . . . . . 1117 Capitol Bankers Life Ins. Co.; Maddox v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1091 Carabello v. Carabello . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1029,1099 Caranchini, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1104 Cardona v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 853 Carey v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1120 Cargill Communications, Inc. v. Miners . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 981 Cargo v. White . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 900 Carlisle v. Robinett . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 820 Carlisle v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 867 Carlisle v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 974 Carlos v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 897 Carlson; Edwards v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1001 Carlson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 837,895 Carmouche v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 850 Carnahan; Tyler v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 838 Caron v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1038 Caro Rodriguez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1082 Carpenter v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1078 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) xxxvi TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Carpenter v. Israel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1114 Carpenter v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 839 Carpenter; Waite v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998 Carpenters 46 N. Cal. Counties Conf. Bd.; Pacesetter Constr. v. . . . 1014 Carr v. Georgia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921 Carrasquillo v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 972,1144 Carreiro, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805 Carreras v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 933 Carrington v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1035 Carrizal v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 857 Carroll; Brock v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 924 Carroll v. Federal Express Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1076 Carroll v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 905,940 Carson v. Charter Medical . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 827 Carson v. Director, OWCP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1121 Carter v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 964 Carter; McIntyre v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 827 Carter v. Ontiveros . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 828 Carter v. Sargent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 834 Carter v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1083,1153 Carter v. Vaughn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 959 Carter; Winston v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 845 Caruso; Bright v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 Caruso; LaFountain v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 850,1009 Cary; Baddour v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1092 Cascarano; Biotnott v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 803 Casciano v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1034 Case Corp. v. Freeman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1069 Casellas; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958,1037 Casey v. Arizona Mail Order . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 Casey v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1116 Casey; Rainbow Group, Ltd. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 Casey v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 940 Cash v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 974 Casiano v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 887 Caspari; Littlejohn v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 970 Caspari; Reynolds v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 802 Cass v. New York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1149 Cass v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1138 Cass County v. Leech Lake Band of Chippewa Indians . . . . . . 944,1087 Cass County; Leech Lake Band of Chippewa Indians v. . . . . . . . . 949 Cassell v. Norris . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 857 Cassell; Salazar v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 858 Castaneda v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1059 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED xxxvii Page Castaneda v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 838 Casterline v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 835 Castillo v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 973,1064 Castleberry v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934 Castro; Gnadt v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1108 Castro v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 850 Castro-Severino v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 886 Cater v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1137 Caterina v. Blakely Borough . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 863,1069 Caterpillar Inc. v. Automobile Workers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1042 Caterpillar Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue of Minn. . . . . . . . . . 1112 Causeway Medical Suite; Ieyoub v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 943 Cavallo v. Star Enterprise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1044 CBI-Ill., Inc.; Cvelbar v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 812 Cedar Rapids Community School District v. Garret F. . . . . . . . . . 803 Cedeno v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1020 Cedillo v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1060 Ceja, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1074 Ceja v. Arizona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1084 Ceja v. Stewart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 971,1085 Celaya v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 927 Celestine v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1140 Centex Bateson Constr. v. Dept. of Tax. & Rev. of N. M. . . . . . . . 862 Centinela Hospital Medical Center; Browning v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1017 Central Intelligence Agency; Voinche v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 869 Central Office Telephone v. American Telephone & Telegraph . . . 1036 Central Office Telephone; American Telephone & Telegraph v. . . 1024 Century Offshore Management Corp. v. United States . . . . . . . . . 1090 Cerato v. Morton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 955 Cerceo v. Shmidheiser . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998 Certain Underwriters, Lloyd's of London v. Transit Casualty Co. 1075 Cerwinski v. Insurance Services Office, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 952,1070 Ceska Sporitelna, A. S.; Unisys Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1069 Chadwick v. Andrews . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864 Chaiken v. VV Publishing Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1149 Chalmers v. Tulon Co. of Richmond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 813 Chambers v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 876 Chambers v. Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 827 Chambers v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1053 Chambliss; White v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 913 Champion; Eaves v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1149 Champion; Foster v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 848 Champion; Summers v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 Chan; Society Expeditions, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1100 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) xxxviii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Chan v. Wodnicki . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1117 Chancellor, Bd. of Ed. of New York City v. Felton . . . . . . . . . . . . 803 Chandross v. Arena . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1076 Chaney v. New York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 957 Chang; Wilson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1096 Chang Han Chen v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1152 Chaparro v. IBP, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 811 Chapin v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 973 Chapman v. Kozakiewicz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 Chapman v. LeCureux . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 955 Chappell v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 961 Charles; Checkrite Ltd., Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1028 Charlotte; McClure v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 885 Charly International v. MCA Records, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 822 Charron v. Thompson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830 Charter Medical; Carson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 827 Chase Manhattan Bank v. San Francisco . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1106 Chater; de la Vega v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 842,853,1009 Chater; Lary v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 812 Chater; Lohse v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 909 Chatman v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 976 Chavez v. Shanks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 882 Chavez-Valencia v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 926 Chavis v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1136 Cheatham v. Monroe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1090 Checkrite Ltd., Inc. v. Charles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1028 Cheely v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 902 Chen v. Schramm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 822 Chen v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1152 Chester v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1020 Cheves, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 912 Chevron U. S. A. Inc.; O'Neal v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 973 Chevron U. S. A. Inc.; Seacor Marine, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1047 Chez Sez VIII, Inc. v. Verniero . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 Chicago v. International College of Surgeons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156 Chicago; Spiegel v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 816 Chicago Car Exchange, Inc.; Diresen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 868 Chicago Title Ins. Co.; Kronberg v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1046 Chi-Cheong Li v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1135 Chief Bkrtcy. Judge, U. S. Bkrtcy. Ct., E. D. Mo.; Whitson v. . . . . 831 Chief Judge, Court of Appeals of N. Y.; Anonymous v. . . . . . . . . . 1048 Chief Justice, Superior Court of Mass.; Camoscio v. . . . . . . . . . . . 933 Chief Justice, Supreme Court of N. J.; Anonymous v. . . . . . . . . . . 1048 Childers v. Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED xxxix Page Childs v. PaineWebber Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 870,989 Child & Youth Services of Chester County; Ernst v. . . . . . . . . . . 850 Chiles; Rodriguez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 960 Chisholm v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 879 Choate, Halls & Stewart; Lu v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 821 Chohan v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 974 Choina v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1142 Chriestmon v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 927 Christensen, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 910,1103 Christian v. Beargrass Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1051 Christian v. Gladstone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 994 Christie, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1040 Christopher v. Circle K Convenience Stores, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1017 Christopher v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1064 Christy v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 918 Chrysler Corp.; Williams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958 Ciambrone; Mathis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000,1143 Ciba-Geigy Corp.; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915 CIGNA Ins. Co.; Oldfather v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 949 Cilecek v. Inova Health System Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049 Ciocchetti v. District Court of Colo., Jefferson County . . . . . . . . . 1052 Circle K Convenience Stores, Inc.; Christopher v. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1017 Circle K Corp.; Coleman Oil Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1148 Circuit Court of Ill., Cook County; Palmer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1096 Circuit Court of Va., Prince William County; Craddock v. . . . . . . 1111 Cisco System, Inc.; Sundell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 821 Cisneros-Cabrera v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 969 Citizen v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 842 Citizen v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 889 Citizens United v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809 City. See name of city. Clark, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805,930,1143 Clark; Faria v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998 Clark v. Maryland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 Clark v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 905,1006,1027,1133 Clarke v. Weaver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1098 Clase-Espinal v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 957 Clay v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 840,962 Clayton v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 893 Clemons v. Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 968 Cleveland; Hughes v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 833,1009 Cleveland v. Nation of Islam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1077 Cleveland; Northeast Ohio Coalition for Homeless v. . . . . . . . . . . 931 Cleveland v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1023,1074 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) xl TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Clewell v. Upjohn Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 970,1070 Click v. Alabama . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1001 Clifton v. Federal Election Comm'n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1108 Clinton v. New York City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1144 Clinton; Schwarz v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 837,895,977,978 Clinton; Skolnick v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 Clinton; Stigile v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1147 Clinton; Vey v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 907,1069 Clute v. South Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 982 Clymer v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1137 CMI, Inc. v. Intoximeters, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 817 CNA Ins. Co.; Woods v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1001 Coalition for Economic Equity v. Wilson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 963 Cobb v. Alabama . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 847 Cobb v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Cobblah v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1034 Coca-Cola Co.; Burch v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1084 Coca-Cola Co.; Parham v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 909,990 Cochran v. Planned Parenthood Assn. of San Mateo County . . . . 811 Cochrane v. Tudor Oaks Ltd. Partnership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1112 Cockrell v. Commissioner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1147 Coggins v. First Family Financial Services, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 Coggins v. 297 Lenox Realty Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 920 Cohen v. de la Cruz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 980,1042 Cohen v. Little Six, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 804 Cohen; Martin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 867 Cohen v. Mystic Lake Casino . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 804 Cohen; Richenberg v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807 Cohen v. Tirabassi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 820 Coker v. Jones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 890 Coker v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 969 Colbert v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 924 Colburn v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 838 Cole, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1088 Cole v. Kimberly-Clark Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 812 Cole v. Millard Fillmore Hospital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1042 Cole v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 818,903,977,1098 Colelli v. 1st Klas Marina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 982 Colelli v. Sandt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 982 Coleman v. Beilein . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875 Coleman v. Netherland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 924 Coleman Oil Co. v. Circle K Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1148 Collagen Corp. v. Fiore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1044 Collier; Gilbert v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1124 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED xli Page Collins v. Mississippi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 877 Collins v. Smith . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1031 Collins v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 870,1141 Collins v. U. S. Court of Appeals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 852 Colon v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 881 Colon's Estate v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 868 Colorado; Burke v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 890 Colorado; Kansas v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 803,1026,1073 Colorado; Schreiner v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1082 Colorado; Sullivan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 955 Colorado; Walker v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 883 Columbia; Cross v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1127 Columbia Hospital for Women; Baade v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1127 Columbia Pictures Television, Inc.; Feltner v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 993,1042 Columbia Steel Casting Co.; Portland General Electric Co. v. . . . 803 Combs v. Meadowcraft Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1045 Combs v. Plantation Patterns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1045 Comeaux v. Louisiana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1150 Comeaux v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 959 Comer v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 842,1022 Comer v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1007 Commerce Bank, N. A. v. DiMaria Construction, Inc. . . . . . . . . . 1116 Commerce Club, Inc.; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 880 Commercial Credit Corp.; Forgione v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 951 Commercial Realty St. Pete, Inc. v. FCC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 983 Commissioner; Anderson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 948 Commissioner; Atlantic Mut. Ins. Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 931 Commissioner; Berkery v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 881 Commissioner; Bowater Inc. and Subsidiaries v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1046 Commissioner; Buchbinder v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 868 Commissioner; Cockrell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1147 Commissioner; Dawson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 858 Commissioner; Drobny v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 916 Commissioner; Gass v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1115 Commissioner; Grant v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 818 Commissioner; Griffin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1003 Commissioner; Gupta v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 867 Commissioner; Harbor Bancorp & Subsidiaries v. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1108 Commissioner; Heath v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 841 Commissioner; Massachusetts State Police Assn. v. . . . . . . . . . . . 1108 Commissioner; Ray's Estate v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 868 Commissioner; Seltzer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1119 Commissioner; Shapiro's Estate v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1045 Commissioner; Snap-Drape, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 821 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) xlii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Commissioner; Talmage v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 804 Commissioner; Van Zelst v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807 Commissioner; Warden v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1109 Commissioner, Ala. Dept. of Revenue; Monroe v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1090 Commissioner, Office of Mental Retardation & Developmental Dis- abilities of N. Y.; McReynolds v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 920 Commissioner of Internal Revenue. See Commissioner. Commissioner of Revenue of Minn.; Caterpillar Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . 1112 Commissioner of Social Services of New York City; McReynolds v. 1030 Committee of Sup. Ct. of S. C. on Character and Fitness; Smith v. 954 Commonwealth. See also name of Commonwealth. Commonwealth Secretary of Va. v. Miserandino . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 963 Communications Satellite Corp. (COMSAT); Sea-Fone, Ltd. v. . . . 1016 Compagnie Francaise de Croisieres; Kirman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915 Compton; Brewer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 Conard v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1135 Condit v. Hamilton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1111 Condon; Blackwell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 936 Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Ore. v. United States . . . 1027 Conforti; Grenell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 821 Congress of U. S.; Hart v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 956 Conley v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1020 Connecticut; Campfield v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823 Connecticut; Galiette v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1115 Connecticut; Hilton v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1134 Connecticut; Mejias v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830 Connecticut; Sebastian v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1077 Connecticut; Tangari v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 867 Connecticut; Tuchman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1101 Connecticut v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1045 Connecticut Natural Food Market, Inc.; Nischan v. . . . . . . . . . . . 956 Connelly v. Forest Hills . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 959,1143 Conner v. Lentz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 894 Conner v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 876 Conner v. Thalacker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 910 Consolidated Biscuit Co.; Walker v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1028 Consolidated Edison Co. of N. Y. v. Pen a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1108 Consolidated Edison Co. of N. Y.; Reiss v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1113 Consolidated Rail Corp.; Engelhart v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1147 Constable v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1005 Construction Contractors Bd.; Volosin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 955 Consumer Power Co.; Hudson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 955 Consumers Ed. and Prot. Assn. v. Pennsylvania Milk Marketing Bd. 933 Continental Airlines; Former Eastern Pilots v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1114 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED xliii Page Continental Airlines; LPP Claimants v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1114 Contreras v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 839 Contreras Rodriguez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1139 Conway v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 895,1065 Conyers v. Los Angeles Police Dept. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1127 Conyers v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1130 Conyers v. Voorhies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 882 Cook; Texas v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 821 Cook v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 999 Cook County; Kleinschmidt Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1117 Cooke v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 824 Cooksey v. Bowersox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1027,1143 Cooksey v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 988 Coombs v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 874 Cooper; Allustiarte v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864 Cooper v. Costello . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 894 Cooper; Hennon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Cooper v. Taylor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 824 Cooper; Trivedi v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 817 Cooper v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 927,1089 Cooper Industries, Inc.; Jones v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1112 Coor v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 896 Copanos v. Food and Drug Administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823 Copple v. Mechem Financial, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 Coppola v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1064 Corbet; Gooding v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1017 Corbett; Hewlett v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1134 Corbin v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1021 Corcoran; Miller v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 884 Cordero v. Lalor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 846 Corelli v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 894 Corey v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1081 Corn v. Lauderdale Lakes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 981 Cornelius v. Exxon Co. USA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1042 Cornell; Herron v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 888 Cornell Univ.; Mayer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 818 Corner Pocket of Sioux Falls, Inc. v. Powerhouse Technologies 1117 Cornes v. DeTella . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 849 Cornhill Ins. PLC; Valsamis, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 818,1008 Cornish v. District of Columbia Bd. on Pro. Responsibility . . . . . 867,1009 Corral v. Hair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1059 Correa v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 927 Correctional Medical Systems; Tatum v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 886 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) xliv TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Correction Management Affiliates, Inc.; Hayes v. . . . . . . . . . . . 957,1070 Corrections Commissioner. See name of commissioner. Corriere v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Corrinet v. United Nations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1091 Corrow v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1133 Cortez v. Merit Systems Protection Bd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 954 Corto v. John F. Kennedy Center for Performing Arts . . . . . . . . . 893 Corto v. National Scenery Studios . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921 Cosgrove v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004,1144 Cosgrove v. Shearson Lehman Brothers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864 Cosselmon, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1106 Costello; Cooper v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 894 Costello; Hines v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 853 Cotner v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1007 Cotoia v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1051 Cotten v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 855 Cotton v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 906 Cottrell; Higgason v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 878 Couch v. McClure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 849 Coughlin; Waldau v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1113 Coulter v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Council for Human Services Home Care Services, Inc.; Mathura v. 829 County. See name of county. Cournoyer v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1102 Court of Appeals. See U. S. Court of Appeals. Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Columbiana County; Rodgers v. 1093 Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Erie County; Borsick v. . . . . . . . 882 Court of Criminal Appeals of Tex.; Larson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1123 Court of Criminal Appeals of Tex.; Martinez Lozano v. . . . . . . . . 1080 Covert v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 880 Covington v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 870 Cowan v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1109 Cox v. Guilford County Bd. of Ed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1046 Cox v. Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 999 Cox v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1098 CPC International, Inc.; United States v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1024,1043 Craddock v. Circuit Court of Va., Prince William County . . . . . . . 1111 Craig v. Louisiana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 Craig v. Martin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1142 Crandel; Reutter v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 851 Crandell; Hughes v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 844 Craver v. Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 834 Crawford v. Moran . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 969,1070 Crawford v. Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 889 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED xlv Page Crawford v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934,1005,1021,1117 Crawford-El v. Britton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 946,993 Creative Strategy Fund I v. Prudential Securities, Inc. . . . . . . . . 860 Credicorp, Inc. v. Department of Banking and Finance of Fla. . . . 819 Creeden; Mason v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 Criales; American Airlines, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 906 Criley v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1028 Crislip v. Newton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 828 Crispin-Reyes; Aybar v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1078 Crispin-Reyes; Morales Laboy v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1078 Crocker v. Robinson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 972,1154 Croft v. DeTella . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1062 Croft v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1062 Crook v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1084 Cropp v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1098 Cross v. Angelone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 Cross v. Columbia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1127 Cross v. Nichols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 952 Crouch v. Secretary of State of S. C. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1090 Crouse Irving Memorial Hospital; Guthmann v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 Crow v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1014 Crow; White v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1054 Crowder v. Royal Ins. Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 857 Crowder v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 900,925 Crowley, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 910 Crow Tribe of Indians v. Montana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Crow Tribe of Indians; Montana v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 912,1087 Cruz v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 985 Cruz v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 988,1064 C. R. W. v. Office of Bar Admissions, Supreme Court of Ga. . . . . . 869 Csoka v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1058 Csorba v. ITT Aerospace/Communications Division . . . . . . . . . 889,1010 Csorba v. Varo, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 887,1010 CSX Transportation, Inc.; Brigman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1090 CSX Transportation, Inc.; Harmon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 868 Cuevas v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 988 Cullen v. Gibson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1117 Culpepper v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1064 Cumberland Farms, Inc.; Adams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 808 Cummings v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1092 Cunningham v. Board of Governors, FRS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 874 Cunningham v. Goord . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 890 Cunningham v. Rubin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 Cunningham v. Schlumberger Well Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) xlvi TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Cunningham v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 851,862,897 Cunningham; Williams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1005 Curasi v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 952 Curiale v. Graham . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1127 Curiale v. Mystrom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 890 Curry v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 833 Curry v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 877 Curtis v. Vaughn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1105 Customer Creditors; WesBanco Bank Barnesville v. . . . . . . . . . . 816 Cuvo; Guido v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823 Cuyson; Rogers v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 892 Cvelbar v. CBI-Ill., Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 812 Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School Dist.; Michael F. v. . . . . . 1047 Cypress Fairbanks Medical Center; Pan-American Life Ins. v. . . . 862 Cyr v. Dallas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997 Daddario v. Cape Cod Comm'n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1036 Dahod v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 953 Dahodwala v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 953 Dale v. Superior Court of Cal., San Luis Obispo County . . . . . . . 1127 Dale v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1051 Dallas; Cyr v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997 Dallas v. Kirks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 816 Dallas & Mavis Forwarding Co.; Bigelow v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915 Dallas Morning News v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1142 Dalton; Hodge v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 815 Dalton; Longest v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004 Damren v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1054 Damrow; Musser v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 817 Dana Corp., Parish Division v. Newton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809 Daniels v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 926,983 Dano Resource Recovery, Inc. v. District of Columbia . . . . . . . . . 868 DAP Products, Inc.; Sascho, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 968 Darakshan v. Berkeley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 950 Darling v. MacPherson, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 861 Darne v. Weber . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1094 Darne v. Wisconsin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1096 Dass v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1063 Daughtry v. Dennehy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 983 Dauphin County Prison; Denison v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1019 Davenport v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 888,1016 David v. Denver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 858 David v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 841,1035 David B. v. McDonald . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1048 Davidson; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1126 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED xlvii Page Davidson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1034 Davila; Perelman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 938 Davis, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1025 Davis v. Arizona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1001 Davis v. Board of Assessors of Raynham . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 Davis v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Bd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1112 Davis v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1127 Davis; Glanton v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 859 Davis; J. E. Merit Constructors, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 951 Davis v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 827 Davis v. Monroe County Bd. of Ed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1088 Davis v. Norris . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018 Davis; O'Connor v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1114 Davis v. Tabachnick . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 982 Davis v. United States . . . . . . . . . . 855,882,888,898,902,904,905,976,1084 Davis v. White . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 900 Dawson v. Commissioner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 858 Dawson; Huck v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 909 Dawson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1097 Day; Lanford v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 881 Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.; DiRussa v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049,1154 Deaton v. Department of Agriculture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1113 DeCaro v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 Decator v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 937 Deep Sea Research, Inc.; California v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 946 Deerwester v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 884 Dees v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1152 Dehaene; De Wiest v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 943 Dehoney v. South Carolina Dept. of Corrections . . . . . . . . . . . . 861,1069 DeJesus v. Stepanik . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 951 DeJesus v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 887 DeKalb County; Almand v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 966 DeKalb County; DeKalb Stone, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 861 DeKalb County School Dist. v. Schrenko . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1015 DeKalb Stone, Inc. v. DeKalb County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 861 DeKeyser v. Larkins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958 DeLaCorte v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 896 de la Cruz; Cohen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 980,1042 Delaney v. Massachusetts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1058 Delaney v. Rodriguez . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915 Delaney v. Troutman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830 de la Vega v. Chater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 842,853,1009 Delaware; Abdul-Akbar v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 890 Delaware; Gattis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1124 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) xlviii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Delaware; Quarles v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 938 Delaware; Sanders v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1133 Delaware County Sheriff's Dept.; Kirk v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1116 Delaware Dept. of Correction; Abdul-Akbar v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 852 Delaware River and Bay Authority v. Operating Engineers . . . . . 861 Del Buono v. Reynolds Weigel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Delchamps, Inc.; Viator v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 862 Delgado; James v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 954 Delgado v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 882 Delgado-Flores v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 872 Dell Corp.; Norville v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 826,1009 Delnero v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 815 Delo; Stallings v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 961 DeLong v. Strongsville . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 827 Delor v. ATX Telecommunication Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1019 Del Rio v. Attorney General of Cal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 913 Delta Air Lines, Inc.; Criley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1028 Delta Airlines, Inc.; Rijos v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 DeLuca v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 983 Demar v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 882 Demarey v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1003 De Meo v. Smith Barney, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 927 Democratic Party of Va.; Jordahl v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1077 Dengle v. Immigration and Naturalization Service . . . . . . . . . . . . 944 Denison v. Dauphin County Prison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1019 Denison Univ.; Lamvermeyer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 967 Denmark v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 987 Dennehy; Daughtry v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 983 Denney v. Jones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1059 Dennis v. Butterworth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 836 Dennis; Maryland v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 928 Dennis v. Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 Dennis v. Scott Paper Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1091 Denny's Inc.; Fore v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000,1154 Denny's Inc. v. Thomas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1028 Denty v. SmithKline Beecham Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 820 Denver; David v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 858 Deock; Giannetti v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 DePace v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1153 Department of Agriculture; Deaton v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1113 Department of Agriculture; Gunn v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1111 Department of Agriculture; Heimann v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 951 Department of Army; Roman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004 Department of Banking and Finance of Fla.; Credicorp, Inc. v. . . 819 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED xlix Page Department of Corrections; Jackson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1094 Department of Defense; Norris v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 870 Department of Defense; Reyes v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 899 Department of Defense; SRS Technologies, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1046 Department of Ed.; Gerwig v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1073 Department of Employment and Training of Boston; Gorod v. . . . 1091 Department of HUD; Hughes v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1060 Department of HUD, Buffalo Office; Jackson Square Assoc. v. . . . 816 Department of Justice; Geyer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1032 Department of Justice; Harvey v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1032 Department of Justice; Payne v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1016 Department of Justice; Tax Analysts v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 931 Department of Justice; Thai Pham v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1045 Department of Justice; Turner v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1019,1085 Department of Justice, Office of Pro. Responsibility; Triestman v. 1095 Department of Labor; Bonanno v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998 Department of Labor; New Orleans v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823 Department of Labor; Pierce v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1016 Department of Navy; Adams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1151 Department of Tax. & Rev. of N. M.; Centex Bateson Constr. v. 862 Department of Transportation of Alaska; Ehrlander v. . . . . . . . . 813 Department of Treasury; Gardner v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 982 Department of VA; Ashton v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1047 Department of VA; Md. Dept. of Ed., Rehab. Servs. v. . . . . . . . . . 806 Department of VA; National Federation of the Blind v. . . . . . . 806,1008 DePuew v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 923 Derden v. Anderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 828 De Restrepo; Fabian v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 828,1022 DeRosa v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 899 Derthick v. Bassett-Walker, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Desert Outdoor Advertising, Inc.; Moreno Valley v. . . . . . . . . . . . 912 DeTella; Cornes v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 849 DeTella; Croft v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1062 DeTella; Gomez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 801 DeTella; Momient-El v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 984 Deteresi v. Los Angeles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 859 Detrich v. Arizona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 879 Detroit; Mitchell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1105 Detroit Bd. of Ed.; Swain v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1057,1144 Detroit News; Mayfield v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 Detroit Public Schools; Gordon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1017 Deutsche Financial Services Corp.; A­1 Appliance v. . . . . . . . . . . 864 Devine v. Indian River County School Bd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1110 Devine; Medina v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 983 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) l TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Devine; Wagner v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1090 Devlin v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1054 Dewbre v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1141 De Wiest v. Dehaene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 943 Dews v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 969 DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc. v. Munford, Inc. . . . . . . 1068 Diamant Boart, Inc. v. Martin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 933 Diaz; Acosta v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 801 Diaz; Lau v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 801 Diaz; Silver v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 801 Diaz-Cruz v. Board of Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958 Dice, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1012,1103 Dick v. Peoples Bank of Bloomington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1148 Dickens v. Arizona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 920 Dickerson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1065,1068 Dickinson Place Charitable Corp.; Adam v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 916 Diersen v. Chicago Car Exchange, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 868 Diggs v. Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1124 DiGiovanni v. Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 804,983,1085 Di-Jing Hu v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 887 Dike v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 835 Dillard Department Stores, Inc.; Tabb v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 913 Dilley; Allen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 826 Dilling Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. NLRB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 862 Dillon v. Northern Ind. Commuter Transportation Dist. . . . . . . . 914 DiMaria Construction, Inc.; Commerce Bank, N. A. v. . . . . . . . . . 1116 Dingle v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 925 DiPaola; Glendora v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 965 Director, Brooklyn Developmental Center; McReynolds v. . . . . . . 969 Director, OWCP; Carson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1121 Director of penal or correctional institution. See name or title of director. DiRosa; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1081 DiRussa v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049,1154 DiScenza; Tackett v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 851 Disciplinary Bd. of Supreme Court of N. M.; McDevitt v. . . . . . . . 815 Discon, Inc. v. NYNEX Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809 Discon, Inc.; NYNEX Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 803 Distajo v. Doctor's Associates, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 948 Distributel, Inc. v. Alaska . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 862 District Attorney of Allegheny County; Dolenc v. . . . . . . . . . . . . 955 District Attorney of Bucks County v. Smith . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1109 District Court. See U. S. District Court. District Court of Colo., Jefferson County; Ciocchetti v. . . . . . . . . 1052 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED li Page District Court of Iowa, Ida County; Hurd v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1097 District Judge. See U. S. District Judge. District of Columbia; Dano Resource Recover, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . 868 District of Columbia Bar; Richardson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1051 District of Columbia Bd. on Pro. Responsibility; Cornish v. . . . 867,1009 District of Columbia Court of Appeals; Stanton v. . . . . . . . . . . . . 817 Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, Cal. Dept. of Industrial Relations; Martin Cadillac Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1050 Dixie v. Reno . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 987 Dixon; Adkins v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 937 Dixon v. Marion Police Dept. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 Dixon v. Mueller . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 920 Dixson v. Ruff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 D. L. Baker, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Bd. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1046 Doane; Omaha v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1048 Doane Products Co.; Hightower v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 863 Dobbs; Gilbert v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1054 Dobucki; Swofford v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 979 Dockery v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 845 Doctor's Associates, Inc.; Distajo v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 948 Doctor's Associates, Inc.; Riggs v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 948 Doctors Clinic v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1119 Doe, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 946 Doe v. Board of Ed. of Oak Park High School Dist. 200 . . . . . . . . 998 Doe; James v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875 Doe v. Massachusetts Dept. of Social Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 810 Doe; Overcash v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 943 Doe v. Pataki . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1122 Doe; Safford v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921 Doe v. Sundquist . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 810 Doe v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 901,1138 Doe #1 v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1138 Doherty v. Pennington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 909 Dolan; Solomon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1005 Dolenc v. District Attorney of Allegheny County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 955 Dollar v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1092 Doman; Banderas v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864,1071 Doman; Banderas Orthopaedic Clinic v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864,1071 Domarco-Sanchez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 873 Dombrowski v. New York City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1127 Domenick v. Fonar Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 908 Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Comm'n 1046 Donahue; Renteria v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 897 Donestevez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 899 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) lii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Donnell v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1092 Donohoo v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 821 Donovan v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998 Dooley v. Korean Air Lines Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1038 Doran v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 896 Dorand v. Right Up Your Alley, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809 D'Orange; Feely v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 Doria; Skolnick v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 954 Dormire; Waters v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1003 Dormire; Weatherspoon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1121 Dorsey; Jordan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 Dorsey; McCarty v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921 Dorsey v. Rutherford County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1131 Dorton; Riley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1030 Double R Inc. v. Leary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 Double R Vending, Inc. v. Leary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 Douglass v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 860 Doug Mockett & Co. v. Plumley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 Dow Corning Corp.; Official Committee of Tort Claimants v. . . . . 977 Downs; White v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 Dowtin-El v. Tyskiewicz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1094 Doyle, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 911 DP Partners, Ltd. Partnership v. Hall Financial Group, Inc. . . . . 815 D. R. v. East Brunswick Bd. of Ed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 968 Dragovich; Walker v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986,1070 Drake v. Arizona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 827 Drake; Jamhoury v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1003 Drane; Turner v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 897 Dresen v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1052 Drew v. Ricoh Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 858 Drobny, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805 Drobny v. Commissioner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 916 Drones v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 898 Drug Enforcement Administration; Aybar v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 833 Drug Enforcement Administration; Engelking v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1094 Drug Enforcement Administration; Essell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1032 Drug Enforcement Administration; Thompson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 876 Dryden v. Madison County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1145 Duarte v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 938 DuBois; DuPont v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 834 Duchesne County v. Ute Indian Tribe, Uintah and Ouray Reserv. 1107 Duchow v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 968 Duckett v. Godinez . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 848 Duck Kim v. New York City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809,1008 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED liii Page Duckworth; Jackson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 955 Duckworth; Jennings v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 839 Dudley v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 848 Dudonis v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1005 Duenas v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 902 Duhon v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 887 Duke v. Marshall & Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1112 Duk Kyung Kim v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 940 Dumbrique v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1133 Dunkin' Donuts, Inc.; Yankee Enterprises, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1076 Dunkley v. New York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018 Dunlap v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1111 Dunn v. Miami Herald Publishing Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 822 Dunn v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1005 DuPont v. DuBois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 834 DuPont v. Massachusetts Dept. of Correction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 834 Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Bush Ranch, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 906 Du Pont de Nemours & Co.; Choina v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1142 Du Pont de Nemours & Co.; Stafford v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1069 Dupre v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1078 Duquesne Club; Platek v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934 Duran v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 841 Durham v. Health Net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809 Durham v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 984 Duwamish Indian Tribe v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 806 Duy Nguyen v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 987 Dwight B. v. Jerry Lynn C. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 802,936,1037 Dye; Ponder v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 840 Dyer v. Michigan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 Dyke; Mackey v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 848 Dymits v. San Mateo County Municipal Court . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 971 Eagle Pass; ZYZY, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 Earles v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1075 East v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 918 East v. Seideman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055 East Baton Rouge Parish School Bd.; Davis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1112 East Brunswick Bd. of Ed.; D. R. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 968 East Columbia Basin Irrigation Dist. v. United States . . . . . . . . . 948 Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 931,1043,1105 Easterwood, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1106 Eastman Kodak Co.; Mattern v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 East Side Floor and Wall v. Fairmont . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 Eaves v. Champion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1149 Echols, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 802 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:10] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) liv TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Echols v. Baker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 887 Eckerd Corp. v. Shannon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1111 Eckstein; Video Express v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1110 Eddington v. Groose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 918 Eddmonds v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 989 Edds v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1135 Eddy v. Polymer Technology Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1075 Edgar; Pollard v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 824 Edmond; Haeger v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 952 Edmonds v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 902,978 Edmunson v. Savko . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1096,1154 Edwards v. Arkansas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 950 Edwards v. Brew . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018 Edwards v. Carlson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1001 Edwards v. Kansas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 954 Edwards v. Manchester . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1124 Edwards v. New York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1121 Edwards v. United States . . . . . . . 931,965,993,1013,1043,1066,1074,1098 E. F. v. Scafidi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 816 Effinger v. Kentucky . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 971 Eguizabal v. Wellesley College . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1112 Ehman v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 989 Ehrlander v. Department of Transportation of Alaska . . . . . . . . . 813 Eidson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 899,1004 E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Bush Ranch, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . 906 E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.; Choina v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1142 E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.; Stafford v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1069 Eighth Dist. Court Clerks; Jenkins v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 Einheber v. Public Employment Relations Bd. of Cal. . . . . . . . . . 1049 Einheber v. University of Cal. at Berkeley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049 Eke v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1034 El Al Israel Airlines, Ltd. v. Tsui Yuan Tseng . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 947 Elam v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1007 Elder v. New Jersey Transit Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 918 Electronics Instrumentation & Technology; Nova Designs v. . . . . 996 Electronics Instrumentation & Technology; Performance Diver v. 996 E. L. Hamm & Associates, Inc.; Gordon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1030 Elisondo v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 981 Elko County Grand Jury v. Siminoe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1027 Ellerth; Burlington Industries, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1086,1106 Ellington v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 939 Elliott; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018 Ellis; Bowring v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 857 Ellis v. Henry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 848 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED lv Page Ellis v. Transamerica Occidental Life Ins. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864 Ellis v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1068 Ellison v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 893 Elmore v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 837 El Muhammad v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 918 Elo; Calloway v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018 El Paso; Miranda v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 913 El Paso Independent School Dist.; Alvarado v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 868 Embry; Richmond v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1122 Emerson; Borland v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 Emerson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 Emerson Aviation v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 Emery Air Freight Corp.; McKinney v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864 Emery Worldwide; McKinney v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864 Emhart Glass Machinery, Inc.; Schwartz v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1151 Emmett; Aswegan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 956 Enand v. Montgomery County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 970,1070 Endicott; McGee v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 840 Eneias v. Singletary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 829 Engelhart v. Consolidated Rail Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1147 Engelking v. Drug Enforcement Administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1094 English v. Redman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 918 Enright; Raymer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 872 Entergy Operations, Inc.; Oubre v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 422 EPA; Arrest the Incinerator Remediation (A. I. R.), Inc. v. . . . . . 1045 EPA; Fafarman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1016 EPA; Maier v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1014 Epland v. Lumbermen's Mut. Casualty Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 869 Epps v. Singletary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 884 EEOC; Benjamin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 923 EEOC; Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1046 EEOC; Johnson & Higgins, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 808 EEOC; L. B. Foster Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1147 EEOC; Williams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1035 Equitable Life Assurance Society of U. S.; Kidd v. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1028 Erdman v. Grayson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018,1144 Erdman v. Michigan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 971 Erdman v. Stegall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 Erevia-Suarez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1153 Erickson; Lachance v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262 Ernst v. Child & Youth Services of Chester County . . . . . . . . . . 850 Ertelt v. North Dakota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 971,1070 Erwin v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1122 Escotto v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1060 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) lvi TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Esensten; Shea v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 914 Eshkol v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 841 Espinoza Cruz v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 985 Essell v. Drug Enforcement Administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1032 Essex Cty. Util. Auth. v. Atlantic Coast Demolition & Recycling 966 Essex Electro Engineers, Inc. v. Widnall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 916 Estate. See name of estate. Estep v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1066 Esteves v. Brock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 828 Ethicon, Inc.; United States Surgical Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 950 Evangelista v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1114 Evans v. Horn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 842,973 Evans v. Maryland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 966 Evans v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 960 Evans; Wilson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1078 Evans Cooling Systems, Inc. v. General Motors Corp. . . . . . . . . . 1115 Everhart v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1097 Excalibur Group, Inc. v. Minneapolis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1077 Excel Corp.; Rendon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 859 Exxon Co. USA; Cornelius v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1042 Exxon Corp.; Oxxford Clothes XX, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915 F.; Cedar Rapids Community School Dist. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 803 F. v. Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School Dist. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1047 F. v. Scafidi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 816 Fabian v. De Restrepo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 828,1022 Fabian v. Justo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 Fabian v. Metropolitan Dade County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 956,1022 Fabian v. Miami . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1003,1070 Fadayiro v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 896 Fafarman v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 Fafarman v. Environmental Protection Agency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1016 Fagan; Trippett v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1008 Fagbemi v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 855 Fain v. Kerns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 Fain v. Sacramento County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 894 FAIR v. San Buenaventura . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1084 Faircloth v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 926 Fairechild v. United Airlines, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 Fairfax County; Levy v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 956 Fairman; Mathis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1016 Fairmont; East Side Floor and Wall v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 Fairmont; Guido v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 Fairmont Hotel; Abellan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1036 Fairport Int'l Exploration v. Shipwrecked Vessel Capt. Lawrence 804 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED lvii Page Falcon Drilling Co.; Vedalier v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1148 Falls v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1130 Fannin v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1129 Fanny v. New Jersey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 848 Faragher v. Boca Raton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 978,1088,1105 Faria v. Clark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998 Farley; Kerr-McGee Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1090 Farmer v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 897,1010 Farmers Home Group; Hill v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 853,1037 Farmon; Bogdanoff v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 853 Farr v. Madison Gas & Electric . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 894 Farrish v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1118 Faruq v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 904 Fasi v. Gannett Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 916 Faulkner v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 824,1009 Fazon v. Brown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 874 FCC National Bank; Price v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 950 Federal Bureau of Investigation; Lindblom v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 913 Federal Bureau of Investigation; Thompson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1032 Federal Bureau of Investigation; Voinche v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 950 FCC; Ameritech Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1089,1101 FCC v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1043,1089,1101 FCC; Commercial Realty St. Pete, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 983 FCC; Free Air Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807 FCC; GTE Midwest Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1089,1101 FCC; Interactive America Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1029 FCC v. Iowa Utilities Bd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1043,1089,1101 FCC; MobileTel, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 948 FCC; Southern New England Telephone Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . 