2 upvotes, 2 direct replies (showing 2)
View submission: Which side shoulders the burden of proof?
Burden of proof is a power play. You have two people who believe two different things. There is no burden of proof. If, however, you *wish* to convince others of your position, the work is there for you to build a bridge. You then do have work to do to achieve your goal of convincing others of your position.
Don't get trapped in the fallacy of the burden of proof. Get to finding creative ways to teach.
Comment by diogenesthehopeful at 03/09/2024 at 07:50 UTC
2 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Burden of proof is a power play
I don't quite understand what you are trying to get at here. Maybe arguments don't carry any weigh? Hopefully that isn't to imply this:
There is no burden of proof.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get to finding creative ways to teach.
I like this a lot, but only because of my cynical nature. It is really a sad commentary to assert there is more truth in fiction than non fiction. It seems backwards.
Comment by Rthadcarr1956 at 03/09/2024 at 02:32 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
I don’t know who or why you got downvoted. I like your answer better than my own.