Autah-cs.584 net.news.groups utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!npois!harpo!utah-cs!morrison Tue Apr 27 00:32:48 1982 Re: net.mucords I may be way off base here, but I suspect that things would be better broken down by kind of "music," rather than the medium which brings it to you. I'm sure there are plenty of folks who are only interested in "classical" music, only interested in "folk" music, only interested in "rock", only interested in "jazz", or , or in some proper subset of all of those. Anyone interested mostly in jazz is probably equally interested in the theorey/history/literature of jazz, live performances, records, radio, and so on. So how about a more rational reorganization {net.music,net.records} => {net.music, net.music.class,net.music.jazz,net.music.}. Those rare instances which are pan-classification (e.g. something about a new recording technology) could go into the top-level net.music, and most things into a more appropriate cubby-hole. And there's certainly nothing to keep those of us interested from reading all the music groups.
This Usenet Oldnews Archive article may be copied and distributed freely, provided:

1. There is no money collected for the text(s) of the articles.
2. The following notice remains appended to each copy:

The Usenet Oldnews Archive: Compilation Copyright© 1981, 1996
Bruce Jones, Henry Spencer, David Wiseman.


Goto NEXT article in NET.news.groups Newsgroup
Return to NET.news.groups index
Return to the Usenet Oldnews Archive index ----------------------------------------------------------------- gopher://quux.org/ conversion by John Goerzen of http://communication.ucsd.edu/A-News/ This Usenet Oldnews Archive article may be copied and distributed freely, provided: 1. There is no money collected for the text(s) of the articles. 2. The following notice remains appended to each copy: The Usenet Oldnews Archive: Compilation Copyright (C) 1981, 1996 Bruce Jones, Henry Spencer, David Wiseman.