3 upvotes, 1 direct replies (showing 1)
View submission: Promote ideas, protect people
all you have to do is not threaten people's safety, and you're fine.
The problem is *perception* of threat.
If I'm Israeli, and I see someone say "We should burn Israel to the ground", isn't that a threat against me, even though it's not directed *at* me specifically, even though I'm not even taking part in the conversation?
Another example: "I hope you fucking choke on a rapist's dick, you stupid cunt". That's *not a threat*. It's obviously not polite or 'okay', but it's not a threat. I wouldn't be surprised if the person being told this *perceived* it as such though.
Comment by verdatum at 14/05/2015 at 17:57 UTC
1 upvotes, 1 direct replies
decent arguments. I think I'd be alright with proposals to burn habited places to the ground being discouraged. People can go make their battleplans somewhere else.
I wonder if there's some precedent on the second example. Hoping that maladies happen to someone; taking a passive stance, but not actually making an explicit threat....it's still effectively a curse (i.e. "*may you* fucking choke etc. etc."). I'm not very fond of them regardless; they don't particularly contribute to positive discussion.
But sure, I suppose some clarification on these sort of nitpicky devil-in-the-details sort of situations wouldn't be a bad thing...