1089,1101 FCC; U S WEST, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1089,1101 Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.; Brown v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 912 Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.; Donohoo v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 821 Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.; Gens v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 931 Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.; Helen Gens and Associates v. . . . . . . 931 Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.; McCarron v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1046 Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.; Young v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 928 Federal Election Comm'n; Clifton v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1108 Federal Election Comm'n v. Maine Right To Life Committee, Inc. 810 Federal Election Comm'n v. Williams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1015 FERC; New Mexico Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources v. 811 FERC; North Carolina v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1108 FERC; Roanoke River Basin Assn. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1108 Federal Express Corp.; Carroll v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1076 Federal Financial Co.; Hall v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 858 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) lviii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page FLRA; Patent Office Professional Assn. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 951 Federal Trade Comm'n; Norton v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 817 Feely v. D'Orange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 Feezor v. Babbitt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807 Fefferman; Schaefer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 862 Fehn v. Securities and Exchange Comm'n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 813 Feinstein; Beverly Health and Rehabilitation Services, Inc. v. . . . 816 Felinska v. New England Teamsters and Trucking Ind. Pens. Fd. 815 Felix v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 988 Feller v. Hofbauer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 Feltmann v. Plaza Motors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1075 Feltmann v. Sieben, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1075 Feltner v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 993,1042 Felton, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 980,1040 Felton; Agostini v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 803 Felton; Chancellor, Bd. of Ed. of New York City v. . . . . . . . . . . . 803 Female Juvenile v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 824 Fennema; Moore v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 954 Ferbar Corp. of Cal., Inc.; Bay Area Laundry Pens. Tr. v. . . . . . . 192 Ferguson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1134 Fernandez v. Michigan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 955 Fernandez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 893,1068,1134 Ferrera v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 879 Ferritor; Qualls v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 970,1099 Fetty v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 812 Fiddes, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1073 Fidelity & Casualty Co. of N. Y.; Tillman Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . 864 Fidelity Financial Services, Inc. v. Fink . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211 Fidelity Technologies Corp. v. Butler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 821 Field v. Orlando . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1019 Fields v. Fields' Estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 813 Fields v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 848,976 Fields' Estate; Fields v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 813 Fierer, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1013 Figter Ltd. v. Teachers Ins. and Annuity Assn. of America . . . . . 996 Figueroa, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 911 Figueroa-Romero v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1067 Filipos v. Filipos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 882,1010 Findley v. FPC-Boron Employees' Club . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 Finerty v. National Labor Relations Bd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 995 Fink; Fidelity Financial Services, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211 Finklea v. New Jersey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 837 Finley; National Endowment for Arts v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 991,1105 Finn v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1113 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED lix Page Finnell; Houston v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 822 Fiore; Collagen Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1044 Fiore v. Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 869 Fiore Trucking and Contracting v. Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . 869 Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. PaineWebber Real Estate Securities 857 First Citizens Bank & Trust Co.; McGahren v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 950 First City Bank; AEDC Federal Credit Union v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1146 First City Bank; National Credit Union Administration v. . . . . . . 1146 First Family Financial Services, Inc.; Coggins v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 First Interstate Bank of Ariz., N. A.; Zertuche v. . . . . . . . . . . . . 844 First Jersey Securities, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange Comm'n 812 1st Klas Marina; Colelli v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 982 First Mercury Syndicate, Inc. v. Buffalo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1028 First Nat. Bank & Tr. Co.; AT&T Family Federal Credit Union v. 479 First Nat. Bank & Tr. Co.; National Credit Union Administration v. 479 First Virginia Bank v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1075 Fiserv C. I. R., Inc.; Hutchinson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1076 Fisher, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1025,1041 Fisher v. Burke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 872 Fisher v. Love . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 902 Fisher v. Vassar College . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1075 Fisher v. Wyatt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 878,1099 Flanagan v. Judicial Review Council of Conn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 Flanagan v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1133 Fleming, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 981 Fleming; Lawhorn v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 889 Fleming v. Maine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1063 Fletcher; Kalina v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 Fletcher v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 957 Fletcher v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1063 Flick v. Weddington Productions, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 808 Flieger v. Bowersox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 877,1099 Flinn v. Prudential Property & Casualty Ins. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . 809 Florencio Fernandez v. Michigan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 955 Flores; Bell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 850,1069 Flores; Soto v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Flores v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1140 Flores-Mireles v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 938 Florida; Alvord v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1013 Florida; Ashley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 Florida; Attwood v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 887 Florida; Aysisayh v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1094 Florida; Banks v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 851 Florida; Barnes v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 903 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) lx TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Florida; Bell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1123 Florida; Bolin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 973 Florida; Bowen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1081 Florida; Bowlin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 982 Florida; Burns v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1121 Florida; Casey v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1116 Florida; Christy v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 918 Florida; Damren v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1054 Florida; Davis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1127 Florida; Devlin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1054 Florida; Elam v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1007 Florida; Forty v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1095 Florida; Garcia v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1057 Florida; Gudinas v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 936 Florida; Hartley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 825 Florida; Henyard v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 846 Florida; Hernandez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 834 Florida; Hill v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 907 Florida; J. A. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831 Florida; James v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 Florida; Jenkins v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 920 Florida; Johnson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1095,1120 Florida; Jones v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 880 Florida; Joseph v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 970 Florida; Kilgore v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 834 Florida; Lambrix v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1122 Florida; Lancaster v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 801,1003 Florida; Lawrence v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 880,1080 Florida; Lawson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 892 Florida; Lott v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 Florida; Lovett v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 955 Florida; Lowe v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1121 Florida; Macri v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1057 Florida; Mungin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 833 Florida; Owen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 Florida; Robertson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1136 Florida; Rolling v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 984 Florida; Ross v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 838 Florida; Sapp v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 840 Florida; Silver v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1081 Florida; Simpson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1093 Florida; Sliney v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1129 Florida; Spaziano v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055 Florida; Spencer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 884 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED lxi Page Florida; Steinhorst v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1022 Florida; Thomas v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 965,985 Florida; Trotter v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 876 Florida; Valentine v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830 Florida; Van Poyck v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 995 Florida; Villarreal v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 922 Florida; Wike v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1058 Florida; Willacy v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 970 Florida; Woodley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 893 Florida Dept. of Corrections; Rivera v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1093 Florida Dept. of Corrections; Yon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1091 Florida Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services; Willis v. . . . 855 Florida Dept. of Revenue; Newsweek, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 442 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third Dist.; Akpaeti v. . . . . . . . 1092 Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Comm'n; Flotilla, Inc. v. . . . . 915 Florida Keys Community College; Jenkins v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1050 Florida Secretary of State; Libertarian Party of Fla. v. . . . . . . . . 812 Florida Seed Co. v. Monsanto Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 913 Flotilla, Inc. v. Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Comm'n . . . . 915 Flournoy v. Branham . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018 Flowers v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1150 Flowers v. Mississippi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1090 Flowers v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1135 Fluor Corp. and Affiliates v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1118 Fluor Daniel, Inc.; Goewey v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1045 Fly v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 904 Flynn v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 844,1009 Foley v. Kentucky . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 893 Foley v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1022 Follett, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1106 Fonar Corp.; Domenick v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 908 Fonar Corp.; General Electric Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 908 Fonseca-Caro v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1097 Fontenot v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 879 Fontes v. U. S. District Court . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1124 Font Ramirez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1006 Food and Drug Administration; Copanos v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823 Footman v. Singletary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1124 Ford v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1057 Ford v. Gaston . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 845 Ford; Hopkins v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1045 Ford v. Lawrence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1047 Ford v. Philadelphia Federal Credit Union . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 971 Ford v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 870 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) lxii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Fordice; Ayers v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1084 Ford Motor Co.; Sammarco v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 813 Fore v. Denny's Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000,1154 Foreman v. Babcock & Wilcox Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1115 Forest Hills; Connelly v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 959,1143 Forgione v. Commercial Credit Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 951 Forman v. Richmond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997 Former Eastern Pilots Granted Right to Substitute Counsel v. Continental Airlines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1114 Formica v. Huntington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004 Forney v. Apfel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1072,1088 Foroughi v. Industrial Comm'n of Ariz. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 884 Forsyth v. Humana Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 Forsyth; Humana Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 994 Fort Dearborn Life Ins. Co.; Jozaitis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1120 Fortner; White v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018 Fort Smith R. Co. v. Train Dispatchers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1016 Forty v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1095 Foster; Antonelli v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 834 Foster v. Champion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 848 Foster v. International Business Machines Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 815 Foster v. Love . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 Foster v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 873 Foster Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Comm'n . . . . . . . . 1147 Foti; Marts v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 Fowler v. Moore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 835 Fowlkes v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 906 Foy v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 939 FPC-Boron Employees' Club; United States ex rel. Findley v. . . . 865 Fraction v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 832 Franco-Ramirez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1138 Frank; Johnston v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 972 Frank; Ralston v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 888 Franklin, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805 Franklin v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 974,1140 Franklin County Juvenile Probation; Harner v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 842 Franklin First Federal Savings Bank; Williams v. . . . . . . . . . . . 815,989 Frankovich; Jyan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986,1085 Frantz v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1033 Fraser; Robertson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 910 Frazer v. Millington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 832 Frederick v. Wisconsin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 963 Free Air Corp. v. Federal Communications Comm'n . . . . . . . . . . 807 Freedom of Information Comm'n; Mozzochi v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 967 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED lxiii Page Freeman; Case Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1069 Freeman v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 926,1083 Freeman v. Upchurch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 927 French; Gaither v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1053 French v. Thomas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 836 Frenzel v. Wyoming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 959 Friends of Vietnam Veterans Memorial v. Stanton . . . . . . . . . . . . 1108 Frillz, Inc. v. Alvarez . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 813 Fritz v. Bond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1118 Frohne v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 812 Fronko v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 862 Frost v. Meadows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 878 Fruitbine, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 980,1040 Fry v. Allergan Medical Optics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 952 Fryar v. Massachusetts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1033 Fuentes, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 947 Fuentes; Subia v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1054 Fuentes v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1100,1119,1134 Fuentez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1097 Fuhr v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 848 Fuji Heavy Industries, Ltd.; Navarro v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1015 Fulcomer; Williams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1080 Fuller v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 963 Fuller v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 963 Fuller; Vine v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1077 Fulton v. Sanders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1076 Fulton County Bd. of Ed.; Sanders v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 820 Fulton-DeKalb Hospital Authority; Stafford v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1120 Fultz v. White . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 835,873 Fund Manager; Long v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 993 Furrer, S. P. A.; John F. Vickers Masonry v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 982 Futrell, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 929,1025 F/V A. A. Baranov v. National Marine Fisheries Service . . . . . . . 868 F/V Sea Pearl v. National Marine Fisheries Service . . . . . . . . . . 868 Gabry; Mayberry v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1019 Gabry; Shabazz v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1120 Gach; Leaphart v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1057 Gaddy v. Alabama . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1032 Gaines v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 900 Gaines v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 962,1066 Gainey v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 939,962 Gaither v. French . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1053 Gaither; Green v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 Galbreath v. New York City Bd. of Ed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1001 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) lxiv TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Gale v. Perovic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1094 Galen of Va., Inc.; Roberts v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 911 Galgiani v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 872 Galiette v. Connecticut . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1115 Gallardo v. Hurley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1022 Gallegos v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Galvao v. Gillette Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1142 Gamble v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1137 Gamma-10 Plastics, Inc. v. American President Lines, Ltd. . . . . . 908 Gammon; Jordan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 851 Gammon; Lawrence v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830 Gammons, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1041 Gandy v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1092 Gannett Co.; Fasi v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 916 Garber v. Los Angeles Municipal Court . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 Garcia v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1057 Garcia v. Indiana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 845 Garcia v. North Dakota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 874 Garcia v. Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 Garcia v. Reyes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1109 Garcia v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 854,898,1007 Garcia v. Wisconsin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 841 Garcia-Venegas v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1068 Gardeley v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 854 Gardner, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1041 Gardner v. Department of Treasury . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 982 Gardner v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1059 Gardner v. Stager . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 811 Gardner v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 907,1008 Garen v. Supreme Court of Wash. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 816 Garner v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1021 Garner; Vargas v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 876 Garret F.; Cedar Rapids Community School Dist. v. . . . . . . . . . . . 803 Garver, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1025,1145 Garza; Lightbourn v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1052 Gass v. Commissioner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1115 Gaster v. McKie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1134 Gaston; Ford v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 845 Gately v. Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 824 Gates v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 826,854 Gateway 2000, Inc.; Hill v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 808 Gattis v. Delaware . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1124 Gaughan; Howard v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998 Gaytan-Martinez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 904 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED lxv Page Gazza v. New York Dept. of Environmental Conservation . . . . . . 813 Gease v. Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School Dist. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1011 Geddie v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 825 Gee v. Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 836 Gee v. Southwest Airlines Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915 Geissal v. Moore Medical Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1086 Gelabert v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 836 Gelzer v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 902 Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk A/S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 963 General American Life Ins. Co. v. IT Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1068 General Circuit Breaker & Elec. Supply; Westinghouse Elec. v. . . 857 General Electric Co. v. Fonar Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 908 General Electric Co. v. Joiner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 General Electric Co.; Tobin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 967 General Motors Corp., In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 990 General Motors Corp.; Baker v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222 General Motors Corp.; Butler v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 General Motors Corp.; Evans Cooling Systems, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . 1115 General Motors Corp. v. Grear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 990 General Motors Corp.; Mink v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 920,959 General Practice Associates, Inc. v. Humana Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1050 General Services Administration; Swanson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 948 Gens v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 931 Gens and Associates v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . 931 Gentry v. Tennessee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 999 George v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1116,1138 George A. Hormel & Co.; Schneider v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1109 Georges v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 938 Georgetown Univ.; Lasley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1060 Georgi, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805 Georgia; Berry v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 852 Georgia; Bishop v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1119 Georgia; Brantley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 985 Georgia; Buskirk v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 859 Georgia; Carr v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921 Georgia; Glean v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 Georgia; Greene v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 Georgia; Jones v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 953 Georgia; Phagan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 Georgia; Philpot v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1054 Georgia; Thomason v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1129 Georgia; Waldrip v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 Georgia State Bd. of Elections; Thomas v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1031 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) lxvi TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Geraci v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934 Gerber Products Co.; Green v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1117 Germain, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 992 German Roman Catholic Cong. of St. Michael's Church v. Wuerl 861 Gerwig v. Department of Ed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1073 Gerwig v. Newman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1031,1144 Geske & Sons, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Bd. . . . . . . . . . . . 808 Geyer v. Department of Justice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1032 Ghana v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 897 Ghotra v. Bandila Shipping Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1107 Ghotra; Bandila Shipping Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1107 Giannetti v. Deock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 Giba v. Oregon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1027 Gibbs v. Anderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1127 Gibson v. Cain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 920 Gibson; Cullen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1117 Gibson v. Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 948 Gibson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1068 Gibson v. West . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 938,1070 Gifford v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 923 Gignac v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 975 Gilbarco, Inc. v. Octel Communications Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 Gilbert, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 929 Gilbert v. Collier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1124 Gilbert v. Dobbs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1054 Gilbert v. Maryland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 877 Gilbert v. Motheral . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018 Gill v. Rhode Island . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934,1069 Gill v. System Planning Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1148 Gilleran, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1012 Gillette Co.; Galvao v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1142 Gillis v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1057 Gilmore; Porter v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1093 Gilmore; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 954 Gilmore; Stewart v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 990 Gilmour v. Rogerson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1122 Ginn; Pierce v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 877 Ginn v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 824 Giraldo v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 925 Gisriel v. Ocean City Bd. of Supervisors of Election . . . . . . . . . 965,1053 Giuliani; McReynolds v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 969 Giuseppe Furrer, S. P. A.; John F. Vickers Masonry v. . . . . . . . . . 982 Givens v. Roe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1127 G. I. W. Industries, Inc.; Prescott v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 867 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED lxvii Page Gjerde v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 949 Gladstone; Christian v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 994 Glanton v. Davis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 859 Glanz; Roberts v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 826 Glasper v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 926 Glass v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 890 Glean v. Georgia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 Glendale v. Loder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807 Glendale; Loder v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807 Glendale; Maxhimer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1094 Glendora v. DiPaola . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 965 Glendora v. Marshall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1059 Glendora v. Sullivan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 904 Glendora v. Tele-Communications, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1059 Glenn; Salter v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1030 Glenn v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 962 Glenos v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 953 Glickman; LDG Timber Enterprises, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 916 Gnadt v. Castro . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1108 Gober; Lewis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1126 Gober; Phillips v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1124 Gober; Ramey v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1151 Gober; Wells v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1045 Gochicoa v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1121 Godett v. Reno . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1151 Godinez; Duckett v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 848 Godinez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 960 Goewey v. Fluor Daniel, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1045 Goicochea; Langworthy v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 924,978 Gokey; Kampfer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 972 Gold v. Panalpina, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 810 Golden v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1135 Gomez; Barker v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 Gomez; Bergne v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1061 Gomez v. DeTella . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 801 Gomez; Maciel v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 Gomez; McCright v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 872 Gomez; Moore v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 829 Gomez-Pelayo v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1134 Goni v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 925 Gonsalves v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1067 Gonzales v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 903, 926,962,1013,1017,1034,1052,1063,1083,1119,1131,1137 Gonzales Samayoa v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) lxviii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Gonzalez v. Turner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 888 Gonzalez v. Wing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 930 Gonzalez-Portillo v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1061 Gonzalez-Quezada v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 842 Gooden v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 938 Goodhart v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1014,1099 Gooding v. Corbett . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1017 Goodson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 842 Goodyear Auto Service Center; Martin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1077 Goolkasian; Amcor Capital Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807 Goord; Cunningham v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 890 Goord; Hili v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 884 Goord; Hizbullahankhamon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 Goord; Scott v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004 Gordils v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 975 Gordon v. Board of Ed. for New York City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 818,1036 Gordon; Calderon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 907 Gordon v. Detroit Public Schools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1017 Gordon v. E. L. Hamm & Associates, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1030 Gordon v. Rockland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 820 Gordon v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 841 Gordon County; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 821 Gordy v. Beltram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1032 Gorod v. Department of Employment and Training of Boston . . . 1091 Gorod v. Massachusetts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1148 Gosch v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1071,1142 Gossage v. Hughes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1066 Gottschalk v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 937 Gould, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1088 Governor of Cal.; Arteaga v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 446 Governor of Cal.; Coalition for Economic Equity v. . . . . . . . . . . . 963 Governor of Cal.; Hart v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 918 Governor of Cal.; Rhomberg v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 812 Governor of Fla.; Rodriguez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 960 Governor of Guam v. Guam Society of Ob. and Gyn. . . . . . . . . . . . 949 Governor of Ill.; Pollard v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 824 Governor of La. v. Love . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 Governor of Miss.; Ayers v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1084 Governor of Mo.; Tyler v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 838 Governor of N. J.; Alexander v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 949 Governor of N. Y.; Doe v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1122 Governor of Okla. v. Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n . 908,1009 Governor of Tenn.; Doe v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 810 Governor of Wis.; Milwaukee Branch of NAACP v. . . . . . . . . . . . 1076 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED lxix Page Gowing, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 912,1044 Gracia v. Trevino . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 Gracia v. Volvo Europa Truck, N. V. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1050 Grady v. Sovereign Order of St. John of Jerusalem, Inc. . . . . . . . 1147 Graham; Curiale v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1127 Graham v. Turpin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 855,1009 Graham v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 899 Grahovac v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 893 Grajales-Montoya v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1007 Gramley; Neal v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 834 Gramley; Pitsonbarger v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 802 Grand Fraternity Rosae Crucis v. Moyer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 913 Grand Lockwood Partnership v. Maxwell House Coffee Co. . . . . . 967 Grant v. Commissioner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 818 Grant; Wilson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 844,1009 Graves, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805,994,1010 Graves v. Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 829 Graves v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 989 Graves v. Vesuvius USA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1015 Gravette v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 999 Gray v. Idaho . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823 Gray v. Maryland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 930 Gray v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 854 Grayson; Erdman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018,1144 Grear; General Motors Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 990 Great Western Mortgage Corp.; Peacock v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915 Greaves v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1060 Greben; Labankoff v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1094 Green, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 909 Green v. Brookline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 Green v. Gaither . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 Green v. Gerber Products Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1117 Green; High Ridge Assn., Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1047 Green; Jarrett v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 Green v. Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 971 Green v. Philadelphia Housing Authority . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 816 Green v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 825,874,939,973,1067,1119 Greenberg; Greene v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1077 Greene, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1103 Greene v. Georgia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 Greene v. Greenberg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1077 Greene v. McDaniel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1124 Greene v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 960 Greensboro; Henson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) lxx TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Greenwood; Ahmed v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1148 Greenwood v. Societe Francaise de Transportes Maritime . . . . . . 995 Greer v. Louisiana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 968 Gregg v. Oregon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 859 Gregory v. Love . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 873 Gregory v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1083,1135 Greisen; Buster v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 981 Grenell v. Conforti . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 821 Gresham v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1052 Gretzler v. Stewart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1081 Grider v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1021 Grier v. Titan Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1111 Griffin; Brown v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 Griffin v. Commissioner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1003 Griffin v. Hanks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1096 Griffin v. Jackson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 954 Griffin v. Lehman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1003 Griffin v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1007 Griffin-El v. Bowersox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1082 Grimes; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 Grimmett; Horn v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 899 Grimmett; Nelson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 899 Grisham; Nelson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1148 Grist v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 900 Grondin; Bedi v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1050 Gronquist v. Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 887 Groose; Anderson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 889 Groose; Aziz v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 850 Groose; Eddington v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 918 Groose; Hornbuckle v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 873 Groose; Murray v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 851 Gross v. Pittsburgh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 861 Gross v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1137 Gross v. U. S. District Court . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1151 Grzybek, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 980,1103 GTE Midwest Inc. v. Federal Communications Comm'n . . . . . 1089,1101 GTE North, Inc.; Morton v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 880 GTE North, Inc.; Simmons v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1059 GTE Service Corp.; Smolko v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809 Guadagno v. Wallack Ader Levithan Associates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1122 Guam; Manalo v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 985 Guam Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Gutierrez v. . . 949 Gudinas v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 936 Gudmanson; Johnson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 855 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED lxxi Page Guerrero v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 962,1152 Guerrero-Martinez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 802,962 Guess v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1067 Guetersloh v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1110 Guice, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1027 Guido v. Cuvo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823 Guido v. Fairmont . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 Guilford County Bd. of Ed.; Cox v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1046 Guillen v. Hanks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 955 Guillory; Martin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 987 Guinn v. Tacha . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 920 Guinn v. Zavaras . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 845,1037 Guneratne v. St. Mary's Hospital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 Gunn; Adesanya v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 853 Gunn v. Department of Agriculture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1111 Gunn; Roller v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 874 Gunther v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 879 Guo v. Ryland Group, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 867,1051 Gupta v. Commissioner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 867 Gupton, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1104 Gurstel, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1104 Gustilo v. Maravilla Gustilo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864,1009 Guthmann v. Crouse Irving Memorial Hospital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 Guthrie v. Alabama . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 848 Gutierrez v. Guam Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists . . . 949 Gutierrez-Cervantez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1083 Gutierrez de Martinez v. Lamagno . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 931 Gutierrez-Moran v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1135 Gutierrez Rivera v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 940 Gutierrez-Silva v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 923 Gutierrez-Tavares v. Immigration and Naturalization Service . . . 825 Gutmans v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1006 Gutowsky; Placer County v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 914 Gwinnett County; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1047 Gypsy Church of Northwest; Allen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 907 Haake v. Singletary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1140 Hacker v. Hacker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 828 Hackettstown Community Hospital; Mao-Shiung Wei v. . . . . . . 878,1022 Hadlock; Lu v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Haeger v. Edmond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 952 Haeger v. Sullivan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1149 Hafadai Beach Hotel v. National Labor Relations Bd. . . . . . . . . . 1107 Hager v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1097 Hagood v. Alabama Dept. of Environmental Management . . . . . . 863 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) lxxii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Haight v. Kentucky . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 837 Hair; Corral v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1059 Hairston v. Love . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 828 Halash v. Michigan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 810 Hale v. National Center for State Courts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 916 Hale v. Secakuku . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1114 Hale v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 860 Haley v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1140 Hall v. Atlanta Public School System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997 Hall v. Brookside Community, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 Hall v. Federal Financial Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 858 Hall v. Hipps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 999 Hall v. Jacobs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1091 Hall v. Minnesota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1095 Hall; Morrison v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 829,1036 Hall v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 856,870,1131,1140 Hall; Washington v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 907 Haller, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 910 Hall Financial Group, Inc.; DP Partners, Ltd. Partnership v. . . . . 815 Ham v. Snider . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1124 Hambrice, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . 968 Hamilton v. Louisiana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1124 Hamilton v. Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1059 Hamilton v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1052 Hamilton County; Condit v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1111 Hamilton Township; Naro v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 820 Hamm & Associates, Inc.; Gordon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1030 Hammer v. Bowlen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 887 Hammon v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 Hampel, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1089 Han Chen v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1152 Hancock; Asam v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 983 Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.; Di-Jing Hu v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 887 Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.; Pearson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 803 Handa v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1083 Hankins v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 923 Hanks; Griffin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1096 Hanks; Guillen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 955 Hanks; Henley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018 Hanks; McCoy v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 Hanks; Taylor v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 834,989 Hanley v. Benson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 882 Hanley v. Maddox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 854 Hanrahan v. Williams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 812 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED lxxiii Page Hansen v. Pitzer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 905 Hansen v. Sea Ray Boats, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 Hanson v. Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 Hanson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 988 Hantman, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1041 Hapgood v. Warren . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1046 Harbison v. Tennessee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 Harbor Bancorp & Subsidiaries v. Commissioner . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1108 Harcleroad; Lee v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 927 Harding v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 891,1053 Hardison v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 855 Hardy; Kuplen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1053 Hare v. Sacchett . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 833 Hargett; Harmon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 842 Harker v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1045 Harkless, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1106 Harmon v. CSX Transportation, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 868 Harmon v. Hargett . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 842 Harmon v. OKI Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 966 Harmon v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1061 Harner v. Franklin County Juvenile Probation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 842 Harp v. Morton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 884 Harper; Wilson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 876 Harpster; Ohio v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1112 Harre; Muegler v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998 Harriman City Schools; Moore v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1019 Harrington v. Harris . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1016 Harrington; Swekel v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1047 Harrington v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 924 Harris v. Arlington County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 863 Harris; Harrington v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1016 Harris; Hwang v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 810,977 Harris v. Jensen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 950 Harris v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1059,1109 Harris v. Kaver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 954 Harris v. Mississippi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 827 Harris v. New Jersey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997,1143 Harris v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 900 Harris; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1115 Harris v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 833,899,987,1025,1033 Harris v. West . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 873 Harris v. White . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 899,971,1010 Harris County; White-Page v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 913 Harrison v. Bailey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 828 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) lxxiv TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Harrison; Knox v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1062 Harrison v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 846 Hart v. Congress of U. S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 956 Hart v. Wilson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 918 Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 951 Hartford Fire Ins. Co.; Saunders v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 Hartford Ins. Group; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Ins. Co. v. I/N Kote . . . . . . . 983 Hartley v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 825 Hartline v. Pima County Sheriff's Dept. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1127 Hartline v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 844 Hartmann v. Loudoun County Bd. of Ed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1046 Hartmann; Loudoun County Bd. of Ed. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1046 Hartwig; Johnson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 896 Hartwig; Wooten v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 846 Harvard v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 824 Harvey v. Department of Justice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1032 Haseotes; Spain v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997 Hasty; Rudd v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1080 Hatch v. McKenzie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1013 Haut v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 846 Hawk; Todd v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1135 Hawkins v. McNeil Pharmaceutical . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 815 Hawkins v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 844,1005 Hawley; VanDiver v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 985 Haycock, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805 Hayden v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 841,1066 Hayes v. Bessinger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 Hayes v. Correction Management Affiliates, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . 957,1070 Hayes v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 818,855,900 Haynes v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 884 Hays v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1008 Hayward v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1152 Hazen Paper Co.; Biggins v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 952 Heacock v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 844 Health Net; Durham v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809 Healthpartners of Southern Ariz. v. Atkins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 824 Healy Co.; Herman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1025 Heaning v. New York Telephone Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1050 Heaning v. NYNEX-N. Y. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1050 Hearn v. Hofbauer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 854 Hearn v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 989 Heath v. Commissioner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 841 Heath v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 975 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED lxxv Page Heberlig v. Sobina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 Hebert; Mid South Controls and Services, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 Hebron v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 925 Hedges v. Stumbo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 946 Heim v. Nebraska . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1123 Heimann v. Department of Agriculture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 951 Heimbecker; Overbeek v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809 Heinemann, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 930,1039 Heinemann v. Pocahontas Times . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1005 Heit v. Michigan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921 Hekimain v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 855 Helen Gens and Associates v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. . . . . . . . 931 Helman; Saleem v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1096 Helms v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1051 Helton v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1130 Henderson v. Angelone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 842 Henderson; Mulberry v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 936 Henderson v. Norris . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1129 Henderson v. Tansy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 874 Henderson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 857,1061 Henderson; Williams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 881 Heng I v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 923 Henley v. Hanks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018 Hennefer; Spencer Estates v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1015 Hennepin County v. Ben Oehrleins & Sons & Daughter, Inc. . . . . 1029 Hennepin County; Ben Oehrleins & Sons & Daughter, Inc. v. . . . 1036 Henness v. Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 971 Henning v. Love . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 841 Hennon v. Cooper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Henry; Ellis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 848 Henry v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 894 Henson v. Greensboro . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809 Hentz v. Mississippi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 Henyard v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 846 Herald Mail Co.; Mason v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 Herbert v. Cain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 842,1009 Herman; Boatwright v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 867 Herman; Bush & Burchett, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807 Herman; Isbell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1113 Herman v. S. A. Healy Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1025 Herman; Sisson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 987 Herman; Stallworth v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 817 Herman; Talasila, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 860 Herman; Talley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1017 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) lxxvi TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Hernandez v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 834 Hernandez v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 984 Hernandez v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1135 Hernandez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 890 Hernandez-Flores v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 960 Hernandez-Garcia v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 988 Herring; Jenkins v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 966 Herring v. Schotten . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921 Herrod v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1065 Herron v. Cornell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 888 Hertz v. Storer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1059 Herzog v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 983 Heslop v. Morton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1001 Hess v. Hess . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 811 Hess v. Schluntz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1129 Hewitt v. Lawson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 879 Hewlett v. Corbett . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1134 Heyliger v. State Univ. and Community College System of Tenn. 1117 Hicks v. Polunsky . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1124 Hicks v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 882,960,1034,1052 Hicks v. Westinghouse Materials Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 859 Hicks v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Bd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 937,1037 Higa v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 848 Higgason v. Cottrell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 878 Higgins v. Higgins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 836 High Ridge Assn., Inc. v. Green . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1047 Hightower v. Doane Products Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 863 Hightower v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921 Hili v. Goord . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 884 Hill; Brab v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 981 Hill v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 922 Hill v. Farmers Home Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 853,1037 Hill v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 907 Hill v. Gateway 2000, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 808 Hill v. J. J. B. Hilliard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 981 Hill; Johnson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 893 Hill v. Maxwell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 918,1037 Hill v. Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055 Hill v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1057 Hill; Thomas v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055 Hill v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1016 Hill; Watson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1048 Hillary v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1090 Hilliard; Hill v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 981 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED lxxvii Page Hilton v. Connecticut . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1134 Himber v. Powers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1092 Hindera v. Thai . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 812 Hinds v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1138 Hine v. Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Assn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864 Hines, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 909 Hines v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1077 Hines v. Costello . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 853 Hines; Marts v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1058 Hines; Pearson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 803 Hines v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 960 Hinkel v. Hinkel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1048 Hinkle; Breakley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 842 Hinkle; James v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 896 Hinkle; McFarland v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 883 Hinojosa; Sosa v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055 Hipps; Hall v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 999 Hishaw v. Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1123 Hizbullahankhamon v. Goord . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 Hoang v. ADIA Personnel Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1094 Hochman; Weddell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 951 Hochstein v. Hopkins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 959 Hodge v. Dalton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 815 Hodge v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 853 Hodges v. Tennessee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 999 Hodgkiss v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1012 Hodgson v. Benson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 897 Hofbauer; Feller v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 Hofbauer; Hearn v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 854 Hofbauer; Peabody v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 874 Hofbauer; Severance v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 970 Hoffman; Stewart v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 Hoffman v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1063,1149 Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.; White v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 Hofmann, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 981 Hohn v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 944,1043 Hoke v. Arizona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 832 Holcomb, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1106 Holden v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1126 Holder v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921 Holland v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 902 Holley v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1022,1065 Holloway v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 905 Hollowell v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055,1154 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) lxxviii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Hollywood Towers Condominium Assn.; Spiegel v. . . . . . . . . . . . . 808 Holman v. Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1150 Holman v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 884 Holmes v. Indiana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 849 Holmes v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 899,1053 Holsum Bakers of P. R., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Bd. . . . 817 Holt v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1017 Holt v. Lewis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 817 Holton v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1067 Honeywell, Inc. v. Minnesota Life and Health Ins. Guar. Assn. . . 858,1009 Honeywell, Inc.; Yoder v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 812 Hood v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1093 Hood; Tabron v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1131 Hook; Arizona Dept. of Corrections v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 Hooker v. Producers Tractor Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 813 Hoover v. Leonardo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1133 Hope, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805 Hopkins; Anderson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 930 Hopkins v. Ford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1045 Hopkins; Hochstein v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 959 Hopkins v. Reeves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1042,1074 Hopkins; Sikora v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 892,989 Hopkins; Williams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1010 Hormel & Co.; Schneider v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1109 Horn; Evans v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 842,973 Horn v. Grimmett . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 899 Hornbuckle v. Groose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 873 Horsman v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1053 Horton; Martin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1045 Hosch v. Bandag, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 842,1099 Hoskins v. State Bar of Cal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 832 Hotchkiss v. Supreme Court of U. S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1149 Hotchkiss v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 892 House v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055 Houseworth; Alston v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 857 Houseworth; Jones v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875 Houston, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1104 Houston v. Finnell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 822 Houston; Mikkilineni v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 Houston; Vollert v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 810 Houston Brokerage, Inc. v. McDonald . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 811 Houston Independent School Dist.; Becerra v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 824 Howard v. Anderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 968 Howard v. Gaughan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED lxxix Page Howard v. Maryland Administrative Bd. of Election Laws . . . . . . 1052 Howard v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 825,1131 Howell v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1033 Howze v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 872 Hoxsie v. Kerby . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 844 HSSM #7 Ltd. Partnership; Bilzerian v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 803 Hu v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 887 Hualde-Redin v. Royal Bank of P. R. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 826,1123 Huard v. O'Connor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1047 Hubbard v. Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. . . . . . . . . . . 920 Hubble v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 975 Hubert v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 837 Huck v. Dawson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 909 Huddleston; Sawyer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 994 Hudgins v. Brown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 860 Hudson v. Bloomfield Hills Public Schools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 822 Hudson v. Consumer Power Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 955 Hudson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93,939,961 Hudson-Gardner v. South Carolina Dept. of Hwys. & Pub. Transp. 828,1009 Huffman v. Superior Court of Cal., Monterey County . . . . . . . . . 875 Huffman; Yost v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1019 Huggins; Abbott Laboratories v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1153 Huggins; Prewitt v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1003 Hughes v. Cleveland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 833,1009 Hughes v. Crandell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 844 Hughes v. Department of Housing and Urban Development . . . . . 