7 upvotes, 1 direct replies (showing 1)
View submission: Problems with the is/ought fallacy?
Can't you just use the is/ought to attack the premises of ethical systems like Utilitarianism?
Well, no: the is/ought distinction isn't about propositions (like premises), it's about arguments (or the inferences thereof).
For example, stating "maximizing utility is good" is an implicit "ought" premise...
It's not implicit: utilitarians are quite explicit about this.
Utilitarianism may assume this within its premises...
It's not assumed: utilitarians argue for this.
Comment by DieFreien at 12/09/2019 at 07:16 UTC
1 upvotes, 1 direct replies
Oof. I believe I misread him. I suppose my real question lies in another place. Can we apply the "is/ought" to valuations of "good" and "bad"?