37 upvotes, 2 direct replies (showing 2)
View submission: Content Policy Update
This should be the top comment. Disregarding specific inquiries to what subs should or should not be banned and/or quarantined, this post describes *exactly* what is wrong with the new content policy.
Comment by yakatuus at 06/08/2015 at 00:12 UTC
23 upvotes, 1 direct replies
It highlights a lot of the problem of wording a content policy.
Photographs, videos, or digital images of you in a state of nudity or engaged in any act of sexual conduct, taken without your permission.
Does this apply to public figures? People in elected positions? I was curious as to why it isn't "published without your permission." So JLaw nudes are back in because Anthony Weiner/Brett Favre dick pics have to be back in?
we are banning a handful of communities that exist solely to annoy other redditors, prevent us from improving Reddit, and generally make Reddit worse for everyone else
So /r/bestof/ is ok but /r/worstof/ is not?
Comment by [deleted] at 06/08/2015 at 03:18 UTC
2 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Note how this is the single criticizing post /u/spez has not replied to.