78 upvotes, 5 direct replies (showing 5)
View submission: Removing sexually explicit content from r/all
Are you going to pull gore/violence/depictions of graphic medical surgeries from r/all as well then? I think there's a large portion of users who dont want to see that. And how will that resulting r/all feed be different from r/popular? Isnt that already a filtered r/all without sexually explicit or gorey content?
Comment by trebmald at 11/02/2021 at 18:27 UTC
37 upvotes, 2 direct replies
Nipples scare off advertisers faster than gore does.
Comment by KeyserSosa at 11/02/2021 at 16:17 UTC*
30 upvotes, 22 direct replies
This is a first step to allowing for more capabilities to filter content on r/all and other listings that many people may (not) want to see.
Comment by khoulzaboen at 12/03/2021 at 10:07 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Sexual content and extreme violence should never be on reddit.
Comment by VulgarDisplayofDerp at 16/03/2021 at 14:38 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
I never got grossed out by a nice set of tits - but randomly coming across a fucking foot from medizzy is a put off and makes me not want to spend any money with advertisers..
/s
This decision was stupid.
Comment by B217 at 29/03/2021 at 06:28 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
This. Gore and violence is still there, for some insane reason. Reddit is fine with showing the corpse of a lost dog after being eaten by wolves or people literally dying on camera on /r/all, but god forbid some nudity shows up on it.