2 upvotes, 1 direct replies (showing 1)
Thanks for your thoughts! I recognize that the author and Kierkegaard are not talking about my second definition, and I used their definition in point 2. I just brought up the other one because the comments on people who criticize faith were off-base.
I’m fine with a saying that I use faith **if** the definition does not include accepting any proposition on insufficient evidence. This definition would not apply to someone who affirms God’s existence on the basis of faith, and I’ve never actually heard any Christian use this definition when talking about their own religion. It seems like a misleading and unhelpful definition.
Comment by reasonablefideist at 25/01/2020 at 00:35 UTC
2 upvotes, 1 direct replies
I’ve never actually heard any Christian use this definition when talking about their own religion.
Pleased to meet you :) Although I will admit that faith has many complex and sometimes competing definitions for me. Kierkegaard defined faith at least 3 times in his works and in quite different ways each time.
And a super relevant essay[1] I happened to read this morning.