1 upvotes, 1 direct replies (showing 1)
Then why ask that that question and then get all defensive when i said it's more religion than reason? You were upset that i wouldnt make unsupported assertions.
Because I've been debating for decades and this isn't my first rodeo.
But of course you're fine with saying Bell's inequality proves Copenhagen, which is more of blatant lie than any unsupported assertion.
Well Bell's inequaltiy being violated proves local realism is untenable. I'm just saying "Copenhagen" is still standing even though it is clear that Wigner, Bohr and Heisenberg were a lot more comfortable with it than Schrodinger, Einstein and Rosen were.
I've been banned from a lot of subs not because I'm not a patient man, but rather because my patience has limits. I'm fine with the way this dialog is going but I'm starting to get a bit concerned about the direction it might be heading. If you don't want to dialog any more, we can stop now if you like.
Comment by Techtrekzz at 16/09/2024 at 12:14 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Local realism being untenable, isn’t an argument for or against freewill. There’s no local realism in Bohm’s model either. Particles are treated as form and function of a universal whole and not independent objects.