created by theconstellinguist on 30/11/2024 at 08:28 UTC*
1 upvotes, 0 top-level comments (showing 0)
1: https://drreidmeloy.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/1990%5C_NarcissismAndHy.pdf
2: https://drreidmeloy.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/1990_NarcissismAndHy.pdf
3: https://narcissismresearch.miraheze.org/wiki/AIReactiveCodependencyRageDisclaimer
4: https://narcissismresearch.miraheze.org/wiki/AIReactiveCodependencyRageDisclaimer
1. We discuss pair and reflection responses and their relationship to narcissism in psychopathic disturbance. We recommend interpreting the personal response within the context of the psychopathic character and view personal responses as expressions of narcissism and omnipotence in highly psychopathic subjects.
1. We also hypothesize that the impressionistic responses are indicative of primitive dissociative processes and hysteria in psychopathic subjects, and that their presence provides construct validity for the work of Guze (1976) and others who suggested an underlying histrionic dimension to psychopathy.
1. Narcissism is one of two primary factors associated with psychopathic disturbance (Harpur, Hare, & Hakstian, 1989). Hysteria has also been linked to psychopathy (Guze, 1976; Guze, Woodruff, & Clayton, 1971; Hart & Hare, 1989; Meloy, 1988). Psychodynamic theorists have come to view the psychopath as an aggressive and pathological variant of narcissistic disorder (Gacono & Meloy, 1988; Kernberg, 1975; Meloy, 1988) whose intraps~chic functioning relies on primitive splitting and dissociative mechanisms (Gacono & Meloy, 1988; Meloy, 1988).
1. These indices tend to increase in narcissistic individuals. The combination of pairs and reflections has been theorized to be an empirical measure of the grandiose self-structure (Kernberg, 1975) in psychopathic individuals (Meloy, 1988).
1. Subjects were 42 male felons who met the DSM-111-R (American Psychiatric Association, 1987) criteria for antisocial personality disorder. They were between the ages of 18 and 43 (M = 28) and free of a diagnosis of schizophrenia, mental retardation, or bipolar illness. Subjects with an IQ < 80 were excluded. The mean IQ for subjects was 101.87. The diagnosis for antisocial personality disorder was determined utilizing both interview and record data and was based on agreement among any pair of the authors.
1. Using Exner (1986) scoring, the impressionistic response must include achromatic or chromatic color and an abstraction (Ab). Examples include: "The red made me think of Christmas" (Card II), "The red made me think of abortion" (Card III), "I see laughter and gaiety. The colors" (Card X), and "These would be angry thoughts, because they're red" (Card 11). Temperature responses stimulated by colors are also included in this category.
1. The examiner is perceived as a potential threat to the psychopath's grandiosity. Through presentation of the self-referential, overvalued ~personal response (a form of omnipotence), the psychopath bolsters his grandiosity by identifying with the perceived omnipotence of the examiner, thereby preventing any feelings of vulnerability or devaluation.
1. Formless or pure r in the severe psychopath may indicate a global, diffuse, and suggestible perceptual-associative process, what Shapiro (1965) termed "hysterical cognition" (p. 11 1). This same subject's record included three personals (PER) and one impressionistic response indicative of selfreferenced hysterical cognition
1. 'lf you're on a lake sometime and looking at a bank, you will see the reflection of the bank" (What makes it look like a reflection?), ''I think I just described it." In this response, the mirror is more important than the object itself, Confusion between object and mirror is also exhibited in this partial response from another severe psychopath who committed a rape and murder,
1. He saw "a male gorilla watching his reflection in a pool" on Card I11 and responded: "Yea, that's interesting. If one was looking down into a pool you would see themselves, not a reflection." The presence of "reflection only" and "confused reflection" responses may support the clinical and theoretical assertion that severe psychopaths are chameleonlike and find their identity through the imitation and simulation of others (Deutsch, 194.2; Gaddini, 1969; Greenacre, 1958; Meloy, 1988).
1. The association between hysteria and antisocial personality has been discussed by many authors (Guze, 1976; Guze et al., 1971; Hart, 1989; Lilienfeld, Van Valkenberg, Karntz, & Akiskal, 1986; Meloy, 1988). Lilienfeld et al, (1986) hypothesized that "an individual with histrionic ~ersonalit~ is likely to develop either antisocial personality or somatization disorder, with the outcome dependent primarily on the sex of the patient" (p. 721).
1. The impressionistic (IMP) response, combining color and abstraction, may signal an hysterical cognitive style and briefly capture the primary psychopath's tendency to split off affect through rapid and diffuse symbolization.
1. Narcissism and hysteria are personality or character traits that determine the severity and expressive nature of psychopathy. Although the PER response appears to be an important discriminating variable in understanding the grandiosity and omnipotence in severe psychopaths, the idiosyncratic nature of pair, reflection, and IMP responses, rather than providing firm conclusions, should be interpreted in the context of other data and suggests further avenues of research into the psychopathology of the psychopath.
There's nothing here!