11 upvotes, 1 direct replies (showing 1)
View submission: Quinnspiracy Theory: In-N-Out Edition
Devil's advocate: This argument doesn't work. Because they can say that you compare a "real-rape"-accusation (which is news worthy) with a "not-really-rape"-admittance (which is not news worthy). Zoe Quinn's definition of rape is bullshit and not the legal frame work, so you don't have to report it. Whether somebody has admitted to or has been accused of "not-really-rape" is not news-worthy. It's just relationship cheating.
The correct argument to force a report on this story is, that it has included corruption/nepotism/favors from journalists. The rape angle doesn't work.
Comment by [deleted] at 23/08/2014 at 12:50 UTC
13 upvotes, 0 direct replies
If a prominent vegan goes around preaching that eating meat is murder and then is caught eating meat,that would be news worthy.