7 upvotes, 4 direct replies (showing 4)
View submission: [Updated] Who runs /r/Holocaust? Each line represents a moderator overlap. [OC]
[removed]
Comment by eventhroweraway at 23/07/2014 at 04:33 UTC*
39 upvotes, 1 direct replies
I know. I put "libertarian" in quotes because fedora libertarians are not the same breed as classical libertarians. "I don't believe the government has any right to interfere with our lives beyond national defense. Oh, but there should totally be an IQ test to procreate. Also: stop immigration. Build robots instead. And movie popcorn isn't overpriced. It's the free market."
Haha. I don't really care about downvotes. Frankly, looking at what gets upvoted on Reddit, I wear them with pride.
Comment by autowikibot at 23/07/2014 at 04:20 UTC
3 upvotes, 0 direct replies
1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-aggression%20principle
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The **non-aggression principle** (**NAP**)—also called the **non-aggression axiom**, the **zero aggression principle** (**ZAP**), the **anti-coercion principle**, or the __non-initiation of force principle__—is a moral[2] stance which asserts that aggression[3] is inherently illegitimate. NAP and property rights[4] are closely linked, since what aggression is depends on what a person's rights[5] are. Aggression, for the purposes of NAP, is defined as the initiation or threatening of violence against a person or legitimately owned property of another. Specifically, any unsolicited actions of others that physically affect an individual’s property or person, no matter if the result of those actions is damaging, beneficial, or neutral to the owner, are considered violent or aggressive when they are against the owner's free will[6] and interfere with his right to [self-determination](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-determination_(philosophy%5C[7])) and the principle of self-ownership[8].
2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morality
3: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aggression
4: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_property
5: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rights
6: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_will
7: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-determination_(philosophy%5C
8: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-ownership
====
**Image**[9] ^(i)[10]
9: https://i.imgur.com/75aCGOE.jpg
10: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Domestic_violence_free-zone.jpg
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
^Interesting: ^Voluntaryism[11] ^| ^Libertarianism[12] ^| ^Self-ownership[13] ^| ^Dispute ^resolution ^organization[14]
11: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntaryism
12: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarianism
13: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-ownership
14: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dispute_resolution_organization
^Parent ^commenter ^can [^toggle ^NSFW](http://www.np.reddit.com/message/compose?to=autowikibot&subject=AutoWikibot[15] NSFW toggle&message=%2Btoggle-nsfw+cj56gyw) ^or [^delete](http://www.np.reddit.com/message/compose?to=autowikibot&subject=AutoWikibot[16] Deletion&message=%2Bdelete+cj56gyw)^. ^Will ^also ^delete ^on ^comment ^score ^of ^-1 ^or ^less. ^| ^(FAQs)[17] ^| ^Mods[18] ^| ^Magic ^Words[19]
15: http://www.np.reddit.com/message/compose?to=autowikibot&subject=AutoWikibot
16: http://www.np.reddit.com/message/compose?to=autowikibot&subject=AutoWikibot
17: http://www.np.reddit.com/r/autowikibot/wiki/index
18: http://www.np.reddit.com/r/autowikibot/comments/1x013o/for_moderators_switches_commands_and_css/
19: http://www.np.reddit.com/r/autowikibot/comments/1ux484/ask_wikibot/
Comment by [deleted] at 23/07/2014 at 04:41 UTC
9 upvotes, 4 direct replies
Sure, but ideological purity doesn't really mean all that much. It's silly to say a self-identified libertarian isn't a 'real libertarian' if a lot of other self-identified libertarians agree with them
Comment by muyuu at 23/07/2014 at 08:42 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
It's true that many of these clowns go around as libertarians, though. I suffer them sometimes in Libertarian forums.
