https://i.redd.it/tjxgoi21c3ne1.jpeg
created by Schermitzler on 06/03/2025 at 15:49 UTC
29 upvotes, 19 top-level comments (showing 19)
More info on the movement here: www.standupforscience2025.org
Comment by sweezitle at 07/03/2025 at 08:58 UTC
11 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Wow it’s depressing seeing y’all bitch and moan about people trying to protect science. Stop being losers who want to take knowledge away. The truth remains truth even if you don’t like it or are scared of it.
Comment by No_Hovercraft8054 at 06/03/2025 at 18:01 UTC
11 upvotes, 3 direct replies
What are we talking about here?
Comment by Droffilc_ at 07/03/2025 at 00:02 UTC
7 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Glad to see sane people around here.
Comment by LocoRawhide at 06/03/2025 at 16:05 UTC
9 upvotes, 1 direct replies
Is the science of DNA included in this movement?
Comment by Galvius-Orion at 08/03/2025 at 03:15 UTC
2 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Why is science treated like a religion by those who claim to be for and against it? Since when did we try and claim that certain things are “The Science”?
Sorry I just hate it because I think everyone became unmoored from reality 5 years ago and stopped trying to actually do science, ie the method of determining if something is the truth or not, and instead started just saying they were the truth even if it can be disproven through testing. Whether climate change (which is objectively real) or other things I can’t mention because reddit.
Comment by DR_M_RD at 06/03/2025 at 19:46 UTC
8 upvotes, 2 direct replies
Please stand and protest! The only thing holding up Auburn is the University, which does have a decent output of good peer reviewed science. If the University looses it's scientific funding kiss the University goodbye. Guess where the town heads next...
Comment by DbleDeez at 06/03/2025 at 17:09 UTC
3 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Getting sick of this stuff, put it in the Bham sub
Comment by Decent-Weekend-1489 at 08/03/2025 at 11:49 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Trust The $cience™
Comment by panix187 at 07/03/2025 at 00:09 UTC
0 upvotes, 0 direct replies
> Grassroots
lol right.
Comment by Pope_JohnPaw at 06/03/2025 at 21:27 UTC
-5 upvotes, 1 direct replies
“3. Defend Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in Science”
PASS.
Comment by SinfulSunday at 06/03/2025 at 22:58 UTC
-6 upvotes, 1 direct replies
How many people will be there with, “Trans Women are Women” signs?
Asking for a friend.
Comment by OneSecond13 at 06/03/2025 at 19:05 UTC
-9 upvotes, 2 direct replies
This just sounds like the continuing attempt to dumb down America by cloaking a left-wing radical agenda behind the facade of "science". I feel confident the people behind this movement wouldn't know "science" if it slapped them in the face.
Comment by deamonkai at 06/03/2025 at 16:40 UTC
-6 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Yall be careful. Trump will send his personal SS patrol to send you to the gulag/concentration camp. If you’re a foreigner, prepare to be shipped into human slavery.
“There is no deportation, only human trafficking”
No quarter.
Comment by edgyteen03911 at 06/03/2025 at 22:39 UTC
-5 upvotes, 1 direct replies
I am a scientist, and i dont like DEI in science. The reason is because it does not reward MERIT. It hurts people who genuinely put in effort because they can be hindered by a DEI objective that doesnt allign with their demographic. Especially in things like medicine and science where the general publics health is modulated based on these sectors performances, you dont want DEI to be the basis of hiring you want merit.
Comment by Express_Platform_592 at 07/03/2025 at 15:30 UTC
0 upvotes, 1 direct replies
Coming from the people who can’t define what a woman is. 😂
Comment by sgt_futtbucker at 06/03/2025 at 21:21 UTC
-7 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Gets rid of political interference but promotes DEI. Good job contradicting yourselves bozos
Comment by MikeV0993 at 08/03/2025 at 13:02 UTC
0 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Fear-based crap
Comment by Lbogart1963 at 10/03/2025 at 11:32 UTC
0 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Stand up with private money. No more corporate welfare from the fed.
Comment by TShieldsESQ at 10/03/2025 at 17:37 UTC
0 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Reducing “indirect cost allocations” is not the same as “cutting research”. But that’s a less sexy flyer.
