Comment by spgrk on 03/09/2024 at 13:19 UTC

1 upvotes, 1 direct replies (showing 1)

View submission: Which side shoulders the burden of proof?

View parent comment

It is obvious that the free will of the layperson with no interest in philosophy exists, since it is just a description of a type of behaviour. Why should this not be the default meaning of free will?

Replies

Comment by [deleted] at 04/09/2024 at 00:08 UTC

1 upvotes, 1 direct replies

Why should this not be the default meaning of free will?

No one, as far as I know, on the entire planet debates that kind of "free will." People debate the other kind(s).