10 upvotes, 5 direct replies (showing 5)
View submission: GUYS. /R/CONSPIRACY IS SUPER. SERIAL. Guys?
On the other hand, it's pretty obvious that a lot of people here ARE invading that sub. We should start mandating that links should be posted as archives rather than live (np.reddit.com), like how SRD operates.
Comment by [deleted] at 04/10/2013 at 08:16 UTC
7 upvotes, 1 direct replies
[deleted]
Comment by [deleted] at 04/10/2013 at 16:04 UTC
4 upvotes, 1 direct replies
/r/conspiratard certainly does influence the vote count in /r/conspiracy.
I've seen links to /r/conspiracy posted here that were originally in the positive upvote range, only to be pretty heavily downvoted a few hours later.
Comment by MarquisDesMoines at 04/10/2013 at 14:37 UTC
2 upvotes, 0 direct replies
I still stand by the fact that it's not an invasion if it's a large public sub. There's no rule that you have to agree with them to post (at least not formally). We are not secretive about using their forum to harvest entertaining examples of crazy conspiracy beliefs. Some of us might vote, some might not.
But ultimately I've yet to see any example of someone saying "Oh no! Someone in /r/conspiracy has a good point! Downvote into oblivion!" The ones that are downvoted heavily tend to be outright insane or promoting the most vile sorts of propaganda.
Comment by CrossdressingPosidon at 04/10/2013 at 17:03 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Posting image links of screencaps also tends to work pretty well.
Comment by Oflameo at 04/10/2013 at 22:41 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
That doesn't do anything. Everyone know if you just remove "np." it was like it wasn't there in the first place.
If you subscribe to both I am not sure it does anything at all.