Gotta love etymological orthographies

https://i.redd.it/h3y8id0e8pge1.jpeg

created by GignacPL on 02/02/2025 at 09:59 UTC

496 upvotes, 20 top-level comments (showing 20)

I felt personally attacked by the latest ElitPonkots' video on his cirilisation of Polish and felt the need to defend my own system by mocking his (how mature of me).

Моĭа версĭа ĭест обĭективнье лепша, океĭ??? Без дискусĭi.

Comments

Comment by Kyr1500 at 02/02/2025 at 10:14 UTC

174 upvotes, 2 direct replies

I didn't know etymological orthographies were made with mematic

Comment by Aphrontic_Alchemist at 02/02/2025 at 10:07 UTC

72 upvotes, 2 direct replies

You know that meme with ever escalating bad dudes?

French is the 2nd guy, Tibetan is the 3rd.

Comment by dubovinius at 02/02/2025 at 10:46 UTC

53 upvotes, 1 direct replies

In the case of languages like Irish, which has complex mutation processes which stem from the language's history, having an etymological orthography really helps it so that related words and inflections of the same word aren't completely unrecognisable.

Comment by frenchiesinatranchis at 02/02/2025 at 10:13 UTC

26 upvotes, 2 direct replies

Chut. T'a aukin droi pour me dir si oui ou non mon ortograf doi ètr fönétik ou pa. Parcque je fai se que je veu du bordel qu'è l'ortograf françaiz, et ça inclu la chanjé.

Comment by MarcHarder1 at 02/02/2025 at 10:29 UTC

25 upvotes, 2 direct replies

Dat makt goot sen dat /fɪɲa/ entwyder 'finger' oder 'finder' gesryven wart, afhängigh an de bediedunk, oder /he̞ɲ/ as 'häng' en 'händ'.

dɔt mɔʏ̯kt gœt zɛn dɔt /fɪɲa/ ɛntvi̞da fɪɲa ɪda fɪɲa jəʃri̞və vɔɐ̯t, ɔfhe̞ɲɪç ɔn də bədidʊŋk, ɪda /he̞ɲ/ ɔs he̞ɲ n̩ he̞ɲ

Comment by Ismoista at 02/02/2025 at 12:11 UTC

24 upvotes, 2 direct replies

No orthography is phonetic, if anything they are phonemic. Sorry to destroy you with facts and logic 😎

Comment by Xitztlacayotl at 02/02/2025 at 10:24 UTC

13 upvotes, 2 direct replies

Totally signing the chad.

Chociaż twoja werzja nie jest lepsza boś dodał nieistniejące litery. Abyś zrobił fajną cyryllizację polskiego, trzebasz używa�� tylko bułgarską cyryllicę (do reformy 1945.)

Comment by nvmdl at 02/02/2025 at 12:17 UTC

11 upvotes, 1 direct replies

And then you get languages like Czech with an unholy mix of phonetic and etymological orthography that doesn't make any sense and confuses native speakers even more that non-natives.

Comment by norude1 at 02/02/2025 at 12:19 UTC

9 upvotes, 1 direct replies

I don't like that morphological orthographies are always forgotten. The system in Russian for example is quite good, most morphemes look the same regardless of context and the pronunciation is derived fairly easily. When you need to write something down and you're unsure, just put that morpheme in a stressed position and copy it from there

Comment by Artiom_Woronin at 02/02/2025 at 13:11 UTC

7 upvotes, 0 direct replies

What’s morphological orthograthy then?

Comment by GanacheConfident6576 at 02/02/2025 at 15:05 UTC

6 upvotes, 0 direct replies

you know what the logical conclusion of etymological orthography is? writing a dead language. in the case of english spelling; many of the etymologies it purports to reflect are flat out false

Comment by bwv528 at 02/02/2025 at 13:12 UTC

5 upvotes, 0 direct replies

Thz är myckieth ängklere oc staffwa när dhett jnnthitt findz någhro reguler, för dågh kann mandh inthz schryfwa feehhll

Comment by Widhraz at 03/02/2025 at 00:13 UTC

3 upvotes, 1 direct replies

https://preview.redd.it/60yd9gzqgtge1.png?width=1280&format=png&auto=webp&s=5c554094c2cd7d9039d9f5ca69a4b85156b75806

Comment by dhskdjdjsjddj at 02/02/2025 at 13:40 UTC

2 upvotes, 0 direct replies

THAD morphological orthographies

Comment by SkiingWalrus at 02/02/2025 at 15:07 UTC

2 upvotes, 0 direct replies

Russian French English Tibetan 🔛🔝

Comment by AynidmorBulettz at 02/02/2025 at 15:17 UTC

2 upvotes, 0 direct replies

Let's go back to using Chữ Nôm and gatekeeping the language 🔥🗣️

Comment by AutBoy22 at 02/02/2025 at 16:45 UTC

2 upvotes, 0 direct replies

Do logographic langs count?

Comment by Xenapte at 02/02/2025 at 23:10 UTC

2 upvotes, 0 direct replies

Next step: reinstate the old grammar. Or I should just say use a classical language, preferably your language's ancestor to gatekeep further

Comment by Capybara39 at 03/02/2025 at 01:24 UTC

2 upvotes, 0 direct replies

Mega Chad glyphs that give you information about the meaning but not the pronunciation

Comment by Alegzaender at 02/02/2025 at 10:58 UTC

-18 upvotes, 3 direct replies

Are they real guys from some communities or something.. I regarded linguists and related specialists as broad minded, having huge outlook people that it's pleasant to talk to, as it's most likely to know a lot of new and interesting things from. I'm disappointed in this community, and in life at all. Though suicide is not a solution