Comment by scarface2cz on 25/01/2020 at 16:18 UTC

6 upvotes, 1 direct replies (showing 1)

View submission: Reductio: if we consider merely affecting the environment to be morally wrong, we face the conclusion that our existence is evil. This indicates we have made a mistake...

its dishonest to say that significant minority or even majority of environmentalists condemn affecting the environment, since merely standing and doing nothing is affecting environment.

​

most activists and part of all people condemn significantly damaging actions-pollution of water and land, deforestation, needless mining of resources and so on.

​

to make a point, your starting point has to be honest. it doesnt look like it is.

Replies

Comment by DrRidleyCooper at 25/01/2020 at 16:27 UTC

-3 upvotes, 4 direct replies

I appreciate the comment, but there are some. And this thinking leaks into the everyday: think about the moral outrage heaped onto people for driving a Hummer or flying in a private jet. Their actions are wasteful and pollute (affect the environment) but their particular actions can not be plausibly said to create suffering. So we've made a mistake, or at least I argue in the article...