1060 Hughes; Gossage v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1066 Hughes; Maryland v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 989 Hughes v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 913 Hughes v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 877,902 Humana Inc. v. Forsyth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 994 Humana Inc.; Forsyth v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 Humana Inc.; General Practice Associates, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1050 Hume v. Wallis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Hunt v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 861 Hunt v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 846,874,975,1068 Hunter v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 Huntington; Formica v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004 Huor v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 923 Hurd v. District Court of Iowa, Ida County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1097 Hurdle v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1102 Hurley; Gallardo v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1022 Hutchinson, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 912 Hutchinson v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 896 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) lxxx TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Hutchinson v. Fiserv C. I. R., Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1076 Hutchinson v. Pfeil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 914 Hutson v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 894 Hutson v. South Carolina Dept. of Corrections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 879 Hwa Ja Kim v. Wills & Van Metre, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 803 Hwang v. Harris . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 810,977 Hyde v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 937,1065 Hyland; Wonder v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1148 Hyundai Motor Co.; Scholtz v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823 IAMAWD; SFIC Properties, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823 IBP, Inc.; Chaparro v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 811 IBP, Inc. v. Wilson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 810 Idaho; Gray v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823 Idaho; Sivak v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 887,918,1001 I. D. P. v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 Ieyoub v. Causeway Medical Suite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 943 Igbonwa v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1119 Ignacio; Bailey v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 833 Ignacio; Briggs v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1095 Ikelionwu v. Burr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 936 Illinois; Anderson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 889 Illinois; Bowers v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1137 Illinois; Broachwala v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 886,1010 Illinois; Burgess v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 999 Illinois; Deerwester v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 884 Illinois; Eddmonds v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 989 Illinois; Glass v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 890 Illinois; House v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055 Illinois; Hutson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 894 Illinois; Johns v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 955 Illinois v. Krueger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809 Illinois; Lear v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 872 Illinois; Loya v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 Illinois; McNeal v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 Illinois; Miranda v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871 Illinois; Montefolka v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 916 Illinois; Moss v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 828 Illinois; Odanuyi v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1131 Illinois; Ortiz v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 982 Illinois; Owens v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1129 Illinois; Palonis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1150 Illinois; Pecor v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 974 Illinois; Pecoraro v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875 Illinois; Pulliam v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED lxxxi Page Illinois; Richardson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1123 Illinois; Rodriguez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 898 Illinois; Sayles v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 835 Illinois; Schrager v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 858 Illinois; Seuffer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1001 Illinois; Simon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1133 Illinois; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 920 Illinois; Starns v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 838 Illinois; Sublett v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 836 Illinois; Tenner v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 892 Illinois; Towns v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 826 Illinois; Watkins v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 922 Illinois; Wilson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1132 Illinois; Young v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 859 Illinois Bd. of Elections; King v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1087 Illinois Human Rights Comm'n; Richards v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1126 Immigration and Naturalization Service; Albano Santos v. . . . . . . 824 Immigration and Naturalization Service; Anonymous v. . . . . . . . . 957 Immigration and Naturalization Service; Atuahene v. . . . . . . . . . 973 Immigration and Naturalization Service; Dengle v. . . . . . . . . . . . 944 Immigration and Naturalization Service; Gutierrez-Tavares v. . . . 825 Immigration and Naturalization Service; Kamara v. . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 Immigration and Naturalization Service; Katsoulis v. . . . . . . . . . 1027 Immigration and Naturalization Service; Martinez-Serrano v. . . . 809 Immigration and Naturalization Service; Nicol v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 972 Immigration and Naturalization Service; Olanrewaju v. . . . . . . . . 971 Immigration and Naturalization Service; Osaren v. . . . . . . . . . . . 807 Immigration and Naturalization Service; Ramus v. . . . . . . . . . . . 987 Immigration and Naturalization Service; Razack v. . . . . . . . . . . . 845 Immigration and Naturalization Service; Sidali v. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1089 Immigration and Naturalization Service; Tabchouri v. . . . . . . . . . 1027 Immigration and Naturalization Service; Vincente-Guzman v. . . . 1059 Independence; Ventura v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 863 Indiana; Baker v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1019 Indiana; Garcia v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 845 Indiana; Holmes v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 849 Indiana; Peterson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1078 Indiana; Slagle v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 Indiana; Van Cleave v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1119 Indiana; Webster v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 802 Indian River Country School Bd.; Devine v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1110 Individuals for Responsible Government, Inc. v. Washoe County 966 Industrial Comm'n of Ariz.; Foroughi v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 884 Industrial Workers v. Bruce Hardwood Floors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 928 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) lxxxii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Ingelwood; Wade v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 Ingle; Payne v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1151 I/N Kote; Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Ins. Co. v. . . . . . . 983 Inland Container Corp.; McDonald v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 854 Innocencio v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1051 Ino Ino, Inc. v. Bellevue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1077 Inova Health Systems Services; Cilecek v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049 In re. See name of party. Insultherm, Inc. v. Tank Insulation International, Inc. . . . . . . . . . 907 Insurance Services Office, Inc.; Cerwinski v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 952,1070 Interactive America Corp. v. Federal Communications Comm'n . . 1029 Internal Revenue Service; Nelson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 909 Internal Revenue Service; Turner v. . . . . . . . . . . . 1019,1031,1085,1099 Internal Revenue Service; Waugh v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823 Internal Revenue Service; Woods v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 876 International. For labor union, see name of trade. International Business Machines Corp.; Foster v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 815 International College of Surgeons; Chicago v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156 International Fidelity Ins. Co. v. Board of Trustees of Operating Engineers Local 825 Fund Service Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 861 International Trade Comm'n; Tanabe Seiyaku Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . 1027 Intoximeters, Inc.; CMI, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 817 Iowa; Atley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004 Iowa; Beeman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 846 Iowa; Langley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1150 Iowa; Patrick v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 936 Iowa; Semeniuk v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004 Iowa Utilities Bd.; Association for Local Telecom. Services v. 1089,1101 Iowa Utilities Bd.; AT&T Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1043,1089,1101 Iowa Utilities Bd.; FCC v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1043,1089,1101 Iowa Utilities Bd.; MCI Telecom. Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . 1043,1089,1101 Ireland v. Tunis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 Isbell v. Herman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1113 Isbell v. U. S. District Court . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1113 Iseley, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1074 Iseley v. Pennsylvania Dept. of Corrections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1126 Isong v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 883 Israel; Carpenter v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1114 Israel v. Singletary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 985 Isreal v. Marshall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1124 IT Corp.; General American Life Ins. Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1068 ITT Aerospace/Communications Div.; Csorba v. . . . . . . . . . . . . 889,1010 ITT Aerospace/Communications Div., ITT Corp.; Millner v. . . 1050,1154 Ivy v. Bowersox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1121 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED lxxxiii Page Izquierdo Cruz v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 988 J. A. v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831 Jack Eckerd Corp. v. Shannon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1111 Jackson, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1040 Jackson v. Anderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1119 Jackson v. Department of Corrections of La. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1094 Jackson v. Duckworth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 955 Jackson; Griffin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 954 Jackson v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 956,1143 Jackson v. Kantola . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 856 Jackson; Lakeland Lounge of Jackson, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1027 Jackson v. Larkins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 957 Jackson v. Norris . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 844 Jackson; Truth Seeker Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 995 Jackson v. United States . . . . 878,881,901,902,927,957,987,1033,1066,1135 Jackson v. Zapata Haynie Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 860 Jackson Square Associates v. Department of HUD, Buffalo Office 816 Jacob v. MetroLaser, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 916 Jacobs; Hall v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1091 Jacobson v. McIlwain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 970,1085 Jacobson v. Singletary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 839 Jadair Inc.; Blueprint Engines, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998 Jafar v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 834 Ja Kim v. Wills & Van Metre, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 803 Jakovich v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 988 Jamerson v. Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1121 James v. Barclift . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 854,1037 James v. Delgado . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 954 James v. Doe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875 James v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 James v. Hinkle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 896 James v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 843 James v. Minter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 856 James v. Scott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055 James v. Singletary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 854,883,1037 James v. Thickens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 854 James v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1067,1140 Jamhoury v. Drake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1003 Jamison, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1026 Jamison v. Angelone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 843 Jamison v. Morton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871 Janecka v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 825 Janezeck; Virginia Beach Bd. of Zoning Appeals v. . . . . . . . . . . . 863 Janneh v. Runyon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 854,1154 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) lxxxiv TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Japan; Aizawa v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 Jaques Admiralty Law Firm v. ACandS, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 816 Jarquin v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1058 Jarrett v. Green . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 Jarrett v. Ohio Citizen Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 872,1037 Jarrett v. Toxic Action Wash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 827,872,1037 Jarvouhey v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1082 Jasso-Trevino v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 896 Javier Moreno v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 987 Javier Nevarez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 988 Jednorski; Williams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1063 Jefferson v. Bertsch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1147 Jefferson v. Bertsch & Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1147 Jefferson v. Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1064 Jefferson v. Tarrant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 Jefferson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 822,926 Jeffries; Wood v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1008 J. E. Merit Constructors, Inc. v. Davis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 951 Jendrzejewski v. Michigan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1097 Jenkins v. Eighth Dist. Court Clerks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 Jenkins v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 920 Jenkins v. Florida Keys Community College . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1050 Jenkins v. Herring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 966 Jenkins v. Kentucky . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 857 Jenkins v. Medford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1090 Jenkins; Medford v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1090 Jennings, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 806 Jennings v. Duckworth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 839 Jennings; Schmier v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1149 Jennings v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1017 Jensen; Harris v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 950 Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc.; Steere v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 859 Jernigan v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 885 Jerry Lynn C.; Dwight B. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 802,936,1037 Jersey City; Adams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 Jeudy v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1030 Jim Arnold Corp.; Baker Hughes Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 933 Jimenez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 999 Jiminez Ruiz v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 843 Jin v. University of Pa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055 J. J. B. Hilliard; Hill v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 981 J. (Juvenile) v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1140 JLM Aviation International, Inc. v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . 1051 Jobe v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED lxxxv Page Joerger v. Reno . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1146 Johari v. Johari . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 969,1070 John Doe #1 v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1138 John F. Kennedy Center for Performing Arts; Corto v. . . . . . . . . 893 John F. Vickers Masonry v. Giuseppe Furrer, S. P. A. . . . . . . . . . 982 John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.; Di-Jing Hu v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 887 John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.; Pearson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 803 Johninson v. Norris . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 836 Johns v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 955 Johnson, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 804,1012,1074 Johnson; Allen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921 Johnson; Atkins v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 899 Johnson; Bagley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1129 Johnson; Bakr v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1119 Johnson; Banos v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1093 Johnson v. Baylor Univ. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1115 Johnson; Bazile v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 848,1009 Johnson; Booker v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831 Johnson; Bounds v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1061 Johnson; Brewer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1062 Johnson; Bryant v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1126 Johnson; Cadle Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 Johnson v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1054,1154 Johnson; Calvin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 984 Johnson; Carrasquillo v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 972,1144 Johnson; Carrizal v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 857 Johnson; Carter v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 964 Johnson; Chapin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 973 Johnson; Citizen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 842 Johnson; Comer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 842,1022 Johnson; Davis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 827 Johnson; Dudonis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1005 Johnson; Elisondo v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 981 Johnson v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1095,1120 Johnson; Fuller v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 963 Johnson; Gardner v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1059 Johnson; Gelabert v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 836 Johnson; Gochicoa v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1121 Johnson; Gosch v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1071,1142 Johnson v. Gudmanson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 855 Johnson; Harris v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1059,1109 Johnson v. Hartwig . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 896 Johnson; Hernandez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 984 Johnson; Hightower v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) lxxxvi TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Johnson v. Hill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 893 Johnson; Holder v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921 Johnson; Hollowell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055,1154 Johnson; Jackson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 956,1143 Johnson; James v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 843 Johnson v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1001 Johnson v. Kalokathis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1121 Johnson v. Kansas Dept. of Corrections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1031 Johnson v. Knowles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 Johnson; Livingston v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 880,991 Johnson; Lucious v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 891,1085 Johnson; Manzano v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 964,1042 Johnson; Martinez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875 Johnson; McBride v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1058,1078 Johnson; McGowan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 880 Johnson; Milner v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 888 Johnson; Monroe v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1003 Johnson; Morgan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 827 Johnson v. Morton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 972 Johnson v. Municipal Courts of Cal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 881 Johnson v. Nixon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 840 Johnson; Norris v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 Johnson v. Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 832 Johnson v. Oppel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 930 Johnson; Randall v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1123 Johnson; Ransom v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 944 Johnson; Rector v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1120 Johnson; Redd v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 847 Johnson; Reed v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1005 Johnson v. Rendell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 Johnson; Reyna v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 841 Johnson; Rincon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1136 Johnson v. Robbinsdale Independent School Dist., No. 281 . . . . . 904,925 Johnson v. Rodriguez . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 995 Johnson v. Roe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1151 Johnson; Seals v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 884 Johnson v. Seckinger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 839 Johnson; Sinegal v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 922 Johnson; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004,1080 Johnson; Stevens v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 870 Johnson; Thomas v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 877,1070 Johnson; Thompson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018 Johnson; Tucker v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1017 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED lxxxvii Page Johnson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 888, 889,898,903­905,923,927,972,1019,1035,1070,1082,1097,1136 Johnson; Van Barnes v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 845 Johnson v. Vaughn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1122 Johnson; Ward v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1093 Johnson v. Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 973 Johnson v. Welby . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 827 Johnson; Willis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 829 Johnson; Woerner v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1060 Johnson v. Woods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004 Johnson & Higgins, Inc. v. EEOC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 808 Johnston v. Frank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 972 Johnston v. Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1150 Johnston v. Tidewater Marine Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 Johnston v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1152 Johnston v. Varner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958 Johnstown America Corp.; Trinity Industries, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . 1048 Joiner; General Electric Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 Jokinen v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 987 Jones v. Arizona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1054 Jones v. Arkansas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 Jones v. Bates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 804,928,1038 Jones v. Bernstein . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1135 Jones v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 955,1054 Jones; Coker v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 890 Jones v. Cooper Industries, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1112 Jones; Denney v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1059 Jones v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 880 Jones v. Georgia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 953 Jones v. Houseworth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875 Jones v. Louisiana State Bar Assn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 856 Jones v. Marshall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 Jones v. Maryland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 Jones v. Pep Boys, Manny, Moe, and Jack of Cal. . . . . . . . . . . 1094,1154 Jones v. Peterson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915 Jones v. Supreme Court of U. S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 869 Jones v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807,832 Jones v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865,885,889,976,1130 Jones v. Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 984 Jones v. Watson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 812 Jones; Wells v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 886 Jones v. Wendel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 Jones v. Zimmerman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1057 Jordahl v. Democratic Party of Va. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1077 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) lxxxviii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Jordan v. Dorsey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 Jordan v. Gammon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 851 Jordan; Mainiero v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 816,1008 Jordan v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 923 Jordan v. Withrow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1003 Joseph v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 970 Joseph; Milden v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 949,1069 Joseph v. New Orleans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1058 Joseph v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1138 Joyce v. Thompson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 924 Joyner Jennings, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 806 Jozaitis v. Fort Dearborn Life Ins. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1120 Judd v. New Mexico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 894 Judge, Circuit Court of Cook County; Sampson v. . . . . . . . . . . 870,1037 Judge, Circuit Court of Va., Staunton; Turner v. . . . . . . . . . . 1031,1099 Judge, District Court of Tex., Harris County; Gilbert v. . . . . . . . . 1018 Judge, Greene County Court; Cordero v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 846 Judge, Jackson County Circuit Court v. Oregon ex rel. Huddleston 994 Judge, 190th Judicial District Court, Harris County; Medina v. . . 983 Judge, Orleans Parish Civil District Court, Division D.; Smith v. 1081 Judge, Tex. Criminal District Court 3, Dallas County; Bagley v. 1031 Judge, U. S. Court of Appeals; Guinn v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 920 Judicial Review Council of Conn.; Flanagan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 Justo; Fabian v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 Juvenile Dept. of Multnomah County; Mitchell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004 Juvenile 4 v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 976 Juvenile No. 1 v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 988 Jyan v. Frankovich . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986,1085 Kabede v. California Medical Facility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 894 Kadish, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1012 Kaiser Permanente; Ramey-Gillis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 887,1010 Kalamazoo; Remus v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1114 Kalasho v. Panzer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 922 Kalina v. Fletcher . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 Kalokathis; Johnson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1121 Kamara v. Immigration and Naturalization Service . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 Kampfer v. Gokey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 972 Kansas v. Colorado . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 803,1026,1073 Kansas; Edwards v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 954 Kansas; Martinez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1030 Kansas; Sammons v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1019 Kansas Associates, Inc.; McDermott v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1060,1144 Kansas Dept. of Corrections; Johnson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1031 Kansas Pub. Employees Retirement Sys. v. Blackwell, Sanders, etc. 1068 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED lxxxix Page Kantola; Jackson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 856 Karagiannopoulos, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805 Karagozian; Klimas v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 983 Katalinich v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 905 Katsoulis v. Immigration and Naturalization Service . . . . . . . . . . 1027 Kaucky v. Southwest Airlines Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 949 Kavanau v. Santa Monica Rent Control Bd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1077 Kaver; Harris v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 954 Kay; Anonymous v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1048 Kaymark v. Boley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1109 KCAL­TV Channel 9 v. Los Angeles News Service . . . . . . . . . . . 823 Kearney; Brown v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1062 Kearney; Shockley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 918 Kearns v. Runyon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 916 Keating v. Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n . . . . . . . . . 908,1009 Kelley v. Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1151 Kelley v. Rolfs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1095 Kelly v. Bossier City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1148 Kelly; Pueblo of Santa Ana v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807 Kelly v. Staples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 815 Kelly; Staples v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 906 Kelly v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 891,902 Kelsey v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1136 Kemmish v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1132 Kemna; Calia v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 900 Kemna; Mitchell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 880 Kenley v. Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1095 Kennedy; Maus v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 900 Kennedy v. State Bar of Cal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 832 Kennedy Center for Performing Arts; Corto v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 893 Kenneth R.; Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. . . . . . . . . . . 967 Kent v. National Marine Fisheries Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 868 Kentucky; Akpaeti v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1080 Kentucky; Bowling v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 Kentucky; Effinger v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 971 Kentucky; Foley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 893 Kentucky; Haight v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 837 Kentucky; Jenkins v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 857 Kentucky; Lane v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1123 Kentucky; Parker v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1122 Kentucky; Roberson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 886 Kentucky; Smiley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 950 Kentucky; Sommers v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1132 Kentucky; Thompson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831,834 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) xc TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Kentucky; Violett v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1151 Kentucky; Watson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1081 Kentucky Right to Life, Inc. v. Stengel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 860 Kenyon, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 945,1039 Kerbey; Hoxsie v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 844 Kernan; Sadeghy v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 851 Kernan; Steffen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 878 Kernan; Tillis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 876 Kernats; Smiths Industries Medical Systems, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . 1044 Kerns; Fain v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 Kerr v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1053 Kerr-McGee Corp. v. Farley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1090 Kersner, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 992,1145 Keselica v. Virginia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1132 Kessel; Leavitt v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 908 Keuhne & Nagel, Inc.; Watkis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1037 Key Bank of Maine; Penobscot Indian Nation v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 913 Keyport; Phillips v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 Khalife v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1045 Khalily; Matimak Trading Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1091 Khan; State Oil Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Kidd v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of U. S. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1028 Kiepfer v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934 Kiewit Pacific Co.; Beals v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1108 Kilcoyne v. Bentley College . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1048 Kilgore v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 834 Killingsworth v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 961 Killion v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 872 Kim v. New York City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809,1008 Kim v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 940 Kim v. Wills & Van Metre, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 803 Kimberly-Clark Corp.; Cole v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 812 Kinard; Michau v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 Kinard v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 926 Kinder v. Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 854 King, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1014 King v. Bureau of Indian Affairs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 900 King v. Illinois Bd. of Elections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1087 King v. Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 King v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1130,1140 King County; Macri v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1153 King County; Taxpayers of King County v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1076 King-Hill v. Zapata Haynie Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 860 Kingston v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1084 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED xci Page Kiowa Tribe of Okla. v. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc. . . . . . . 930 Kirby v. Alabama Dept. of Corrections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 885,1085 Kirby v. Burton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1019 Kirby v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 840 Kirk v. Delaware County Sheriff's Dept. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1116 Kirk v. Osceola . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915 Kirk v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 808 Kirkland; Schaffer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830,1009 Kirkland v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 863 Kirks; Dallas v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 816 Kirman v. Compagnie Francaise de Croisieres . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915 Kit v. Arizona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 Kitze v. Virginia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 817 Kleinschmidt Inc. v. Cook County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1117 Klimas v. Karagozian . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 983 Kling; Roberts v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1025 Knapp v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 968 Knight; Wilder v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1150 Knoll v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1118 Knowles; Johnson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 Knox v. Harrison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1062 Knox v. Nevada Dept. of Motor Vehicles and Public Safety . . . . . 815 Knox v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 817 Knox v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 905,1022,1061 Kobrin v. University of Minn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1113 Koenick; Brown v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921,1022 Koenig v. Maryland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1017 Koger v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1084 Kolodziej v. Smith . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1029 Konop v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1007 Konstantopoulos v. Wesvaco Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 Koon v. Louisiana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1001 Koonce v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 850 Korando, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805 Korean Air Lines Co.; Dooley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1038 Korelis v. Ramada Hotel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 845 Kornafel, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805 Kost, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805 Kozakiewicz; Chapman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 Kramer v. New Jersey Supreme Court . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1015 Kranyik v. West Melbourne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 822 Kravander v. Loh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 Kremetis v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 867 Kronberg v. Chicago Title Ins. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1046 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) xcii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Krueger; Illinois v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809 Kruziki; Puchner v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 862 Krys; Lufthansa German Airlines v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1111,1146 Kuehne & Nagel, Inc.; Watkis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 878 Kuhlmann; Al-Matin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 910 Kulch; Structural Fibers, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1008 Kuplen v. Hardy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1053 Kurz v. Philadelphia Electric Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 913 Kuykendall; Warren v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 KVBC (TV), Channel 13; United States v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1115 Kykta v. Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 884 Kyler; McDevitt v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 897 Kyler; Stewart v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830 Kyung Kim v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 940 Kyzer v. Leventhall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 898 Labankoff v. Greben . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1094 Labankoff v. Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1003 Labor Union. See name of trade. Laboy v. Crispin-Reyes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1078 Lachance v. Erickson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262 Lachance v. McManus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262 Ladejobi v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1034 LaFayette v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 839 LaFountain v. Caruso . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 850,1009 Lagos v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1007 Lago Vista Independent School Dist.; Gebser v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1011 La Grange v. Longoria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 845,1154 LaGrone v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 Lake Hamilton; Sewell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1075 Lakeland Lounge of Jackson, Inc. v. Jackson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1027 Lal v. Nix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 969 Lalor; Cordero v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 846 Lamagno; Gutierrez de Martinez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 931 Lamas v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 962 Lamb v. Lamb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 936 Lamb v. Singletary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 801 Lambert v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 892 Lambert v. Thompson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 Lambert v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 886 Lambrix v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1122 Lambros v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1065 Lampkin v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 891,1136 Lampley v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1137 Lamvermeyer v. Denison Univ. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 967 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED xciii Page Lancaster v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 801,1003 Land; Anderson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1048 Landan, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 802 Lander Co.; MMP Investments, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 811 Landerman v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1033 Landon v. Singletary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1150 Landwehr; Lomax v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 832 Lane, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805,1106 Lane v. Kentucky . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1123 Lane v. National Data Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 984 Lane v. Vaughn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 937 Lang; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 999 Lang v. Star Herald . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 839 Lang v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 843 Langford v. Day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 881 Langford v. Montana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1102 Langley v. Iowa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1150 Langworthy, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1088,1154 Langworthy v. Goicochea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 924,978 Lanham; Tatum v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 Lankford v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 974 L'anza Research International; Quality King Distributors v. . . . . 911 Lapidus v. Vann . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 La Porte; Texas Manufactured Housing Assn., Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . 908 Larion v. Sandul . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 979 Larkin; Palmisano v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1080 Larkin v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1035 Larkins; DeKeyser v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958 Larkins; Jackson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 957 Larkins; Rowkosky v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1060 Larkins; York v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 Larry v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 Larsen v. American Medical Security, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 965 Larsen v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1140 Larson v. Court of Criminal Appeals of Tex. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1123 Larson v. Ohlander . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 947,1052 Larson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 870 Lary v. Chater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 812 LaSalle Financial Services, Inc.; Miles v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 849,1069 Lasley v. Georgetown Univ. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1060 Laszcynski v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1083 La Terraza Apartments; Weiss v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 803 Latney v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 940 Lattimore v. Monterey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1057 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) xciv TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Lau v. Diaz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 801 Lauderdale Lakes; Corn v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 981 Laughlin v. Perot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1148 Laurel; Ramsey v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1030 Laurenzana v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 896 Lavalais v. Louisiana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 825 LaValley; Palmer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 860 Lavender v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1029 Lavertu v. Borofsky, Lewis & Amodeo-Vickery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 843 Lawhorn v. Fleming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 889 Lawrence v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 880,1080 Lawrence; Ford v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1047 Lawrence v. Gammon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830 Lawrence v. Singletary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1123 Lawson v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 892 Lawson; Hewitt v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 879 Lawson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1109 Layman v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1107 Lazard Freres & Co.; Protective Life Ins. Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864 Lazaro v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1042 L. B. Foster Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Comm'n . . . . 1147 LDG Timber Enterprises, Inc. v. Glickman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 916 Leak v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 927 Leap v. Malone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809 Leaphart v. Gach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1057 Lear v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 872 Leary; Double R Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 Leary; Double R Vending, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 Leasure v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 869,1065 Leath v. American Medical International Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1147 Leatherwood v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1034 Leavitt v. Kessel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 908 Leavy; Taylor v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1059 LeBlanc, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1146 Lebron v. New York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1032 Lebron v. Russo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1150 LeCroy v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1063 LeCureux; Chapman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 955 Ledbetter v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 862 Lee, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 806 Lee v. Arkansas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 Lee v. Harcleroad . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 927 Lee; Michau v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 Lee v. Morton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1092 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED xcv Page Lee v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1021,1063 Leech Lake Band of Chippewa Indians v. Cass County . . . 944,949,1087 Leech Lake Band of Chippewa Indians; Cass County v. . . . 944,949,1087 Leffel v. Valley Financial Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 968 Legros v. Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 Lehman, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1044 Lehman; Griffin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1003 Leibowitz, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 930,1039 Leisinger v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1131 Lemley v. Lemley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 970 Lenhart v. Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 836 Lentz; Conner v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 894 Leon v. Superior Court of Cal., Los Angeles County . . . . . . . . . . 918 Leon v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 880 Leonard v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 885 Leonardo; Hoover v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1133 Leventhal v. Moseley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 925 Leventhall; Kyzer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 898 Leveritt v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 902 Levy v. Fairfax County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 956 Levy v. McQuigg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 922 Lewis; Anzivino v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 847 Lewis v. BOCA Appeals Bd. of Clarksburg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 868 Lewis v. Brunswick Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 978,1088 Lewis v. Cain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 985 Lewis v. Gober . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1126 Lewis; Holt v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 817 Lewis v. Runyon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 964 Lewis; Sacramento County v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 911,993 Lewis v. Skandalakis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 849 Lewis v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 936 Lewis v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 854,857,976,1035,1066 Lherisson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1136 Li v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1135 Libberton v. Arizona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 Libertarian Party of Fla. v. Smith . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 812 Libertarian Party of Ill. v. Rednour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 858 Liberty National Enterprises; Ambanc La Mesa Partnership v. 1110 Liberty National Life Ins. Co.; Williamson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 Liddell; Missouri v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1147 Lidman v. Barone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871 Lied v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Lievsay v. Western Financial Savings Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1149 Lightbourn v. Garza . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1052 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) xcvi TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Lillard v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 885 Lin; Romney v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 906 Lincoln County; Pesek v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830 Lincoln National Life Ins. Co.; Silver v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 949 Lindblom v. Federal Bureau of Investigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 913 Lindgren v. Anderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1114 Lindh; Murphy v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1069 Lindo v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1033 Lindow, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 806 Lindsay v. Thiokol Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 863 Linehan v. Minnesota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1011 Linkage Corp.; Trustees of Boston Univ. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1015 Lipin v. American National Red Cross . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1047 Lipman v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 901 Lisby v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 899 Lisk v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 885 Little v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1140,1153 Littlejohn v. Caspari . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 970 Little Six, Inc.; Cohen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 804 Littleton; Palm v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 Litton v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 878 Litzenberg v. Litzenberg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1058 Livingston v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 880,991 Lloyd v. American Transit Ins. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1030 Lloyd v. Unity Mut. Life Ins. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 856 Lluis v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1098 Lobmiller; Bracewell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 Local. For labor union, see name of trade. Lockhart, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1023 Lockhart v. Municipal Court of Tacoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1126 Lockhart v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1023 Lockhart v. U. S. District Court . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 956 Lockridge v. U. S. Postal Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1141 Loder v. Glendale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807 Loder; Glendale v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807 Lodge. For labor union, see name of trade. Loh; Kravander v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 Lohse v. Chater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 909 Lomax v. Landwehr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 832 Lomax v. U. S. District Court . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1123 Lonardo, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1147 Lonay v. Stookey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 854 Londono v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 872,926 Long v. Fund Manager . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 993 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED xcvii Page Long v. Morton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 956 Long v. Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 Long; Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1107 Long; Thompson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1147 Long Beach; McClure v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 808 Longest v. Dalton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004 Longoria; La Grange v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 845,1154 Longstaff v. Singletary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 880 Lopez v. Monterey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1085 Lopez v. Ricca-Stroud . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1014 Lopez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1137 Lorah v. Baughman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1031 Lord v. Lord . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1122 Lorenzen v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1030 Los Angeles; Branson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1058 Los Angeles; Deteresi v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 859 Los Angeles; National Assn. of Home Builders of U. S. v. . . . . . . 967 Los Angeles; Nunley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1091 Los Angeles County; Blue's Estate v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1111 Los Angeles County Dept. of Children & Fam. Servs.; Andrews v. 959,1070 Los Angeles County Dept. of Public Social Servs.; Antonov v. . . . 832 Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transp. Auth.; Weinreich v. 971 Los Angeles County Superior Court; Awofolu v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 Los Angeles Municipal Court; Garber v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 Los Angeles News Service; KCLA­TV Channel 9 v. . . . . . . . . . . 823 Los Angeles Police Dept.; Conyers v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1127 Losoya v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1131 Lott v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 Lott v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 976 Loudoun County Bd. of Ed. v. Hartmann . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1046 Loudoun County Bd. of Ed.; Hartmann v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1046 Lough v. Brunswick Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 806 Lough v. Mercury Marine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 806 Louis; Moore v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 833 Louis E. Oliverio & Associates v. Western States Ins. Co. . . . . . . 820 Louisiana; Campbell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1013,1026 Louisiana; Comeaux v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1150 Louisiana; Craig v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 Louisiana; Greer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 968 Louisiana; Hamilton v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1124 Louisiana; Koon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1001 Louisiana; Lavalais v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 825 Louisiana; McCartney v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 Louisiana v. Mistretta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 811 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) xcviii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Louisiana; Schexnayder v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 839,1009 Louisiana Dept. of Corrections; Washington v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 829 Louisiana Dept. of Transportation and Dev.; Worthington v. . . . . . . 867 Louisiana in the Interest of Billiot; Billiot v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997 Louisiana-Pacific Corp.; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1092 Louisiana State Bar Assn.; Jones v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 856 Louisiana State Univ. Medical Center; Bradford v. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 Love; Fisher v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 902 Love; Foster v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 Love; Gregory v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 873 Love; Hairston v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 828 Love; Henning v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 841 Love v. Norris . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 954 Love v. Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 957,1070 Love; Swindle v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 893 Love v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1139 Love v. U. S. Postal Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 974 Lovelace v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1132 Lovett v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 955 Lowe v. Cantrell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 850 Lowe v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1121 Lowe v. Nueces County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 Lowe v. Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 828 Lowe; Yiamouyiannis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 861 Lower Brule Sioux Tribe v. South Dakota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 816 Lowery v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1152 Loya v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 Lozano v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1111 Lozano v. Bowersox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 886 Lozano v. Court of Criminal Appeals of Tex. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1080 Loza-Romero v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1139 LPP Claimants v. Continental Airlines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1114 Lu v. Choate, Halls & Stewart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 821 Lu v. Hadlock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Lucas County Dept. of Human Services; Warren v. . . . . . . . . . . . 1081 Lucas, Prendergast, Albright, Gibson & Newman; Zschach v. . 813,1008 Lucent Technologies, Inc.; Neal v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 977 Lucious v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 891,1085 Lufthansa German Airlines v. Krys . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1111,1146 Lufthansa German Airlines; Papapanos v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1090 Lugo v. Prunty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1117 Lugo v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 999 Lumbermen's Mut. Casualty Co.; Epland v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 869 Lumpkin v. Brown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 995 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED xcix Page Lunding v. New York Tax Appeals Tribunal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 287 Lungren; TruServ Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1015,1099 Lurz v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 961 Lusk v. Singletary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1096 Luttrell; Ackles v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 928 Lyle v. Magnolia State Enterprises, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 836 Lynch v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 802 Lynn v. Murphy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1115 Lyons v. Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1130 Lyons v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 906 Lytle; Bernal v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1151 M. A. Baheth & Co. v. Schott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1092 MacDonald; Bibbs v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 920 Machinists; SFIC Properties, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823 Maciel v. Gomez . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 Mack; O'Leary v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 801 Mackall v. Angelone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1100 Mackey v. Dyke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 848 Mackey v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 975 Macklin v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 891,989 MacPhee v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 MacPherson, Inc.; Darling v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 861 Macri v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1057 Macri v. King County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1153 Madden v. Asbestos Workers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1077 Madden v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 976 Maddock; Roy v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 876 Maddox v. Capitol Bankers Life Ins. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1091 Maddox; Hanley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 854 Maden v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 889 Madison County; Dryden v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1145 Madison Gas & Electric; Farr v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 894 Magallon v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1119 Magana v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1139 Magana de Godinez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 989 Magee v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 Magnivision, Inc.; Bonneau Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1090 Magnolia State Enterprises, Inc.; Lyle v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 836 Maguire v. Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 923 Magwood v. Alabama . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 836 Mahan; Browning v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1094 Mahapatra v. Onondaga County Dept. of Social Services . . . . . . . 936 Mahdavi v. One Hundred State, County, and City Officials . . . . . . 985 Mahn v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 855 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) c TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Maier v. Environmental Protection Agency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1014 Maine; Fleming v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1063 Maine Right To Life Committee, Inc.; Federal Election Comm'n v. 810 Mainiero v. Jordan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 816,1008 Mainville v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 940,1037 Makel; Mayberry v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871 Makel; Williams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 893 Maki v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1066 Makowski v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1019 Malaki v. Yazdi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 901,1010 Malanitini v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 939 Malerba; Price v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049 Mallott & Peterson v. Stadtmiller . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 803 Malone; Leap v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809 Maloney v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Bd. of Cal. . . . . . 1054,1154 Manalo v. Guam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 985 Manatt v. Union Pacific R. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1050 Manchester; Edwards v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1124 Mancus v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 927 Manh Tran v. Wayne State Univ. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 860 Mann, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 945,1039 Mann v. Arizona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 895 Mann v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 926 Mann v. University of Cincinnati . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1042 Manns, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 979 Manson, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 929,1025 Manufacturing Technologies, Inc.; Kiowa Tribe of Okla. v. . . . . . . 930 Manville Trust; Baker v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 897 Manzano v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 964,1042 Mao-Shiung Wei v. Hackettstown Community Hospital . . . . . . 878,1022 Marathon Oil Co.; Ruhrgas, A. G. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 967 Maravilla Gustilo; Gustilo v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864,1009 Marcello v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998 Marchon Eyewear, Inc. v. Tura LP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1109 Marcus, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1012 Margen v. Thompson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 966 Margen; Thompson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 966 Marietta; Boomer's v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 818 Marietta; Shretta v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 818 Marietta; Varsalona's Italian Restaurant v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 818 Marine Midland Bank; Rashid v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 968 Marino v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1134 Marion Police Dept.; Dixon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 Marks v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 961,1075,1135 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED ci Page Marmolejo v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1014,1099 Marquez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 975 Marr v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1067 Marr v. Wright . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 977 Marrero v. Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 977 Marrero v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 849 Marroquin v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1150 Marshall; Brewer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1087,1151 Marshall; Buchanan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 Marshall; Glendora v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1059 Marshall; Isreal v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1124 Marshall; Jones v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 Marshall v. New Jersey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 850,876 Marshall v. Parke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 901 Marshall; Perez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1096 Marshall v. Turner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1153 Marshall & Co.; Duke v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1112 Martel v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1034 Martin, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1039,1099 Martin v. Angelone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1065,1154 Martin v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Va., Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1029 Martin; Branson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1126 Martin v. Cohen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 867 Martin; Craig v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1142 Martin; Diamant Boart, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 933 Martin v. Goodyear Auto Service Center . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1077 Martin v. Guillory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 987 Martin v. Horton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1045 Martin v. New York City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 951 Martin; Premo v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1147 Martin v. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 818 Martin v. Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1075 Martin v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 849,931,939,1067,1115,1134 Martin Cadillac Co. v. Div., Labor Stds. Enf., Cal. D. I. R. . . . . . . 1050 Martinez v. BCF Engineering, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 885 Martinez v. Beaver Stairs Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 881 Martinez v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875 Martinez v. Kansas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1030 Martinez v. Michigan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 Martinez v. Office of Personnel Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 802 Martinez; Serapion v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1047 Martinez v. Simkins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 971 Martinez v. Slater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1005 Martinez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 843,900,975,989,1052,1141 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) cii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Martinez-Guerrero v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 962 Martinez Lozano v. Court of Criminal Appeals of Tex. . . . . . . . . . 