1965 upvotes, 9 direct replies (showing 9)
View submission: Content Policy Update
For the sake of transparency I feel like it would be best to make the list of banned communities public. With all of the concerns lately about the admins not being transparent enough, banning subs without telling us who they are seems counterproductive.
Comment by [deleted] at 05/08/2015 at 20:26 UTC
111 upvotes, 1 direct replies
I can get behind this as well. A section where banned subs are posted when they are banned (you could set up a bot for that) would be helpful and interesting. It doesn't have to be visible for everyone; maybe open a separate subreddit for it?
Comment by spez at 05/08/2015 at 21:56 UTC
591 upvotes, 34 direct replies
I think that's a fine idea.
Comment by TLUL at 06/08/2015 at 19:35 UTC
2 upvotes, 0 direct replies
/r/boltons (women with large breast implants) is banned for no reason that I can discern. Maybe it promotes negative body image? /s
Comment by [deleted] at 05/08/2015 at 23:54 UTC
2 upvotes, 0 direct replies
4chan is more transparent than Reddit, and publishes a running list of bans and reasons.
Comment by FedorsButt at 06/08/2015 at 17:04 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Oh who gives a fuck just enjoy reddit. You'd know if you were part of a banned community.
Comment by [deleted] at 05/08/2015 at 22:31 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
lol, they won't even release a comprehensive list of all their subs
Comment by [deleted] at 05/08/2015 at 20:30 UTC*
4 upvotes, 1 direct replies
[deleted]
Comment by [deleted] at 06/08/2015 at 00:34 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
You don't get to ask for transparency, you're a consumer, you will do as you are told. Now, pick up that can.
Comment by newsagg at 05/08/2015 at 21:15 UTC
0 upvotes, 0 direct replies
I'm not sure that's such a great idea. How would the people in charge be able to extract intel if everyone knew where the subreddits that didn't exclusively contain nothing but bullshit fluff exist?