Comment by Scorpius289 on 15/02/2017 at 20:22 UTC*

485 upvotes, 6 direct replies (showing 6)

View submission: Introducing r/popular

View parent comment

Why are special "subreddits", like all and popular, even in the same namespace as standard/user-made ones? Why not have... I dunno /s/all, or any other letter that's not already used?

Sounds like asking for trouble, sooner or later you might run into clashing issues.

Plus it makes it harder to differentiate whenever a subreddit is special, or just trying to trick its users that it is.

Replies

Comment by [deleted] at 15/02/2017 at 20:49 UTC*

199 upvotes, 4 direct replies

[deleted]

Comment by 7LPdWcaW at 15/02/2017 at 20:32 UTC

98 upvotes, 1 direct replies

I'd say probably consistency, they want users to have the same feeling for all, also to prevent /r/all say getting mixed up with /s/all.

Comment by algysidfgoa87hfalsjd at 15/02/2017 at 21:25 UTC

9 upvotes, 0 direct replies

Sounds like asking for trouble, sooner or later you might run into clashing issues.

Going the other way you rely on users to know which one the "real" ?/popular is, which is also asking for trouble.

Comment by concernedandannoyed at 15/02/2017 at 22:46 UTC

5 upvotes, 0 direct replies

It'll get confusing with an /r/popular and an /s/popular, etc.

Comment by madronedorf at 16/02/2017 at 14:34 UTC

2 upvotes, 0 direct replies

You don't want there to be both official and user subreddits with the same name. Would lead to a lot of confusion.

I remember in the early days of the web, whitehouse.com was a porn site. Which obviously got a lot of traffic from people trying to go to whitehouse.gov. (incidentally, including my 5th grade teacher. Oops). You'd see something similar.

Comment by TheAppleFreak at 15/02/2017 at 21:42 UTC

3 upvotes, 0 direct replies

I'd guess for API compatibility, so accessing those pages uses the same interface as everything else.