1080 Martinez-Serrano v. Immigration and Naturalization Service . . . . 809 Martinez-Villareal; Stewart v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 912,1043,1146 Martorano v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 854 Marts v. Foti . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 Marts v. Hines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1058 Maryland; Ball v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1082 Maryland; Beamon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1137 Maryland; Burch v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1001 Maryland; Clark v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 Maryland v. Dennis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 928 Maryland; Evans v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 966 Maryland; Gilbert v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 877 Maryland; Gray v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 930 Maryland v. Hughes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 989 Maryland; Jones v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 Maryland; Koenig v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1017 Maryland; McDonald v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1151 Maryland; Tariq A-R Y v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1140 Maryland Administrative Bd. of Election Laws; Howard v. . . . . . 1052 Maryland Dept. of Ed., Rehab. Servs. v. Department of VA . . . . . 806 Maryland Dept. of Juvenile Justice; Brown v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1096 Maryland Psychiatric Society, Inc. v. Wasserman . . . . . . . . . . . . . 810 Mason v. Creeden . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 Mason v. Herald Mail Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 Massachusetts; Camoscio v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 968 Massachusetts; Delaney v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1058 Massachusetts; Fryar v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1033 Massachusetts; Gorod v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1148 Massachusetts; Rainwater v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1095 Massachusetts; Sullivan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1060 Massachusetts; Tate v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 832 Massachusetts; Van Houten v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 834 Massachusetts Bd. of Registration of Chiropractors; Sears v. . . . . 953 Massachusetts Dept. of Correction; DuPont v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 834 Massachusetts Dept. of Social Services; Doe v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 810 Massachusetts School of Law at Andover v. American Bar Assn. 907 Massachusetts State Police Assn. v. Commissioner . . . . . . . . . . . 1108 Massey v. Smith . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1034 Masters v. Bellflower . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871 Mastracchio v. Vose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1123 Matesanz; Andrews v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1151 Mathieu v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1083 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED ciii Page Mathis v. Ciambrone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000,1143 Mathis v. Fairman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1016 Mathis v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 825,1066 Mathisen v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 839 Mathura v. Council for Human Services Home Care Services, Inc. 829 Mathy v. Virginia Dept. of Taxation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 967 Matimak Trading Co. v. Khalily . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1091 Matimak Trading Co. v. Unitex Mills, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1091 Mattern v. Eastman Kodak Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 Matthews v. Moore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 833,964 Matthews v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1064 Mauchlin v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 856 Maus v. Kennedy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 900 Maus v. Murphy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 886,1057 Maus v. Smith . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 842,918 Maxhimer v. Glendale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1094 Maxwell v. Bratton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 813 Maxwell; Hill v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 918,1037 Maxwell v. Saenz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 Maxwell v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1114 Maxwell House Coffee Co.; Grand Lockwood Partnership v. . . . . 967 May v. Baldwin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921 Mayberry v. Gabry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1019 Mayberry v. Makel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871 Mayer v. Cornell Univ. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 818 Mayfield v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 839 Mayfield v. Detroit News . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 Mayhue Corp.; Tasse v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 838 Mayles v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 925 Mayo v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998 Mayo v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1137 Mayor, Anchorage, Alaska; Curiale v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 890 Mayor of New York City; McReynolds v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 969 Mayor of Rockford; Taylor v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919,1070 Mayor, San Francisco; Lumpkin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 995 Mays, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805 Mays v. Mississippi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 858 Mays v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 959,1034 Mazurkiewicz; McDonald v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1126 Mazurkiewicz; Price v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 959 Mazurkiewicz; Swift v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 957 Mbadiwe v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871 McAllister v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1064 McAlpine v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 984 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) civ TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page McAninch; Wise v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 McAninch; Wright v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1129 MCA Records, Inc.; Charly International v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 822 McArty v. Norris . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823 McBath; Terhune v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 953 McBride; Beaven v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1062 McBride v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1058,1078 McBride v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 McCafferty v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1083 McCarron v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1046 McCarthy v. Ayers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1120 McCartney v. Louisiana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 McCarty v. Dorsey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921 McCaskill v. West . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1118 McCaughtry; Banks v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1063 McCaughtry; Toliver v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 896 McClain v. Price . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055 McClanahan v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1066 McClatchy Newspapers, Inc.; Nelson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 McClellan; Williams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 881 McClendon v. Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1027 McClure v. Charlotte . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 885 McClure; Couch v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 849 McClure v. Long Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 808 McCord v. Millward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1091 McCounly v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 940 McCoy v. Hanks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 McCoy v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1035 McCray v. Michigan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 888 McCright v. Gomez . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 872 McCrory v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 961 McCullough v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 891,1120 McDaniel; Greene v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1124 McDaniel v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 988 McDaniels v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1021 McDermott v. Kansas Associates, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1060,1144 McDevitt v. Disciplinary Bd. of Supreme Court of N. M. . . . . . . . 815 McDevitt v. Kyler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 897 McDonald, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805 McDonald; David B. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1048 McDonald; Houston Brokerage, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 811 McDonald v. Inland Container Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 854 McDonald v. Maryland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1151 McDonald v. Mazurkiewicz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1126 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED cv Page McDonald v. St. Louis Southwestern R. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1115 McDonald v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 881,1062 McDonnell v. Shalala . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 888 McDonnell; Toski v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 966 McDonnell v. Woods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 844 McDonnell Douglas Corp.; Schultz v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 812 McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Stafford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1113 McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Sykes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1113 McDuff v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 844,1052 McFadin; Paul v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1005 McFarland v. Hinkle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 883 McFarland v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 961 McFatridge v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1020 McGahren v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 950 McGee v. Endicott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 840 McGill v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1141,1153 McGinley v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1033 McGinnis v. Brown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 836,1036 McGinnis; Moss v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 881 McGirt v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 869 McGowan v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 880 McGowan v. Texaco Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1090 McGraw v. Better Government Bureau, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1047 McGraw v. Mississippi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830 McIlwain; Jacobson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 970,1085 McIntyre v. Carter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 827 McIntyre v. Nevada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. California . . . . . . . . . 1043,1089,1101 MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Iowa Utilities Bd. . . . 1043,1089,1101 McKay v. Toyota Motor Mfg., U. S. A., Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 803 McKellip v. Sorrell, Anderson, Lehrman, Wanner & Thomas . . . . 871, 1017,1070,1144 McKenzie v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1077 McKenzie; Hatch v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1013 McKenzie v. South Central Bell Telephone Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1077 McKeown v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 939 McKie; Gaster v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1134 McKinney v. Emery Air Freight Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864 McKinney v. Emery Worldwide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864 McKinney v. Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 827 McKinney v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 988 McKnight v. Missouri Division of Family Services . . . . . . . . . . . . 827 McKnight v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 898 McKune; Anderson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) cvi TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page McLamb v. Arizona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 McLaughlin; Timmerman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1091 McLaughlin v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 902 McLaughlin v. Washington State Bar Assn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 820 McLeland v. Syncor International Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1110 McLeod; Zelma v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 952 McMahon, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 806 McManus; Lachance v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262 McManus v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1016 McMillan v. New York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830 McMurtrey v. Arizona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 971 McNeair v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1141 McNeal v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 McNealy v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 822 McNeil v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1153 McNeill v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1053 McNeil Pharmaceutical; Hawkins v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 815 McPhaden v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1035 McQuigg; Levy v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 922 McReynolds v. Comm'r, Office of Mental Retard. of N. Y. . . . . . . 920 McReynolds v. Comm'r, Social Services of New York City . . . . . . 1030 McReynolds v. Director, Brooklyn Developmental Center . . . . . . 969 McReynolds v. Giuliani . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 969 McReynolds v. New York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 969,1057 McSmith v. Tavares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919,1070 Meader v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1064 Meadowcraft Co.; Combs v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1045 Meadows; Frost v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 878 Mecca v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 959 Mechem Financial, Inc.; Copple v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 Medenbach v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 923 Medford v. Jenkins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1090 Medford; Jenkins v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1090 Medical X-Ray Center, P. C.; Read v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 914,1037 Medico v. Medico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 928 Medina v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1149 Medina v. Devine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 983 Medina v. Miller . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997 Mefford; Simmons v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 Mejias v. Connecticut . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830 Melius v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1084 Meloncon v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 881 Mel T. v. California Dept. of Social Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 873 Mendez-Verdejo v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 903 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED cvii Page Mendoza v. Brown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 937 Mendoza v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 938,961 Menke v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1129 Meny v. Norris . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 938 Mercer v. Mount Vernon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 849 Mercury Marine; Lough v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 806 Merit Constructors, Inc. v. Davis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 951 Merit Systems Protection Bd.; Cortez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 954 Merit Systems Protection Bd.; Weber v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 984 Merriam v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 818 Merrill; Rosado v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 863 Mesa v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1097 Mescall; Spiegel v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 808 Meshaw v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 902 Meshbesher, Birrell & Dunlap, Ltd.; Tsipouras v. . . . . . . . . . . . 982,1143 Messer; Bender v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 918 Methodist Hospital of Sacramento; Archer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 936,1022 MetroLaser, Inc.; Jacob v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 916 Metropolitan Council; NAACP, Minneapolis Branch v. . . . . . . . . . 1145 Metropolitan Dade County; Fabian v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 956,1022 Metropolitan Life; Thymes v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 874 Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.; Corrierre v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.; Couler v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.; Parker v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1084 Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.; Thomas v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 863 Meyers v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1006,1062 Meza v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1139 Meza v. U. S. District Court . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830 M. F. Smith & Associates, Inc.; Alfieri v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1111 MGM Grand Air, Inc. v. Miceli . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 820 Miami; Fabian v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1003,1070 Miami Herald Publishing Co.; Dunn v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 822 Miami Student; Miami Univ. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1022 Miami Univ. v. Miami Student . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1022 Miceli; MGM Grand Air, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 820 Michael v. Moats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 883 Michael F. v. Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School Dist. . . . . . . 1047 Michaels, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805 Michalowski v. New Jersey Dept. of Labor, Bd. of Review . . . . . . 952 Michau v. Kinard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 Michau v. Lee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 Michau v. Orr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 829 Michela; Myers v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 832 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) cviii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Michelin Tire Corp.; Armor v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915 Michigan; Allen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 973 Michigan; Bell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 957 Michigan; Dyer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 Michigan; Erdman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 971 Michigan; Florencio Fernandez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 955 Michigan; Halash v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 810 Michigan; Heit v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921 Michigan; Jendrzejewski v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1097 Michigan; Martinez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 Michigan; McCray v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 888 Michigan; Savage v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1054 Michigan; Tulk v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1095 Michigan; Tyler v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1095 Michigan; Vincent v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 972 Michigan Family Independence Agency; Amer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 999 Michigan Mut. Ins. Co. v. Osram Sylvania, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 995 Mickelsen v. Reynolds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958 Mickens v. Virginia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 928 Microdos Data Corp.; Warren Publishing, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 963 Microsoft Corp. v. Vizcaino . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1098 Mid South Controls and Services, Inc. v. Hebert . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 Midwest Operating Engineers Welfare Fund v. Williams . . . . . . . 1101 Mikels v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 849 Mikkilineni v. Houston . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 Milden v. Joseph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 949,1069 Miles v. LaSalle Financial Services, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 849,1069 Miles v. Sunbelt National Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 982 Milian v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 905 Millard Fillmore Hospital; Cole v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1042 Miller; Air Line Pilots v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 991 Miller v. Alabama State Bar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 859 Miller v. Corcoran . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 884 Miller; Medina v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997 Miller v. Provenz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 808 Miller v. Silverstein . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998 Miller v. Stonehedge/FASA-Tex. JDC, Ltd. Partnership . . . . . . . 869 Miller v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 847,871,883,890,969,1053 Milligan, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 916 Millington; Frazer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 832 Millner v. ITT Aerospace/Communications Div., ITT Corp. . . 1050,1154 Mills v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1033 Millward; McCord v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1091 Milner v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 888 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED cix Page Milojevich v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 969 Milton v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 802 Milton Hambrice, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. . . . . . . 968 Milwaukee; Arrieh v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1092 Milwaukee; Phillips' Estate v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1116 Milwaukee Branch of NAACP v. Thompson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1076 Mims v. Burton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1058 Mincy v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 849 Miner v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 904 Miners; Cargill Communications, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 981 Ming You v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 953 Mink v. General Motors Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 920,959 Minneapolis; Excalibur Group, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1077 Minnesota; Hall v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1095 Minnesota; Linehan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1011 Minnesota; Schreiber v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 890 Minnesota; Tsipouras v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1114 Minnesota Life and Health Ins. Guar. Assn.; Honeywell, Inc. v. . . 858,1009 Minter; James v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 856 Minter v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1083 Miranda v. El Paso . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 913 Miranda v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871 Miserandino; Commonwealth Secretary of Va. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 963 Miserandino; Resort Properties, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 953 Mississippi; Brown v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 849,1009 Mississippi; Collins v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 877 Mississippi; Flowers v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1090 Mississippi; Harris v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 827 Mississippi; Hentz v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 Mississippi; Mays v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 858 Mississippi; McGraw v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830 Mississippi; Sones v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 889 Mississippi; Wells v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1122 Mississippi; Wilcher v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1053,1154 Mississippi; Wiley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 886 Mississippi Chemical Corp.; Terra International, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . 1029 Missouri; Aston v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 870 Missouri; Basile v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 883 Missouri; Clemons v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 968 Missouri; Johnston v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1150 Missouri; Kelley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1151 Missouri; Kenley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1095 Missouri; Kinder v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 854 Missouri v. Liddell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1147 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) cx TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Missouri; Lyons v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1130 Missouri; Roberts v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 Missouri; Roll v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 954 Missouri; Simmons v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 953,1129 Missouri; Skillicorn v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 999 Missouri; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 954 Missouri; Sutherland v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871 Missouri; Taylor v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049 Missouri; Twenter v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958 Missouri; White v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 948 Missouri; Whitfield v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831 Missouri Army National Guard; Newport v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1069 Missouri Division of Family Services; McKnight v. . . . . . . . . . . . . 827 Missouri Employees' Ret. System Bd. of Trustees; Bowers v. . . . 953 Missouri Family Health Council; St. Charles County v. . . . . . . . . 859 Missouri Motor Vehicle Comm'n; Adams Ford Belton, Inc. v. . . . . 952 Missouri Pacific R. Co.; Monroe v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 967 Mistretta; Louisiana v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 811 Mitchell; Ayers v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 913 Mitchell v. Detroit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1105 Mitchell v. Juvenile Dept. of Multnomah County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004 Mitchell v. Kemna . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 880 Mitchell v. Rees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1120 Mitchell; Tavakoli-Nouri v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055,1154 Mitchell v. Thickens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 854 Mitchell v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871,880,1060,1063,1133 Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc.; Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. 818 Mmahat v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 848,878,977,989 MMP Investments, Inc. v. Lander Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 811 Moats; Michael v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 883 MobileTel, Inc. v. Federal Communications Comm'n . . . . . . . . . . . 948 Mockett & Co. v. Plumley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 Moffitt; Myers v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 914 Molina, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805 Molinary v. Powell Mountain Coal Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1118 Molinary v. Wax Coal Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1118 Moller v. California Dept. of Social Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 872 Mollett v. Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 Molson v. Standard Federal Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 802 Momient-El v. DeTella . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 984 Monge v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1072,1106 Monier v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 901 Monk v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 885 Monllor v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1006 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED cxi Page Monroe; Cheatham v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1090 Monroe v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1003 Monroe v. Missouri Pacific R. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 967 Monroe v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 Monroe County Bd. of Ed.; Davis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1088 Monroy-Vargas v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1035 Monsanto Co.; Florida Seed Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 913 Montague v. West . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 999 Montalvo v. Banco Bilbao Vizcaya . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915,1099 Montalvo v. Borg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875 Montalvo Silguero v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 922 Montana v. Crow Tribe of Indians . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 912,1087 Montana; Crow Tribe of Indians v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Montana; Langford v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1102 Montana; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 965 Montano v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1152 Montebello v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1034,1097 Montefolka v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 916 Monterey County; Lattimore v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1057 Monterey County; Lopez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1085 Montes-Fierro v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 880 Montgomery v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1136 Montgomery County; Enand v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 970,1070 Montgomery County Bd. of Ed.; Barnes v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1028 Montgomery Hospital; Allen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 982 Moody v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871 Moomchi v. New Mexico Corrections Dept. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1074 Moomchi v. Wilson & Pryor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1032 Moore, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805,1026 Moore v. Anderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1078 Moore; Arnold v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1058 Moore v. Fennema . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 954 Moore; Fowler v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 835 Moore v. Gomez . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 829 Moore v. Harriman City Schools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1019 Moore v. Louis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 833 Moore; Matthews v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 833,964 Moore v. Nesbitt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 839 Moore v. Parmenter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 836 Moore; Plyler v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1039 Moore v. Sticks Billiards, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 861 Moore v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 836,849,1082,1135,1149 Moore; Young v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1001 Moore Medical Corp.; Geissal v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1086 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) cxii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Moore & Peterson; Allred v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1048 Morales v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 901 Morales Laboy v. Crispin-Reyes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1078 Morales Vargas v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1036 Moran; Crawford v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 969,1070 Moran v. Moran . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 822 Moran; Tulare County Dept. of Health Services v. . . . . . . . . . . . . 863 Moreland v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 962 Morena v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 987 Moreno v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 826,987 Moreno Valley v. Desert Outdoor Advertising, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . 912 Morfa v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 940 Morgan v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 827 Morgan v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 927,1027 Morgan; Watkins v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1142 Morin v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1021 Morris v. Bell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1149 Morris v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 905,975,976 Morris v. Wright . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 906 Morrison v. Hall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 829,1036 Morrison v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1006,1132 Morrison's Hospitality Group; West v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 859 Morton; Bey v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1081 Morton; Cerato v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 955 Morton v. GTE North, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 880 Morton; Harp v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 884 Morton; Heslop v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1001 Morton; Jamison v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871 Morton; Johnson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 972 Morton; Lee v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1092 Morton; Long v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 956 Morton v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1119 Moseley; Leventhal v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 925 Moser v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1035 Mosley v. Norris . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 Mosley v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1007 Moss v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 828 Moss v. McGinnis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 881 Most v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 961 Moten; Newton v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1132 Motheral; Gilbert v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018 Moulton v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1114 Mountain v. Brennan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 850 Mount Vernon; Mercer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 849 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED cxiii Page Mount Vernon v. Stone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1112 Movie Group, Inc.; TT Telefilm, GmbH & Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1118 Moyer; Grand Fraternity Rosae Crucis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 913 Mozzochi v. Freedom of Information Comm'n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 967 Muegler v. Harre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998 Mueller; Dixon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 920 Muhammad v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1034 Mulberry v. Henderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 936 Mulligan; Camoscio v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 933 Multani v. Newsweek, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919,989 Mumford v. Basinski . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 914 Mu'min, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 978 Mu'min v. Pruett . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 978 Munday v. Waste Management of North America, Inc. . . . . . . . . . 1116 Munford v. Munford, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1068 Munford, Inc.; DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc. v. . . . . . . 1068 Munford, Inc.; Munford v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1068 Mungia v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 876 Mungin v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 833 Municipal Court of Tacoma; Lockhart v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1126 Municipal Courts of Cal.; Johnson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 881 Muniz v. Solano County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 914 Munoz v. Benz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1093 Murdock v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 898 Murphy v. Bureau of Prisons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 889 Murphy v. Lindh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1069 Murphy; Lynn v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1115 Murphy; Maus v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 886,1057 Murphy v. Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1122 Murphy v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 937 Murphy v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Bd. of Cal. . . . . . . . . 1030 Murr v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 858 Murray v. Groose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 851 Murray v. Trans Union Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 860 Murray; Young v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1124 Muscarello v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1023 Musco Corp. v. Qualite, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 Musco Corp. v. Qualite Sports Lighting, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 Muskogee v. Allen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1148 Musser v. Damrow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 817 Mutual of Omaha; Woods v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 834 M/V IKAN SELAYANG v. Sogem-Afrimet, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1112 MW Ag, Inc. v. New Hampshire Ins. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 Myers, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 994 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) cxiv TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Myers v. Alabama . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1054 Myers v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 918 Myers v. Michela . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 832 Myers v. Moffitt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 914 Myers v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 848,1020,1062 Myers v. Ventura County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1015 Mystic Lake Casino; Cohen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 804 Mystrom; Curiale v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 890 NACCO Industries, Inc. v. Tracy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1091 Nagle; Thompson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 Nagle; Young v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1080 Naidas v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1139 Nance v. Pike . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1095 Nance v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 891 Nanney v. Raney . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 Napa County v. Schutt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 808 Napoleon v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 953 Naranjo v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1082 Naranjo-Cuevo v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 902 Naro v. Hamilton Township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 820 Nash v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1117 Nathan J. (Juvenile) v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1140 National Academy of Sciences v. Animal Legal Defense Fund . . . 949 National Aeronautics and Space Administration; Olivares v. . . . . 814 NAACP, Minneapolis Branch v. Metropolitan Council . . . . . . . . . 1145 National Assn. of Home Builders of U. S. v. Los Angeles . . . . . . . 967 National Center for State Courts; Hale v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 916 National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. Tarkanian . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1028 National Credit Union Administration v. First City Bank . . . . . . 1146 National Credit Union Administration v. First Nat. Bank & Tr. Co. 479 National Data Corp.; Lane v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 984 National Endowment for Arts v. Finley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 991,1105 National Fed. of the Blind v. Department of Veterans Affairs . . . 806,1008 NLRB; Allentown Mack Sales & Service, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 359 NLRB; Alta Bates Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1028 NLRB; Dilling Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 862 NLRB; D. L. Baker, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1046 NLRB; Finerty v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 995 NLRB; Geske & Sons, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 808 NLRB; Hafadai Beach Hotel v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1107 NLRB; Holsum Bakers of P. R., Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 817 NLRB; New Breed Leasing Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 948 NLRB; Ross Brothers Construction Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 948 NLRB; Saipan Hotel Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1107 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED cxv Page NLRB; Webcor Packaging, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1108 National Marine Fisheries; Wright v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 868 National Marine Fisheries Service; F/V A. A. Baranov v. . . . . . . 868 National Marine Fisheries Service; F/V Sea Pearl v. . . . . . . . . . . 868 National Marine Fisheries Service; Kent v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 868 National Marine Fisheries Service; Noradoun v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 868 National Scenery Studios; Corto v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921 National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1116 Nation of Islam; Cleveland v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1077 Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government; Alaska v. . . . . . . . 520 Naumann; Zimmer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 820 Naumov v. University of Pittsburgh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 859,1143 Navarrete v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 901 Navarro v. Fuji Heavy Industries, Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1015 Navarro-Duarte v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1060 Naveo-Morcello v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1134 Neal v. Gramley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 834 Neal v. Lucent Technologies, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 977 Neal v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 Neal v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1139 Nebraska; Heim v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1123 Nebraska; Sedivy v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1126 Nebraska; Williams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 992 Nebraska v. Wyoming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1026 Neely, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1073 Neff v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1067 Neilson v. Syrett Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 817 Nelmida v. BMW of Honolulu, Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 858 Nelmida v. Shelly Eurocars, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 858 Nelson v. Grimmett . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 899 Nelson v. Grisham . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1148 Nelson v. Internal Revenue Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 909 Nelson v. McClatchy Newspapers, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 Nelson v. Peterson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018 Nelson v. Rehabilitation Enterprises of North Eastern Wyo., Inc. 1050 Nelson; Taylor v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 896,1070 Nelson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 961,1130 Nemetz; Ramos v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Nesbitt; Moore v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 839 Nesbitt v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 904 Netherland; Coleman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 924 Netter v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1140 Neuman v. Rivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1030 Nevada; Blandino v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1003 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) cxvi TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Nevada; Browne v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 877 Nevada; McIntyre v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 Nevada; Powell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 954 Nevada Dept. of Motor Vehicles and Public Safety; Knox v. . . . . . 815 Nevada State Bar; Nicholson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 815,1037 Nevarez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 988 Neville; Washington v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 923,1037 Newberry; Stephens v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 892 New Breed Leasing Corp. v. National Labor Relations Bd. . . . . . 948 New England Teamsters and Trucking Ind. Pens. Fd.; Felinska v. 815 New Hampshire; Zeta Chi Fraternity v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 995 New Hampshire Ins. Co.; MW Ag, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 New Jersey; Bell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866,1009 New Jersey; Fanny v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 848 New Jersey; Finklea v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 837 New Jersey; Harris v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997,1143 New Jersey; Marshall v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 850,876 New Jersey v. New York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 911,993,1042 New Jersey Dept. of Env. Prot.; Bell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 933,1010 New Jersey Dept. of Env. Prot.; Solid Waste Trans. & Recycling v. 1111 New Jersey Dept. of Env. Prot.; Wes Outdoor Adv. v. . . . . . . . 933,1010 New Jersey Dept. of Labor, Bd. of Review; Michalowski v. . . . . . 952 New Jersey Dept. of Transportation; Atuahene v. . . . . . . . . . 1044,1120 New Jersey Dept. of Transportation; Bell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866,1009 New Jersey Dept. of Transportation; Wes Outdoor Adv. v. . . . . . 866,1009 New Jersey Div. of Medical Assistance and Health Servs.; Young v. 853 New Jersey Institute of Technology; Pribytkov v. . . . . . . . . . . 881,1010 New Jersey Supreme Court; Kramer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1015 New Jersey Transit Corp.; Elder v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 918 Newman; Gerwig v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1031,1144 New Mexico; Brown v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 973 New Mexico; Judd v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 894 New Mexico; Texas v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 910 New Mexico Corrections Dept.; Moomchi v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1074 New Mexico Energy, Minerals & Nat. Resources Dept. v. FERC 811 Newmont Mining Corp.; Pinal Creek Group v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1106 New Orleans v. Department of Labor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823 New Orleans; Joseph v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1058 New Orleans; Saacks v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 914 Newport v. Missouri Army National Guard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1069 Newsweek, Inc. v. Florida Dept. of Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 442 Newsweek, Inc.; Multani v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919,989 Newton; Crislip v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 828 Newton; Dana Corp., Parish Division v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED cxvii Page Newton v. Moten . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1132 Newton County Wildlife Assn. v. Rogers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1108 New York; Adams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 852 New York; Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. . . . . . . . . . . 808 New York; Ayala v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 New York; Becht v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 887 New York; Bentley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 New York; Bonds v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 985 New York; Brown v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 833 New York; Cass v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1149 New York; Chaney v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 957 New York; Dunkley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018 New York; Edwards v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1121 New York; Lebron v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1032 New York; McMillan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830 New York; McReynolds v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 969,1057 New York; New Jersey v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 911,993,1042 New York; Peggs v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1081 New York; Prodell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 810 New York; Sacco v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 936 New York; Tichenor v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 918 New York; Williams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 985 New York; Ziman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1114 New York City; Buraczewska v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 New York City; Clinton v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1144 New York City; Dombrowski v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1127 New York City; Martin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 951 New York City; Soon Duck Kim v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809,1008 New York City Bd. of Ed.; Galbreath v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1001 New York Dept. of Environmental Conservation; Gazza v. . . . . . . 813 New York Tax Appeals Tribunal; Lunding v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 287 New York Telephone Co.; Heaning v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1050 Neysmith v. Angelone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1065 Nghiem v. Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. . . . . . . 1080 Nguyen v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 987 Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.; Gunther v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 879 Nichols; Cross v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 952 Nichols v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1136 Nicholson v. Nevada State Bar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 815,1037 Nicholson v. World Business Network, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 949 Nicol v. Immigration and Naturalization Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . 972 Nidds v. Schindler Elevator Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 950 Nippon Paper Industries Co. v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . 1044,1143 Nischan v. Connecticut Natural Food Market, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . 956 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) cxviii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Nix; Lal v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 969 Nixon; Johnson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 840 Noa v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1133 Noble v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 904 Noelle v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 863 Noil v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1138 Noradoun v. National Marine Fisheries Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 868 Norde v. Ward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 Norfolk and Western R. Co.; Smelser v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 817 Normandy Middle School; Brooks v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 850 Norris; Burnett v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1093 Norris; Cassell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 857 Norris; Davis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018 Norris v. Department of Defense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 870 Norris; Henderson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1129 Norris; Jackson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 844 Norris; Johninson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 836 Norris v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 Norris; Love v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 954 Norris; McArty v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823 Norris; Meny v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 938 Norris; Mosley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 Norris; Singleton v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 840 Norris; Stephens v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 891 Norris; Tisdale v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 972 Norrod; Barton v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934 North Carolina; Adams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1096 North Carolina; Allen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 846 North Carolina; Alston v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 838 North Carolina; Bacon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 843 North Carolina; Ballenger v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 817 North Carolina; Buckom v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 973 North Carolina; Cagle v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1032 North Carolina; Chambers v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 876 North Carolina; Conner v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 876 North Carolina; Cummings v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1092 North Carolina; Curry v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 833 North Carolina; East v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 918 North Carolina v. Federal Energy Regulatory Comm'n . . . . . . . . 1108 North Carolina; Fletcher v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 957 North Carolina; Flowers v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1135 North Carolina; Gaines v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 900 North Carolina; Geddie v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 825 North Carolina; Gillis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1057 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED cxix Page North Carolina; Harris v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 900 North Carolina; Holden v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1126 North Carolina; Hunt v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 861 North Carolina; Lambert v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 892 North Carolina; Larry v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 North Carolina; McGirt v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 869 North Carolina; McNeill v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1053 North Carolina; Moody v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871 North Carolina; Neal v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 North Carolina; Page v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 North Carolina; Perkins v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 837 North Carolina; Posey v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 843 North Carolina; Propst v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 838 North Carolina; Rich v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 North Carolina; Richardson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 North Carolina; Strickland v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1078 North Carolina; Stroud v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 826 North Carolina; Taylor v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 829 North Carolina; Thomas v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 824 North Carolina; Tyler v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1001 North Carolina; Woods v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875 North Dakota; Ertelt v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 971,1070 North Dakota; Garcia v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 874 North Dakota; Rieger v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1120 Northeast Ohio Coalition for Homeless v. Cleveland . . . . . . . . . . 931 Northern Ind. Commuter Transportation Dist.; Dillon v. . . . . . . . 914 Northern Mariana Islands; Angello v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 826 Northern Va. Hospital Corp.; Zaidi v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 981,1053 Norton v. Federal Trade Comm'n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 817 Norton v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 816 Norville v. Dell Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 826,1009 Noske v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1119 Nova Designs, Inc. v. Electronics Instrumentation & Technology 996 Novak; Reeves v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831 Novoa v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823 Novo Nordisk A/S; Genentech, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 963 Nueces County; Lowe v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 Nunley v. Los Angeles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1091 Nunley v. Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 985 Nurse v. United Air Lines, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 968 Nuru v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1131 Nutrition, Inc.; Pleasant v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 847 Nwokeji v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1066 NYNEX Corp. v. Discon, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 803 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) cxx TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page NYNEX Corp.; Discon, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809 NYNEX-N. Y.; Heaning v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1050 Obermeyer v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 852,977 Obregon; Williams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1058 O'Brien; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1093 Ocean City Bd. of Supervisors of Election; Gisriel v. . . . . . . . . 965,1053 Oceanside v. Shafer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 818 Ochoa v. Arizona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1083 Ochsner v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 973 OCI Mortgage Corp.; Pyles v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 O'Connor v. Davis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1114 O'Connor; Huard v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1047 Octel Communications Corp.; Gilbarco, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 Ocwen Federal Bank; Beach v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 912 Odanuyi v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1131 O'dneal v. Roberts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1131 Odumosu v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 840 Odus v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1102 Oehrleins & Sons & Daughter, Inc. v. Hennepin County . . . . . . . 1036 Oehrleins & Sons & Daughter, Inc.; Hennepin County v. . . . . . . . 1029 Office of Bar Admissions, Supreme Court of Ga.; C. R. W. v. . . . . 869 Office of Comptroller of Currency; Sarsfield v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 867 Office of Disciplinary Counsel of Ohio; Donnell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1092 Office of Personnel Management; Martinez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 802 Office of Personnel Management; Sanderson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1115 Office of Personnel Management; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 936 Official Committee of Tort Claimants v. Dow Corning Corp. . . . . 977 Ogike v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1006 O'Hara v. Bayliner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 822 Ohio; Biros v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 Ohio; Bradley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 953 Ohio; Calo v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 Ohio; Childers v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 Ohio; Dennis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 Ohio; Garcia v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 Ohio v. Harpster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1112 Ohio; Henness v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 971 Ohio; Jefferson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1064 Ohio; King v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 Ohio; Legros v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 Ohio; Long v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 Ohio; Love v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 957,1070 Ohio; Richard v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 Ohio; Roudebush v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 843 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED cxxi Page Ohio; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 972 Ohio; Taylor v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 851 Ohio; White v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 Ohio; Williams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1053 Ohio Adult Parole Authority v. Woodard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 804,930 Ohio Citizen Action; Jarrett v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 872,1037 Ohio Dept. of Human Services; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1003,1054 Ohio ex rel. Eckstein; Video Express v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1110 Ohio Forestry Assn., Inc. v. Sierra Club . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 931,1087 Ohio Tax Comm'r; NACCO Industries, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1091 Ohlander; Larson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 947,1052 Ojavan Investors, Inc. v. California Coastal Comm'n . . . . . . . 1015,1099 O'Keefe; Rodriguez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1123 Okereke, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1107 OKI Systems; Harmon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 966 Oklahoma; Al-Mosawi v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 852 Oklahoma; Bauhaus v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 920 Oklahoma; Bryan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 957 Oklahoma; Crawford v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 889 Oklahoma; Gee v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 836 Oklahoma; Graves v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 829 Oklahoma; Green v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 971 Oklahoma; Hamilton v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1059 Oklahoma; Hill v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055 Oklahoma; Hishaw v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1123 Oklahoma; Jamerson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1121 Oklahoma; Johnson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 832 Oklahoma; Lenhart v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 836 Oklahoma; Lowe v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 828 Oklahoma; McKinney v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 827 Oklahoma; Mollett v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 Oklahoma; Murphy v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1122 Oklahoma; Nunley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 985 Oklahoma; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 985 Oklahoma; Stouffer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831 Oklahoma; Toliver v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 838 Oklahoma; Wanless v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 844 Oklahoma; Webber v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1058 Oklahoma; Williams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934 Oklahoma Bar Assn.; Hine v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864 Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Assn.; Hine v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864 Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n; Keating v. . . . . . . . . 908,1009 Oklahoma Tax Comm'n; Keating v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 908,1009 Okolo, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 994 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) cxxii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Okoro, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805 Okoro v. Strubbe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 957 Okpala, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 947 Okpala v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1097 Okusami v. Psychiatric Institute of Washington, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . 949 Olanrewaju v. Immigration and Naturalization Service . . . . . . . . 971 Oldfather v. CIGNA Ins. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 949 Old Republic Surety Co.; Richardson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 851 Old Vail Partners v. Riverside County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 943 O'Leary v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1111 O'Leary v. Mack . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 801 O'Leary v. Roman Catholic Church of Sacramento . . . . . . . . . . . . 1114 O'Leary v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1020 Olivares v. National Aeronautics and Space Administration . . . . . 814 Oliver; Panos v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 828 Oliver v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1021 Oliverio & Associates v. Western States Ins. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 820 Olivieri v. Rodriguez . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1110 Olivieri v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1138 Olson v. Sun Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1149 Omaha v. Doane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1048 Omawalli v. Anderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 Omni Homes v. Board of Supervisors, Prince William Cty., Va. . . 813 Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 980 O'Neal v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 973 One Hundred State, County, and City Officials; Mahdavi v. . . . . . 985 O'Neill v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1020 Onofre-Segarra v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1142 Onondaga County Dept. of Social Services; Mahapatra v. . . . . . . . 936 Ontiveros; Carter v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 828 Onyeagoro, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 912 Operating Engineers; Delaware River and Bay Authority v. . . . . 861 Oppel; Johnson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 930 Orand v. Adams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1116 Orange County; Robinson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1020 Orban v. Vaughn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1059 Oregon; Calhoun v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1127 Oregon; Giba v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1027 Oregon; Gregg v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 859 Oregon ex rel. Huddleston; Sawyer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 994 Oregon State Bar; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1117 O'Reilly v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1033 Oreskovich v. Our Lady of Lourdes Health Center . . . . . . . . . . . 1028 Orlando; Spring Brook Field v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1019 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED cxxiii Page Orleans Parish School Bd. v. United States Gypsum Co. . . . . . . . 995 Ormond Beach; Sternbenz v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1120 Oro-Barahona v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1020 Orr; Michau v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 829 Orthopaedic Hospital; Belshe v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1044 Ortiz v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 982 Ortiz v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 961,1085,1132,1139 Ortiz-Villa v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 885 Ortland v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 851 Osaren v. Immigration and Naturalization Service . . . . . . . . . . . . 807 Osborn v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1033 Osborne v. Seminole County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915 Osborne v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049 Osceola; Kirk v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915 Oser v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 880 Ospina v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 849 Osram Sylvania, Inc.; Michigan Mut. Ins. Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 995 Osram Sylvania Products, Inc. v. Von Der Ahe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 943 Otis, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 806 Otis v. Thisius . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 900 Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 422 Our Lady of Lourdes Health Center; Oreskovich v. . . . . . . . . . . . 1028 Outwater; Tucker v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997 Overbeek v. Heimbecker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809 Overcash v. Doe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 943 Owen v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 Owen v. Wille . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1126 Owens; Asam v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 862 Owens v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1129 Owens v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 806,939,989,1139 Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Assn., Inc. v. Bissell . . . . . 1109 Oxxford Clothes XX, Inc. v. Exxon Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915 P. v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 P. v. Verniero . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1109 P.; Verniero v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1110 Pacesetter Construction Co. v. Carpenters 46 Northern Cal. Coun- ties Conference Bd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1014 Pacheco v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1062 Pacific Employers Ins. Co.; Super Young Industries v. . . . . . . . . . 