1 upvotes, 1 direct replies (showing 1)
View submission: What's the current feminist take on OnlyFans?
Well, the notion of applying Darwinism to the leading of society (that is, "survival of the fittest") is usually the discourse of far-right regimes. I, personally, don't think Darwinism can, or should, be applied to politics, it is the description of a natural process, not a blueprint for a society.
I wouldn't call the DPRK Darwinian either, I don't think there is any kind of genetic selection within the regime and their policy of self-reliance doesn't, in my view, show any sort of Darwinism in their thought, but that they understand the concrete geopolitical position they are in.
Comment by Adunaiii at 04/11/2020 at 09:41 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
I wouldn't call the DPRK Darwinian either, I don't think there is any kind of genetic selection within the regime and their policy of self-reliance doesn't, in my view, show any sort of Darwinism in their thought, but that they understand the concrete geopolitical position they are in.
Trying to survive is Darwinian. Valuing individual "hooman rights" over the survival of the collective is Christianity. Thus, I posit that the DPRK is Darwinian.
This entire notion of looking inward, into the society, while the battlefield is the planet, and the fighting sides are collectives (races), only betrays the myopia of the Christians, Kantians, liberals, capitalists - in a word, all those who deny Nature, who "don't think Darwinism can, or should, be applied to politics".