3 upvotes, 1 direct replies (showing 1)
View submission: (Part1) 911 Simple Physics Structural Failure Vs Demolition - YouTube
Demolition using the Vérinage thechnique uses gravity instead of explosives.
This technique uses the basic principles of physics; A body of same weight and dimensions dropped on top of another body with the same weight and dimensions to achieve destruction on both bodies.
The technique consists on causing instantaneous structural failure in the middle section of the building that triggers the fall of the top section onto the lower section.
Now I ask you (you-anyone reading this that believes in the official story) this: What will happen if the structural failure is not positioned in the middle section of the building?
I'll ask this in a simpler way:
According to physics and this technique, 50% (bottom section) - 50% (top section) = 0%
What would the result be if you change the size of the sections? Let's use WTC's example:
Both WTC towers had 110 floors, WTC2 was damaged from the 77th floor to the 85th floor, this leaves 25 floors above that "fell" on the rest of the section but we will be even more generous and only count the lowest floor as the only damaged section. Now the top section is bigger, 33 floors. Remember that since we are assuming the 77th was damaged we cannot include it on the lower section, we only have 76 floors below intact.
Now for WTC 2 the math is - 69% (lower 76 floor section) - 30% (top 33 floor section) = [insert your years of math learning here]
For wtc1 the difference is even bigger, it was damaged on the floors 93 up to 99. We will consider the lowest damaged floor to be our damaged section, this leaves the bottom section with 92 intact floors and the top section with 17.
Now for WTC 1 the math is - 93% (lower 92 floor section) - 15.45%(top 17 floor section) = [insert your years of math learning here]
Now if you have learned proper math in your life span you will have answered these results for the above problems: WTC2 would still have 39% standing and WTC1 would still have 77.55% standing.
In 911 we have to believe that 3 towers defied the simple principles of math and instead of having 3 damaged buildings standing with still 39%, 77.55% and 93% (wtc7) intact structure we have 0%, 0% and 0%?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you (anyone reading) still refuse to accept what is the most basic math calculations then contact any of the demolition teams that use the vérinage technique and ask them what would happen if they didn't collapse the middle section of the buildings. Better yet, ask them if a ~16% top section of a building can completely destroy 93% of the rest of the building and don't be surprised if they ask wether you are stupid or not.
Comment by Myconspiracyname at 05/01/2014 at 13:14 UTC
0 upvotes, 1 direct replies
See, your problem is that you are using "basic math" on a very complex and dynamic system. I'm guessing you're not a scientist in the real world.