1115 Pacific Gas & Electric Co.; Stanislaus County v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1076 Padgett v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 938 Padron v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 833 Page; Holman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1150 Page; Labankoff v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1003 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) cxxiv TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Page v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 Pahlavi; Ansari v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 914 PaineWebber Inc.; Childs v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 870,989 PaineWebber Real Estate Securities; Total Medical Management v. 857 Pairo, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1040 Palm v. Littleton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 Palma Ruedas v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1142 Palmer v. Bell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 Palmer v. Circuit Court of Ill., Cook County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1096 Palmer v. LaValley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 860 Palmer v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1005 Palmisano v. Larkin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1080 Palmisano v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 840 Palo v. Pitcher . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 985 Palonis v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1150 Panalpina, Inc.; Gold v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 810 Pan-American Life Ins. Co. v. Cypress Fairbanks Medical Center 862 Pang; Washington v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1029 Pangalos v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1008 Pankhurst v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1030 Panos; Anderson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 951 Panos v. Oliver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 828 Panzer; Kalasho v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 922 Papapanos v. Lufthansa German Airlines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1090 Papesh v. Brookshire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 895 Papike v. Tambrands, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 862 Papsidero, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1013,1103 Paradies v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1014 Parchue v. Roe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1032 Parham v. Coca-Cola Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 909,990 Park; Townson & Alexander, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1105 Parke; Burris v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 990 Parke; Marshall v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 901 Parke Care Centers, Inc.; Blankenship v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1110 Parke Convalescent Center; Blankenship v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1110 Parker v. Kentucky . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1122 Parker v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1084 Parker; Rivera v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 972 Parker; Sheehy v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1054 Parker; Trusty v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 829 Parker v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 837,877,899 Parker v. Wertenberger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 849 Parks v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1142 Parmenter; Moore v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 836 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED cxxv Page Parnell v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 841 Parrish v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1021 Parsons v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 846 Partners Health Plan of Ariz., Inc. v. Atkins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 824 Pastor-Alvarez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1017 Pataki; Doe v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1122 Patch v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 983 Pate v. Service Merchandise Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 821 Patent and Trademark Office Bd. of Appeals; Abbey v. . . . . . . . . 886 Patent Office Professional Assn. v. FLRA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 951 Patrick v. Iowa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 936 Patterson v. South Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 853 Patterson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1064 Patton v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 903 Paul v. McFadin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1005 Payne v. Department of Justice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1016 Payne v. Ingle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1151 Payne v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 987,1033 Peabody v. Hofbauer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 874 Peach v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 974 Peacock v. Great Western Mortgage Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915 Peake v. Angelone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 938,1022 Pearson v. Hines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 803 Pearson v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 803 Pearson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1035 Pebworth v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 840 Pecina v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1141 Peck, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1102 Peckham v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1008 Pecor v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 974 Pecoraro v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875 Pedraza v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 847 Pedroza-Ortiz v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1096 Peeples v. Anderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055 Peggs v. New York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1081 Pellegrino v. South Dakota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1138 Pemberton v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1113 Pen a; Becker v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 813 Pen a; Consolidated Edison Co. of N. Y. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1108 Pena-Rodriguez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Penchishen v. Stroh Brewery Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 868 Pendergrass v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 890 Pennington; Doherty v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 909 Pennsylvania; Bronshtein v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 936 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) cxxvi TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Pennsylvania; Chambers v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 827 Pennsylvania; Cox v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 999 Pennsylvania; Craver v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 834 Pennsylvania; Diggs v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1124 Pennsylvania; DiGiovanni v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 804,983,1085 Pennsylvania; Fiore v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 869 Pennsylvania; Fiore Trucking and Contracting v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 869 Pennsylvania; Gatley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 824 Pennsylvania; Gease v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 Pennsylvania; Gibson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 948 Pennsylvania; Hanson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 Pennsylvania; Maguire v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 923 Pennsylvania; Marrero v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 977 Pennsylvania; Reinert v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 810 Pennsylvania; Reitz v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831,1022 Pennsylvania; Sattazahn v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 895 Pennsylvania; Sheehy v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1054 Pennsylvania; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 891 Pennsylvania; Stokes v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1082 Pennsylvania; Szuchon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 889 Pennsylvania; Whiteford v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 983 Pennsylvania; Wright v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831 Pennsylvania; Younkin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1080 Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. Scott . . . . . . . . . . 992,1105 Pennsylvania Dept. of Corrections; Iseley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1126 Pennsylvania Dept. of Corrections v. Yeskey . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1086,1146 Pennsylvania Milk Marketing Bd.; Consumers Ed. & Prot. Assn. v. 933 Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.; Schuylkill Energy Resources v. 977 Penobscot Indian Nation v. Key Bank of Maine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 913 Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.; Fetty v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 812 Peoples v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1119 Peoples Bank of Bloomington; Dick v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1148 Pep Boys, Manny, Moe, and Jack of Cal.; Jones v. . . . . . . . . . . 1094,1154 Peralta v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 900 Perelman v. Davila . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 938 Perez v. Bureau of Prisons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 930 Perez v. Marshall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1096 Perez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 903 Perez v. Vaughn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 833 Performance Diver v. Electronics Instrumentation & Technology 996 Perkel, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1107 Perkins v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 837 Perot; Laughlin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1148 Perovic; Gale v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1094 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED cxxvii Page Perry v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875,892,1006 Pesek v. Lincoln County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830 Peters; Spreitzer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1120 Peters v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 860 Peterson v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1080 Peterson v. Indiana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1078 Peterson; Jones v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915 Peterson; Nelson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018 Petrosian v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1138 Petties v. U. S. Postal Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 846 Pevarnik v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1082 Peyton v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 885 Pfeil; Hutchinson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 914 Pfeil v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 960 Pfizer, Inc.; Ridgeway v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 906 Phagan v. Georgia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 Pham v. Department of Justice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1045 Phan v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1109 Philadelphia Electric Co.; Kurz v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 913 Philadelphia Federal Credit Union; Ford v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 971 Philadelphia Housing Authority; Green v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 816 Phillips v. Anderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 839 Phillips v. Gober . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1124 Phillips v. Keyport . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 Phillips v. Singletary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 928 Phillips v. Washington Legal Foundation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 911,946,980 Phillips' Estate v. Milwaukee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1116 Philpot v. Georgia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1054 Phipps v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1119 Phonometrics, Inc. v. Radisson Hotels International, Inc. . . . . . . . 868 Piccolo v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1141 Pickett, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1012 Pickett; Wiggins v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 985 Pierce v. Department of Labor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1016 Pierce v. Ginn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 877 Pike; Nance v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1095 Pikeville United Methodist Hospital of Ky., Inc. v. Steelworkers . 994 Pilco v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 870 Pilgrim v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 897 Pima County Sheriff's Dept.; Hartline v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1127 Pinal Creek Group v. Newmont Mining Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1106 Pincher v. Rockwell International Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1116 Pinto v. Stinson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1131 Pisano; Torres v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) cxxviii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Piscataway Township Bd. of Ed. v. Taxman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 946,1010 Pitcher; Palo v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 985 Pitcher; Pritchett v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1001 Pitera v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 847 Pitsonbarger v. Gramley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 802 Pittsburg County, Okla., Bd. of Comm'rs; Shelton v. . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 Pittsburgh; Gross v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 861 Pitzer; Hansen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 905 Pitzer; Sesler v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 877 Pizza Hut of America, Inc.; Brown v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1028 Placer County v. Gutowsky . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 914 Plainfield Post Office; Vrettos v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 994 Plancarte v. Roe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 985 Planned Parenthood Assn. of San Mateo County; Cochran v. . . . . 811 Planned Parenthood League of Mass., Inc.; Bell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Plantation Patterns; Combs v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1045 Platek v. Duquesne Club . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934 Plaza Motors; Feltmann v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1075 Pleasant v. Nutrition, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 847 Plumley; Doug Mockett & Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 Plunkett v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1097 Plyler v. Moore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1039 Pocahontas Times; Heinemann v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1005 Polaris Ins. Co. v. Aqua-Marine Constructors, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . 933 Polk v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 988 Pollack, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1025,1103 Pollan, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 992,1103 Pollard, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805 Pollard v. Edgar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 824 Pollard v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1083 Polley v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1016,1143 Polunsky; Hicks v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1124 Poly-America, Inc.; Avrett v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 Polymer Technology Corp.; Eddy v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1075 Pompey v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1133 Ponder v. Baldwin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 840 Ponder v. Dye . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 840 Ponder v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1110 Pondexter v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 825 Poole v. Whitehurst . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1057 Poreda, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1041 Porter v. Gilmore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1093 Porter v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 903,926 Portillo v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 838 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED cxxix Page Portillo-Rodriguez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 939 Portland General Electric Co. v. Columbia Steel Casting Co. . . . . 803 Posey v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 843 Postmaster General; Bak v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 952 Postmaster General; Bigsby v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1118 Postmaster General; Janneh v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 854,1154 Postmaster General; Kearns v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 916 Postmaster General; Lewis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 964 Postmaster General; Spranger v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 Potter v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1082 Potts v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 870 Powell, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1144 Powell v. Bowersox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055 Powell v. Nevada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 954 Powell v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 887,987,1130 Powell v. Wal-Mart, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 Powell Mountain Coal Co.; Molinary v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1118 Powell, Trachtman, Logan, Carrle & Bowman; Bardsley v. . . . . . 802 Power v. Rutgers, State Univ. of N. J. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 982 Powerhouse Technologies, Inc.; Corner Pocket of Sioux Falls v. 1117 Powers; Himber v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1092 Poynton v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 874,1010 Practice Mgmt. Information Corp. v. American Medical Assn. . . . 933 Prado v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 872 Praino v. Board of Ed. of Wappingers Central School Dist. . . . . . 888 Prellwitz v. Wisconsin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830 Premo v. Martin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1147 Prescott v. G. I. W. Industries, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 867 Prescott Convention Center, Inc. v. Scott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1076 President of U. S. v. New York City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1144 President of U. S.; Schwarz v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 837,895,977,978 President of U. S.; Stigile v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1147 President of U. S.; Vey v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 907,1069 Preston v. Bowersox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 943,1037 Preuss v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 862 Prewitt v. Alexander . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 Prewitt v. Huggins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1003 Pribble v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1118 Pribytkov v. New Jersey Institute of Technology . . . . . . . . . . . 881,1010 Price v. Arpaio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 891 Price v. FCC National Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 950 Price v. Malerba . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049 Price v. Mazurkiewicz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 959 Price; McClain v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) cxxx TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Prince v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 872 Printy; Lugo v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1117 Prior v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 824 Pritchett v. Pitcher . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1001 Proctor, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 910,1087 Proctor v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 835 Prodell v. New York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 810 Producers Tractor Co.; Hooker v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 813 Propst v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 838 Protective Life Ins. Co. v. Lazard Freres & Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864 Provenz; Miller v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 808 Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co.; White v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 950 Prudential Ins. Co. of America; Pangalos v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1008 Prudential Ins. Co. of America; Texas Pharmacy Assn. v. . . . . . . 820 Prudential Ins. Co. of America; Wheeler Lloyd v. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 Prudential Property & Casualty Ins. Co.; Flinn v. . . . . . . . . . . . . 809 Prudential Securities, Inc.; Creative Strategy Fund I v. . . . . . . . 860 Pruett; Beavers v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1023 Pruett; Mu'min v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 978 Pruett; Satcher v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1010 Prunty; Shaw v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 838 Prunty; Whitfield v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831 Pryner v. Tractor Supply Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 912 Pryner; Tractor Supply Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 912 Psychiatric Institute of Wash., Inc.; Taiwo Okusami v. . . . . . . . . . 949 Public Employment Relations Bd. of Cal.; Einheber v. . . . . . . . . . 1049 Puchner v. Kruziki . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 862 Pueblo of Santa Ana v. Kelly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807 Pulitzer Publishing Co.; Webb v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 972 Pulliam v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921 Purcell v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 843 Purkett; Taylor v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 Purkett; Tyler v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1031 Pyle v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831 Pyles v. OCI Mortgage Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 Pyron v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 896 Qualite, Inc.; Musco Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 Qualite Sports Lighting, Inc.; Musco Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. L'anza Research International 911 Qualls v. Ferritor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 970,1099 Quarles v. Delaware . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 938 Quartermann v. Quartermann . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1087 Quevado v. Baldor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 870,1010 Quilca-Carpo v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1132 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED cxxxi Page Quillen v. Southwest Va. Production Credit Assn. . . . . . . . . . . 879,1037 Quinley v. State Farm Ins. Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1028 Quinn, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 910 Quinn v. West Virginia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004 Quinn-L Capital Corp. v. Royal Ins. Co. of America . . . . . . . . . . . 815 Quint, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1041 Quintana v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 877 Quintanilla v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 903,1020 Quintero-Cruz v. Ward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 916 Quiroga; Camoscio v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997 Qureshi v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 845 R. v. East Brunswick Bd. of Ed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 968 R.; Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 967 R. v. Vermont Dept. of Social and Rehabilitation Services . . . . . . 955 Rabin v. America's Favorite Chicken Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 820 Rabinovitz; Spiegel v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998 Raczak; Ameritech Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1107 Radisson Hotels International, Inc.; Phonometrics, Inc. v. . . . . . . 868 Radvon v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934 Ragland v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1096 Ragozzino v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 872 Raia v. Virginia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1122 Rainbow Group, Ltd. v. Casey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 Raineri v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 879 Rainey; Scott v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1032 Rainwater v. Massachusetts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1095 Rakov v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 827 Rak Ree Enterprises, Inc.; Timmons v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1112 Ralston v. Frank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 888 Ram; Silva v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1045 Ramada Hotel; Korelis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 845 Ramapo College; Rubinstein v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997 Ramey v. Gober . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1151 Ramey v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 901 Ramey-Gillis v. Kaiser Permanente . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 887,1010 Ramirez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . 847,876,892,975,1006,1007,1020 Ramirez-Cruz v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 939 Ramon Fontes v. U. S. District Court . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1124 Ramon Goni v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 925 Ramon Gordils v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 975 Ramos v. Nemetz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Ramos Gonzalez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 962 Ramos-Oseguera v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1135 Ramsey v. Laurel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1030 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) cxxxii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Ramus v. Immigration and Naturalization Service . . . . . . . . . . . . 987 Randall v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1123 Randall v. Singletary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1080 Raney; Nanney v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 Ransom v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 944 Rapanos v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 Rasco v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1083 Rashad; Burt v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1075 Rashid v. Marine Midland Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 968 Ravenswood Village Nursing Home; Ward v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1080 Rawlins v. Arizona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 845 Ray; Vargas v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1127 Raymer v. Enright . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 872 Ray's Estate v. Commissioner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 868 Razack v. Immigration and Naturalization Service . . . . . . . . . . . . 845 Read v. Medical X-Ray Center, P. C. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 914,1037 Rector v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1120 Redd v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 847 Reddy v. Redlands Community Hospital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 848 Redlands Community Hospital; Reddy v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 848 Redman; English v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 918 Redner v. Tampa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998 Rednour; Libertarian Party of Ill. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 858 Red Wolf's Estate; Burlington Northern R. Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . 801 Reebok International Ltd.; Stutz Motor Car of America, Inc. v. . . 863 Reece v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1152 Reed v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1005 Reed v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 879,884,922 Reed v. Virginia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 Reedy v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 846 Ree Enterprises, Inc.; Timmons v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1112 Rees; Mitchell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1120 Reeves, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 947,1044 Reeves; Hopkins v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1042,1074 Reeves v. Novak . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831 Regions Bank of La.; Rivet v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 470 Regions Hospital v. Shalala . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 448 Rehabilitation Enterprises of North Eastern Wyo., Inc.; Nelson v. 1050 Reid v. Reid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 890 Reid v. U. S. District Court . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 835 Reidt v. U. S. Court of Appeals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1061,1144 Reidy v. Travelers Ins. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809 Reiman, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805,1009 Reiman v. Arnett . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 894 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED cxxxiii Page Reiner v. Sikora . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1118 Reinert v. Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 810 Reinert & Duree v. Sosne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 947 Reinert & Duree; Sosne v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 947 Reisenauer v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1098 Reiss v. Consolidated Edison Co. of N. Y., Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1113 Reitz v. Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831,1022 Reliford, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 994 Remus v. Kalamazoo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1114 Remy v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 926 Rendell; Johnson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 Rendon v. Excel Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 859 Reno; Cammon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 987 Reno; Dixie v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 987 Reno; Godett v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1151 Reno; Joerger v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1146 Reno; Terrall v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1031 Reno; Vander Zee v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 995 Renteria v. Donahue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 897 Rentschler, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1044 Republic Tobacco Co.; Stephens v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 892 Reshard v. Britt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 933,1085 Resort Properties, Inc. v. Miserandino . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 953 Reutter v. Crandel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 851 Reyes v. Department of Defense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 899 Reyes; Garcia v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1109 Reyes v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 927,1067 Reyes-Cruz v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1152 Reyna v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 841 Reynolds v. Caspari . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 802 Reynolds; Mickelsen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958 Reynolds v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 857,998,1035,1144 Reynolds Weigel; Del Buono v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Rezza; Vrettos v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 877 Rhoades Oil Co. v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1045 Rhode Island; Gill v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934,1069 Rhodes v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 894 Rhodes v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 900 Rhomberg v. Wilson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 812 Rhymer v. Yokohama Tire Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 821 Ricca-Stroud; Lopez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1014 Ricci v. Arlington Heights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1038 Rice, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1106 Rich v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) cxxxiv TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Richard v. Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 Richards v. Illinois Human Rights Comm'n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1126 Richardson, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1118 Richardson v. District of Columbia Bar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1051 Richardson v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1123 Richardson v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 Richardson v. Old Republic Surety Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 851 Richardson v. Southern Univ. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1078 Richardson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 960,1006,1053 Richburg v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 869 Richenberg v. Cohen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807 Richie; American Bible Society v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1011 Richie; American Council on Gift Annuities v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1011 Richman v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 924 Richmond v. Embry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1122 Richmond; Forman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997 Richmond County; Worley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1029 Ricks v. Thomas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1136 Ricks v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 973 Ricoh Corp.; Drew v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 858 Ridder v. Springfield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997,1046,1099 Riddick v. Angelone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 847 Riddick v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 924 Riddle v. BellSouth Business Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 953 Ridgeway v. Pfizer, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 906 Rieger v. North Dakota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1120 Ries v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 848 Riggins v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 821 Riggs v. Burson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 982 Riggs v. Doctor's Associates, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 948 Right Up Your Alley, Inc.; Dorand v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809 Rijos v. Delta Airlines, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 Riley v. Dorton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1030 Riley; Student Loan Marketing Assn. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 913 Rimell v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 983,1085 Rincon v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1136 Rinella v. Robinson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 951 Rini v. United Van Lines, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809 Riojas v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 896 Rios v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 974 Rios-Favela v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1065 Risk Managers International, Inc. v. Williams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1105 Ritter v. Ross . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 995 Ritz v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1132 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED cxxxv Page Rivas v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 924 Rivera v. Arocho . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 Rivera v. Florida Dept. of Corrections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1093 Rivera v. Parker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 972 Rivera v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 938,940 Rivera-Robles v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871 River Oaks Furniture, Inc. v. Ansin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 818 Rivers; Neuman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1030 Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 860 Rivers v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1006 Riverside County; Old Vail Partners v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 943 Rivet v. Regions Bank of La. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 470 Roach v. Angelone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1057 Roach v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 983 Roadway Express, Inc.; Rivers v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 860 Roanoke River Basin Assn. v. FERC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1108 Robbinsdale Independent School Dist., No. 281; Johnson v. . . . . 904,925 Roberson v. Kentucky . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 886 Roberts v. Galen of Va., Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 911 Roberts v. Glanz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 826 Roberts v. Kling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1025 Roberts v. Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 Roberts; O'dneal v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1131 Roberts; Sharp v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 853 Roberts; Sloan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 937 Roberts v. University of Louisville Hospital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 911 Robertson v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1136 Robertson v. Fraser . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 910 Robertson v. South Gate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 811 Robertson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 939 Robinett; Carlisle v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 820 Robinson v. Arvonio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1032 Robinson; Crocker v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 972,1154 Robinson v. Orange County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1020 Robinson; Rinella v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 951 Robinson v. Smith . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1054 Robinson v. Trigg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 835 Robinson v. United States . . . 891,927,975,1005,1020,1065,1092,1136,1139 Rocanova v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 821 Rochon v. Blackburn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1121 Rockland County; Gordon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 820 Rockwell International Corp.; Pincher v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1116 Rodger v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 853 Rodgers v. Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Columbiana County 1093 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) cxxxvi TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Rodgers v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1061 Rodriguez, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1146 Rodriguez v. Chiles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 960 Rodriguez; Delaney v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915 Rodriguez v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 898 Rodriguez; Johnson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 995 Rodriguez v. O'Keefe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1123 Rodriguez; Olivieri v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1110 Rodriguez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . 841,895,923,924,962,1082,1139 Rodriguez v. Watts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1032 Rodriguez-Aguirre v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 847 Rodriguez-Calderon v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 878 Rodriguez-Guerra v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1021 Rodriguez-Vasquez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1141 Rodriquez v. Batcheller . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1058 Roe; Alexander v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 898 Roe; Givens v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1127 Roe; Johnson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1151 Roe; Parchue v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1032 Roe; Plancarte v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 985 Roe; Timmons v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 Rogers v. Cuyson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 892 Rogers; Newton County Wildlife Assn. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1108 Rogers v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252,879,891,964,1052,1154 Rogerson; Gilmour v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1122 Roggio v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 821 Rogovich v. Arizona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 829 Rolex Watch U. S. A., Inc.; Amiri v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1127 Rolfs; Kelley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1095 Roll v. Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 954 Roller v. Gunn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 874 Roller v. Tuggle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055 Rolling v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 984 Roman; Avaiteca, S. A. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 952 Roman v. Department of Army . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004 Roman v. Tenet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1057 Roman v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1061,1107 Roman v. Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1019 Roman Catholic Church of Sacramento; O'Leary v. . . . . . . . . . . . 1114 Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Kenneth R. . . . . . . . . . . . 967 Rome, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1073 Romero v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1020 Romney v. Lin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 906 Rooney v. Watson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 966 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED cxxxvii Page Root v. Bollman Hat Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 952 Roots v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1117 Rosado v. Merrill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 863 Rosano v. Adelphi Univ. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 810 Rosemond v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830 Rosenbaum v. Rosenbaum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 928 Ross v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 838 Ross; Ritter v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 995 Ross; Stretton v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 Ross v. Thompson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 883 Ross v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 924,1066 Ross Brothers Construction Co. v. National Labor Relations Bd. 948 Roudebush v. Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 843 Rounsavall v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 903 Rouse v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 905 Rowe, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1106 Rowe; Sprunk v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1126 Rowe v. Walgreen Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 858 Rowell v. South Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 923 Rowell v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 835 Rowkosky v. Larkins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1060 Roy v. Maddock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 876 Royal v. Barbo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1130 Royal Bank of P. R.; Hualde-Redin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 826,1123 Royal Ins. Co. of America; Quinn-L Capital Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . 815 Royal Ins. Corp.; Crowder v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 857 Roybal v. Shanks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1007 Rubin; Brown v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1032 Rubin; Cunningham v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 Rubinstein v. Ramapo College . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997 Rubio v. Smith . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 920 Rudd v. Hasty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1080 Ruedas v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1142 Ruff; Dixson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 Ruff v. Smith . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 826,1069 Ruffin v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1152 Rufin v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 925 Ruhrgas, A. G. v. Marathon Oil Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 967 Ruiz v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 843,894 Ruiz-Mendoza v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1083 Ruiz Torres v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 878 Runyon; Bak v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 952 Runyon; Bigsby v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1118 Runyon; Janneh v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 854,1154 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) cxxxviii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Runyon; Kearns v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 916 Runyon; Lewis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 964 Runyon; Spranger v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 Rush v. Virginia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 835 Rush North Shore Medical Center; Alexander v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 811 Russell v. Brigman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 937 Russell v. Wilkinson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1112 Russo; Lebron v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1150 Rutgers, State Univ. of N. J.; Power v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 982 Rutherford, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1014 Rutherford v. Alderman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 Rutherford County; Dorsey v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1131 Ryan; Wexler & Wexler v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 914 Rybar v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807 Ryder; Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1116 Ryland Group, Inc.; Guo v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 867,1051 S. v. Boyd . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1090 Saacks v. New Orleans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 914 Sablan v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1075 Sacasa; Wollesen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 956 Sacchett; Hare v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 833 Sacco v. New York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 936 Sacramento County; Fain v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 894 Sacramento County v. Lewis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 911,993 Sadeghy v. Kernan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 851 Sadlier, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1146 Saenz; Maxwell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 Saez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 876 Safford v. Doe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921 S. A. Healy Co.; Herman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1025 Saia v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1064 St. Charles County v. Missouri Family Health Council . . . . . . . . . 859 Saintfort v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1149 St. Louis; Townes v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 893 St. Louis Southwestern R. Co.; McDonald v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1115 St. Mary's Hospital; Guneratne v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.; Barge v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997 St. Paul Ramsey Hospital; Ulrich v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 952 Saipan Hotel Corp. v. National Labor Relations Bd. . . . . . . . . . . . 1107 Salazar v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1096 Salazar v. Cassel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 858 Saleem v. Helman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1096 Sales v. Arkansas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 827 Salinas v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED cxxxix Page Salter v. Glenn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1030 Salvatore v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 981 Samayoa v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 Sammarco v. Ford Motor Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 813 Sammons v. Kansas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1019 Sample v. Tennessee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 828 Sampson v. Bedoya . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 870,1037 Sams v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 838 San Antonio; Sierra Club v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1089 San Buenaventura; FAIR v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1084 Sanchez Cox v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1098 Sanders, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 994 Sanders v. Behr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 928,970 Sanders v. Delaware . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1133 Sanders; Fulton v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1076 Sanders v. Fulton County Bd. of Ed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 820 Sanders v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831,878,1006,1036 Sanderson v. Office of Personnel Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1115 Sanderson, Inc.; Steere v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 859 Sandoval-Reynoso v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871 Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.; Knox v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 817 Sandt; Colelli v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 982 Sandul; Larion v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 979 San Francisco; Chase Manhattan Bank v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1106 San Francisco; Shers v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 914 San Francisco; Timehin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1050 San Joaquin County v. California Water Resources Control Bd. . . 1048 San Marcos; Tamez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 San Mateo County Municipal Court; Dymits v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 971 Santa Ana v. Kelly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807 Santa Clara Dept. of Family and Children's Services; Arteaga v. 835,1085 SantaCruz-Naranjo v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 988 Santa Monica Rent Control Bd.; Kavanau v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1077 Santiago v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 974 Santos v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921 Santos v. Immigration and Naturalization Service . . . . . . . . . . . . 824 Santos; Zankich v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1078 Santos-Lopez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1129 Santos-Martinez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 877 Sapp v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 840 Saranello, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1012 Sarga v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 984,1070 Sargent; Carter v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 834 Sarmiento-Maldonado v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 880 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) cxl TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Sarsfield v. Office of Comptroller of Currency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 867 Sascho, Inc. v. DAP Products, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 968 Sass v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 860 Satcher v. Pruett . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1010 Sattazahn v. Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 895 Satterfield v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958 Saunders v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 Saunders v. Taylor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 877 Savage v. Michigan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1054 Savko; Edmunson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1096,1154 Savoy v. Savoy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871 Sawyer v. Oregon ex rel. Huddleston . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 994 Sayles v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 835 Sayles v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1035 Saylor v. Saylor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1029 Scafidi; E. F. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 816 Scarpa v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1065 Scearcy v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 847 Schacht; Wisconsin Dept. of Corrections v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1071 Schaefer v. Fefferman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 862 Schaefer v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1052 Schaefer v. Uptown Property Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 862 Schaffer, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805 Schaffer v. AgriBank, FCB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823 Schaffer v. Kirkland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830,1009 Schanck v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 976 Schelkle v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1078 Schermer; Whitson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831 Scherping v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 922,959 Schexnayder v. Louisiana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 839,1009 Schiefen, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1074 Schifflet v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1132 Schildt v. Souval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 869 Schindler Elevator Corp.; Nidds v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 950 Schirm v. Union Pacific R. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 981 Schirner v. Wicomico County Planning and Zoning Comm'n . . . . 954 Schleibaum v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 947 Schleibaum; United States v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 945 Schlotz v. Hyundai Motor Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823 Schlumberger Well Services; Cunningham v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 Schluntz; Hess v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1129 Schmidt v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 846 Schmidtendorff v. Wisconsin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 862 Schmier v. Jennings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1149 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED cxli Page Schneider v. George A. Hormel & Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1109 Schneider; Stokes v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1020 Schoeneman, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 929,1025 Schofield v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 926 School Dist. No. 2 of Madison County; Torres v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 844 Schott; M. A. Baheth & Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1092 Schotten; Herring v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921 Schrager v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 858 Schramm; Chen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 822 Schramm; Tu Ying Chen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 822 Schreiber v. Minnesota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 890 Schreiner v. Colorado . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1082 Schrenko; DeKalb County School Dist. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1015 Schrott v. Callithen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 852 Schultz v. McDonnell Douglas Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 812 Schuylkill Energy Resources, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light 977 Schwartz v. Bethel Park . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 895,977 Schwartz v. Emhart Glass Machinery, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1151 Schwartz v. Sullivan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049 Schwartz Partnership v. Sullivan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049 Schwarz v. Clinton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 837,895,977,978 Schwarz v. Spalding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 826,977 Schwarz v. Woodruff, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 845,977 Scott, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805,929 Scott v. Brundage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1059 Scott v. Goord . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004 Scott; James v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055 Scott; Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. . . . . . . . . . . 992,1105 Scott; Prescott Convention Center, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1076 Scott v. Rainey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1032 Scott v. Szczerbicki . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1094 Scott; Tyler v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1093 Scott v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 903,1139 Scott v. Western State Univ. College of Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1050 Scott; Withers v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 897 Scott; Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1076 Scott-Harris; Bogan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 980 Scott Paper Co.; Dennis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1091 Scott Paper Co.; Woodson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 914 Seacor Marine, Inc. v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1047 Sea-Fone, Ltd. v. Communications Satellite Corp. (COMSAT) . . . 1016 Seals v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 884 Sea Ray Boats, Inc.; Hansen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 Sears v. Massachusetts Bd. of Registration of Chiropractors . . . . 953 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) cxlii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Sears, Roebuck & Co.; Cosgrove v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004,1144 Sears, Roebuck & Co.; Hurdle v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1102 Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Long . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1107 Sebastian v. Connecticut . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1077 Secakuku; Hale v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1114 Seck v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 924 Seckinger; Johnson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 839 Secretary of Agriculture; LDG Timber Enterprises, Inc. v. . . . . . 916 Secretary of Air Force; Essex Electro Engineers, Inc. v. . . . . . . . 916 Secretary of Air Force; Stephens v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004 Secretary of Army; Gibson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 938,1070 Secretary of Army; Harris v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 873 Secretary of Army; McCaskill v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1118 Secretary of Army; Montague v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 999 Secretary of Army; Tempo, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 933 Secretary of Army; Tempo West, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 933 Secretary of Army; Watts v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 848 Secretary of Defense; Martin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 867 Secretary of Defense; Richenberg v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807 Secretary of Ed.; Student Loan Marketing Assn. v. . . . . . . . . . . . 913 Secretary of Energy; Becker v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 813 Secretary of Energy; Consolidated Edison Co. of N. Y. v. . . . . . . . 1108 Secretary of Health and Human Services; Brown v. . . . . . . . . . . . 810 Secretary of Health and Human Services; McDonnell v. . . . . . . . . 888 Secretary of Health and Human Services; Regions Hospital v. . . . 448 Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Toledo Hospital . . . . 1145 Secretary of Interior; Feezor v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807 Secretary of Labor; Boatwright v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 867 Secretary of Labor; Bush & Burchett, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807 Secretary of Labor v. S. A. Healy Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1025 Secretary of Labor; Sisson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 987 Secretary of Labor; Stallworth v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 817 Secretary of Labor; Talasila, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 860 Secretary of Labor; Talley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1017 Secretary of Navy; Hodge v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 815 Secretary of Navy; Longest v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004 Secretary of State; Strawberry v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1147 Secretary of State of Cal. v. Bates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 804,928,1038 Secretary of State of Colo. v. Am. Const. Law Foundation . . . . . . 1107 Secretary of State of Colo.; Am. Const. Law Foundation v. . . . . . 1113 Secretary of State of S. C.; Crouch v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1090 Secretary of State of Tex.; Lightbourn v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1052 Secretary of Transportation; Aziz v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1118 Secretary of Transportation; Martinez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1005 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED cxliii Page Secretary of Transportation; Wright v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 Secretary of Treasury; Brown v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1032 Secretary of Treasury; Cunningham v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 Secretary of Veterans Affairs; Fazon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 874 Secretary of Veterans Affairs; Hudgins v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 860 Secretary of Veterans Affairs; McGinnis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 836,1036 Secretary of Veterans Affairs; Mendoza v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 937 Secretary of Veterans Affairs; Soria v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958 Secretary of Veterans Affairs; Thompson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 825 Securities and Exchange Comm'n; Fehn v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 813 Securities and Exchange Comm'n; First Jersey Securities, Inc. v. 812 Securities and Exchange Comm'n; Wells v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958 Sedivy v. Nebraska . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1126 Segal, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1012 Seideman; East v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055 Seiyaku Co. v. International Trade Comm'n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1027 Self v. Auburn Steel Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934 Sellman v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 939 Seltzer v. Commissioner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1119 Semeniuk v. Iowa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004 Seminole County; Osborne v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915 Serapion v. Martinez . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1047 Servaportion; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1081 Serva-Portion, Inc.; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 956 Service Merchandise Co.; Pate v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 821 Sesler v. Pitzer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 877 Seth v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 900 Seuffer v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1001 Sever, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1107 Severance v. Hofbauer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 970 Sewell v. Lake Hamilton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1075 Seymore v. Shawver & Sons, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 SFIC Properties, Inc. v. IAMAWD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823 SFIC Properties, Inc. v. Machinists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823 Shabazz v. Gabry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1120 Shafer; Oceanside v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 818 Shaffer v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 869 Shahar v. Bowers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049 Shahid v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 902 Shakespeare Co. v. Silstar Corp. of America, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1046 Shalala; Brown v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 810 Shalala; McDonnell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 888 Shalala; Regions Hospital v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 448 Shalala v. Toledo Hospital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1145 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) cxliv TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Shalom v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 890 Shanks; Chavez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 882 Shanks; Roybal v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1007 Shanks; Vigil v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875 Shannon; Jack Eckerd Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1111 Shannon v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 888 Shapiro's Estate v. Commissioner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1045 Sharp v. Calkins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1017 Sharp v. Roberts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 853 Sharp v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1118 Shaw v. Prunty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 838 Shaw Industries, Inc.; Benney v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 909 Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.; Martin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 818 Shawver & Sons, Inc.; Seymore v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 Shay v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 988 Shea v. Esensten . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 914 Sheahan; Triplett v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 Shearson Lehman Brothers; Cosgrove v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864 Sheehan v. U. S. District Court . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1078 Sheehan v. Whitley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 860 Sheehy v. Parker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1054 Sheehy v. Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1054 Sheets v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 845 Sheetz, Inc. v. Vandevender . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1091 Shehee v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 885 Sheldrake, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1104 Shell Oil Co. v. Studiengesellschaft Kohle M. B. H. . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 Shell Petroleum, Inc.; Slagel v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934,1143 Shelly Eurocars, Inc.; Nelmida v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 858 Shelton v. Callahan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 925 Shelton v. Pittsburg County, Okla., Bd. of Comm'rs . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 Shelton v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 922 Shepherd v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1006 Sheppard v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 877 Sheppard v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958 Sherman v. Sherman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1073,1146 Sherman v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 890 Sherrill v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 904 Shers v. San Francisco . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 914 Shideler v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 960 Shieh, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 928 Shieh v. Supreme Court of Cal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 933 Shifman v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1116 Shildmyer v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED cxlv Page Shillinger; Armstrong v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875 Shillinger; Starr v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830 Shinn v. Atlantic Coast Demolition & Recycling, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . 966 Shipwrecked Vessel Capt. Lawrence; Fairport Int'l Exploration v. 804 Shmidheiser; Cerceo v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998 Shockley v. Kearney . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 918 Shomade v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 847 Shong-Ching Tong v. Turner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 982 Shop `n Save Warehouse Foods, Inc.; Brandt v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1075 Short v. West Point . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1108 Shorter v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1007 Showa Denko K. K.; Vaught v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 817 Shown, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1044 Shretta v. Marietta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 818 Shroff v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 837 Shugart v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 976 Shuler; Terry v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 896 Shulze v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 899 Shurley; Texas Commerce Bank-San Angelo, N. A. v. . . . . . . . . . 982 Shutt; Napa County v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 808 Sidali v. Immigration and Naturalization Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1089 Siddiqi, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 945 Sieben, Inc.; Feltmann v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1075 Siefied; Bowman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1094 Siegel v. California Federal Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 835,1009 Siemsen v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 895 Sierra Club; Ohio Forestry Assn., Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 931,1087 Sierra Club v. San Antonio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1089 Sigmon v. Southwest Airlines Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 950 Sikora v. Hopkins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 892,989 Sikora; Reiner v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1118 Silcox; Burton v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1081 Silguero v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 922 Silstar Corp. of America, Inc.; Shakespeare Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1046 Silva v. Ram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1045 Silva v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 880,1139 Silver v. Diaz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 801 Silver v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1081 Silver v. Lincoln National Life Ins. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 949 Silverstein; Miller v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998 Siminoe; Elko County Grand Jury v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1027 Simkins; Martinez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 971 Simmons v. Blodgett . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 892 Simmons v. GTE North, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1059 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) cxlvi TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Simmons v. Mefford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 Simmons v. Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 953,1129 Simmons v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 976 Simmons v. Webster County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1110 Simon v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1133 Simonson v. Simonson-Kuth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 902 Simonson-Kuth; Simonson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 902 Simpson v. Campbell County School System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 885 Simpson v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1093 Simpson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1005 Sims v. Amundson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1124 Sims v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 847 Sinegal v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 922 Singer, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1040 Singletary; Eneias v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 829 Singletary; Epps v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 884 Singletary; Footman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1124 Singletary; Haake v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1140 Singletary; Israel v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 985 Singletary; Jacobson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 839 Singletary; James v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 854,883,1037 Singletary; Lamb v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 801 Singletary; Landon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1150 Singletary; Lawrence v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1123 Singletary; Longstaff v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 880 Singletary; Lusk v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1096 Singletary; Phillips v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 928 Singletary; Randall v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1080 Singletary; Tukes v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1113 Singletary; Valdes v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875 Singletary; Van Poyck v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 856 Singletary; Wilkinson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1150 Singletary; Williams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1057 Singleton v. Baker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 936 Singleton v. Norris . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 840 Singleton v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 825,856 Sisson v. Herman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 987 Sivak v. Idaho . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 887,918,1001 Sjeklocha v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 922 Skandalakis; Lewis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 849 Skillicorn v. Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 999 Skolnick v. Clinton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 Skolnick v. Doria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 954 Skurdal v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1067 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED cxlvii Page Slagel v. Shell Petroleum, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934,1143 Slagle v. Indiana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 Slater; Aziz v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1118 Slater; Martinez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1005 Slater v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 899 Slater; Wright v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 Slaughter v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1138 Slepski v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1008 Sliney v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1129 Sliwowski v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 901 Sloan v. Roberts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 937 Small v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 846 Smelser v. Norfolk and Western R. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 817 Smiley v. Kentucky . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 950 Smith, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805,951,994,1039,1085 Smith v. Alabama . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 957 Smith v. Allen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1148 Smith v. Arizona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 892 Smith v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Kan., Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 811 Smith; Burlington N. & S. F. R. Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1107 Smith v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004,1080 Smith; California v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1147 Smith v. Casellas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958,1037 Smith v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915 Smith; Collins v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1031 Smith v. Commerce Club, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 880 Smith v. Committee of Sup. Ct. of S. C. on Character and Fitness 954 Smith v. Davidson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1126 Smith v. DiRosa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1081 Smith; District Attorney of Bucks County v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1109 Smith v. Elliott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018 Smith v. Gilmore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 954 Smith v. Gordon County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 821 Smith v. Grimes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 Smith v. Gwinnett County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1047 Smith v. Harris . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1115 Smith v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 951 Smith v. Hartford Ins. Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 Smith v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 920 Smith v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004,1080 Smith; Kolodziej v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1029 Smith v. Lang . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 999 Smith; Libertarian Party of Fla. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 812 Smith v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1092 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) cxlviii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Smith; Massey v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1034 Smith; Maus v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 842,918 Smith v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Smith v. Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 954 Smith v. Montana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 965 Smith v. O'Brien . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1093 Smith v. Office of Personnel Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 936 Smith v. Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 972 Smith v. Ohio Dept. of Human Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1003,1054 Smith v. Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 985 Smith v. Oregon State Bar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1117 Smith v. Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 891 Smith; Robinson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1054 Smith; Rubio v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 920 Smith; Ruff v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 826,1069 Smith v. Servaportion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1081 Smith v. Serva-Portion, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 956 Smith; Star Enterprise v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049 Smith v. Sugg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 970 Smith v. Supreme Court of Colo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 858 Smith; Taha v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831,1036 Smith; Texaco Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049 Smith v. Thickens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 854 Smith; Tilli v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1132 Smith v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 839, 851,856,870,895,901,903,922,989,1005,1021,1067,1131,1141 Smith v. U. S. Court of Appeals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 811 Smith v. Valdez . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 903 Smith v. Ward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 885 Smith v. Wolf . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1123 Smith & Associates, Inc.; Alfieri v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1111 Smith Barney, Inc.; De Meo v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 927 SmithKline Beecham Corp.; Denty v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 820 Smiths Industries Medical Systems, Inc. v. Kernats . . . . . . . . . . . 1044 Smolko v. GTE Service Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809 Smykalski v. Stender . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1136 Snap-Drape, Inc. v. Commissioner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 821 Snavely, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 994,1014 Snead v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1097 Snider; Ham v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1124 Snyder; Bailey v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958 Sobina; Heberlig v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 Sobrilski v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1152 Societe Francaise de Transportes Maritime; Greenwood v. . . . . . 995 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:11] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED cxlix Page Society Expeditions, Inc. v. Chan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1100 Sogem-Afrimet, Inc.; M/V IKAN SELAYANG v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1112 Solano County; Muniz v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 914 Solano-Godines v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1061 Solber, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 929,1103 Solid Waste Transfer & Recycling, Inc. v. N. J. Dept. of Env. Prot. 1111 Solis v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1082 Solomon v. Dolan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1005 Somers v. Thurman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 852 Sommers v. Kentucky . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1132 Sones v. Mississippi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 889 Soon Duck Kim v. New York City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809,1008 Soria v. Brown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958 Sorrell, Anderson, Lehrman, Wanner & Thomas; McKellip v. . . . . . 871, 1017,1070,1144 Sosa v. Hinojosa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055 Sosne v. Reinert & Duree . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 947 Sosne; Reinert & Duree v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 947 Soto v. Flores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Soto v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 829,1130,1131 Sotopaz v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1133 Southampton; Basile v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 907 South Carolina; Bouye v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 822 South Carolina; Clute v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 982 South Carolina; Patterson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 853 South Carolina; Rowell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 923 South Carolina; Strable v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 972,1143 South Carolina; Tucker v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004 South Carolina; Wright v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 970 South Carolina Dept. of Corrections; Dehoney v. . . . . . . . . . . . 861,1069 South Carolina Dept. of Corrections; Hutson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 879 South Carolina Dept. of Hwys. & Transp.; Hudson-Gardner v. 828,1009 South Carolina Dept. of Justice; Strable v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1138 South Central Bell Telephone; United States ex rel. McKenzie v. 1077 South Dakota; Lower Brule Sioux Tribe v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 816 South Dakota; Pellegrino v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1138 South Dakota v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 981 South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 329,911,1013 Southeast Local School Dist. Bd. of Ed.; Valot v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 861 Southern Methodist Univ.; Tanik v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1015 Southern New England Telephone Co. v. FCC . . . . . . . . . . . . 1089,1101 Southern Stevedoring Co.; Anderson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 954 Southern Univ.; Richardson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1078 South Gate; Robertson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 811 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:12] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) cl TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Southwest Airlines Co.; Gee v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915 Southwest Airlines Co.; Kaucky v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 949 Southwest Airlines Co.; Sigmon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 950 Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.; Milton v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 802 Southwest Va. Production Credit Assn.; Quillen v. . . . . . . . . . . 879,1037 Souval; Schildt v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 869 Sovereign Order of St. John of Jerusalem, Inc.; Grady v. . . . . . . . 1147 Spahn v. Wittman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 951 Spain v. Haseotes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997 Spalding; Schwarz v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 826,977 Sparks v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1139 Spartan Mills v. Bank of America Ill. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 969 Spaziano v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055 Speaker of House for N. Y. Assembly v. Diaz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 801 Spear v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1098 Speede v. Thompson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 937 Speers, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1104 Spencer v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 884 Spencer v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 890,901 Spencer Estates v. Hennefer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1015 Spiegel v. Chicago . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 816 Spiegel v. Hollywood Towers Condominium Assn. . . . . . . . . . . . . 808 Spiegel v. Mescall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 808 Spiegel v. Rabinovitz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998 Spradlin v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 832 Spranger v. Runyon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 Spreitzer v. Peters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1120 Spriggs v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831 Spring Brook Field v. Orlando . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1019 Springfield; Ridder v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997,1046,1099 Spruill v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1006 Sprunk v. Rowe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1126 Spurlock v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1132 SRS Technologies, Inc. v. Department of Defense . . . . . . . . . . . . 1046 Stadtmiller; Mallott & Peterson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 803 Stafford v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1069 Stafford v. Fulton-DeKalb Hospital Authority . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1120 Stafford; McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1113 Stager; Gardner v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 811 Stainer; Wiggins v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 970 Stallings v. Delo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 961 Stallworth v. Alabama . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1116 Stallworth v. Herman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 817 Stamps v. Stamps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 970 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:12] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED cli Page Stanberry v. Alabama . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 853 Stancell v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 926 Standard Federal Bank; Molson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 802 Stands v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 841 Stanfield v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 857 Stanislaus County v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1076 Stanton v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals . . . . . . . . . . . . 817 Stanton; Friends of Vietnam Veterans Memorial v. . . . . . . . . . . . 1108 Staples v. Kelly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 906 Staples; Kelly v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 815 Star Enterprise; Cavallo v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1044 Star Enterprise v. Smith . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049 Star Herald; Lang v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 839 Starns v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 838 Starr v. Shillinger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830 State. See also name of State. State Bar of Cal.; Bragg v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1149 State Bar of Cal.; Hoskins v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 832 State Bar of Cal.; Kennedy v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 832 State Bd. for Technical and Comprehensive Ed.; Strong v. . . . . . . 1091 State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.; Milton Hambrice, Inc. v. . . . . . . 968 State Farm Ins. Corp.; Quinley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1028 State Oil Co. v. Khan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 State Treasurer of Mich.; Sharp v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 853 State Univ. and Community College System of Tenn.; Heyliger v. 1117 Statonel v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 961 Steagall v. U. S. District Court . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 999 Steele v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 821 Steele v. Walla Walla . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049 Steelworkers; Pikeville United Methodist Hospital of Ky., Inc. v. 994 Steen; Thompson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 967 Steere v. Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 859 Steffen v. Kernan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 878 Stegall; Cain v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018 Stegall; Erdman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 Stehlin v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1132 Steinberg, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 946,1040 Steinhorst v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1022 Stender; Smykalski v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1136 Stengel; Kentucky Right to Life, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 860 Stenger v. Wood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 957,1085 Stepanik; Aultman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 894 Stepanik; DeJesus v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 951 Stephens v. Newberry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 892 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:12] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) clii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Stephens v. Norris . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 891 Stephens v. Republic Tobacco Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 892 Stephens v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871 Stephens v. Widnall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004 Stephenson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 891 Sterbenz v. Ormond Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1120 Sterling v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 882,926 Stern, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1026,1103 Stern v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 859,1037 Stevens v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 870 Stevens v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 883 Steward, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1012 Steward v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 883 Stewart, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 965 Stewart; Amaya-Ruiz v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1130 Stewart; Ceja v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 971,1085 Stewart v. Gilmore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 990 Stewart; Gretzler v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1081 Stewart v. Hoffman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 Stewart v. Kyler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830 Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 912,1043,1146 Stewart v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1066 Stewart; Villafuerte v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 Sticks Billiards, Inc.; Moore v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 861 Stigile v. Clinton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1147 Stiles v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1007 Still v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 806 Stinson; Pinto v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1131 Stocks v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 904 Stokes v. Anderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1134 Stokes v. Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1082 Stokes v. Schneider . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1020 Stokes v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1064,1139 Stone; Mount Vernon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1112 Stone; Williams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 956 Stonehedge/FASA-Tex. JDC, Ltd. Partnership; Miller v. . . . . . . . 869 Stookey; Lonay v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 854 Storer; Hertz v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1059 Stouffer v. Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831 Strable v. Administrative Office of U. S. Courts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1151 Strable v. South Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 972,1143 Strable v. South Carolina Dept. of Justice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1138 Stracener v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 988 Strang v. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency . . . . . . . . . . . 836 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:12] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED cliii Page Strawberry v. Albright . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1147 Stretton v. Ross . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 Strickland v. Arizona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 881 Strickland v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1078 Stringer v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 Stroh Brewery Co.; Penchishen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 868 Stroh Die Casting Co. v. Atlantic States Legal Foundation, Inc. . 981 Strong v. State Bd. for Technical and Comprehensive Ed. . . . . . . 1091 Strong v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 984 Strongville; DeLong v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 827 Strother v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1118 Strothers v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 841,1022 Stroud v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 826 Strubbe; Okoro v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 957 Structural Fibers, Inc. v. Kulch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1008 Stuart v. American Express Tax & Business Services, Inc. . . . . . 1076 Student Loan Marketing Assn. v. Riley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 913 Studiengesellschaft Kohle M. B. H.; Shell Oil Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . 996 Stumbo; Hedges v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 946 Stutson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1135 Stutz Motor Car of America, Inc. v. Reebok International Ltd. . . 863 Suarez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1152 Subia v. Fuentes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1054 Sublett v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 836 Sugg; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 970 Sullivan; Barry K. Schwartz Partnership v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049 Sullivan v. Colorado . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 955 Sullivan; Glendora v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 904 Sullivan; Haeger v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1149 Sullivan v. Massachusetts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1060 Sullivan; Schwartz v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049 Summers v. Champion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 Sun Bank; Olson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1149 Sunbelt National Bank; Miles v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 982 Sun Co.; Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1113 Sundell v. Cisco System, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 821 Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.; Oncale v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 980 Sundquist; Doe v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 810 Sundstrand Corp. v. Blackburn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997 Superintendent of penal or correctional institution. See name or title of superintendent. Superior Court for Jud. Dist. of Hartford/New Britain v. Aparo 967 Superior Court of Cal., Los Angeles County; Leon v. . . . . . . . . . . 918 Superior Court of Cal., Monterey County; Huffman v. . . . . . . . . . 875 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:12] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) cliv TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Superior Court of Cal., San Luis Obispo County; Dale v. . . . . . . . 1127 Superior Court of Ind., Marion County; Wickliffe v. . . . . . . . . . . . 1095 Super Young Industries v. Pacific Employers Ins. Co. . . . . . . . . . 1115 Supreme Court of Cal.; Shieh v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 933 Supreme Court of Colo.; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 858 Supreme Court of N. J.; Tolchin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 977 Supreme Court of U. S.; Hotchkiss v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1149 Supreme Court of U. S.; Jones v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 869 Supreme Court of Wash.; Garen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 816 Sutherland v. Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871 Suttle v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 923 Sutton v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823 Swaffar v. Swaffar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 820 Swain v. Detroit Bd. of Ed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1057,1144 Swanner v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1051 Swanson v. General Services Administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 948 Sweet v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1137 Sweetwater County School Dist. Number One; Tschanz v. . . . . 930,1030 Swekel v. Harrington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1047 Swift v. Mazurkiewicz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 957 Swindle v. Love . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 893 Swint v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 960 Swofford v. Dobucki . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 979 Sykes; McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1113 Syncor International Corp.; McLeland v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1110 Syrett Corp.; Neilson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 817 System Planning Corp.; Gill v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1148 Szczerbicki; Scott v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1094 Szuchon v. Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 889 T. v. California Dept. of Social Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 873 Tabachnick; Davis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 982 Tabb v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 913 Tabchouri v. Immigration and Naturalization Service . . . . . . . . . 1027 Tabron v. Hood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1131 Tacha; Guinn v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 920 Tackett v. DiScenza . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 851 Tackett v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1089 Tagbering v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 825 Taha v. Smith . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831,1036 Tahirkhaili v. Arizona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1148 Tai Anh Phan v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1109 Taiwo Okusami v. Psychiatric Institute of Wash., Inc. . . . . . . . . . 949 Talasila, Inc. v. Herman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 860 Talley v. Herman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1017 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:12] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED clv Page Tallo, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 909 Talmage v. Commissioner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 804 Tambrands, Inc.; Papike v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 862 Tam Duy Nguyen v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 987 Tamez v. San Marcos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 Tampa; Redner v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998 Tanabe Seiyaku Co. v. International Trade Comm'n . . . . . . . . . . . 1027 Tanford v. Brand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 Tangari v. Connecticut . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 867 Tanik v. Southern Methodist Univ. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1015 Tank Insulation International, Inc.; Insultherm, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . 907 Tansy; Henderson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 874 Tarbox v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1140 Tariq A-R Y v. Maryland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1140 Tarkanian; National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1028 Tarrant; Jefferson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 Tasse v. Mayhue Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 838 Tate v. Massachusetts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 832 Tatum v. Correctional Medical Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 886 Tatum v. Lanham . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 Tatum v. Vanliner Ins. Co. of Fenton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 813 Tavakoli-Nouri v. Mitchell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055,1154 Tavakoli-Nouri v. Washington Hospital Center . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1150 Tavares; McSmith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919,1070 Tax Analysts v. Department of Justice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 931 Taxman; Piscataway Township Bd. of Ed. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 946,1010 Taxpayers of King County v. King County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1076 Taylor v. Box . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919,1070 Taylor; Cooper v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 824 Taylor v. Hanks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 834,989 Taylor v. Leavy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1059 Taylor v. Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049 Taylor v. Nelson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 896,1070 Taylor v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 829 Taylor v. Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 851 Taylor v. Purkett . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 Taylor; Saunders v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 877 Taylor v. United States . . . . . . 897,924,927,962,1036,1063,1064,1130,1152 TCF Bank Savings FSB; Barker v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 828 Teachers Ins. and Annuity Assn. of America; Figter Ltd. v. . . . . 996 Teague; Attala County v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807 Tele-Communications, Inc.; Glendora v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1059 Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.; Martin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1075 Tempo, Inc. v. West . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 933 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:12] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) clvi TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Tempo West, Inc. v. West . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 933 Tencer v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 960 Tenet; Roman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1057 Tenet; Whitehead v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1129 Tenner v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 892 Tennessee; Bush v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 953 Tennessee; Gentry v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 999 Tennessee; Harbison v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 Tennessee; Hodges v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 999 Tennessee; Sample v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 828 Tenorio v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1153 Terhune v. McBath . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 953 Terio v. Terio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1129 Terra International, Inc. v. Mississippi Chemical Corp. . . . . . . . . 1029 Terrall v. Reno . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1031 Terranova Corp.; Akpaeti v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1092 Territory. See name of Territory. Terry v. Shuler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 896 Testerman v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1153 Texaco Inc.; McGowan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1090 Texaco Inc. v. Smith . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049 Texas; Allen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958 Texas; Altschul v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 884,897 Texas; Bailey v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 858 Texas; Bell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 827 Texas; Bennett v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831 Texas; Brochu v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 811 Texas; Brown v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 940 Texas; Cantu v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 994 Texas; Carlisle v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 867 Texas; Carreras v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 933 Texas; Castaneda v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1059 Texas; Citizen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 889 Texas v. Cook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 821 Texas; Dunlap v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1111 Texas; Espinoza Cruz v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 985 Texas; Frohne v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 812 Texas; Fuller v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 963 Texas; Guetersloh v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1110 Texas; Hernandez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1135 Texas; Hill v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1057 Texas; Holman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 884 Texas; Hughes v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 913 Texas; Janecka v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 825 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:12] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED clvii Page Texas; Jennings v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1017 Texas; Jones v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807,832 Texas; Kerr v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1053 Texas; LaGrone v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 Texas; Lewis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 936 Texas; Lockhart v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1023 Texas; Maxwell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1114 Texas; Mayo v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998 Texas; McBride v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1056 Texas; McDuff v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 844,1052 Texas v. New Mexico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 910 Texas; Noelle v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 863 Texas; Pondexter v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 825 Texas; Prado v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 872 Texas; Rhodes v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 894 Texas; Rowell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 835 Texas; Stern v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 859,1037 Texas; Stringer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 Texas; Thacker v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 825 Texas; Tucker v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1100 Texas; Vickers v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 914 Texas; Walker v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 825 Texas; Whitfield v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1122 Texas; Williams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1030 Texas; Wilson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 829 Texas Bd. of Pardons and Paroles; Altschul v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1094 Texas Bd. of Pardons and Paroles; Tucker v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1100 Texas Commerce Bank-San Angelo, N. A. v. Shurley . . . . . . . . . . 982 Texas Manufactured Housing Assn., Inc. v. La Porte . . . . . . . . . . 908 Texas Pharmacy Assn. v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America . . . . . . . 820 Texas Prison System; Washington v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 846 Tex-Tenn Corp.; Woythal v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 967 Textron Lycoming Reciprocating Engine Division, AVCO Corp. v. Automobile Workers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 979,1088 Thacker v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 825 Thai; Hindera v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 812 Thai Pham v. Department of Justice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1045 Thalacker; Conner v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 910 Thalacker; Williams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 837 Thibodeau v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 893 Thickens; James v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 854 Thickens; Mitchell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 854 Thickens; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 854 Thickstun v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:12] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) clviii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Thiokol Corp.; Lindsay v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 863 Thisius; Otis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 900 Thi Vu v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 898 Thomas; Barber v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 Thomas v. Baxter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 968,1069 Thomas v. California Dept. of Corrections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 888 Thomas; Denny's Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1028 Thomas v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 965,985 Thomas; French v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 836 Thomas v. Georgia State Board of Elections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1031 Thomas v. Hill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055 Thomas v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 877,1070 Thomas v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 863 Thomas v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 824 Thomas; Ricks v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1136 Thomas v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 855,882,898,904,1033,1061 Thomason v. Georgia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1129 Thompson, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805 Thompson v. Brown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 825 Thompson; Calderon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 911,947,1014 Thompson; Charron v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830 Thompson v. Drug Enforcement Administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 876 Thompson v. Federal Bureau of Investigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1032 Thompson v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018 Thompson; Joyce v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 924 Thompson v. Kentucky . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831,834 Thompson; Lambert v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 Thompson v. Long . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1147 Thompson v. Margen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 966 Thompson; Margen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 966 Thompson; Milwaukee Branch of NAACP v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1076 Thompson v. Nagle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 Thompson; Ross v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 883 Thompson; Speede v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 937 Thompson v. Steen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 967 Thompson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 873,962,1138 Thong Vang v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1140 Thornton, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1039 Thrasher; Watkis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1095 Thrower v. Anderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 850,1009 Thurman; Somers v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 852 Thymes v. Metropolitan Life . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 874 Tichenor v. New York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 918 Tidewater Marine Service; Johnston v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:12] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED clix Page Tilli v. Smith . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1132 Tillis v. Kernan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 876 Tillman Corp. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of N. Y. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864 Timehin v. San Francisco . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1050 Timmerman v. McLaughlin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1091 Timmons v. Rak Ree Enterprises, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1112 Timmons v. Roe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 Timmons v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 874 Tineo v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 905 Tinsley v. TRW Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997,1085 Tirabassi; Cohen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 820 Tisdale v. Norris . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 972 Titan Corp.; Grier v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1111 Tobin, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 945 Tobin v. General Electric Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 967 Tobon v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1139 Tock v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 855 Todd v. Hawk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1135 Tokars, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 964,1040 Tolchin v. Supreme Court of N. J. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 977 Toledo Hospital; Shalala v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1145 Toliver v. McCaughtry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 896 Toliver v. Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 838 Tolle; Bagley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1031 Tomblin v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 873 Tong v. Turner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 982 Toro; Buckner v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018 Torok v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 838 Toro-Pelaez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 845 Torres v. Pisano . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997 Torres v. School Dist. No. 2 of Madison County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 844 Torres v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 878,922 Torres-Echavarria v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1153 Torrey; Williams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 856 Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.; Nghiem v. . . . . . . 1080 Toski v. McDonnell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 966 Total Medical Management, Inc. v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . 857 Town. See name of town. Townes v. St. Louis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 893 Towns v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 826 Townsend v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1150 Townson & Alexander, Inc. v. Park . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1105 Toxic Action Wash; Jarrett v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 827,872,1037 Toyota Motor Mfg., U. S. A., Inc.; McKay v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 803 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:12] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) clx TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Toys "R" Us, Inc. v. Yusuf Ahmed Alghanim & Sons, W. L. L. . . 1111 Tractor Supply Co. v. Pryner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 912 Tractor Supply Co.; Pryner v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 912 Tracy; NACCO Industries, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1091 Traicoff v. Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 848 Train Dispatchers; Fort Smith R. Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1016 Trammel, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1087 Tran v. Wayne State Univ. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 860 Transamerica Corp. Employees Health Care Plan; Bjurman v. . . . 865 Transamerica Occidental Life Ins. Co.; Ellis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864 Transit Casualty Co.; Certain Underwriters, Lloyd's of London v. 1075 Trans Union Corp.; Murray v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 860 Trans World Airlines, Inc.; Hillary v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1090 Travelers Ins. Co.; Reidy v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809 Travis v. Board of Regents of Univ. of Tex. System . . . . . . . . . . . 1148 Travis v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 900 Trawick v. Alabama . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 Trest v. Cain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87,804 Treutelaar v. Wisconsin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 980 Trevino; Gracia v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 Trevino v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 903 Tricarico v. Board of Review of N. J. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 892 Triestman v. Department of Justice, Office of Pro. Responsibility 1095 Trigg; Robinson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 835 Trinity Industries, Inc. v. Johnstown America Corp. . . . . . . . . . . 1048 Triplett v. Sheahan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 Trippett v. Fagan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1008 Tristan v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 989 Trivedi v. Cooper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 817 Trollinger v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 883 Trotter v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 876 Trout v. Blue Ash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1048 Troutman; Delaney v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830 Troutman v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 873 Truesdale v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 856 Trupin v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1051 TruServ Corp. v. California ex rel. Lungren . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1015,1099 Trustees of Boston Univ. v. Linkage Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1015 Trusty v. Parker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 829 Truth Seeker Co. v. Jackson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 995 TRW Inc.; Tinsley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997,1085 Tschanz v. Sweetwater County School Dist. Number One . . . . 930,1030 Tseng; El Al Israel Airlines, Ltd. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 947 Tsipouras v. Meshbesher, Birrell & Dunlap, Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . 982,1143 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:12] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED clxi Page Tsipouras v. Minnesota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1114 Tsui Yuan Tseng; El Al Israel Airlines, Ltd. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 947 TT Telefilm, GmbH & Co. v. Movie Group, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1118 Tuccori, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 945 Tuchman v. Connecticut . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1101 Tucker, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1100 Tucker v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1017 Tucker v. Outwater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 997 Tucker v. South Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004 Tucker v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1100 Tucker v. Texas Bd. of Pardons and Paroles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1100 Tudor Oaks Ltd. Partnership; Cochrane v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1112 Tuggle; Roller v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055 Tugwell v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1061 Tukes v. Singletary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1113 Tulali v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 853 Tulare County Dept. of Health Services v. Moran . . . . . . . . . . . . 863 Tulk v. Michigan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1095 Tulon Co. of Richmond; Chalmers v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 813 Tung v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 856,1069 Tunis; Ireland v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 Tura LP; Marchon Eyewear, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1109 Turk v. White . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 Turner v. Angelone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1031,1099 Turner v. Department of Justice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1019,1085 Turner v. Drane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 897 Turner; Gonzalez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 888 Turner v. Internal Revenue Service . . . . . . . . . . . . 1019,1031,1085,1099 Turner; Marshall v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1153 Turner; Shong-Ching Tong v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 982 Turner v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 924,1019,1031,1085,1099 Turner v. Virginia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1031,1099 Turner v. Wilson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1031,1099 Turner v. Wood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1031,1099 Turner; York v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1031 Turnmire v. Bernhardt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1059,1154 Turpin; Graham v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 855,1009 Tusa v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 981 Tu Ying Chen v. Schramm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 822 Twenter v. Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958 297 Lenox Realty Co.; Coggins v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 920 Tyler, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 804,965,994,1027,1144 Tyler v. Carnahan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 838 Tyler v. Michigan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1095 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:12] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) clxii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Tyler v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1001 Tyler v. Purkett . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1031 Tyler v. Scott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1093 Tyler v. U. S. District Court . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 Tyndall v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1152 Tyrrel v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 820 Tyskiewicz; Dowtin-El v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1094 Ulrich v. St. Paul Ramsey Hospital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 952 Underwood v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 925 Unidentified Party; Barrios v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 920,1037 Union. For labor union, see name of trade. Union Pacific R. Co.; Manatt v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1050 Union Pacific R. Co.; Schirm v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 981 Uniroyal, Inc.; Brown v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 933 Unisys Corp. v. Ceska Sporitelna, A. S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1069 United. For labor union, see name of trade. United Airlines, Inc.; Fairechild v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 United Air Lines, Inc.; Nurse v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 968 United Nations; Corrinet v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1091 United Parcel Service; Browning v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 891 United States. See also name of other party. U. S. Attorney for Dist. of Del.; Beck v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 969 U. S. Court of Appeals; Arteaga v. . . . . . . . . . . . . 446,832,935,1010,1022 U. S. Court of Appeals; Collins v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 852 U. S. Court of Appeals; Reidt v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1061,1144 U. S. Court of Appeals; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 811 U. S. District Court; Adams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 843 U. S. District Court; Ali v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 U. S. District Court; Banks v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 840,1036 U. S. District Court; Burk v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 904 U. S. District Court; Calderon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 907,1099 U. S. District Court; Camarano v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 834 U. S. District Court; Gross v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1151 U. S. District Court; Isbell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1113 U. S. District Court; Lockhart v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 956 U. S. District Court; Lomax v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1123 U. S. District Court; Meza v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830 U. S. District Court; Ramon Fontes v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1124 U. S. District Court; Reid v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 835 U. S. District Court; Sheehan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1078 U. S. District Court; Steagall v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 999 U. S. District Court; Tyler v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 U. S. District Court; Whitfield v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1081 U. S. District Court; Young v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1121 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:12] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED clxiii Page U. S. District Judge; Asam v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 983 U. S. District Judge; Edwards v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1001 U. S. District Judge; Turner v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1031,1099 United States ex rel. Haycock, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805 United States Gypsum Co.; Orleans Parish School Bd. v. . . . . . . . 995 U. S. Postal Service; Lockridge v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1141 U. S. Postal Service; Love v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 974 U. S. Postal Service; Petties v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 846 U. S. Postal Service; Watson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 970,1070 United States Shoe Corp.; United States v. . . . . . . . . . . . 944,1043,1105 United States Surgical Corp. v. Ethicon, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 950 United Van Lines, Inc.; Rini v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809 United Video v. Verniero . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 Unitex Mills, Inc.; Matimak Trading Co. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1091 Unity Mut. Life Ins. Co.; Lloyd v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 856 Universal Maritime Service Corp.; Wright v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1146 University of Cal. at Berkeley; Einheber v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049 University of Cincinnati; Mann v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1042 University of Louisville; Willis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1058 University of Louisville Hospital; Roberts v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 911 University of Minn.; Kobrin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1113 University of Pa.; Yuan Jin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055 University of Pittsburgh; Naumov v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 859,1143 University of Tex. at San Antonio; Wojcik v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 870 Upchurch; Freeman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 927 Uphoff; Brown v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 959 Upjohn Co.; Clewell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 970,1070 Uptown Property Management; Schaefer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 862 Urbina v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1051 Uriarte-Gonzalez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 976 U S WEST, Inc. v. Federal Communications Comm'n . . . . . . . 1089,1101 Utah; Brown v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1031 Ute Indian Tribe, Uintah and Ouray Reserv.; Duchesne County v. 1107 Uy v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1097 Uzuegbunam v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1152 Vaccaro v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1047 Valdes v. Singletary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875 Valdez; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 903 Valentine v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830 Vallery v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 975 Valles v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1140 Valley Broadcasting Co.; United States v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1115 Valley Financial Services; Leffel v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 968 Valley Health Care Corp.; Archer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 936,1022 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:12] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) clxiv TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Valmet Paper Machinery, Inc.; Beloit Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1028 Valot v. Southeast Local School Dist. Bd. of Ed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 861 Valsamis, Inc. v. Cornhill Ins. PLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 818,1008 Van Atta Buick/GMC Truck, Inc.; Canfield v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1117 Van Barnes v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 845 Van Cleave v. Indiana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1119 Vander Zee v. Reno . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 995 Vandevender; Sheetz, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1091 VanDiver v. Hawley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 985 Vang v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1140 Van Houten v. Massachusetts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 834 Vanliner Ins. Co. of Fenton; Tatum v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 813 Vann; Lapidus v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 Van Poyck v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 995 Van Poyck v. Singletary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 856 Van Zelst v. Commissioner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807 Vargas v. Garner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 876 Vargas v. Ray . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1127 Vargas v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1007,1036,1149 Vargas v. Whitworth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 886 Vargas-Hernandez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 873 Varner; Johnston v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958 Varo, Inc.; Csorba v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 887,1010 Varsalona's Italian Restaurant v. Marietta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 818 Varsamas v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 961 Vasquez v. Bexar County Adult Detention Center . . . . . . . . . . 971,1070 Vasquez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 903 Vassar College; Fisher v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1075 Vaughn; Bussey v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1094 Vaughn; Carter v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 959 Vaughn; Curtis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1105 Vaughn; Johnson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1122 Vaughn; Lane v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 937 Vaughn; Orban v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1059 Vaughn; Perez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 833 Vaughn; Zanders v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 879 Vaught v. Showa Denko K. K. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 817 Vedalier v. Falcon Drilling Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1148 Velazquez-Contreras v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 845 Venetie Tribal Government; Alaska v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 520 Ventura v. Independence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 863 Ventura County; Myers v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1015 Vermeulen v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 887 Vermont; Wurzberger v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1112 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:12] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED clxv Page Vermont Dept. of Social and Rehabilitation Services; A. B. R. v. 955 Verna v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 940 Verniero; Chez Sez VIII, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 Verniero; United Video v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 Verniero v. W. P. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1110 Verniero; W. P. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1109 Vernon v. Williams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1050 Vest v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1119 Vesuvius USA; Graves v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1015 Vey v. Clinton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 907,1069 Viator v. Delchamps, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 862 Vicente-Guzman v. Immigration and Naturalization Service . . . . . 1059 Vickers v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 914 Vickers Masonry v. Giuseppe Furrer, S. P. A. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 982 Vidal Marquez v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 975 Video Express v. Ohio ex rel. Eckstein . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1110 Vigil v. Shanks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875 Villa-Chaparro v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 926 Villafuerte v. Stewart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 Village. See name of village. Villa Morena v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 987 Villarreal v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 922 Viltrakis v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 844 Vincent v. Michigan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 972 Vincent v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 938 Vine v. Fuller . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1077 Violett v. Kentucky . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1151 Virginia; Beck v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018 Virginia; Brown v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1126 Virginia; Keselica v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1132 Virginia; Kitze v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 817 Virginia; Mickens v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 928 Virginia; Raia v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1122 Virginia; Reed v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 Virginia; Rush v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 835 Virginia; Turner v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1031,1099 Virginia; Wagstaff v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 815 Virginia Beach Bd. of Zoning Appeals v. Janezeck . . . . . . . . . . . . 863 Virginia Dept. of Taxation; Mathy v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 967 Visconti v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1034 Vizcaino; Microsoft Corp. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1098 Vizcaya; Bonilla Montalvo v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1099 Voinche v. Central Intelligence Agency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 869 Voinche v. Federal Bureau of Investigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 950 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:12] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) clxvi TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Volel v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 897 Vollert v. Houston . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 810 Volosin v. Construction Contractors Bd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 955 Volvo Europa Truck, N. V.; Gracia v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1050 Von Der Ahe; Osram Sylvania Products, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 943 Vons Cos.; Washington Restaurant Management, Inc. v. . . . . . . . 808 Voorhies; Conyers v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 882 Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease; American Citigas Co. v. . . . . . . . 1016 Vose; Mastracchio v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1123 Votion v. Atascosa County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1091 Vrettos v. Bogden . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 855 Vrettos v. Callahan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 956 Vrettos v. Plainfield Post Office . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 994 Vrettos v. Rezza . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 877 Vu v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 898 VV Publishing Corp.; Chaiken v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1149 W. v. Office of Bar Admissions, Supreme Court of Ga. . . . . . . . . . 869 Wade, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1146 Wade v. Inglewood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 Wade v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 895 Wade v. West Virginia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1003 Wagner v. Devine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1090 Wagner v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 925,1142 Wagstaff v. Virginia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 815 Wahrman v. Wahrman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049 Wainwright v. Booz, Allen & Hamilton, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 973,1070 Waite v. Carpenter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998 Waldau v. Coughlin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1113 Waldrip v. Georgia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 Waletzki v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1067,1144 Walgreen Co.; Rowe v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 858 Walker v. Appellate Div., Sup. Ct. of N. Y., First Jud. Dept. . . . . 837 Walker; Batista v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 851 Walker; Beverly v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 883 Walker v. Colorado . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 883 Walker v. Consolidated Biscuit Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1028 Walker v. Dragovich . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986,1070 Walker v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 825 Walker v. United States . . . . . . . . . . 838,873,875,882,961,1029,1036,1141 Walkup v. Board of Comm'rs of Shelby County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1113 Wallace v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Wallack Ader Leviathan Associates; Guadagno v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1122 Walla Walla; Steele v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049 Wallis; Hume v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:12] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED clxvii Page Wal-Mart, Inc.; Powell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 Wal-Mart Stores; American Relocation Network International v. 1116 Walsh; Beard v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 966 Walter v. Austin Industrial, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 888 Walton v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 890 Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc. . 818 Wanless v. Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 844 Wapnick, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 912 Ward, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1027 Ward v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1093 Ward; Norde v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 Ward; Quintero-Cruz v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 916 Ward v. Ravenswood Village Nursing Home . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1080 Ward; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 885 Warden v. Commissioner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1109 Warden. See name of warden. Wardlaw v. Waters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 887 Ware v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1097 Warren, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1107 Warren v. Brunelle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921 Warren; Hapgood v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1046 Warren v. Kuykendall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 Warren v. Lucas County Dept. of Human Services . . . . . . . . . . . . 1081 Warren Publishing, Inc. v. Microdos Data Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 963 Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.; Altosino v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1110 Washington, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 947 Washington; Blount v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1076 Washington v. Brusstar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 879,1022 Washington; Bush v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1078 Washington; Gronquist v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 887 Washington v. Hall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 907 Washington; Johnson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 973 Washington; Jones v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 984 Washington; Kykta v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 884 Washington v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 829 Washington; McClendon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1027 Washington v. Neville . