1 upvotes, 1 direct replies (showing 1)
View submission: What are you trying to do?
If you think another poster is trying to bad faith argue with you can choose to link back to this post as a point of reference after the voting closes. So I gave everyone nearly a week to weigh in here before the polling closes so we can get a reasonably good sample of what the regular posters think about using the word random to make their point. Also the comments will be open so you will have ample time to clear up the meaning of the word random in the comments section using the Standford Enclopedia of Philosophy as a point of reference. For example you could make a case why every poster ought to use the RCT as a definition for random. Or since the moderators might want to remove posts for "direct relevancy" reasons they can police the speech usage and define all of the terms. I've seen a sub where the mods literally listed what is meant by certain terms. I prefer more of a free for all but it is futile to get people to use your terminology. Some posters don't even care about the laws of physics enough to try to understand them, so I hardly think they will use terms according to any standard.
Perhaps "this poll" is a waste of time.
Comment by mildmys at 09/09/2024 at 09:28 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
I appreciate your efforts Diogenesđź’“