4 upvotes, 0 direct replies (showing 0)
View submission: Defending the open Internet (again): Our latest brief to the Supreme Court
From your phrasing, it seems that mods must have a reason to ban someone
for what it's worth, here's a direct quote from a mod team i had the unfortunate experience of interacting with:
You also seem to be under the impression that a moderator has the burden of duty to prove you violated a written rule in order to ban you. This is not the case as it is up to subreddit moderators to decide who participates on their subreddit, and that decision can be made for any reason **or no reason at all**.
this is the kind of behavior that the reddit admins are defending.
There's nothing here!