1 upvotes, 1 direct replies (showing 1)
View submission: The difference between causality and determinism
Randomness could determine something
Then it's random
Comment by ryker78 at 20/08/2024 at 12:55 UTC
-1 upvotes, 3 direct replies
Is this the most circular argument in the most bad faith way?
You are concluding your own premise. It's one of the most basic fallacies around. You are telling everyone it can only be deterministic or it has to be random. This is a strawman fallacy where you are describing the method of the point of determination as random. No one even knows if true randomness exists!
Let's go smart ass, how was the big bang created, was it deterministic or random? How can a random event happen from nothing?
How can a deterministic event happen from a random event? Let's see how smart or bad faith you actually are.