https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-28595-z
created by uniofreading on 02/03/2022 at 12:40 UTC
89 upvotes, 4 top-level comments (showing 4)
Comment by AutoModerator at 02/03/2022 at 12:40 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, **personal anecdotes are now allowed as responses to this comment**. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will continue to be removed and our normal comment rules[1] still apply to other comments.
1: https://www.reddit.com/r/science/wiki/rules#wiki_comment_rules
2: /message/compose/?to=/r/science
Comment by dietwindows at 02/03/2022 at 15:09 UTC
9 upvotes, 1 direct replies
Uhh.. wasn't this done like 30 years ago? Isn't it called punctuated equilibrium?
Comment by Toolatetootired at 02/03/2022 at 14:16 UTC
3 upvotes, 3 direct replies
Can someone ELI5? I get that they are trying to explain the problems with Darwinian evolution, i just don't get the explanation.
Comment by [deleted] at 02/03/2022 at 15:00 UTC
-2 upvotes, 1 direct replies
Apologies if I don’t understand! How does darwinian evolution relate to random mutations brought on by things like genetic drift? Is this describing a similar idea but to a higher degree?