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 923,1037 Washington v. Pang . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1029 Washington; Roman v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1019 Washington v. Texas Prison System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 846 Washington; Traicoff v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 848 Washington v. United States . . . . . . . . . 847,876,895,984,1051,1052,1065 Washington; Williams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1092 Washington; Wilson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 949 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:12] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) clxviii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Washington Hospital Center; Tavakoli-Nouri v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1150 Washington Legal Foundation; Phillips v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 911,946,980 Washington Restaurant Management, Inc. v. Vons Cos. . . . . . . . . 808 Washington State Bar Assn.; McLaughlin v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 820 Washoe County; Individuals for Responsible Government, Inc. v. 966 Wasserman; Maryland Psychiatric Society, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . 810 Waste Management of North America, Inc.; Munday v. . . . . . . . . 1116 Waters v. Dormire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1003 Waters; Wardlaw v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 887 Watkins v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 922 Watkins v. Morgan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1142 Watkins v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 883 Watkins v. White . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 888 Watkinson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1140 Watkis v. Kuehne & Nagel, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 878,1037 Watkis v. Thrasher . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1095 Watson v. Hill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1048 Watson; Jones v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 812 Watson v. Kentucky . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1081 Watson; Rooney v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 966 Watson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 961,1063,1130,1141 Watson v. U. S. Postal Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 970,1070 Watts; Rodriguez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1032 Watts v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1034,1063 Watts v. West . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 848 Waugh v. Internal Revenue Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823 Wax Coal Co.; Molinary v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1118 Waymire; West v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 Wayne State Univ.; Manh Tran v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 860 Weatherspoon v. Dormire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1121 Weatter, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1014 Weaver; Clarke v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1098 Weaver v. Wood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049 Webb v. Pulitzer Publishing Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 972 Webb v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 974 Webber v. Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1058 Webcor Packaging, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Bd. . . . . . . . 1108 Weber v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 878 Weber; Darne v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1094 Weber v. Merit Systems Protection Bd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 984 Webster v. Indiana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 802 Webster v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1051 Webster County; Simmons v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1110 Weddell v. Hochman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 951 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:12] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED clxix Page Weddington Productions, Inc.; Flick v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 808 Wee v. Andrews . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1088 Weeden v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 974 Weekes v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 873 Weeks v. Bowersox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1093 Wei v. Hackettstown Community Hospital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 878,1022 Weinberger v. Wisconsin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 Weinreich v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transp. Auth. . . . 971 Weintraub v. Apfel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1131 Weir v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1130 Weiss v. Alaska . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 948 Weiss v. La Terraza Apartments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 803 Welby; Johnson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 827 Welcker, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 929 Wellesley College; Eguizabal v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1112 Wellington v. Brodeur . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1096 Wells, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864 Wells v. Gober . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1045 Wells v. Jones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 886 Wells v. Mississippi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1122 Wells v. Securities and Exchange Comm'n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958 Wells v. Wells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1001 Wells Fargo Bank; Wolfgram v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 937 Welsand v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 837,1069 Wendel; Jones v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 Wertenberger; Parker v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 849 WesBanco Bank Barnesville v. Customer Creditors . . . . . . . . . . . 816 Wes Outdoor Advertising v. N. J. Dept. of Env. Prot. . . . . . . . . 933,1010 Wes Outdoor Advertising v. N. J. Dept. of Transp. . . . . . . . . . . 866,1009 West; Gibson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 938,1070 West; Harris v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 873 West; McCaskill v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1118 West; Montague v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 999 West v. Morrison's Hospitality Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 859 West; Tempo, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 933 West; Tempo West, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 933 West v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1134 West; Watts v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 848 West v. Waymire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 Westbrook v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1036 Westerfield v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 939 Western Financial Savings Bank; Lievsay v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1149 Western Mohegan Tribe and Nation of N. Y. v. United States . 993,1073 Western States Ins. Co.; Louis E. Oliverio & Associates v. . . . . . 820 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:12] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) clxx TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Western State Univ. College of Law; Scott v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1050 West Indies Transport, Inc. v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1052 Westine v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1141 Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. General Circuit Breaker . . . . . . . 857 Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Ryder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1116 Westinghouse Materials Co.; Hicks v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 859 West Melbourne; Kranyik v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 822 Westmorland; Alvarez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1077 Westowne Shoes, Inc. v. Brown Group, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 861 West Point; Short v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1108 West Virginia; Quinn v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004 West Virginia; Wade v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1003 Wesvaco Corp.; Konstantopoulos v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1128 Wexler & Wexler v. Ryan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 914 Wheaton v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 939 Wheeler v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 894,925,952,1098 Wheeler Lloyd v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 Whitaker v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1137 White, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1088 White; Bradford v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 984 White; Cargo v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 900 White v. Chambliss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 913 White v. Crow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1054 White; Davis v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 900 White v. Downs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 White v. Fortner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1018 White; Fultz v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 835,873 White; Harris v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 899,971,1010 White v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 White v. Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 948 White v. Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 White v. Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 950 White; Turk v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 White v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 882,897,940,960,1082,1129,1139 White; Watkins v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 888 Whiteford v. Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 983 Whitehead v. Tenet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1129 Whitehurst; Poole v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1057 White-Page v. Harris County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 913 Whitfield, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1074,1106 Whitfield v. Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831 Whitfield v. Prunty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831 Whitfield v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1122 Whitfield v. U. S. District Court . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1081 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:12] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED clxxi Page Whitley; Sheehan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 860 Whitley v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1021 Whitlow v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 925 Whitman; Alexander v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 949 Whitson v. Schermer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831 Whittle v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 852 Whitworth; Vargas v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 886 Whren v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1119 Whyte v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1021 Wickliffe v. Superior Court of Ind., Marion County . . . . . . . . . . . 1095 Wicks v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 900 Wickware, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 806 Wicomico County Planning and Zoning Comm'n; Schirner v. . . . . 954 Widener's Estate; AmerSig Graphics, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1050 Widnall; Essex Electro Engineers, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 916 Widnall; Stephens v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004 Wiedmer v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 833,962,989,1070 Wiggins v. Pickett . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 985 Wiggins v. Stainer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 970 Wight v. Board of Dental Examiners . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 892 Wike v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1058 Wilcher v. Mississippi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1053,1154 Wild v. Wooten . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 960 Wilder v. Knight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1150 Wilentz; Anonymous v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1048 Wiles v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 947 Wiley v. Mississippi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 886 Wiley v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 926 Wilkerson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934 Wilkinson; Russell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1112 Wilkinson v. Singletary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1150 Wilkinson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1133 Willacy v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 970 Wille; Owen v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1126 Williams v. Allstate Ins. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 832 Williams v. Angelone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 987 Williams v. Borg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 833,1009 Williams; Brown v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Williams v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1123,1150 Williams v. Chrysler Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958,1070 Williams v. Cunningham . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1005 Williams v. Equal Employment Opportunity Comm'n . . . . . . . . . . 1035 Williams; Federal Election Comm'n v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1015 Williams v. Franklin First Federal Savings Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . 815,989 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:12] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) clxxii TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Williams v. Fulcomer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1080 Williams; Hanrahan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 812 Williams v. Henderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 881 Williams v. Hopkins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1010 Williams v. Jednorski . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1063 Williams v. Makel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 893 Williams v. McClellan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 881 Williams; Midwest Operating Engineers Welfare Fund v. . . . . . . 1101 Williams v. Nebraska . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 992 Williams v. New York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 985 Williams v. Obregon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1058 Williams v. Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1053 Williams v. Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934 Williams; Risk Managers International, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1105 Williams v. Singletary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1057 Williams v. Stone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 956 Williams v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1030 Williams v. Thalacker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 837 Williams v. Torrey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 856 Williams v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 837, 844, 847, 851, 855, 856, 873, 878, 904, 917, 925, 1006, 1033, 1051, 1053,1061,1082,1154 Williams; Vernon v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1050 Williams v. Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1092 Williams v. WMX Technologies, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 966 Williamson v. Liberty National Life Ins. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 Williamson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 882 Willis, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805 Willis v. Florida Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services . . . . 855 Willis v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 829 Willis v. University of Louisville . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1058 Wills & Van Metre, Inc.; Hwa Ja Kim v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 803 Wilson, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 929,1039 Wilson; Arteaga v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 446 Wilson v. Chang . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1096 Wilson; Coalition for Economic Equity v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 963 Wilson v. Evans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1078 Wilson v. Grant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 844,1009 Wilson v. Harper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 876 Wilson; Hart v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 918 Wilson; IBP, Inc. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 810 Wilson v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1132 Wilson; Rhomberg v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 812 Wilson v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 829 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:12] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED clxxiii Page Wilson; Turner v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1031,1099 Wilson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . 837,847,886,974,1053,1068,1078 Wilson v. Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 949 Wilson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Bd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 856 Wilson & Pryor; Moomchi v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1032 Winbush v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1132 Winestock v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 855 Wing; Gonzalez v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 930 Winn v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 901,1037 Winston v. Carter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 845 Winston-Salem; Brooks v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1079 Winters v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1063 Wisconsin; Caban v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 927 Wisconsin; Darne v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1096 Wisconsin; Garcia v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 841 Wisconsin; Prellwitz v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830 Wisconsin; Schmidtendorff v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 862 Wisconsin; Treutelaar v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 980 Wisconsin; Weinberger v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 932 Wisconsin Dept. of Corrections v. Schacht . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1071 Wise v. McAninch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 Wisland v. Admiral Beverage Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1112 Witham v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1115 Withers v. Scott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 897 Withrow; Jordan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1003 Wittman; Spahn v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 951 Wittman v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 894 WMX Technologies, Inc.; Williams v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 966 Wodnicki; Chan v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1117 Woerner v. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1060 Wofford v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 893 Wojcik v. University of Tex. at San Antonio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 870 Wolf; Smith v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1123 Wolfgram v. Wells Fargo Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 937 Wolford v. Burns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 838 Wolhar, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1012 Wollesen v. Sacasa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 956 Wonder v. Hyland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1148 Wood v. Bainbridge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1047 Wood; Baki v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 857 Wood; Calhoun v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 857 Wood v. Jeffries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1008 Wood; Stenger v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 957,1085 Wood; Turner v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1031,1099 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:12] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) clxxiv TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Wood; Weaver v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1049 Woodard; Ohio Adult Parole Authority v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 804,930 Woodhouse v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 851 Woodley v. Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 893 Woodruff v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1082 Woodruff v. Wyoming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1060 Woodruff, Inc.; Schwarz v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 845,977 Woods, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 947,1070 Woods v. CNA Ins. Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1001 Woods v. Internal Revenue Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 876 Woods; Johnson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1004 Woods; McDonnell v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 844 Woods v. Mutual of Omaha . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 834 Woods v. North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875 Woods v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 890 Woodson v. California Attorney General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1105 Woodson v. Scott Paper Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 914 Woodson v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1130 Woolley v. Zimmerman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 892 Wooten v. Hartwig . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 846 Wooten; Wild v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 960 Workers' Compensation Appeals Bd.; Hicks v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 937,1037 Workers' Compensation Appeals Bd.; Wilson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 856 Workers' Compensation Appeals Bd. of Cal.; Maloney v. . . . . 1054,1154 Workers' Compensation Appeals Bd. of Cal.; Murphy v. . . . . . . . . 1030 World Business Network, Inc.; Nicholson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 949 Worley v. Richmond County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1029 Worthington v. Louisiana Dept. of Transportation and Dev. . . . . . 867 Woythal v. Tex-Tenn Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 967 W. P. v. Verniero . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1109 W. P.; Verniero v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1110 Wright; Arizona v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 Wright v. California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 918 Wright; Marr v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 977 Wright v. McAninch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1129 Wright; Morris v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 906 Wright v. National Marine Fisheries Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 868 Wright v. Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831 Wright v. Slater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 Wright v. South Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 970 Wright v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 903,1007,1035,1066,1067 Wright v. Universal Maritime Service Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1146 Wuerl; German Roman Catholic Cong. of St. Michael's Church v. 861 Wurzberger v. Vermont . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1112 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:12] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED clxxv Page Wyatt; Fisher v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 878,1099 Wyoming; Frenzel v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 959 Wyoming; Nebraska v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1026 Wyoming; Woodruff v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1060 Xuyen Thi Vu v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 898 Y v. Maryland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1140 Yahweh v. Zavaras . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1095 Yankee Enterprises, Inc. v. Dunkin' Donuts, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1076 Yankton Sioux Tribe; South Dakota v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 329,911,1013 Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe v. Scott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1076 Yazdi; Malaki v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 901,1010 Yeskey; Pennsylvania Dept. of Corrections v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1086,1146 Yiamouyiannis v. Lowe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 861 Yoder v. Honeywell, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 812 Yokohama Tire Corp.; Rhymer v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 821 Yon v. Florida Dept. of Corrections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1091 York v. Larkins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1002 York v. Turner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1031 Yossif v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1098 Yost v. Huffman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1019 You v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 953 Young v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 928 Young v. Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 859 Young v. Moore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1001 Young v. Murray . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1124 Young v. Nagle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1080 Young v. New Jersey Div., Medical Assistance and Health Servs. 853 Young v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1063 Young v. U. S. District Court . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1121 Younkin v. Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1080 Yuan Jin v. University of Pa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055 Yuan Tseng; El Al Israel Airlines, Ltd. v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 947 Yusuf Ahmed Alghanim & Sons, W. L. L.; Toys "R" Us, Inc. v. . . 1111 Yuzary v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 868 Zagnojny v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1064 Zaidi v. Northern Va. Hospital Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 981,1053 Zaman (Tahirkhaili) v. Arizona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1148 Zambrano v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1132 Zamora-Delgado v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 891 Zanders v. Vaughn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 879 Zani, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805 Zankich v. Santos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1078 Zapata Haynie Corp.; Arthur v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 860 Zapata Haynie Corp.; Jackson v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 860 Job: 522REP Unit: $U12 [02-08-00 08:04:12] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) clxxvi TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Zapata Haynie Corp.; King-Hill v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 860 Zaragoza v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 923 Zaring Homes, Inc.; Black v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 Zavaras; Guinn v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 845,1037 Zavaras; Yahweh v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1095 Zawodniak v. Arkansas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1125 Zelma v. McLeod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 952 Zertuche v. First Interstate Bank of Ariz., N. A. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 844 Zeta Chi Fraternity v. New Hampshire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 995 Ziglar v. Alabama . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 852 Ziman v. New York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1114 Zimmer v. Naumann . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 820 Zimmerman; Jones v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1057 Zimmerman; Woolley v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 892 Zimomra v. Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 948 Zolot, In re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 910 Zschach v. Lucas, Prendergast, Albright, Gibson & Newman . . 813,1008 Zwerling v. United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1016 ZYZY, Inc. v. Eagle Pass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 522US1 Unit: $$U1 [01-27-00 18:35:55] PAGES PGT: OPLG CASES ADJUDGED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES AT OCTOBER TERM, 1997 BROWN v. WILLIAMS et al. on motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis No. 97­5370. Decided October 20, 1997 Pro se petitioner seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis so that he may file a petition for a writ of certiorari to the Sixth Circuit. Since 1994, when this Court invoked its Rule 39.8 to deny him in forma pauperis status, Brown v. Brown, 513 U. S. 1040, he has filed eight petitions, each of which has been denied without recorded dissent. Held: Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. For the reasons discussed in Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Ap- peals, 506 U. S. 1, he is also barred from filing any further certiorari petitions in noncriminal matters unless he first pays the required dock- eting fee and submits his petition in compliance with Rule 33.1. Motion denied. Per Curiam. Pro se petitioner Carson Lynn Brown seeks leave to pro- ceed in forma pauperis in order that he may file a petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, which dismissed his appeal after he failed to pay the required filing fee. We deny petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis. He is allowed until November 10, 1997, within which to pay the docketing fee required by this Court's Rule 38(a) and to submit his petition in compliance with Rule 33.1. For the 1 522US1 Unit: $$U1 [01-27-00 18:35:55] PAGES PGT: OPLG 2 BROWN v. WILLIAMS Stevens, J., dissenting reasons discussed below, we also direct the Clerk of the Court not to accept any further petitions for certiorari in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless he first pays the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and submits his petition in compliance with Rule 33.1. Petitioner has a history of abusing this Court's certiorari process. In 1994, we invoked Rule 39.8 to deny petitioner in forma pauperis status. Brown v. Brown, 513 U. S. 1040 (1994). Undeterred by this action, petitioner has continued filing frivolous petitions with this Court. To date, petitioner has filed eight petitions over the last eight years, each of which has been denied without recorded dissent. In the in- stant petition, Brown alleges that certain prison officials con- spired to violate his constitutional rights by, inter alia, deny- ing him access to the courts and sabotaging his laundry, and that the District Judge below was biased against him as an "African Jew." These claims are patently frivolous. We enter this order barring prospective in forma pau- peris filings by petitioner for the reasons discussed in Mar- tin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Because petitioner has limited his abuse of the certiorari process to noncriminal cases, we limit our sanction accordingly. It is so ordered. Justice Stevens, dissenting. For reasons previously stated, see Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1, 4 (1992), and cases cited, I respectfully dissent. 522US1 Unit: $$U2 [01-27-00 18:52:00] PAGES PGT: OPIN OCTOBER TERM, 1997 3 Syllabus STATE OIL CO. v. KHAN et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit No. 96­871. Argued October 7, 1997-Decided November 4, 1997 Respondents' agreement to lease and operate a gas station obligated them to buy gasoline from petitioner State Oil Company at a price equal to a suggested retail price set by State Oil, less a specified profit margin; required them to rebate any excess to State Oil if they charged custom- ers more than the suggested price; and provided that any decrease due to sales below the suggested price would reduce their margin. After they fell behind in their lease payments and State Oil commenced evic- tion proceedings, respondents brought this suit in federal court, alleging in part that, by preventing them from raising or lowering retail gas prices, State Oil had violated § 1 of the Sherman Act. The District Court entered summary judgment for State Oil on this claim, but the Seventh Circuit reversed on the basis of Albrecht v. Herald Co., 390 U. S. 145, 152­154, in which this Court held that vertical maximum price fixing is a per se antitrust violation. Although the Court of Appeals characterized Albrecht as "unsound when decided" and "inconsistent with later decisions," it felt constrained to follow that decision. Held: Albrecht is overruled. Pp. 10­22. (a) Although most antitrust claims are analyzed under a "rule of rea- son," under which the court reviews a number of relevant factors, see, e. g., Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Soc., 457 U. S. 332, 342­343, some types of restraints on trade have such predictable and pernicious anticompetitive effect, and such limited potential for procompetitive benefit, that they are deemed unlawful per se, see, e. g., Northern Pacific R. Co. v. United States, 356 U. S. 1, 5. A review of this Court's perti- nent decisions is relevant in assessing the continuing validity of the Albrecht per se rule. See, e. g., Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Sea- gram & Sons, Inc., 340 U. S. 211, 213 (maximum resale price fixing ille- gal per se); United States v. Arnold, Schwinn & Co., 388 U. S. 365, 379­ 380 (vertical nonprice restrictions illegal per se); Continental T. V., Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc., 433 U. S. 36, 47­49, 58­59 (overruling Schwinn). A number of this Court's later decisions have hinted that Albrecht's analytical underpinnings were substantially weakened by GTE Syl- vania-see, e. g., Maricopa County, supra, at 348, n. 18; 324 Liquor Corp. v. Duffy, 479 U. S. 335, 341­342; Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co., 495 U. S. 328, 335, n. 5, 343, n. 13-and there is a consid- 522US1 Unit: $$U2 [01-27-00 18:52:00] PAGES PGT: OPIN 4 STATE OIL CO. v. KHAN Syllabus erable body of scholarship discussing the procompetitive effects of verti- cal maximum price fixing. Pp. 10­15. (b) Informed by the foregoing decisions and scholarship, and guided by the general view that the antitrust laws' primary purpose is to pro- tect interbrand competition, see, e. g., Business Electronics Corp. v. Sharp Electronics Corp., 485 U. S. 717, 726, and that condemnation of practices resulting in lower consumer prices is disfavored, Matsushita Elec. Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U. S. 574, 594, this Court finds it difficult to maintain that vertically imposed maximum prices could harm consumers or competition to the extent necessary to justify their per se invalidation. Albrecht's theoretical justifications for its per se rule-that vertical maximum price fixing could interfere with dealer freedom, restrict dealers' ability to offer consumers essential or desired services, channel distribution through large or specially advantaged dealers, or disguise minimum price fixing schemes-have been abun- dantly criticized and can be appropriately recognized and punished under the rule of reason. Not only are they less serious than the Al- brecht Court imagined, but other courts and antitrust scholars have noted that the per se rule could in fact exacerbate problems related to the unrestrained exercise of market power by monopolist-dealers. For these reasons, and because Albrecht is irrelevant to ongoing Sherman Act enforcement, see Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp., 467 U. S. 752, 777, and n. 25, and there are apparently no cases in which enforcement efforts have been directed solely against the conduct con- demned in Albrecht, there is insufficient economic justification for the per se rule. Respondents' arguments in favor of the rule-that its elim- ination should require persuasive, expert testimony establishing that it has distorted the market, and that its retention is compelled by Toolson v. New York Yankees, Inc., 346 U. S. 356, and Flood v. Kuhn, 407 U. S. 258-are unavailing. Pp. 15­19. (c) Albrecht does not deserve continuing respect under the doctrine of stare decisis. Stare decisis is not an inexorable command, particu- larly in the area of antitrust law, where there is a competing interest in recognizing and adapting to changed circumstances and the lessons of accumulated experience. See, e. g., National Soc. of Professional En- gineers v. United States, 435 U. S. 679, 688. Accordingly, this Court has reconsidered its decisions construing the Sherman Act where, as here, the theoretical underpinnings of those decisions are called into serious question. See, e. g., GTE Sylvania, supra. Because Albrecht has been widely criticized since its inception, and the views underlying it have been eroded by this Court's precedent, there is not much of that decision to salvage. See, e. g., Neal v. United States, 516 U. S. 284, 295. In 522US1 Unit: $$U2 [01-27-00 18:52:00] PAGES PGT: OPIN Cite as: 522 U. S. 3 (1997) 5 Syllabus overruling Albrecht, the Court does not hold that all vertical maximum price fixing is per se lawful, but simply that it should be evaluated under the rule of reason, which can effectively identify those situations in which it amounts to anticompetitive conduct. The question whether respondents are entitled to recover damages in light of this Court's overruling of Albrecht should be reviewed by the Court of Appeals in the first instance. Pp. 20­22. 93 F. 3d 1358, vacated and remanded. O'Connor, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. John Baumgartner argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Paul Kalinich. Acting Assistant Attorney General Klein argued the cause for the United States et al. as amici curiae urging reversal. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor Gen- eral Dellinger, Deputy Solicitor General Wallace, Deputy Assistant Attorney General Melamed, Edward C. DuMont, Catherine G. O'Sullivan, and David Seidman. Anthony S. DiVincenzo argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents. Pamela Jones Harbour, Deputy Attorney General of New York, argued the cause for the state parties as amici curiae urging affirmance. With her on the brief were Dennis C. Vacco, Attorney General of New York, Barbara Gott Billet, Solicitor General, and Stephen D. Houck, Robert L. Hubbard, Darrell M. Joseph, and John A. Ioannou, Assistant Attor- neys General, Bruce M. Botelho, Attorney General of Alaska, and Daveed A. Schwartz, Assistant Attorney General, Grant Woods, Attorney General of Arizona, Winston Bryant, At- torney General of Arkansas, and J. Jordan Abbott, Assistant Attorney General, Richard Blumenthal, Attorney General of Connecticut, M. Jane Brady, Attorney General of Delaware, Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General of Florida, and Patricia A. Conners, Assistant Attorney General, Calvin E. Halloway, Sr., Attorney General of Guam, Margery S. Bron- ster, Attorney General of Hawaii, Alan G. Lance, Attorney 522US1 Unit: $$U2 [01-27-00 18:52:00] PAGES PGT: OPIN 6 STATE OIL CO. v. KHAN Counsel General of Idaho, and Brett T. DeLange, Deputy Attorney General, Jim Ryan, Attorney General of Illinois, and Bar- bara Preiner, Solicitor General, Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General of Iowa, and Elizabeth M. Osenbaugh, Solicitor Gen- eral, Carla J. Stovall, Attorney General of Kansas, and John W. Campbell, Deputy Attorney General, J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General of Maryland, and Ellen S. Cooper, As- sistant Attorney General, Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, and Fredrick H. Hoffecker, Hubert H. Hum- phrey III, Attorney General of Minnesota, Mike Moore, At- torney General of Mississippi, and James F. Steel, Deputy Attorney General, Joseph P. Mazurek, Attorney General of Montana, Frankie Sue Del Papa, Attorney General of Ne- vada, Steven M. Houran, Acting Attorney General of New Hampshire, and Walter L. Maroney, Senior Assistant Attor- ney General, Peter Verniero, Attorney General of New Jer- sey, and Laurel A. Price, Deputy Attorney General, Tom Udall, Attorney General of New Mexico, and Susan G. White, Assistant Attorney General, Michael F. Easley, At- torney General of North Carolina, and K. D. Sturgis, Assist- ant Attorney General, Heidi Heitkamp, Attorney General of North Dakota, and Laurie J. Loveland, Solicitor General, D. Michael Fisher, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and James A. Donahue III, Acting Chief Deputy Attorney Gen- eral, Jeffrey B. Pine, Attorney General of Rhode Island, Mark Barnett, Attorney General of South Dakota, John Knox Walkup, Attorney General of Tennessee, Michael E. Moore, Solicitor General, and Dennis Garvey, Interim Dep- uty Attorney General, Dan Morales, Attorney General of Texas, Jorge Vega, First Assistant Attorney General, and Laquita A. Hamilton, Deputy Attorney General, James S. Gilmore III, Attorney General of Virginia, and Frank Seales, Jr., Senior Assistant Attorney General, Christine O. Gregoire, Attorney General of Washington, and Jon P. Fer- guson, Darrell V. McGraw, Jr., Attorney General of West Virginia, James E. Doyle, Attorney General of Wisconsin, 522US1 Unit: $$U2 [01-27-00 18:52:00] PAGES PGT: OPIN Cite as: 522 U. S. 3 (1997) 7 Opinion of the Court and Kevin J. O'Connor, Assistant Attorney General, and William U. Hill, Attorney General of Wyoming.* Justice O'Connor delivered the opinion of the Court. Under § 1 of the Sherman Act, 26 Stat. 209, as amended, 15 U. S. C. § 1, "[e]very contract, combination . . . , or conspir- acy, in restraint of trade" is illegal. In Albrecht v. Herald Co., 390 U. S. 145 (1968), this Court held that vertical maxi- mum price fixing is a per se violation of that statute. In this case, we are asked to reconsider that decision in light of subsequent decisions of this Court. We conclude that Albrecht should be overruled. I Respondents, Barkat U. Khan and his corporation, entered into an agreement with petitioner, State Oil Company, to lease and operate a gas station and convenience store owned *Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed for the American Automobile Manufacturers Association et al. by Stephen M. Shapiro, Roy T. Englert, Jr., Donald M. Falk, Phillip D. Brady, and Charles H. Lock- wood II; for the American Petroleum Institute by Edwin M. Zimmerman, Robert A. Long, Jr., G. William Frick, Harry M. Ng, and Douglas W. Morris; for the Business Roundtable by Thomas B. Leary and Robert C. Weinbaum; and for the Newspaper Association of America et al. by Wil- liam T. Lifland, Patricia Farren, David S. J. Brown, Rene P. Milam, Peter C. Gould, Andrew Merdek, William T. Garcia, Cristina L. Mendoza, and George Freeman. Briefs of amici curiae were filed for the Association of the Bar of the City of New York by Richard M. Steuer; for the Coalition for Fair Con- sumer Pricing by Steven B. Feirman, Barry M. Heller, H. Bret Lowell, Philip F. Zeidman, and Stanley J. Adelman; for the Minnesota Service Station and Convenience Store Association et al. by Gary E. Persian and Paul E. Slater; for the National Association of Manufacturers by Mark L. Davidson, Jan S. Amundson, and Quentin Riegel; for the National Automobile Dealers Association by Paul R. Norman; for the National Beer Wholesalers Association, Inc., by Ernest Gellhorn, Donald I. Baker, and W. Todd Miller; and for the Service Station Dealers of America by Peter H. Gunst. 522US1 Unit: $$U2 [01-27-00 18:52:00] PAGES PGT: OPIN 8 STATE OIL CO. v. KHAN Opinion of the Court by State Oil. The agreement provided that respondents would obtain the station's gasoline supply from State Oil at a price equal to a suggested retail price set by State Oil, less a margin of 3.25 cents per gallon. Under the agreement, respondents could charge any amount for gasoline sold to the station's customers, but if the price charged was higher than State Oil's suggested retail price, the excess was to be re- bated to State Oil. Respondents could sell gasoline for less than State Oil's suggested retail price, but any such decrease would reduce their 3.25 cents-per-gallon margin. About a year after respondents began operating the gas station, they fell behind in lease payments. State Oil then gave notice of its intent to terminate the agreement and com- menced a state court proceeding to evict respondents. At State Oil's request, the state court appointed a receiver to operate the gas station. The receiver operated the station for several months without being subject to the price re- straints in respondents' agreement with State Oil. Accord- ing to respondents, the receiver obtained an overall profit margin in excess of 3.25 cents per gallon by lowering the price of regular-grade gasoline and raising the price of pre- mium grades. Respondents sued State Oil in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging in part that State Oil had engaged in price fixing in violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act by preventing respondents from raising or lowering retail gas prices. According to the complaint, but for the agreement with State Oil, respondents could have charged different prices based on the grades of gasoline, in the same way that the receiver had, thereby achieving increased sales and profits. State Oil responded that the agreement did not actually prevent respondents from setting gasoline prices, and that, in substance, respondents did not allege a violation of antitrust laws by their claim that State Oil's suggested retail price was not optimal. 522US1 Unit: $$U2 [01-27-00 18:52:00] PAGES PGT: OPIN Cite as: 522 U. S. 3 (1997) 9 Opinion of the Court The District Court found that the allegations in the com- plaint did not state a per se violation of the Sherman Act because they did not establish the sort of "manifestly anti- competitive implications or pernicious effect on competition" that would justify per se prohibition of State Oil's conduct. App. 43­44. Subsequently, in ruling on cross-motions for summary judgment, the District Court concluded that re- spondents had failed to demonstrate antitrust injury or harm to competition. App. to Pet. for Cert. 37a. The District Court held that respondents had not shown that a difference in gasoline pricing would have increased the station's sales; nor had they shown that State Oil had market power or that its pricing provisions affected competition in a relevant mar- ket. Id., at 37a, 40a. Accordingly, the District Court en- tered summary judgment for State Oil on respondents' Sher- man Act claim. Id., at 40a. The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed. 93 F. 3d 1358 (1996). The court first noted that the agree- ment between respondents and State Oil did indeed fix maxi- mum gasoline prices by making it "worthless" for respond- ents to exceed the suggested retail prices. Id., at 1360. After reviewing legal and economic aspects of price fixing, the court concluded that State Oil's pricing scheme was a per se antitrust violation under Albrecht v. Herald Co., supra. Although the Court of Appeals characterized Albrecht as "unsound when decided" and "inconsistent with later deci- sions" of this Court, it felt constrained to follow that decision. 93 F. 3d, at 1363. In light of Albrecht and Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co., 495 U. S. 328 (1990) (ARCO), the court found that respondents could have suffered antitrust injury from not being able to adjust gasoline prices. We granted certiorari to consider two questions, whether State Oil's conduct constitutes a per se violation of the Sher- man Act and whether respondents are entitled to recover damages based on that conduct. 519 U. S. 1107 (1997). 522US1 Unit: $$U2 [01-27-00 18:52:00] PAGES PGT: OPIN 10 STATE OIL CO. v. KHAN Opinion of the Court II A Although the Sherman Act, by its terms, prohibits every agreement "in restraint of trade," this Court has long recog- nized that Congress intended to outlaw only unreasonable restraints. See, e. g., Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Soc., 457 U. S. 332, 342­343 (1982) (citing United States v. Joint Traffic Assn., 171 U. S. 505 (1898)). As a consequence, most antitrust claims are analyzed under a "rule of reason," according to which the finder of fact must decide whether the questioned practice imposes an unreasonable restraint on competition, taking into account a variety of factors, includ- ing specific information about the relevant business, its con- dition before and after the restraint was imposed, and the restraint's history, nature, and effect. 457 U. S., at 343, and n. 13 (citing Board of Trade of Chicago v. United States, 246 U. S. 231, 238 (1918)). Some types of restraints, however, have such predictable and pernicious anticompetitive effect, and such limited po- tential for procompetitive benefit, that they are deemed un- lawful per se. Northern Pacific R. Co. v. United States, 356 U. S. 1, 5 (1958). Per se treatment is appropriate "[o]nce ex- perience with a particular kind of restraint enables the Court to predict with confidence that the rule of reason will con- demn it." Maricopa County, supra, at 344; see also Broad- cast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 441 U. S. 1, 19, n. 33 (1979). Thus, we have expressed reluctance to adopt per se rules with regard to "restraints imposed in the context of business relationships where the economic im- pact of certain practices is not immediately obvious." FTC v. Indiana Federation of Dentists, 476 U. S. 447, 458­459 (1986). A review of this Court's decisions leading up to and beyond Albrecht is relevant to our assessment of the continuing va- lidity of the per se rule established in Albrecht. Beginning 522US1 Unit: $$U2 [01-27-00 18:52:00] PAGES PGT: OPIN Cite as: 522 U. S. 3 (1997) 11 Opinion of the Court with Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co., 220 U. S. 373 (1911), the Court recognized the illegality of agreements under which manufacturers or suppliers set the minimum resale prices to be charged by their distributors. By 1940, the Court broadly declared all business combina- tions "formed for the purpose and with the effect of raising, depressing, fixing, pegging, or stabilizing the price of a com- modity in interstate or foreign commerce" illegal per se. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., 310 U. S. 150, 223 (1940). Accordingly, the Court condemned an agreement between two affiliated liquor distillers to limit the maximum price charged by retailers in Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc., 340 U. S. 211 (1951), noting that agreements to fix maximum prices, "no less than those to fix minimum prices, cripple the freedom of traders and thereby restrain their ability to sell in accordance with their own judgment." Id., at 213. In subsequent cases, the Court's attention turned to ar- rangements through which suppliers imposed restrictions on dealers with respect to matters other than resale price. In White Motor Co. v. United States, 372 U. S. 253 (1963), the Court considered the validity of a manufacturer's assignment of exclusive territories to its distributors and dealers. The Court determined that too little was known about the com- petitive impact of such vertical limitations to warrant treat- ing them as per se unlawful. Id., at 263. Four years later, in United States v. Arnold, Schwinn & Co., 388 U. S. 365 (1967), the Court reconsidered the status of exclusive dealer territories and held that, upon the transfer of title to goods to a distributor, a supplier's imposition of territorial restric- tions on the distributor was "so obviously destructive of competition" as to constitute a per se violation of the Sher- man Act. Id., at 379. In Schwinn, the Court acknowledged that some vertical restrictions, such as the conferral of terri- torial rights or franchises, could have procompetitive bene- fits by allowing smaller enterprises to compete, and that 522US1 Unit: $$U2 [01-27-00 18:52:00] PAGES PGT: OPIN 12 STATE OIL CO. v. KHAN Opinion of the Court such restrictions might avert vertical integration in the dis- tribution process. Id., at 379­380. The Court drew the line, however, at permitting manufacturers to control prod- uct marketing once dominion over the goods had passed to dealers. Id., at 380. Albrecht, decided the following Term, involved a newspa- per publisher who had granted exclusive territories to inde- pendent carriers subject to their adherence to a maximum price on resale of the newspapers to the public. Influenced by its decisions in Socony-Vacuum, Kiefer-Stewart, and Schwinn, the Court concluded that it was per se unlawful for the publisher to fix the maximum resale price of its news- papers. 390 U. S., at 152­154. The Court acknowledged that "[m]aximum and minimum price fixing may have dif- ferent consequences in many situations," but nonetheless condemned maximum price fixing for "substituting the per- haps erroneous judgment of a seller for the forces of the competitive market." Id., at 152. Albrecht was animated in part by the fear that vertical maximum price fixing could allow suppliers to discriminate against certain dealers, restrict the services that dealers could afford to offer customers, or disguise minimum price fixing schemes. Id., at 152­153. The Court rejected the notion (both on the record of that case and in the abstract) that, because the newspaper publisher "granted exclusive territories, a price ceiling was necessary to protect the public from price gouging by dealers who had monopoly power in their own territories." Id., at 153. In a vigorous dissent, Justice Harlan asserted that the ma- jority had erred in equating the effects of maximum and min- imum price fixing. Id., at 156­168. Justice Harlan pointed out that, because the majority was establishing a per se rule, the proper inquiry was "not whether dictation of maximum prices is ever illegal, but whether it is always illegal." Id., at 165­166. He also faulted the majority for conclusively listing "certain unfortunate consequences that maximum 522US1 Unit: $$U2 [01-27-00 18:52:00] PAGES PGT: OPIN Cite as: 522 U. S. 3 (1997) 13 Opinion of the Court price dictation might have in other cases," even as it rejected evidence that the publisher's practice of fixing maximum prices counteracted potentially anticompetitive actions by its distributors. Id., at 165. Justice Stewart also dissented, asserting that the publisher's maximum price fixing scheme should be properly viewed as promoting competition, be- cause it protected consumers from dealers such as Albrecht, who, as "the only person who could sell for home delivery the city's only daily morning newspaper," was "a monopolist within his own territory." Id., at 168. Nine years later, in Continental T. V., Inc. v. GTE Syl- vania Inc., 433 U. S. 36 (1977), the Court overruled Schwinn, thereby rejecting application of a per se rule in the context of vertical nonprice restrictions. The Court acknowledged the principle of stare decisis, but explained that the need for clarification in the law justified reconsideration of Schwinn: "Since its announcement, Schwinn has been the subject of continuing controversy and confusion, both in the scholarly journals and in the federal courts. The great weight of scholarly opinion has been critical of the deci- sion, and a number of the federal courts confronted with analogous vertical restrictions have sought to limit its reach. In our view, the experience of the past 10 years should be brought to bear on this subject of considerable commercial importance." 433 U. S., at 47­49 (footnotes omitted). The Court considered the historical context of Schwinn, noting that Schwinn's per se rule against vertical nonprice restrictions came only four years after the Court had refused to endorse a similar rule in White Motor Co., and that the decision neither explained the "sudden change in position," nor referred to the accepted requirements for per se viola- tions set forth in Northern Pacific R. Co. 433 U. S., at 51­ 52. The Court then reviewed scholarly works supporting the economic utility of vertical nonprice restraints. See id., 522US1 Unit: $$U2 [01-27-00 18:52:00] PAGES PGT: OPIN 14 STATE OIL CO. v. KHAN Opinion of the Court at 54­57 (citing, e. g., Posner, Antitrust Policy and the Su- preme Court: An Analysis of the Restricted Distribution, Horizontal Merger and Potential Competition Decisions, 75 Colum. L. Rev. 282 (1975); Preston, Restrictive Distribution Arrangements: Economic Analysis and Public Policy Stand- ards, 30 Law & Contemp. Prob. 506 (1965)). The Court concluded that, because "departure from the rule-of-reason standard must be based upon demonstrable economic effect rather than-as in Schwinn-upon formalistic line drawing," the appropriate course would be "to return to the rule of reason that governed vertical restrictions prior to Schwinn." GTE Sylvania, supra, at 58­59. In GTE Sylvania, the Court declined to comment on Al- brecht's per se treatment of vertical maximum price restric- tions, noting that the issue "involve[d] significantly different questions of analysis and policy." 433 U. S., at 51, n. 18. Subsequent decisions of the Court, however, have hinted that the analytical underpinnings of Albrecht were sub- stantially weakened by GTE Sylvania. We noted in Mari- copa County that vertical restraints are generally more defensible than horizontal restraints. See 457 U. S., at 348, n. 18. And we explained in 324 Liquor Corp. v. Duffy, 479 U. S. 335, 341­342 (1987), that decisions such as GTE Syl- vania "recognize the possibility that a vertical restraint imposed by a single manufacturer or wholesaler may stimu- late interbrand competition even as it reduces intrabrand competition." Most recently, in ARCO, 495 U. S. 328 (1990), although Al- brecht's continuing validity was not squarely before the Court, some disfavor with that decision was signaled by our statement that we would "assume, arguendo, that Albrecht correctly held that vertical, maximum price fixing is subject to the per se rule." 495 U. S., at 335, n. 5. More signifi- cantly, we specifically acknowledged that vertical maximum price fixing "may have procompetitive interbrand effects," and pointed out that, in the wake of GTE Sylvania, "[t]he 522US1 Unit: $$U2 [01-27-00 18:52:00] PAGES PGT: OPIN Cite as: 522 U. S. 3 (1997) 15 Opinion of the Court procompetitive potential of a vertical maximum price re- straint is more evident . . . than it was when Albrecht was decided, because exclusive territorial arrangements and other nonprice restrictions were unlawful per se in 1968." 495 U. S., at 343, n. 13 (citing several commentators identify- ing procompetitive effects of vertical maximum price fixing, including, e. g., P. Areeda & H. Hovenkamp, Antitrust Law ¶ 340.30b, p. 378, n. 24 (1988 Supp.); Blair & Harrison, Re- thinking Antitrust Injury, 42 Vand. L. Rev. 1539, 1553 (1989); Easterbrook, Maximum Price Fixing, 48 U. Chi. L. Rev. 886, 887­890 (1981)) (hereinafter Easterbrook). B Thus, our reconsideration of Albrecht's continuing validity is informed by several of our decisions, as well as a consider- able body of scholarship discussing the effects of vertical re- straints. Our analysis is also guided by our general view that the primary purpose of the antitrust laws is to protect interbrand competition. See, e. g., Business Electronics Corp. v. Sharp Electronics Corp., 485 U. S. 717, 726 (1988). "Low prices," we have explained, "benefit consumers regard- less of how those prices are set, and so long as they are above predatory levels, they do not threaten competition." ARCO, supra, at 340. Our interpretation of the Sherman Act also incorporates the notion that condemnation of practices re- sulting in lower prices to consumers is "especially costly" because "cutting prices in order to increase business often is the very essence of competition." Matsushita Elec. Indus- trial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U. S. 574, 594 (1986). So informed, we find it difficult to maintain that vertically imposed maximum prices could harm consumers or competi- tion to the extent necessary to justify their per se invalida- tion. As Chief Judge Posner wrote for the Court of Appeals in this case: "As for maximum resale price fixing, unless the supplier is a monopsonist he cannot squeeze his dealers' margins 522US1 Unit: $$U2 [01-27-00 18:52:00] PAGES PGT: OPIN 16 STATE OIL CO. v. KHAN Opinion of the Court below a competitive level; the attempt to do so would just drive the dealers into the arms of a competing sup- plier. A supplier might, however, fix a maximum resale price in order to prevent his dealers from exploiting a monopoly position. . . . [S]uppose that State Oil, perhaps to encourage . . . dealer services . . . has spaced its deal- ers sufficiently far apart to limit competition among them (or even given each of them an exclusive territory); and suppose further that Union 76 is a sufficiently dis- tinctive and popular brand to give the dealers in it at least a modicum of monopoly power. Then State Oil might want to place a ceiling on the dealers' resale prices in order to prevent them from exploiting that mo- nopoly power fully. It would do this not out of disinter- ested malice, but in its commercial self-interest. The higher the price at which gasoline is resold, the smaller the volume sold, and so the lower the profit to the sup- plier if the higher profit per gallon at the higher price is being snared by the dealer." 93 F. 3d, at 1362. See also R. Bork, The Antitrust Paradox 281­282 (1978) ("There could, of course, be no anticonsumer effect from [the type of price fixing considered in Albrecht], and one suspects that the paper has a legitimate interest in keeping subscriber prices down in order to increase circulation and maximize revenues from advertising"). We recognize that the Albrecht decision presented a num- ber of theoretical justifications for a per se rule against verti- cal maximum price fixing. But criticism of those premises abounds. The Albrecht decision was grounded in the fear that maximum price fixing by suppliers could interfere with dealer freedom. 390 U. S., at 152. In response, as one com- mentator has pointed out, "the ban on maximum resale price limitations declared in Albrecht in the name of `dealer free- dom' has actually prompted many suppliers to integrate forward into distribution, thus eliminating the very inde- pendent trader for whom Albrecht professed solicitude." 522US1 Unit: $$U2 [01-27-00 18:52:00] PAGES PGT: OPIN Cite as: 522 U. S. 3 (1997) 17 Opinion of the Court 8 P. Areeda, Antitrust Law ¶ 1635, p. 395 (1989) (hereinafter Areeda). For example, integration in the newspaper indus- try since Albrecht has given rise to litigation between inde- pendent distributors and publishers. See P. Areeda & H. Hovenkamp, supra, ¶ 729.7, pp. 599­614 (1996 Supp.). The Albrecht Court also expressed the concern that maxi- mum prices may be set too low for dealers to offer consumers essential or desired services. 390 U. S., at 152­153. But such conduct, by driving away customers, would seem likely to harm manufacturers as well as dealers and consumers, making it unlikely that a supplier would set such a price as a matter of business judgment. See, e. g., Lopatka, Stephen Breyer and Modern Antitrust: A Snug Fit, 40 Antitrust Bull. 1, 60 (1995); Blair & Lang, Albrecht After ARCO: Maxi- mum Resale Price Fixing Moves Toward the Rule of Rea- son, 44 Vand. L. Rev. 1007, 1034 (1991). In addition, Albrecht noted that vertical maximum price fixing could effectively channel distribution through large or specially advantaged dealers. 390 U. S., at 153. It is unclear, however, that a supplier would profit from limiting its market by exclud- ing potential dealers. See, e. g., Easterbrook 905­908. Fur- ther, although vertical maximum price fixing might limit the viability of inefficient dealers, that consequence is not neces- sarily harmful to competition and consumers. See, e. g., id., at 907; Lopatka, supra, at 60. Finally, Albrecht reflected the Court's fear that maximum price fixing could be used to disguise arrangements to fix minimum prices, 390 U. S., at 153, which remain illegal per se. Although we have acknowledged the possibility that maximum pricing might mask minimum pricing, see Mari- copa County, 457 U. S., at 348, we believe that such con- duct-as with the other concerns articulated in Albrecht- can be appropriately recognized and punished under the rule of reason. See, e. g., Easterbrook 901­904; see also Pitofsky, In Defense of Discounters: The No-Frills Case for a Per Se 522US1 Unit: $$U2 [01-27-00 18:52:00] PAGES PGT: OPIN 18 STATE OIL CO. v. KHAN Opinion of the Court Rule Against Vertical Price Fixing, 71 Geo. L. J. 1487, 1490, n. 17 (1983). Not only are the potential injuries cited in Albrecht less serious than the Court imagined, the per se rule established therein could in fact exacerbate problems related to the un- restrained exercise of market power by monopolist-dealers. Indeed, both courts and antitrust scholars have noted that Albrecht's rule may actually harm consumers and manufac- turers. See, e. g., Caribe BMW, Inc. v. Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft, 19 F. 3d 745, 753 (CA1 1994) (Breyer, C. J.); Areeda ¶ 1636a, at 395; G. Mathewson & R. Winter, Competition Policy and Vertical Exchange 13­14 (1985). Other commentators have also explained that Al- brecht's per se rule has even more potential for deleterious effect on competition after our decision in GTE Sylvania, because, now that vertical nonprice restrictions are not un- lawful per se, the likelihood of dealer monopoly power is in- creased. See, e. g., Easterbrook 890, n. 20; see also ARCO, 495 U. S., at 343, n. 13. We do not intend to suggest that dealers generally possess sufficient market power to exploit a monopoly situation. Such retail market power may in fact be uncommon. See, e. g., Business Electronics, 485 U. S., at 727, n. 2; GTE Sylvania, 433 U. S., at 54. Nor do we hold that a ban on vertical maximum price fixing inevitably has anticompetitive consequences in the exclusive dealer context. After reconsidering Albrecht's rationale and the substan- tial criticism the decision has received, however, we conclude that there is insufficient economic justification for per se in- validation of vertical maximum price fixing. That is so not only because it is difficult to accept the assumptions underly- ing Albrecht, but also because Albrecht has little or no rele- vance to ongoing enforcement of the Sherman Act. See Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp., 467 U. S. 752, 777, and n. 25 (1984). Moreover, neither the parties nor any 522US1 Unit: $$U2 [01-27-00 18:52:00] PAGES PGT: OPIN Cite as: 522 U. S. 3 (1997) 19 Opinion of the Court of the amici curiae have called our attention to any cases in which enforcement efforts have been directed solely against the conduct encompassed by Albrecht's per se rule. Respondents argue that reconsideration of Albrecht should require "persuasive, expert testimony establishing that the per se rule has distorted the market." Brief for Respond- ents 7. Their reasoning ignores the fact that Albrecht itself relied solely upon hypothetical effects of vertical maximum price fixing. Further, Albrecht's dire predictions have not been borne out, even though manufacturers and suppliers appear to have fashioned schemes to get around the per se rule against vertical maximum price fixing. In these circumstances, it is the retention of the rule of Albrecht, and not, as respondents would have it, the rule's elimination, that lacks adequate justification. See, e. g., GTE Sylvania, supra, at 58­59. Respondents' reliance on Toolson v. New York Yankees, Inc., 346 U. S. 356 (1953) (per curiam), and Flood v. Kuhn, 407 U. S. 258 (1972), is similarly misplaced, because those de- cisions are clearly inapposite, having to do with the antitrust exemption for professional baseball, which this Court has de- scribed as "an aberration . . . rest[ing] on a recognition and an acceptance of baseball's unique characteristics and needs," id., at 282. In the context of this case, we infer little mean- ing from the fact that Congress has not reacted legislatively to Albrecht. In any event, the history of various legislative proposals regarding price fixing seems neither clearly to sup- port nor to denounce the per se rule of Albrecht. Respond- ents are of course free to seek legislative protection from gasoline suppliers of the sort embodied in the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act, 92 Stat. 322, 15 U. S. C. § 2801 et seq. For the reasons we have noted, however, the remedy for respondents' dispute with State Oil should not come in the form of a per se rule affecting the conduct of the entire marketplace. 522US1 Unit: $$U2 [01-27-00 18:52:00] PAGES PGT: OPIN 20 STATE OIL CO. v. KHAN Opinion of the Court C Despite what Chief Judge Posner aptly described as Al- brecht's "infirmities, [and] its increasingly wobbly, moth- eaten foundations," 93 F. 3d, at 1363, there remains the ques- tion whether Albrecht deserves continuing respect under the doctrine of stare decisis. The Court of Appeals was correct in applying that principle despite disagreement with Al- brecht, for it is this Court's prerogative alone to overrule one of its precedents. We approach the reconsideration of decisions of this Court with the utmost caution. Stare decisis reflects "a policy judgment that `in most matters it is more important that the applicable rule of law be settled than that it be settled right.' " Agostini v. Felton, 521 U. S. 203, 235 (1997) (quot- ing Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co., 285 U. S. 393, 406 (1932) (Brandeis, J., dissenting)). It "is the preferred course because it promotes the evenhanded, predictable, and con- sistent development of legal principles, fosters reliance on judicial decisions, and contributes to the actual and perceived integrity of the judicial process." Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U. S. 808, 827 (1991). This Court has expressed its reluc- tance to overrule decisions involving statutory interpreta- tion, see, e. g., Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, 431 U. S. 720, 736 (1977), and has acknowledged that stare decisis concerns are at their acme in cases involving property and contract rights, see, e. g., Payne, 501 U. S., at 828. Both of those concerns are arguably relevant in this case. But "[s]tare decisis is not an inexorable command." Ibid. In the area of antitrust law, there is a competing interest, well represented in this Court's decisions, in recognizing and adapting to changed circumstances and the lessons of accu- mulated experience. Thus, the general presumption that legislative changes should be left to Congress has less force with respect to the Sherman Act in light of the accepted view that Congress "expected the courts to give shape to the statute's broad mandate by drawing on common-law tra- 522US1 Unit: $$U2 [01-27-00 18:52:00] PAGES PGT: OPIN Cite as: 522 U. S. 3 (1997) 21 Opinion of the Court dition." National Soc. of Professional Engineers v. United States, 435 U. S. 679, 688 (1978). As we have explained, the term "restraint of trade," as used in § 1, also "invokes the common law itself, and not merely the static content that the common law had assigned to the term in 1890." Business Electronics, 485 U. S., at 732; see also GTE Sylvania, 433 U. S., at 53, n. 21; McNally v. United States, 483 U. S. 350, 372­373 (1987) (Stevens, J., dissenting). Accordingly, this Court has reconsidered its decisions construing the Sher- man Act when the theoretical underpinnings of those deci- sions are called into serious question. See, e. g., Copperweld Corp., supra, at 777; GTE Sylvania, supra, at 47­49; cf. Tigner v. Texas, 310 U. S. 141, 147 (1940). Although we do not "lightly assume that the economic re- alities underlying earlier decisions have changed, or that ear- lier judicial perceptions of those realities were in error," we have noted that "different sorts of agreements" may amount to restraints of trade "in varying times and circumstances," and "[i]t would make no sense to create out of the single term `restraint of trade' a chronologically schizoid statute, in which a `rule of reason' evolves with new circumstances and new wisdom, but a line of per se illegality remains forever fixed where it was." Business Electronics, supra, at 731­ 732. Just as Schwinn was "the subject of continuing contro- versy and confusion" under the "great weight" of scholarly criticism, GTE Sylvania, supra, at 47­48, Albrecht has been widely criticized since its inception. With the views under- lying Albrecht eroded by this Court's precedent, there is not much of that decision to salvage. See, e. g., Neal v. United States, 516 U. S. 284, 295 (1996); Patterson v. McLean Credit Union, 491 U. S. 164, 173 (1989); Rodriguez de Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc., 490 U. S. 477, 480­481 (1989). Although the rule of Albrecht has been in effect for some time, the inquiry we must undertake requires considering " `the effect of the antitrust laws upon vertical distributional 522US1 Unit: $$U2 [01-27-00 18:52:00] PAGES PGT: OPIN 22 STATE OIL CO. v. KHAN Opinion of the Court restraints in the American economy today.' " GTE Syl- vania, supra, at 53, n. 21 (quoting Schwinn, 388 U. S., at 392 (Stewart, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part)). As the Court noted in ARCO, 495 U. S., at 336, n. 6, there has not been another case since Albrecht in which this Court has "confronted an unadulterated vertical, maximum-price-fixing arrangement." Now that we confront Albrecht directly, we find its conceptual foundations gravely weakened. In overruling Albrecht, we of course do not hold that all vertical maximum price fixing is per se lawful. Instead, ver- tical maximum price fixing, like the majority of commercial arrangements subject to the antitrust laws, should be evalu- ated under the rule of reason. In our view, rule-of-reason analysis will effectively identify those situations in which vertical maximum price fixing amounts to anticompetitive conduct. There remains the question whether respondents are enti- tled to recover damages based on State Oil's conduct. Al- though the Court of Appeals noted that "the district judge was right to conclude that if the rule of reason is applicable, Khan loses," 93 F. 3d, at 1362, its consideration of this case was necessarily premised on Albrecht's per se rule. Under the circumstances, the matter should be reviewed by the Court of Appeals in the first instance. We therefore vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. 