80 upvotes, 2 direct replies (showing 2)
View submission: Quinnspiracy Theory: In-N-Out Edition
I might add that the Article on Max Temkin, written by Patricia *"everything is rape"* Hernandez, didn't really care if he was innocent or not.
All she cared about was that he might be guilty in some way or the other and that he publicly defended himself after being publicly accused, which made him somewhat guilty.
Hernandez' **obsession** with rape twisted the matter into portraying Temkin as "somewhat" guilty, not necessarily of rape, but definitely of something.
A golden statement from the comment section is her not saying, but strongly implying that he's **statistically guilty.**
The Arcticle mentioned in the vid, for those who dare to venture into her twisted mind.
Comment by mw19078 at 23/08/2014 at 16:00 UTC
8 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Patricia is a fucking joke, she's by far the worst excuse kotaku had for a "journalist" which says a lot.
Comment by MumrikDK at 24/08/2014 at 01:53 UTC
3 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Hernandez:
He spends too much time trying to defend himself—which I understand as an impulse, given the gravity of the situation—and not enough time contemplating the idea that he might've messed up.
After quoting Temkin for this:
but we never had sex
Huh.