0 upvotes, 1 direct replies (showing 1)
View submission: Explain how compatiblism is not just cope.
Yeah that is kind of what I figured you'd say which is why I hesitate to prove anything about that on this sub anymore. People are entitled to their opinions and this sub could be nothing more than people discussing their dogmatic beliefs. However I see a threat to political freedom. In the US the average person doesn't see the Bill of Rights as something that we need to protect and why would anybody actually believe that if they didn't believe that had free will in the first place? Who needs a bill of rights if there is no free will?!? The Bill of Rights is absurd based on that premise. What can I possibly do with a Bill of Rights if I cannot make any free will choices anyway?
I guess it doesn't matter anyway because we are going to keep teaching AI until it gets so smart that it will take away any rights that we have left assuming the free will deniers don't give up what we have left first.
Comment by No-Diamond-2235 at 16/09/2024 at 10:27 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
i dont see a problem with having rules, being a determinist.
I think about it as of a responsibility of who you are, not what you do. You will do what you are programed to do and cannot do otherwise.