Comment by Gecko_45 on 09/03/2012 at 06:43 UTC

46 upvotes, 3 direct replies (showing 3)

View submission: /r/conspiracy tries to convince /r/subredditdrama about a conspiracy in /r/occupywallstreet

Honest question, the new mods at r/occupywallstreet seem to have a comment history of *not* supporting the occupy wall street movement. If it's not a conspiracy what would you call it?

Replies

Comment by jonatron92 at 09/03/2012 at 07:21 UTC

10 upvotes, 0 direct replies

People fail to realise a conspiracy is only a secret agenda held by 2 or more people. We clearly have this here

Comment by [deleted] at 09/03/2012 at 12:22 UTC

-31 upvotes, 1 direct replies

Why does it matter? Two of us oppose OWS, one of us is a big fan of it, and the last one doesn't care either way. We are there to flush out the fascists and all four of us are adults who can put personal feelings aside to work together towards a common goal. Honestly I think the maturity of the /r/EPS[1] moderation team is something that could be used in Washington DC!

1: /r/EPS

Comment by cooljeanius at 09/03/2012 at 15:04 UTC

-9 upvotes, 0 direct replies

Balance and objectivity? It's not like the old mods went anywhere.