**From:** Bob Apthorpe <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX> > **To:** Sean Conner <sean@conman.org> > **Subject:** More run-ins with Nameprotect.com > **Date:** Sat, 11 Jan 2003 04:52:18 -0600 >
…
Early on, I found spiders from Cyveillance.com rummaging through a bunch of my dynamically-generated web pages (message boards, mailing list admin pages, etc.) Of course, there was no reverse DNS (Domain Name Service) on the spider and it was claiming to be some version of Internet Explorer, but hitting pages once a second and crawling every day on a dynamically-generated calendar is a tip-off you're not dealing with a meth-addled web surfer. Rainman, perhaps, but definitely not a real human.
I don't have anything to hide but that's no justification for letting ill-mannered commercial robots rummage through the electronic equivalent of my sock drawer. I close the door when I'm in the bathroom. I wear pants. Modesty and privacy do not imply improper behavior. Besides, I have a few hundred megabytes of photos of improv comedy shows I've played in. I don't want my connection saturated because some anonymous robot was brainlessly and greedily slurping content that no human was ever going to enjoy, at least not in the way I intended. My network, my rules.
Email from “Bob Apthorpe”
Now I know blogger's readership figures are inflated. I checked and sure enough, Cyveillance [1] came ripping through my site last month for 213 hits (that I didn't notice—I think I'm now down to 75 or so real human hits per day). Now, unlike NameProtect® [2]'s rather terse use of Mozilla/4.7 [3] as a user-agent, Cyveillance [4] has gone the other extreme:
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0);Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.05; Windows NT 5.0);Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.05; Windows NT 4.0);Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.05; Windows NT 3.51)
I guess they're running their robot under Windows 2000 (reported as Windows NT (Not Today)5.0), Windows NT 4.0 and Windows NT 3.51 and want to cover all the bases.
## Brand Protection Solution
Cyveillance's Brand Protection Solution helps companies actively protect their brand equity by returning control over online brand integrity and use. By identifying and providing detailed intelligence on sites leveraging a company's brand for their own commercial purposes, Cyveillance enables companies to transform the Internet from a branding liability to a high-impact branding medium.
With Cyveillance's Brand Protection Solution, clients are able to accomplish the following:
> * Create a more positive online branding experience for customers across the Internet;
* Build customer loyalty through consistent representation and understanding of brand messages; and
* Increase ROI (Return On Investment) and effectiveness of online branding initiatives.
## Client Success Story
Many clients have leveraged Cyveillance's Brand Protection Solution to prevent revenue leakage and recoup lost dollars. For example, a large insurance agency leveraged Cyveillance's Brand Protection Solution because the client wanted to stop traffic diversion from its corporate Web site by other sites leveraging this client's name, logo and slogan to drive business. Cyveillance identified several hundred cases of sites diverting potential buyers away from this client's site. These cases included several in which the client's own agents were using the brand to drive traffic from the corporate Web site and others in which sites were using the recognizable name and logo in meta tags, URL (Uniform Resource Locators)s and titles.
With this knowledge, the client could immediately take action against the misrepresented sites, prevent further revenue leakage and strengthen brand equity.
“Cyveillance Brand Management [5]”
Beautiful the way they phrase things, isn't it?
I would think that effective use of Google [6] would be just as effective and possibly cheaper than hiring an outfit like NameProtect® [7] or Cyveillance [8], but that's just me.
It would be nice if these sites would follow the Robots Exclusion [9] protocol but nooooooooooooo!
My only consolation is that they find their way towards xxx.lanl.gov [10], because, you know, the name says it all, and besides, they just <SARCASM>loooooove robots [11]</SARCASM> coming through their site.
[2] http://www.nameprotect.com/
[5] http://www.cyveillance.com/web/solutions/brand_protection.htm
[7] http://www.nameprotect.com/
[9] http://www.robotstxt.org/wc/norobots.html