522US1 Unit: $$U3 [01-27-00 18:58:46] PAGES PGT: OPIN OCTOBER TERM, 1997 23 Syllabus BATES v. UNITED STATES certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit No. 96­7185. Argued October 7, 1997-Decided November 4, 1997 James and Laurenda Jackson owned and operated Education America, Inc., a for-profit consulting and management firm for technical and voca- tional schools. In 1986, the Jacksons acquired the Acme Institute of Technology, a not-for-profit technical school, and appointed petitioner Bates, then vice president of Education America, to serve as Acme's treasurer. In 1987, James Jackson, as Acme's president, signed a pro- gram participation agreement with the Department of Education that authorized the school to receive student loan checks through the Title IV Guaranteed Student Loan (GSL) program. See 20 U. S. C. § 1070 et seq. Acme's participation hinged upon both its continued accreditation by an approved accrediting association and Jackson's promise to comply with all applicable statutes and regulations. Under the GSL program, banks and other private institutions lent money to Acme students for tuition and other educational expenses. The Federal Government ad- ministered the program and guaranteed payment if a student borrower defaulted. Acme would receive a loan check directly from the lender, endorse the check, and credit the amount of the check against the stu- dent's tuition debt. If a GSL student withdrew from Acme before the term ended, the governing regulations required the school to return to the lender, within a specified time, a portion of the loan proceeds. The lender would then deduct the refund from the amount that the student owed. If Acme did not repay the lender, the student-and if she de- faulted, the Government-would remain liable for the full amount of the loan. In late 1987, pursuant to decisions made by the Jacksons and Bates, Acme initiated a pattern and practice of not making GSL refunds. Bates gave priority to the payment of a management fee to Education America and salaries to the Jacksons, and instructed other Acme em- ployees not to make the required GSL refunds. Bates, as Education America's vice president, wrote a letter that stated the unmade refunds were solely the responsibility and decision of the corporate office. By March 1989, Acme's refund liability had grown to approximately $85,000. Acme subsequently lost its accreditation, and, in 1990, the Department of Education notified the school that Acme was no longer eligible to participate in the GSL program. A few months later, Acme ceased op- erations. In 1994, Bates was indicted on twelve counts of "knowingly 522US1 Unit: $$U3 [01-27-00 18:58:46] PAGES PGT: OPIN 24 BATES v. UNITED STATES Syllabus and willfully misapply[ing]" federally insured student loan funds, in vio- lation of 20 U. S. C. § 1097(a) (1988 ed.) and 18 U. S. C. § 2. Agreeing with Bates that conviction under § 1097(a) for willful misapplication re- quired an allegation of the defendant's "intent to injure or defraud the United States," the District Court dismissed the indictment because it lacked such an allegation. The Seventh Circuit vacated the judgment and reinstated the prosecution, concluding that § 1097(a) required the Government to prove only that Bates knowingly and willfully misap- plied Title IV funds. Held: Specific intent to injure or defraud someone, whether the United States or another, is not an element of the misapplication of funds pro- scribed by § 1097(a). The text of § 1097(a) does not include an "in- tent to defraud" requirement, and this Court ordinarily resists read- ing words into a statute that do not appear on its face. In contrast, 20 U. S. C. § 1097(d), enacted at the same time as § 1097(a), has an "intent to defraud" requirement. It is generally presumed that Congress acts intentionally and purposely where it includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another. See Russello v. United States, 464 U. S. 16, 23. Despite the contrasting language of §§ 1097(a) and (d), Bates relies on decisions interpreting 18 U. S. C. § 656, which proscribes willful misapplication of bank funds. An "intent to defraud" element, originally included in the text of § 656, was dropped from the text during a technical revision of the criminal code. In view of that history, courts have continued to hold that an "intent to defraud" is an element of the offense described in § 656. Assuming, without deciding, that § 656 is correctly read to retain an "intent to defraud" element, § 1097(a) never contained such a requirement, one present from the start and still contained in § 1097(d). Neither text nor history warrants adoption of Bates's construction of § 1097(a). Nor does § 1097(a) set a trap for the unwary. As construed by the Seventh Circuit, § 1097(a) catches only the transgressor who intentionally exercises unauthorized dominion over federally insured student loan funds for his own benefit or for the benefit of a third party. So read, the measure does not render felonious innocent maladministration of a business enterprise or a merely unwise use of funds. Furthermore, a 1992 amendment adding "fails to refund" to § 1097(a)'s text does not demonstrate that the deliber- ate failure to return GSL funds, without an intent to defraud, became an offense within § 1097(a)'s compass only under the statute's current text. The added words simply foreclose any argument that § 1097(a) does not reach the failure to make refunds. Cf. Commissioner v. Estate of Sternberger, 348 U. S. 187, 194. Finally, as nothing in the text, struc- ture, or history of § 1097(a) warrants importation of an "intent to de- 522US1 Unit: $$U3 [01-27-00 18:58:46] PAGES PGT: OPIN Cite as: 522 U. S. 23 (1997) 25 Opinion of the Court fraud" requirement into the misapplication proscription, the rule of lenity does not come into play in this case. See United States v. Wells, 519 U. S. 482, 499. Pp. 29­33. 96 F. 3d 964, affirmed. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. C. Richard Oren, by appointment of the Court, 520 U. S. 1114, argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. Lisa Schiavo Blatt argued the cause for the United States. With her on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Dellin- ger, Acting Assistant Attorney General Keeney, Deputy So- licitor General Dreeben, and Daniel S. Goodman.* Justice Ginsburg delivered the opinion of the Court. This case concerns the meaning of § 490(a) (Pub. L. 99­ 498), 100 Stat. 1491, as added, 20 U. S. C. § 1097(a) (1988 ed.), which declared it a felony "knowingly and willfully" to misapply student loan funds insured under Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965. The United States acknowl- edges that § 1097(a) demanded allegation and proof of the defendant's intentional conversion of loan funds to his own use or the use of a third party. The question presented is whether § 1097(a) demanded, in addition, allegation and proof that the defendant specifically intended to injure or defraud someone-either the United States as loan guarantor, as the District Court read the measure, or another. We hold, in accord with the Court of Appeals, that specific intent to injure or defraud someone, whether the United States or another, is not an element of the misapplication of funds proscribed by § 1097(a). I The indictment in this case, App. 2­12, alleged the follow- ing facts. James and Laurenda Jackson owned and operated *Lisa B. Kemler filed a brief for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers as amicus curiae urging reversal. 522US1 Unit: $$U3 [01-27-00 18:58:46] PAGES PGT: OPIN 26 BATES v. UNITED STATES Opinion of the Court Education America, Inc., a for-profit consulting and manage- ment firm for technical and vocational schools. In Decem- ber 1986, the Jacksons acquired the Acme Institute of Tech- nology, a not-for-profit technical school located in South Bend, Indiana, which offered associate degree programs in electronic engineering, and tool, die, and plastics mold de- sign. After the acquisition, the Jacksons appointed Bates- then the vice president of Education America-to serve as treasurer of Acme's board of trustees. On April 30, 1987, James Jackson, as president of Acme, signed a program participation agreement with the Depart- ment of Education that authorized the school to receive stu- dent loan checks through the Title IV federal Guaranteed Student Loan (GSL) program. See 20 U. S. C. § 1070 et seq. (1988 ed.).1 Acme's participation hinged upon both its con- tinued accreditation by an approved accrediting association and Jackson's promise to comply with all applicable statutes and regulations. Under the GSL program, banks and other private in- stitutions lent money to Acme students for tuition and other educational expenses. The Federal Government adminis- tered the program and guaranteed payment if a student borrower defaulted. Acme would receive a loan check di- rectly from the lender, endorse the check, and credit the amount of the check against the student's tuition debt. If a GSL student withdrew from Acme before the term ended, the governing regulations, 34 CFR §§ 668.22 and 682.606 (1990), required Acme to return to the lender a portion of the loan proceeds, based upon how late in the term the student 1 In 1992, Congress amended the GSL program and renamed it the Fed- eral Family Education Loan Program. Higher Education Amendments of 1992, Pub. L. 102­325, § 411(a)(1), 106 Stat. 510. Because the indictment in this case concerns only pre-1992 conduct, we refer to the program as the GSL program. 522US1 Unit: $$U3 [01-27-00 18:58:46] PAGES PGT: OPIN Cite as: 522 U. S. 23 (1997) 27 Opinion of the Court withdrew and how much the student had paid at that point.2 Refunds to the lender, the applicable regulation, § 682.607, instructed, were to be made within a specified period (30 or 60 days) following the student's withdrawal. The lender would then deduct the refund from the amount that the stu- dent owed. If Acme did not refund the loans to the lender, the student-and if she defaulted, the Government-would remain liable for the full amount of the loan. Around the end of 1987, pursuant to decisions made by the Jacksons and Bates, Acme initiated a pattern and practice of not making GSL refunds. On April 14, 1988, James Jackson sent a letter to Acme's director ordering him, effective the following month, to "tally [Acme's] receipts for the preceding month and remit a management fee of 10% of [the] total re- ceipts to Education America, Inc." App. 4. The letter also told the director to pay the Jacksons a monthly salary. The letter further stated: "If the above creates a cash shortfall in your school, money will be loaned back to you to cover the shortfall." See ibid. Bates, serving as Acme's chief finan- cial officer, permitted these fee and salary payments to take priority over the GSL refunds, and specifically instructed other Acme employees not to make the required GSL re- funds. In late 1988 or early 1989, Education America offi- cials ordered Acme to stop using a special bank account that segregated the unearned student-loaned tuition from the general account. Acme's former owners had used this spe- cial account to ensure that funds were always available for timely refunds to lenders. By October 1988, Acme had amassed roughly $55,000 in unmade GSL refunds. Acme's financial aid director sent James Jackson a letter in January 1989 to draw Jackson's attention to the gravity of the unmade refunds, which then 2 The Department of Education since has consolidated the requirements of §§ 668.22 and 682.606 into the current § 668.22. See 59 Fed. Reg. 61211 (1994). 522US1 Unit: $$U3 [01-27-00 18:58:46] PAGES PGT: OPIN 28 BATES v. UNITED STATES Opinion of the Court totaled $68,000. By March 1989, Acme's refund liability had grown to approximately $85,000. In a letter dated March 13, 1989, Bates, as Education America's vice president, re- leased Acme's financial aid director from all responsibility concerning GSL refunds, as she had requested. The letter stated that unmade refunds were "solely the responsibility and decision of the corporate office." See id., at 5. In April 1989, the National Association of Trade and Tech- nical Schools, a national accrediting association, conducted an on-site audit of Acme to determine whether it should con- tinue to accredit the school. A month later, the Association reported to the Department of Education that Acme had "in- adequately demonstrated its ability to make appropriate and timely refunds," and had "loaned substantial amounts of money to [James Jackson,] the chief trustee." The report also noted evidence that management fees had been "up- stream[ed]" to Education America. See ibid. Acme subse- quently lost its accreditation, and the Department of Educa- tion notified the school on April 7, 1990, that effective March 8, 1990, Acme was no longer eligible to participate in the GSL program. On June 5, 1990, Acme ceased operations. During Bates's tenure as Acme's chief financial officer, the school amassed $139,649 in unmade refunds, not including interest and certain special allowances. On September 8, 1994, a federal grand jury indicted Bates on twelve counts of "knowingly and willfully misapply[ing]," id., at 11, federally insured student loan funds between Jan- uary 15, 1990, and June 15, 1990, in violation of 20 U. S. C. § 1097(a) (1988 ed.) and 18 U. S. C. § 2 (1988 ed.). On Febru- ary 7, 1995, Bates filed a motion to dismiss the indictment. He argued, and the District Court agreed, that conviction under § 1097(a) for willful misapplication required an alle- gation of the defendant's "intent to injure or defraud the United States." 96 F. 3d 964, 967 (CA7 1996). Because the indictment lacked such an allegation, the District Court dis- missed it. 522US1 Unit: $$U3 [01-27-00 18:58:46] PAGES PGT: OPIN Cite as: 522 U. S. 23 (1997) 29 Opinion of the Court On appeal, the Seventh Circuit vacated the District Court's judgment and reinstated the prosecution. 96 F. 3d 964 (1996). The Court of Appeals concluded that § 1097(a) required the Government to prove only that "the defendant misapplied-i. e., converted-Title IV funds and that he did so knowingly and willfully." Id., at 970. The Seventh Cir- cuit's decision conflicts with the Eleventh Circuit's decision in United States v. Kammer, 1 F. 3d 1161, 1165­1166 (1993), which held that § 1097(a) requires the Government to allege and prove that the defendant had an "intent to defraud" the United States. We granted certiorari to resolve this con- flict, 519 U. S. 1108 (1997), and now affirm the Seventh Cir- cuit's judgment. II Our inquiry begins with the text of 20 U. S. C. § 1097(a) (1988 ed.). At the time of the offenses charged in the indict- ment, the measure provided in relevant part: "Any person who knowingly and willfully embezzles, misapplies, steals, or obtains by fraud, false statement, or forgery any funds, assets, or property provided or insured under this subchap- ter . . . shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both." 3 The text of § 1097(a) does not include an "intent to de- fraud" state of mind requirement, and we ordinarily resist reading words or elements into a statute that do not appear on its face. In contrast, § 1097(d), enacted at the same time as § 1097(a), makes it a felony "knowingly and willfully" to "destro[y] or concea[l] any record relating to the provision of assistance under [Title IV] with intent to defraud the United States" (emphasis added). As this Court has reiterated: " `[W]here Congress includes particular language in one sec- tion of a statute but omits it in another section of the same Act, it is generally presumed that Congress acts intention- 3 Higher Education Amendments of 1986, Pub. L. 99­498, § 490(a), 100 Stat. 1491. 522US1 Unit: $$U3 [01-27-00 18:58:46] PAGES PGT: OPIN 30 BATES v. UNITED STATES Opinion of the Court ally and purposely in the disparate inclusion or exclusion.' " Russello v. United States, 464 U. S. 16, 23 (1983) (quoting United States v. Wong Kim Bo, 472 F. 2d 720, 722 (CA5 1972)). Despite the contrasting language of §§ 1097(a) and (d), Bates urges that an "intent to defraud" is an essential, albeit unexpressed, element of the offenses charged against him. For this argument, Bates relies primarily upon the District Court's reasoning in this case. The District Court, like the Eleventh Circuit in United States v. Kammer, 1 F. 3d, at 1165, looked to decisions interpreting 18 U. S. C. § 656, which proscribes willful misapplication of bank funds. The Courts of Appeals unanimously agree that § 656 requires the Gov- ernment to prove that the defendant acted with an intent to "injure or defraud" the bank or "deceive" a bank officer,4 even though the statute, on its face, contains no such ele- ment.5 In another case involving a different defendant named Bates, the Seventh Circuit explained why § 656 in- cluded an "intent to injure or defraud" element: "The current statutory language does not expressly re- quire any proof of [fraudulent or injurious] intent. 4 United States v. Whitlock, 663 F. 2d 1094, 1102 (CADC 1980); United States v. Wester, 90 F. 3d 592, 595 (CA1 1996); United States v. Castiglia, 894 F. 2d 533, 537 (CA2), cert. denied, 497 U. S. 1004 (1990); United States v. Thomas, 610 F. 2d 1166, 1174 (CA3 1979); United States v. Duncan, 598 F. 2d 839, 858 (CA4), cert. denied, 444 U. S. 871 (1979); United States v. McCord, 33 F. 3d 1434, 1448 (CA5 1994), cert. denied sub nom. Haley v. United States, 515 U. S. 1132 (1995); United States v. Woods, 877 F. 2d 477, 479 (CA6 1989); United States v. Crabtree, 979 F. 2d 1261, 1266 (CA7 1992), cert. denied, 510 U. S. 878 (1993); United States v. Ness, 665 F. 2d 248, 249 (CA8 1981); United States v. Wolfswinkel, 44 F. 3d 782, 786 (CA9 1995); United States v. Evans, 42 F. 3d 586, 589 (CA10 1994); United States v. Morales, 978 F. 2d 650, 652 (CA11 1992). 5 Section 656 currently provides that any person "connected in any ca- pacity with any Federal Reserve bank" or a related organization commits a felony if she "embezzles, abstracts, purloins or willfully misapplies any of the moneys, funds or credits" of the bank or related organization. 522US1 Unit: $$U3 [01-27-00 18:58:46] PAGES PGT: OPIN Cite as: 522 U. S. 23 (1997) 31 Opinion of the Court Originally the statute did require proof of intent to `in- jure or defraud' the bank or `deceive' a bank officer but these words were inadvertently dropped in the course of a technical revision of the criminal code. To avoid making every unauthorized loan by a bank officer a will- ful misapplication of bank funds, courts . . . read the missing words back into the section." United States v. Bates, 852 F. 2d 212, 215 (1988). Assuming, without deciding, that the Seventh Circuit's reading of § 656 is correct, § 1097(a) never contained, as § 656 did, an "intent to defraud" requirement, a requirement pres- ent from the start and still contained in § 1097(d). In short, there is here neither text nor history warranting the con- struction of § 1097(a) that Bates urges us to adopt.6 Nor does § 1097(a) set a "trap for the unwary," as the Sev- enth Circuit suggested § 656 would if read to render felonious "every unauthorized loan by a bank officer." See Bates, 852 F. 2d, at 215. Under the Seventh Circuit's construction, § 1097(a) catches only the transgressor who intentionally ex- ercises unauthorized dominion over federally insured stu- dent loan funds for his own benefit or for the benefit of a third party. "[I]nnocent . . . maladministration of a business enterprise" or a use of funds that is simply "unwise," see Brief for Petitioner 5, does not fit within that construction.7 6 Ratzlaf v. United States, 510 U. S. 135 (1994), does not bear on our decision today. Ratzlaf decided only, in the particular statutory context of currency structuring, that knowledge of illegality was an element of 31 U. S. C. § 5322(a) as that provision was then framed. Ratzlaf did not in- volve the question presented here regarding § 1097(a), which is whether, in addition to a knowledge requirement, the Government must allege and prove an "intent to injure or defraud." 7 The Seventh Circuit's "working definition" of § 1097(a) reads: "[W]illful misapplication under § 1097(a) requires the government to allege and prove that the defendant consciously, voluntarily, and intentionally exercised unauthorized control or dominion over federally provided or guaranteed Title IV funds that interfered with the rights of the funds' true owner(s), for the use and benefit of the defendant or a third person, 522US1 Unit: $$U3 [01-27-00 18:58:46] PAGES PGT: OPIN 32 BATES v. UNITED STATES Opinion of the Court Bates also relies on a 1992 amendment to § 1097(a), which added "fails to refund" to the provision's text.8 This change, Bates argues, establishes that the deliberate failure to re- turn GSL funds, without an intent to defraud, was not pre- viously an offense within § 1097(a)'s compass, but became one only under the statute's current text. Congress' 1992 amendment hardly means that § 1097(a) did not previously cover the conduct in question. Cf. Commissioner v. Estate of Sternberger, 348 U. S. 187, 194 (1955) ("Subsequent amend- ments have clarified and not changed th[e earlier] princi- ple."). The three added words-"fails to refund"-simply foreclose any argument that § 1097(a) does not reach the fail- ure to make refunds; those words do not make the argument a persuasive one. See H. R. Conf. Rep. No. 102­630, p. 513 (1992) ("[F]ailure to pay refunds does constitute criminal misapplication under current law. Language is added in this bill merely as a clarification."). Bates finally urges that, to the extent § 1097(a) is ambigu- ous, the rule of lenity supports interpretation of the provi- sion to include fraudulent intent as an essential element of the offense of knowing and willful misapplication of funds. As we have explained, however, nothing in the text, struc- while knowing that such an exercise of control or dominion over the funds was a violation of the law." 96 F. 3d, at 970. The Government argues that the Seventh Circuit erred in reading § 1097(a) to require proof that a defendant knew his misapplication violated the law. Brief for United States 21­22. However, the Government did not challenge by cross-petition any part of the Seventh Circuit's decision, so the question whether the defendant must know his conduct was a viola- tion of the law is not before us. 8 As amended in 1992, § 1097(a) reads in relevant part: "Any person who knowingly and willfully embezzles, misapplies, steals, obtains by fraud, false statement, or forgery, or fails to refund any funds, assets, or property provided or insured under this subchapter . . . shall be fined not more than $20,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both." Higher Education Amendments of 1992, Pub. L. 102­325, § 495, 106 Stat. 631. 522US1 Unit: $$U3 [01-27-00 18:58:46] PAGES PGT: OPIN Cite as: 522 U. S. 23 (1997) 33 Opinion of the Court ture, or history of § 1097(a) warrants importation of an "in- tent to defraud" requirement into the misapplication pro- scription. The rule of lenity, therefore, does not come into play. See United States v. Wells, 519 U. S. 482, 499 (1997). The Government need not charge or prove that Bates aimed to injure or defraud anyone, nor is it a defense that Bates hoped the Jacksons, the students, or someone else would pay the amount due the lenders so that the federal fisc would suffer no loss. * * * For the reasons stated, the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is Affirmed. 522US1 Unit: $$U4 [01-27-00 18:57:05] PAGES PGT: OPIN 34 OCTOBER TERM, 1997 Syllabus CITY OF MONROE et al. v. UNITED STATES on appeal from the united states district court for the middle district of georgia No. 97­122. Decided November 17, 1997 Before 1966, the city charter of Monroe, Georgia, did not specify whether a mayoral candidate needed a plurality or a majority vote to win elec- tion. In practice, the city used plurality voting until 1966 and majority voting thereafter. In 1966, Georgia's General Assembly amended Mon- roe's charter to require majority voting, but the change was never sub- mitted for preclearance under § 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. In 1968, the State passed the current Municipal Election Code, § 34A­ 1407(a) of which contains a rule mandating deference to those munici- pal charters that provide for plurality voting and a default rule requir- ing a city whose charter has no plurality-vote provision to use majority voting. Section 34A­1407(a) was precleared by the United States At- torney General. When Monroe submitted its 1990 charter for pre- clearance, it did not ask to have the charter's majority-vote provision precleared. Nonetheless, the Attorney General objected to the provi- sion and sued Monroe and city officials to enjoin majority voting and require a return to plurality voting. In granting the Government sum- mary judgment, the three-judge District Court rejected Monroe's claim that preclearance of the 1968 state code encompassed Monroe's adoption of a majority system. Held: Monroe may implement § 34A­1407(a)'s precleared default rule. The section's deference rule does not apply here because Monroe's char- ter does not have and has not had a plurality-vote provision. Thus, the District Court erred in basing its contrary conclusion on City of Rome v. United States, 446 U. S. 156, 169­170, n. 6, which concerned only the deference rule. In contrast, this case is controlled by the default rule. It therefore satisfies all of City of Rome's preclearance require- ments: Georgia submitted the default rule to the Attorney General in an unambiguous and recordable manner and gave the Attorney General adequate opportunity to determine the purpose of the rule's elec- toral changes and whether such changes would adversely affect minor- ity voting. 962 F. Supp. 1501, reversed. 522US1 Unit: $$U4 [01-27-00 18:57:05] PAGES PGT: OPIN Cite as: 522 U. S. 34 (1997) 35 Per Curiam Per Curiam. The United States claims the city of Monroe, Georgia, did not seek preclearance for majority voting in mayoral elec- tions, as required by § 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, 79 Stat. 439, as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 1973c. The Government seeks to enjoin majority voting and to require Monroe to return to the plurality system it had once used. A three- judge District Court for the Middle District of Georgia agreed with the Government and granted summary judg- ment. 962 F. Supp. 1501 (1997). The District Court re- jected Monroe's claim that the Attorney General's preclear- ance of a 1968 statewide law encompassed Monroe's adoption of a majority system. On Monroe's motion, this Court stayed enforcement of the judgment. 521 U. S. 1138 (1997). The case is now on appeal, and the judgment must be reversed. I The parties agree upon the facts. Until 1966, Monroe's city charter did not specify whether a candidate needed a plurality or a majority vote to win a mayoral election. In practice, the city used plurality voting in its elections until 1966 and majority voting thereafter. In 1966, the General Assembly of Georgia amended the city's charter to require majority voting in mayoral elections. 1966 Ga. Laws 2459. Because Monroe is a jurisdiction cov- ered by § 5 of the Voting Rights Act, the change had to be precleared. Georgia or Monroe could have sought preclear- ance by submitting the change to the Attorney General or seeking a declaratory judgment from the United States Dis- trict Court for the District of Columbia. Neither did, so the 1966 charter amendment was not precleared. In 1968, the General Assembly passed a comprehensive Municipal Election Code (1968 code), which is still in force today. The statute applies to Monroe and all other munici- palities in Georgia. Section 34A­1407(a) of the 1968 code 522US1 Unit: $$U4 [01-27-00 18:57:05] PAGES PGT: OPIN 36 CITY OF MONROE v. UNITED STATES Per Curiam has two sentences. The first sentence sets forth a rule of deference to municipal charters: "If the municipal charter . . . provides that a candidate may be nominated or elected by a plurality . . . , such provision shall prevail." The second sentence lays down a state-law default rule for all other cities: "Otherwise, no candidate shall be . . . elected . . . [with- out] a majority of the votes cast . . . ." Georgia Munici- pal Election Code, § 34A­1407(a) (1968 code section or § 34A­1407(a)), 1968 Ga. Laws 977, as amended, Ga. Code Ann. § 21­3­407(a) (1993). Georgia submitted the 1968 code to the Attorney General for preclearance. Its cover letter stated: " `In view of the variety of laws which heretofore existed, no effort will be made herein to set forth the prior laws superseded by the Municipal Election Code.' " 962 F. Supp., at 1505. The let- ter then listed the majority-vote provision as a significant change, noting: " `Whether the majority or plurality rule is in effect in the municipal election will depend upon how the municipality's charter is written at present or may be writ- ten in [the] future . . . .' " Ibid. The Attorney General ob- jected to other provisions of the 1968 code but did not object to § 34A­1407(a), so it was, and is, precleared. The United States does not dispute this conclusion, nor does it claim Georgia's submission was misleading, ambiguous, or other- wise defective. In 1971, the General Assembly passed a comprehensive revision of Monroe's charter. 1971 Ga. Laws 3227. The 1971 charter made explicit provision for majority voting. Neither Georgia nor Monroe sought to preclear the revisions to the charter. In 1990, the General Assembly once again amended Mon- roe's charter and carried forward the majority-vote require- ment. This time, Monroe sent the 1990 charter to the Attor- 522US1 Unit: $$U4 [01-27-00 18:57:05] PAGES PGT: OPIN Cite as: 522 U. S. 34 (1997) 37 Per Curiam ney General for preclearance, but the cover letter did not mention the majority-vote provision. The Attorney General objected to it nevertheless, interpreting the submission as effecting a change from plurality to majority voting. The Government filed suit against Monroe and city officials in 1994 and prevailed in the District Court. II The 1968 code must be the centerpiece of this case, for it defers where city charters are specific and provides a default rule where they are not. If a city charter requires plurality voting, the deference rule in the first sentence of the 1968 code section allows the municipal charter provision to take effect. Monroe, however, does not have and has not had a plurality-vote provision in its charter. The first sentence simply does not apply here because no charter provision trig- gers its rule of deference to municipal law. Thus, the second sentence's default rule of state law governs, requiring Mon- roe to use majority voting. Since the Attorney General pre- cleared the default rule, Monroe may implement it. The District Court reached a contrary conclusion, relying on a single footnote in City of Rome v. United States, 446 U. S. 156, 169­170, n. 6 (1980). As the District Court put it: "The [Rome] Court's rationale focused squarely on the no- tion that [Georgia's] submission of the 1968 Statewide Code did not put before the Attorney General the propriety of changes in the voting practices of individual cities." 962 F. Supp., at 1513. The court's reliance on the footnote was misplaced. Un- like this case, which concerns the default rule in the second sentence of the 1968 code section, the City of Rome footnote concerned the deference rule in the first sentence. Rome's pre-1966 charter had an explicit requirement of plurality vot- ing. When the General Assembly amended Rome's charter to provide for majority voting, no one sought to preclear this or other changes. "Rome [later] argue[d] that the Attorney 522US1 Unit: $$U4 [01-27-00 18:57:05] PAGES PGT: OPIN 38 CITY OF MONROE v. UNITED STATES Per Curiam General, in preclearing the 1968 Code, [had] thereby ap- proved by reference the City's 1966 Charter amendments." City of Rome v. United States, 472 F. Supp. 221, 233 (DC 1979), aff'd, 446 U. S. 156 (1980); see also 472 F. Supp., at 233 ("Rome argues that its Charter, having been amended in 1966 to provide for majority voting, did not provide for plu- rality voting in 1968, and that therefore the 1968 Code man- dated majority voting"). This Court rejected Rome's claim because the submission of the 1968 code did not submit Rome's 1966 charter for pre- clearance "in an unambiguous and recordable manner." 446 U. S., at 170, n. 6 (internal quotation marks omitted). Geor- gia's submission of the 1968 code "informed the Attorney General only of [Georgia's] decision to defer to local charters and ordinances regarding majority voting" should a city choose to include a voting provision in its charter as permit- ted by the deference rule. Ibid. (internal quotation marks omitted; emphasis added). Georgia's submission of the 1968 code did not give the Attorney General "an adequate oppor- tunity to determine the purpose of [Rome's 1966] electoral changes and whether they will adversely affect minority vot- ing." Id., at 169, n. 6. Indeed, Georgia's submission of the 1968 code did not even arguably constitute a request for preclearance of the 1966 change to Rome's charter. Given that the unprecleared charter amendment was a nullity as a matter of federal law, the 1968 code did not change the law in Rome. Rather, it deferred to the plurality-vote requirement in the pre-1966 charter. In this case, however, the 1968 code is what changed the law in Monroe. Accordingly, unless the Attor- ney General's preclearance of the code was a nullity, there has been no violation of the Voting Rights Act. In short, City of Rome rejected Rome's effort to use the submission of the 1968 code to validate the 1966 municipal electoral changes. City of Rome, in discussing the "decision to defer to local charters," recognized that the case arose 522US1 Unit: $$U4 [01-27-00 18:57:05] PAGES PGT: OPIN Cite as: 522 U. S. 34 (1997) 39 Scalia, J., concurring in judgment under the rule of deference to municipal law. This rule of deference would not have been interpreted to effect a change in the law, and so it did not put the Attorney General on notice of Rome's shift to majority voting. Because munici- pal law was dispositive under the first sentence of the 1968 code section, City of Rome said nothing about the state-law default rule of majority voting in the second sentence. The instant case, in contrast, is controlled by the default rule of state law set forth in the second sentence. Monroe's pre-1966 charter, unlike Rome's, did not require plurality voting and so could not trigger the rule of deference to mu- nicipal law in the first sentence. Thus Monroe, unlike Rome, does not need to breathe life into its invalid 1966 charter to circumvent the rule of deference. After one disregards Monroe's invalid 1966 and 1971 charters, the state-law de- fault rule mandates majority voting. Cases, such as this one, arising under the default rule sat- isfy all of the preclearance requirements in City of Rome. The Government does not dispute that Georgia submitted the state-law default rule to the Attorney General in an "un- ambiguous and recordable manner." The submission, fur- thermore, gave the Attorney General "an adequate opportu- nity to determine the purpose of the [default-rule] electoral changes and whether they will adversely affect minority vot- ing." In consequence, by preclearing the 1968 code the At- torney General approved the state-law default rule. The controlling default rule having been precleared, Monroe may conduct elections under its auspices. Because the 1968 code disposes of the case on this undis- puted factual record, the Court need not address appellants' other contentions. The judgment of the District Court is Reversed. Justice Scalia, concurring in the judgment. Although I agree with the result reached by the Court, my reasoning is somewhat different. Like Justice Breyer, I 522US1 Unit: $$U4 [01-27-00 18:57:05] PAGES PGT: OPIN 40 CITY OF MONROE v. UNITED STATES Souter, J., dissenting believe that without knowledge of the contents of city char- ters the Attorney General could no more have known the precise practical effect of the second sentence of the Georgia statute than he could have known the precise practical effect of the first, see post, at 47­48. But there is, nonetheless, a critical difference between the two sentences. As far as appears, the first sentence (giving effect to plurality voting provisions contained in municipal charters) does not effect any change in voting. To think it did, one would have to suppose that prior to the statute various municipalities were ignoring their charters, which is most unlikely. So the first sentence did not inform the Attorney General "in some un- ambiguous and recordable manner" that a change was afoot, see City of Rome v. United States, 446 U. S. 156, 169, n. 6 (1980) (internal quotation marks omitted). The second sentence, however, sets forth a default rule of majority voting for all municipalities that have not treated the matter in their charters. To think that this effects a change, one need only believe that some municipalities have no charter provision on point, and that a subset of those have adopted a practice of plurality voting. Such a belief is not only reasonable; it is virtually essential unless one is to con- sider the statute pointless. As to the second sentence, therefore, the Attorney General ought to have known that he was approving a switch to majority voting in some munic- ipalities. If that seemed to him possibly troublesome, I think the burden was upon him to inquire further, and not upon the State, every time it enacts a statewide statute af- fecting voting, to submit a city-by-city breakdown of the con- sequences. City of Rome need not and should not be ex- tended that far. Justice Souter, with whom Justice Breyer joins, dissenting. In 1968 the Georgia Legislature enacted a Municipal Elec- tion Code with the following provisions governing the alter- natives of plurality and majority voting: 522US1 Unit: $$U4 [01-27-00 18:57:05] PAGES PGT: OPIN Cite as: 522 U. S. 34 (1997) 41 Souter, J., dissenting "If the municipal charter . . . provides that a candidate may be nominated or elected by a plurality of the votes cast . . . , such provision shall prevail. Otherwise, no candidate shall be . . . elected to public office in any elec- tion unless such candidate shall have received a majority of the votes cast . . . ." Georgia Municipal Election Code, § 34A­1407(a), 1968 Ga. Laws 977, as amended, Ga. Code Ann. § 21­3­407(a) (1993). These provisions were applicable in ways that would result in no changes in election practices in communities whose charters (so far as otherwise enforceable) provided that a plurality would suffice, whose charters provided that a ma- jority was required, or whose charters were silent but whose practices had been to require a majority. The first sentence quoted from the code (deferring to plurality provisions) would confirm the practice in the first class of municipalities, while the second sentence (a default provision requiring a majority in all other cases) would confirm the practices in the second and third classes. The new code would, however, require a change in the practice in any community whose municipal charter (so far as otherwise enforceable) was silent on the plurality-majority issue, but in which the practice had been to accept a plurality as sufficient. The 1968 code was submitted to the Attorney General of the United States for preclearance under § 5 of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U. S. C. § 1973c (since the entire State of Geor- gia was, and remains, subject to § 5), and the Attorney Gen- eral approved the provisions in question. In two instances we have been presented with a question whether application of the default provision to effect a change in practice to ma- jority voting was precleared by virtue of the blanket pre- clearance of the default provision. In the first case, City of Rome v. United States, 446 U. S. 156 (1980), we answered no; in the second case, this one, the answer should be the same. In Rome's case, the charter provision that was valid and enforceable when the 1968 code was precleared provided ex- pressly for plurality voting. Therefore, the code's deference 522US1 Unit: $$U4 [01-27-00 18:57:05] PAGES PGT: OPIN 42 CITY OF MONROE v. UNITED STATES Souter, J., dissenting provision applied and the plurality rule remained the rule under the code. Rome argued, however, that the default provision should be applied so as effectively to validate an unprecleared 1966 municipal charter change to an express majority requirement. This Court rejected the argument in these words: "We also reject the appellants' argument that the major- ity vote, runoff election, and numbered posts provisions of the city's charter have already been precleared by the Attorney General because in 1968 the State of Georgia submitted, and the Attorney General precleared, a com- prehensive Municipal Election Code that is now Title 34A of the Code of Georgia. Both the relevant regula- tion, 28 CFR § 51.10 (1979), and the decisions of this Court require that the jurisdiction `in some unambigu- ous and recordable manner submit any legislation or regulation in question directly to the Attorney General with a request for his consideration pursuant to the Act,' Allen v. State Board of Elections, 393 U. S. 544, 571 (1969), and that the Attorney General be afforded an adequate opportunity to determine the purpose of the electoral changes and whether they will adversely affect minority voting in that jurisdiction, see United States v. Board of Commissioners of Sheffield, Ala., 435 U. S. 110, 137­138 (1978). Under this standard, the State's 1968 submission cannot be viewed as a submission of the city's 1966 electoral changes, for, as the District Court noted, the State's submission informed the Attorney General only of `its decision to defer to local charters and ordinances regarding majority voting, runoff elec- tions, and numbered posts,' and `did not . . . submit in an "unambiguous and recordable manner" all municipal charter provisions, as written in 1968 or as amended thereafter, regarding these issues.' 472 F. Supp. 221, 233 (DC 1979)." 446 U. S., at 169­170, n. 6. 522US1 Unit: $$U4 [01-27-00 18:57:05] PAGES PGT: OPIN Cite as: 522 U. S. 34 (1997) 43 Souter, J., dissenting Since the Attorney General had never been shown Rome's 1966 municipal charter change (much less precleared it), he had never had an "adequate opportunity" to determine the purpose and effect of the proposed "electoral chang[e]" from plurality to majority, not in 1966 (because preclearance had not been sought) and not in 1968 (because he was not ap- prised of the purported 1966 change necessary to produce a majority vote requirement under the 1968 code). Monroe now claims the benefit of the 1968 code's default provision, in circumstances just like Rome's, with one dis- tinction. Monroe, too, obtained a 1966 charter change pur- porting to enact a majority requirement, for which Monroe, too, failed to seek preclearance. But Monroe could arguably enforce a majority requirement even if the 1966 unprecleared charter amendment were ignored, simply by applying the code's default provision to the circumstances that preceded the unprecleared 1966 amendment: before that amendment, although Monroe's charter was silent on the plurality- majority issue, the municipal practice (perfectly valid for purposes of § 5) was to accept a plurality as sufficient. Thus, the unprecleared 1966 charter change could be ignored in Monroe's case (as it was in Rome's) and the default provi- sion of the 1968 code would make Monroe a majority vote municipality. As a predicate for applying the 1968 code to effect major- ity voting requirements, however, this distinction between Rome's unprecleared 1966 change and Monroe's valid pre- 1966 silent charter is not entitled to make any difference. The object of the preclearance requirement is, at a minimum, to apprise the Attorney General of any change in voting practice. Section 5 requires preclearance not only in the case of a change of a voting "standard" that was not in place when the Voting Rights Act took effect, but also of a change in a "practice" or "procedure." 42 U. S. C. § 1973c. The point of the preclearance procedure is to determine whether the change proposed reflects either a "purpose" or will have 522US1 Unit: $$U4 [01-27-00 18:57:05] PAGES PGT: OPIN 44 CITY OF MONROE v. UNITED STATES Souter, J., dissenting the "effect" of forbidden abridgment of voting rights. Ibid. A new practice and a new effect could result not only from applying the code's default provision to an invalid (because unprecleared) charter revision, but also from applying it to a perfectly valid charter provision and practice. In either case, on the sensible reasoning of City of Rome, there can be no preclearance of a new practice unless the Attorney General is unambiguously put on notice of it. See 446 U. S., at 169­170, n. 6. Thus, Monroe is in no different position from Rome. Neither Rome nor the State ever disclosed the 1966 charter change on which the default provision might operate to provide a new majority vote requirement; neither Monroe nor the State ever disclosed the pre-1966 charter silence on which the default provision might operate to pro- vide a new majority vote requirement. Alternative analy- ses, leading to the conclusion that the Attorney General's preclearance of the relevant section of the 1968 code also precleared its undisclosed effects, are not only at odds with the unambiguous language of § 5 of the Voting Rights Act, but imply that the Attorney General was quite the cavalier when he approved the default provision in 1968. Since no particular charter provisions were submitted to him along with the 1968 code, City of Rome, supra, he was not on no- tice of any particular effect that might result from applica- tion of the default provision. It is therefore unreasonable to suppose that his approval of the code was meant to pre- clear its undisclosed applications even as to otherwise valid charter provisions and municipal practices.* *My analysis entails a modest but nonetheless discernible scope for the Attorney General's preclearance of the 1968 deferral and default provi- sions. The preclearance may have left the provisions enforceable insofar as they would result in ratification of prior, valid municipal practices (as- suming that preclearance was necessary as to such applications); in any case, the preclearance amounted to findings that the default provision did not as such represent an intent to affect minority voting adversely, and that some applications of the provision would presumably be possible with- out adverse effects. 522US1 Unit: $$U4 [01-27-00 18:57:05] PAGES PGT: OPIN Cite as: 522 U. S. 34 (1997) 45 Breyer, J., dissenting Justice Breyer, with whom Justice Souter joins, dissenting. City of Rome v. United States, 446 U. S. 156 (1980), fo- cused upon a change in Rome, Georgia's, method of electing city officials-a change from "first-past-the-post" (plurality wins) to "run-off" (majority needed to win). The change took place in 1966. The change was of a kind that could have made it more difficult for newly enfranchised black vot- ers to elect a mayor (e. g., where the black population of a town amounted, say, to 35% of all voters). The change had not been precleared, though § 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 1973c, required preclearance. In 1968, however, Georgia had precleared a different change in its law. Georgia had submitted, and the Attorney Gen- eral had precleared, a comprehensive Municipal Election Code that provided, in relevant part: "If the municipal charter . . . provides that a candidate may be nominated or elected by a plurality of the votes cast . . . , such provision shall prevail. Otherwise, no candidate shall be . . . elected to public office in any election unless such candidate shall have received a majority of the votes cast . . . ." Georgia Municipal Election Code, § 34A­1407(a), 1968 Ga. Laws 977, as amended, Ga. Code Ann. § 21­3­407(a) (1993). Rome argued that the Attorney General's preclearance of this 1968 change in effect precleared the plurality-to- majority change that Rome had made two years earlier. The Court rejected Rome's argument. The case before us now involves another Georgia city, the city of Monroe. Monroe, like Rome, made a change in its system for electing city officials-a change from "first-past- the-post" (plurality wins) to "run-off" (majority needed to win). Monroe, like Rome, made the change in 1966. And, Monroe's change, like Rome's change, was not precleared. Monroe, like Rome, argues that the Attorney General's pre- 522US1 Unit: $$U4 [01-27-00 18:57:05] PAGES PGT: OPIN 46 CITY OF MONROE v. UNITED STATES Breyer, J., dissenting clearance of Georgia's 1968 change in effect precleared its change to a majority system. Monroe acknowledges that this Court, in City of Rome, supra, rejected Rome's similar claim. But it asks us to note probable jurisdiction in part to "address the impact of the Attorney General's preclear- ance of the 1968 Municipal Elections Code as it relates to the majority vote requirement." Juris. Statement 17. In my view, the circumstances here are virtually identical to those at issue in City of Rome, and this Court's rejection of Rome's argument there requires us to reject Monroe's similar argu- ment here. I rest this conclusion upon what the parties argued before the Court in City of Rome and what the Court wrote. Rome, like Monroe, claimed that, in preclearing the 1968 statewide statute, the Attorney General had precleared its local majority system. The reply, by the United States, in City of Rome, included the following argument: "In its 1968 submission, the State did not `submit' the changes as they applied to the City of Rome. There was no explanation of how, or even whether, the City's procedures were changed. In order to `submit' a new procedure, the change must be clearly explained to the Attorney General, 28 C.F.R. 51.10; he cannot reasonably be held to be put on notice of the election procedures for every municipality when an act with statewide effect is submitted. As this Court [has] held, preclearance can- not occur until the particular change has been submitted to the Attorney General and he has been afforded an opportunity to assess its purpose and its effect on minor- ity voting in that jurisdiction." Brief for Appellees in City of Rome v. United States, O. T. 1979, No. 78­1840, pp. 69­70 (citation omitted). This Court, accepting the argument of the United States, wrote: 522US1 Unit: $$U4 [01-27-00 18:57:05] PAGES PGT: OPIN Cite as: 522 U. S. 34 (1997) 47 Breyer, J., dissenting "Both the relevant regulation, 28 CFR § 51.10 (1979), and the decisions of this Court require that the jurisdic- tion `in some unambiguous and recordable manner sub- mit any legislation or regulation in question directly to the Attorney General with a request for his consider- ation pursuant to the Act,' and that the Attorney Gen- eral be afforded an adequate opportunity to determine the purpose of the electoral changes and whether they will adversely affect minority voting in that jurisdiction. Under this standard, the State's 1968 [preclearance] sub- mission cannot be viewed as a submission of the city's 1966 electoral changes, for, as the District Court noted, the State's submission informed the Attorney General only of `its decision to defer to local charters and ordi- nances regarding majority voting, . . .' and `did not . . . submit in an "unambiguous and recordable manner" all municipal charter provisions, as written in 1968 or as amended thereafter, regarding th[is] issu[e].' " City of Rome v. United States, supra, at 169­170, n. 6 (cita- tions omitted). It seems to me that this statement disposes of the case before us. The statement points out that Georgia's 1968 submission did not describe the effect of its 1968 changes, town by town, in each of Georgia's more than 500 towns and cities. The statement specifically says that Georgia's simple "submission" of its 1968 comprehensive municipal code did not preclear Rome's "1966 electoral chang[e]" because Geor- gia did not also "submit" the relevant "municipal charter pro- visions, as written in 1968 or as amended thereafter." Geor- gia did not submit Monroe's charter to the Attorney General in 1968 any more than it submitted Rome's; nor is there any reason to believe that the Attorney General knew the details of Monroe's circumstances any more than he knew the details of Rome's. Hence, as the District Court concluded in this case, the 1968 preclearance did not preclear Monroe's earlier 1966 change. City of Rome, supra. 522US1 Unit: $$U4 [01-27-00 18:57:05] PAGES PGT: OPIN 48 CITY OF MONROE v. UNITED STATES Breyer, J., dissenting The majority's decision to the contrary rests upon one fac- tual difference between Rome and Monroe. The difference consists of the fact that Rome's original pre-1966 "first- past-the-post" plurality system was written into Rome's city charter. But Monroe's original pre-1966 "first-past-the- post" plurality system was a matter of practice. Its pre- 1966 city charter was silent. This difference means that, had a court set aside the 1966 changes in each city, and were no other change to have taken place, then Rome would have been left with a city charter that prescribed a plurality rule, while Monroe would have been left with a silent city charter and a plurality practice. The precleared 1968 state law, if left free to operate on these different circumstances, would have left Rome with a plurality rule (for its pre-1966 city charter contained that rule), but would have changed Mon- roe's plurality practice to a majority practice (for its pre-1966 city charter was silent). This complex difference, in my view, is irrelevant. The Attorney General, in 1968, was no more likely to have known about Monroe's change from "plurality-practice" to "majority-charter" than to have known about Rome's change from "plurality-charter" to "majority-charter." Nor is there any reason to believe the Attorney General, in 1968, would have wanted to approve previously unprecleared changes of the former, but not of the latter, variety. There is no more reason to believe that the Attorney General, had he known about Monroe's 1966 change, would have approved the appli- cation of the 1968 law to Monroe, than to believe that the Attorney General, had he known about Rome's change, would have approved the application of the 1968 law to Rome. Indeed, if Monroe's black population in 1966 was as high as it is today (37% of the electorate), Monroe's change to a majority vote system could have been precisely the sort of discriminatory change at which the Voting Rights Act was directed. 522US1 Unit: $$U4 [01-27-00 18:57:05] PAGES PGT: OPIN Cite as: 522 U. S. 34 (1997) 49 Breyer, J., dissenting The majority, and Justice Scalia, make a further argu- ment resting upon a distinction between the first and second sentences of the 1968 code that the Attorney General pre- cleared. The majority says, for example, that City of Rome "said nothing about the state-law default rule of majority voting in the second sentence," ante, at 39; and Justice Scalia refers to a "second sentence . . . default rule of major- ity voting for all municipalities that have not treated the matter in their charters," ante, at 40. The majority then finds that the Attorney General precleared the second- sentence default rule as applied to Monroe, apparently be- cause it believes that "[t]he Government does not dispute that Georgia submitted the state-law default rule to the At- torney General in an `unambiguous and recordable manner,' " ante, at 39. Justice Scalia reaches the same conclusion, not because of the Government's position, but because, in his view, the "burden was upon" the Attorney General to seek more information about the "city-by-city" effects of the stat- ute at the time it was submitted. Ante, at 40. A glance at the Georgia statute, supra, at 45, will make clear, however, just how finely the majority has had to parse the statute in its effort to escape the binding effect of prece- dent. That is because City of Rome (involving a city with a "majority" charter) and this case both concern the statute's second sentence. See Brief for Appellants in City of Rome v. United States, O. T. 1979, No. 78­1840, p. 90; City of Rome v. United States, 472 F. Supp. 221, 233 (DC 1979) ("Rome argues that . . . the 1968 Code mandated majority voting") (emphasis added). And nowhere does either the statute's second sentence or City of Rome explicitly make the default/ deference distinction that the majority finds critical. More importantly, there is no reason to think the distinc- tion is critical in respect to the matter here at issue. The Government has not conceded, silently or otherwise, that the Attorney General's preclearance of a statutory "default rule" somehow precleared the application of some such rule to 522US1 Unit: $$U4 [01-27-00 18:57:05] PAGES PGT: OPIN 50 CITY OF MONROE v. UNITED STATES Breyer, J., dissenting Monroe. To the contrary, the Government's argument, which concerns all applications of the "majority" language in the 1968 code's second sentence, is that: "[P]reclearance of the majority vote provision incorpo- rated in the State of Georgia's 1968 Municipal Election Code did not also preclear the prior or subsequent adop- tion and implementation of a majority vote requirement by any particular municipality within the State." Mo- tion to Affirm 11. That argument rather clearly says that the Attorney Gen- eral, in effect, precleared the Georgia statute on its face, not as applied to each of Georgia's several hundred municipali- ties. That is the very argument that the Government made, and the Court accepted, in City of Rome. Justice Scalia does not take the majority's view of the Government's argument. Rather, he says that, in any event, the Attorney General's initial preclearance of the second sen- tence simultaneously precleared that sentence's application because the State's submission was detailed enough to im- pose upon the Attorney General the "burden" of seeking detailed city-by-city information. Ante, at 40. In my view, however, precedent compels a contrary conclusion. In re- spect to the relevant point-whether the Attorney General cleared the statute on its face or also as applied-one cannot distinguish the issue before us from the (in this respect) identical issue in City of Rome. And that conclusion is con- sistent with well-established legal principle. See Clark v. Roemer, 500 U. S. 646, 656 (1991) ("[A]ny ambiguity in the scope of a preclearance request must be resolved against the submitting authority"); McCain v. Lybrand, 465 U. S. 236, 257 (1984) (same); 28 CFR §§ 51.26(d), 51.27(c) (1997) (requir- ing preclearance submissions to explain changes clearly and in detail). In a nutshell, City of Rome turns on the practical fact that the Attorney General, in preclearing the 1968 Georgia 522US1 Unit: $$U4 [01-27-00 18:57:06] PAGES PGT: OPIN Cite as: 522 U. S. 34 (1997) 51 Breyer, J., dissenting statute, would not have intended to preclear earlier, poten- tially unlawful, local changes of which he had not specifically been told. Rome was one such city. Monroe was another. The District Court consequently concluded that the Attorney General's preclearance of the 1968 statute did not preclear Monroe's earlier change, any more than it did Rome's. I agree with the District Court and would affirm its judgment. 522US1 Unit: $$U5 [01-27-00 19:04:02] PAGES PGT: OPLG 52 OCTOBER TERM, 1997 Syllabus SALINAS v. UNITED STATES certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit No. 96­738. Argued October 8, 1997-Decided December 2, 1997 This federal prosecution arose from a scheme in which a Texas county sheriff accepted money, and his deputy, petitioner Salinas, accepted two watches and a truck, in exchange for permitting women to make so- called "contact visits" to one Beltran, a federal prisoner housed in the county jail pursuant to an agreement with the Federal Government. Salinas was charged with one count of violating the Racketeer Influ- enced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U. S. C. § 1962(c), one count of conspiracy to violate RICO, § 1962(d), and two counts of bribery, § 666(a)(1)(B). The jury convicted him on all but the substantive RICO count, and the Fifth Circuit affirmed. Held:1. Section 666(a)(1)(B) does not require the Government to prove the bribe in question had a demonstrated effect upon federal funds. The enactment's plain language is expansive and unqualified, both as to the bribes forbidden and the entities covered, demonstrating by its refer- ence to "any" business or transaction, § 666(a)(1)(B), that it is not con- fined to transactions affecting federal funds; by its application to all cases in which an "organization, government, or agency" receives a spec- ified amount of federal benefits, § 666(b), that it reaches the scheme in- volved here; and by its prohibition on accepting "anything of value," § 666(a)(1)(B), that it encompasses the transfers of personal property to petitioner in exchange for his favorable treatment of Beltran. Given the statute's plain and unambiguous meaning, petitioner is not aided by the legislative history, see, e. g., United States v. Albertini, 472 U. S. 675, 680, or by the plain-statement rule set forth in Gregory v. Ashcroft, 501 U. S. 452, 460­461, and McNally v. United States, 483 U. S. 350, 360, see, e. g., Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. Florida, 517 U. S. 44, 57, n. 9. Moreover, the construction he seeks cannot stand when viewed in light of the pre-§ 666 statutory framework-which limited federal bribery prohibitions to "public official[s]," defined as "officer[s] or employee[s] or person[s] acting for or on behalf of the United States, or any branch thereof," and which was interpreted by some lower courts not to include state and local officials-and the expansion prescribed by § 666(a)(1)(B), which was designed to extend coverage to bribes offered to state and local officials employed by agencies receiving federal funds. Under this 522US1 Unit: $$U5 [01-27-00 19:04:02] PAGES PGT: OPLG Cite as: 522 U. S. 52 (1997) 53 Syllabus Court's construction, § 666(a)(1)(B) is constitutional as applied in this case. Its application to petitioner did not extend federal power beyond its proper bounds, since the preferential treatment accorded Beltran was a threat to the integrity and proper operation of the federal pro- gram under which the jail was managed. See Westfall v. United States, 274 U. S. 256, 259. Pp. 55­61. 2. To be convicted of conspiracy to violate RICO under § 1962(d), the conspirator need not himself have committed or agreed to commit the two or more predicate acts, such as bribery, requisite for a substantive RICO offense under § 1962(c). Section 1962(d)-which forbids "any per- son to conspire to violate" § 1962(c)-is even more comprehensive than the general conspiracy provision applicable to federal crimes, § 371, since it contains no requirement of an overt or specific act to effect the conspiracy's object. Presuming Congress intended the "to conspire" phrase to have its ordinary meaning under the criminal law, see Moris- sette v. United States, 342 U. S. 246, 263, well-established principles and contemporary understanding demonstrate that, although a conspirator must intend to further an endeavor which, if completed, would satisfy all of the elements of a substantive criminal offense, it suffices that he adopt the goal of furthering or facilitating the criminal endeavor, and he need not agree to undertake all of the acts necessary for the crime's completion. Salinas' contrary interpretation of § 1962(c) violates the foregoing principles and is refuted by Bannon v. United States, 156 U. S. 464, 469. Its acceptance, moreover, is not required by the rule of lenity, see United States v. Shabani, 513 U. S. 10, 17. Even if Salinas did not accept or agree to accept two bribes, there was ample evidence that the sheriff committed at least two predicate acts when he accepted nu- merous bribes and that Salinas knew about and agreed to facilitate the scheme, and this is sufficient to support Salinas' conviction under § 1962(d). Pp. 61­66. 89 F. 3d 1185, affirmed. Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Francisco J. Enriquez argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Rolando Cantu. Gerald H. Gold- stein and Cynthia Hujar Orr filed a brief for Brigido Mar- molejo, Jr., as respondent under this Court's Rule 12.6, in support of petitioner. Paul R. Q. Wolfson argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor Gen- eral Dellinger, Acting Assistant Attorney General Keeney, 522US1 Unit: $$U5 [01-27-00 19:04:02] PAGES PGT: OPLG 54 SALINAS v. UNITED STATES Opinion of the Court Deputy Solicitor General Dreeben, Joel M. Gershowitz, and Richard A. Friedman.* Justice Kennedy delivered the opinion of the Court. The case before us presents two questions: First, is the federal bribery statute codified at 18 U. S. C. § 666 limited to cases in which the bribe has a demonstrated effect upon fed- eral funds? Second, does the conspiracy prohibition con- tained in the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organiza- tions Act (RICO) apply only when the conspirator agrees to commit two of the predicate acts RICO forbids? Ruling against the petitioner on both issues, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. I This federal prosecution arose from a bribery scheme op- erated by Brigido Marmolejo, the Sheriff of Hidalgo County, Texas, and petitioner Mario Salinas, one of his principal deputies. In 1984, the United States Marshals Service and Hidalgo County entered into agreements under which the county would take custody of federal prisoners. In ex- change, the Federal Government agreed to make a grant to the county for improving its jail and also agreed to pay the county a specific amount per day for each federal prisoner housed. Based on the estimated number of federal prison- ers to be maintained, payments to the county were projected to be $915,785 per year. The record before us does not dis- close the precise amounts paid. It is uncontested, however, that in each of the two periods relevant in this case the pro- gram resulted in federal payments to the county well in ex- cess of the $10,000 amount necessary for coverage under 18 U. S. C. § 666. (We denied certiorari on the question whether the moneys paid to the county were "benefits" under a "Fed- *Joshua L. Dratel, Richard A. Greenberg, and Lisa Kemler filed a brief for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers as amicus cu- riae urging reversal. 522US1 Unit: $$U5 [01-27-00 19:04:02] PAGES PGT: OPLG Cite as: 522 U. S. 52 (1997) 55 Opinion of the Court eral program" under § 666(b), and we assume for purposes of this opinion that the payments fit those definitions.) Homero Beltran-Aguirre was one of the federal prisoners housed in the jail under the arrangement negotiated between the Marshals Service and the county. He was incarcerated there for two intervals, first for 10 months and then for 5 months. During both custody periods, Beltran paid Marmo- lejo a series of bribes in exchange for so-called "contact visits" in which he remained alone with his wife or, on other occasions, his girlfriend. Beltran paid Marmolejo a fixed rate of $6,000 per month and $1,000 for each contact visit, which occurred twice a week. Petitioner Salinas was the chief deputy responsible for managing the jail and super- vising custody of the prisoners. When Marmolejo was not available, Salinas arranged for the contact visits and on occa- sion stood watch outside the room where the visits took place. In return for his assistance with the scheme, Salinas received from Beltran a pair of designer watches and a pickup truck. Salinas and Marmolejo were indicted and tried together, but only Salinas' convictions are before us. Salinas was charged with one count of violating RICO, 18 U. S. C. § 1962(c), one count of conspiracy to violate RICO, § 1962(d), and two counts of bribery in violation of § 666(a)(1)(B). The jury acquitted Salinas on the substantive RICO count, but convicted him on the RICO conspiracy count and the bribery counts. A divided panel of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed, United States v. Marmolejo, 89 F. 3d 1185 (1996), and we granted certiorari, 519 U. S. 1148 (1997). To resolve the case, we consider first the bribery scheme, then the conspiracy. II Salinas contends the Government must prove the bribe in some way affected federal funds, for instance by divert- ing or misappropriating them, before the bribe violates 522US1 Unit: $$U5 [01-27-00 19:04:02] PAGES PGT: OPLG 56 SALINAS v. UNITED STATES Opinion of the Court § 666(a)(1)(B). The relevant statutory provisions are as follows: "(a) Whoever, if the circumstance described in subsec- tion (b) of this section exists- "(1) being an agent of an organization, or of a State, local, or Indian tribal government, or any agency thereof- . . . . . "(B) corruptly . . . accepts or agrees to accept, any- thing of value from any person, intending to be influ- enced or rewarded in connection with any business, transaction, or series of transactions of such organiza- tion, government, or agency involving any thing of value of $5,000 or more; or . . . . . "shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both. "(b) The circumstance referred to in subsection (a) of this section is that the organization, government, or agency receives, in any one year period, benefits in excess of $10,000 under a Federal program involving a grant, contract, subsidy, loan, guarantee, insurance, or other form of Federal assistance. . . . . . "(d) As used in this section- . . . . . "(5) the term `in any one-year period' means a contin- uous period that commences no earlier than twelve months before the commission of the offense or that ends no later than twelve months after the commission of the offense. Such period may include time both before and after the commission of the offense." 18 U. S. C. § 666. The enactment's expansive, unqualified language, both as to the bribes forbidden and the entities covered, does not support the interpretation that federal funds must be af- 522US1 Unit: $$U5 [01-27-00 19:04:02] PAGES PGT: OPLG Cite as: 522 U. S. 52 (1997) 57 Opinion of the Court fected to violate § 666(a)(1)(B). Subject to the $5,000 thresh- old for the business or transaction in question, the statute forbids acceptance of a bribe by a covered official who in- tends "to be influenced or rewarded in connection with any business, transaction, or series of transactions of [the defined] organization, government or agency." § 666(a)(1)(B). The prohibition is not confined to a business or transaction which affects federal funds. The word "any," which pre- faces the business or transaction clause, undercuts the at- tempt to impose this narrowing construction. See United States v. James, 478 U. S. 597, 604­605, and n. 5 (1986); Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 331 U. S. 519, 529 (1947). Furthermore, the broad definition of the "circumstances" to which the statute applies provides no textual basis for limiting the reach of the bribery prohibition. The statute applies to all cases in which an "organization, government, or agency" receives the statutory amount of benefits under a federal program. § 666(b). The language reaches the scheme alleged, and proved, here. Neither does the statute limit the type of bribe offered. It prohibits accepting or agreeing to accept "anything of value." § 666(a)(1)(B). The phrase encompasses all trans- fers of personal property or other valuable consideration in exchange for the influence or reward. It includes, then, the personal property given to Salinas in exchange for the favorable treatment Beltran secured for himself. The stat- ute's plain language fails to provide any basis for limiting § 666(a)(1)(B) to bribes affecting federal funds. Salinas attempts to circumscribe the statutory text by pointing to its legislative history. "Courts in applying crim- inal laws generally must follow the plain and unambiguous meaning of the statutory language. `[O]nly the most ex- traordinary showing of contrary intentions' in the legislative history will justify a departure from that language." United States v. Albertini, 472 U. S. 675, 680 (1985) (citations 522US1 Unit: $$U5 [01-27-00 19:04:02] PAGES PGT: OPLG 58 SALINAS v. UNITED STATES Opinion of the Court omitted) (quoting Garcia v. United States, 469 U. S. 70, 75 (1984)); see also Ardestani v. INS, 502 U. S. 129, 135 (1991) (courts may deviate from the plain language of a statute only in " `rare and exceptional circumstances' "). The construction Salinas seeks cannot stand when viewed in light of the statutory framework in existence before § 666 was enacted and the expanded coverage prescribed by the new statute. Before § 666 was enacted, the federal criminal code contained a single, general bribery provision codified at 18 U. S. C. § 201. Section 201 by its terms applied only to "public official[s]," which the statute defined as "officer[s] or employee[s] or person[s] acting for or on behalf of the United States, or any department, agency or branch of Government thereof, including the District of Columbia, in any official function, under or by authority of any such department, agency, or branch." § 201(a). The Courts of Appeals di- vided over whether state and local employees could be con- sidered "public officials" under § 201(a). Compare United States v. Del Toro, 513 F. 2d 656, 661­662 (CA2), cert. denied, 423 U. S. 826 (1975), with United States v. Mosley, 659 F. 2d 812, 814­816 (CA7 1981), and United States v. Hinton, 683 F. 2d 195, 197­200 (CA7 1982), aff'd sub nom. Dixson v. United States, 465 U. S. 482 (1984). Without awaiting this Court's resolution of the issue in Dixson, Congress enacted § 666 and made it clear that federal law applies to bribes of the kind offered to the state and local officials in Del Toro, as well as those at issue in Mosley and Hinton. As this chronology and the statutory language demon- strate, § 666(a)(1)(B) was designed to extend federal bribery prohibitions to bribes offered to state and local officials em- ployed by agencies receiving federal funds. It would be in- congruous to restrict § 666 in the manner Salinas suggests. The facts and reasoning of Del Toro give particular instruc- tion in this respect. In that case, the Second Circuit held that a city employee was not a "public official" under § 201(a) even though federal funds would eventually cover 100% of 522US1 Unit: $$U5 [01-27-00 19:04:02] PAGES PGT: OPLG Cite as: 522 U. S. 52 (1997) 59 Opinion of the Court the costs and 80% of the salaries of the program he a