Comment by Simple_Tymes on 06/07/2015 at 18:10 UTC*

2224 upvotes, 34 direct replies (showing 25)

View submission: We apologize

The average users don't care about moderator tools. What matters to the passionate non-mod reddit community is:

Simply, if these issues aren't addressed, then it's time to move somewhere else. If Reddit wants to turn the community into an advertiser platform (and do it in the most unprofessional, mismanaged way) then there's no sense in supporting a site that no longer shares our beliefs. Why should we trust you to do the right thing?

Edit: for Yishan and kn0wing:

Replies

Comment by wanttoshreddit at 06/07/2015 at 21:02 UTC*

78 upvotes, 1 direct replies

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1: https://stacksity.com/

I must admit I do find the $ prefixing everything kinda obnoxious though.

However nothing gets removed as far as I can tell and it's new so we should really cut it some slack and see how it grows. I'm looking forward to seeing how it expands.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2: http://voat.co

They get a lot of flak for being down often but it's run by a small but dedicated team who take donations to try and keep the servers up so it's rather admirable that they're doing as well as they are as whenever Reddit messes up people throw it around to immediately jump ship.

It's fun and fairly light though.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3: http://snapzu.com

I have to say though it's not as...strongly opinionated as Reddit which is a good and a bad thing as it lends to very passive and dull comments.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4: http://www.campussociety.com/invitations/1162

5: http://blog.campussociety.com/an-open-letter-to-victoria-previously-of-reddit-become-victoria-of-campus-society

It doesn't rely on upvotes / likes to determine user score but a 'GPA' system which goes up if users respond well to you and down if you're inactive over a long period of time or get reported by other users.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

6: http://www.wechat.com/en/

I really enjoy the personal touch of that because there's a much more personal connection with these people as they tend to respond often, use actual names/faces, and have a real passion for what they're doing but it can be rather intense at times.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

7: http://getaether.net/

They're not likely to go down anytime soon though because their infrastructure does not rely on a centralised server setup but p2p. Their goal originally was simply to be a purely anonymous reddit so if you're privacy orientated this might be interesting for you but as it's links and not images etc most people might not find it that interesting - especially as it's in dire need of content and as anyone can pretend to be you it's hard to build any sense of community.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

8: http://www.yikyakapp.com/

Yaks are text based though and very short form so this might not appeal to everyone but it can be rather lighthearted and interesting for localised content.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

9: http://thestudentroom.co.uk/private.php

It's rather solid but it is definitely focused more on the UK student crowd.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

10: http://stumbleupon.com

Honestly I had so much love for this website I fear to go back.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

11: https://news.ycombinator.com/

After /r/technology took a tumble in quality I ended up just going back to Hacker News for quite awhile to be honest as it's simple, practical, and the community is very informed and helpful.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

12: http://producthunt.com

Though it does get a bit dull seeing the same people leaving comments and the discussion can be pretty thin.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

13: http://www.tumblr.com

Personally it's not to my liking but it's a viable alternative that while hated on will more than likely have something to cater to your taste.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

14: http://www.newsvine.com

15: https://frizbee.co

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

16: http://slicer.io/

It can be a little messy though as the default page throws everything into "Any" as opposed to a space, which function like subreddits, but I kinda do like that as it reminds me of how /r/all used to be.

Seriously though props to this guy if it's just the one person as it's really well done.

Comment by Thrug at 06/07/2015 at 23:14 UTC

46 upvotes, 0 direct replies

The firing of Victoria may, in fact, be completely justified. But the pure business of firing the head of AMAs (arguably Reddit's highest profile sub) was simply terrible management. Why didn't you know how your business is run? Why didn't you have a transition strategy in place for Victoria's departure? Why didn't she introduce her replacement to her important clients/mods? How is this not business 101?

This absolutely is Business 101. Reddit reeks like a holdover from the worst part of the dotcom bubble that has been propped up for years by spectacular amounts of work from the community.

Clearly none of them have any idea how to run a business, nor conduct appropriate PR, nor protect the brand. It's like a bunch of twenty-somethings, sitting around in their smoke-filled rumpus room wearing "geeks rul3" t-shirts, acting surprised that people expect professionalism.

Any business manager in a real company would have been summarily sacked if they had displayed even half the amateurish incompetence of the Reddit admins.

(Please note their sacking would have involved a formal transition plan, and a public announcement of the transition to maintain trust and brand equity).

Comment by fernandotakai at 06/07/2015 at 19:33 UTC

972 upvotes, 18 direct replies

you know what's funny about censorship? one of reddit's core values[1] is "Allow freedom of expression" (as well as "Be stewards, not dictators. The community owns itself.").

1: https://www.reddit.com/about/values/

another core value? "Default to transparency, and when you can’t be transparent, be honest.".

the hypocrisy is so strong it hurts.

Comment by TheAngelW at 06/07/2015 at 22:10 UTC

186 upvotes, 4 direct replies

I'm starting to think Reddit needs to be taken care of by a foundation, wikipedia-style, with full transparency and no risk of financially motivated decision.

On my part I'd be happy to chip in every year as I do with wikipedia.

Comment by [deleted] at 06/07/2015 at 20:06 UTC

291 upvotes, 1 direct replies

[deleted]

Comment by TheStarkReality at 07/07/2015 at 08:24 UTC

8 upvotes, 0 direct replies

My dad is the manager of 37.5 million dollar business segment of his company, and he says that any company worth its salt has succession plans for any lynch-pin member of staff. If the admins want to run reddit like a business, then they need to run it in a professional manner, and have these kinds of plans in place. I support the fact that everyone's stayed quiet over the reasons behind the firing, because that's just professional, but not being ready for a sudden transition is indicative of either complete lack of foresight and professionalism, or a complete lack of knowledge of reddit and the importance of Victoria's role. I'm not sure which is more disturbing.

Comment by NoPatNoDontSitonThat at 06/07/2015 at 19:21 UTC

39 upvotes, 1 direct replies

And this is how you can prove that Reddit's admins are full of shit when they talk about transparency and communication.

It's a easy answer. Will AMAs be the same without Victoria? Or paid and just PR interviews?

Will corporations determine what subs exist and which ones don't?

Will shadowbans be explained?

These are easy, easy answers that they won't answer because the truth is that their answers are the ones people don't want to hear.

Comment by Bobo480 at 07/07/2015 at 06:20 UTC

5 upvotes, 0 direct replies

Though we will never get it, I just want to know what got Pao this job.

She has no qualifications to be a CEO, has never excelled in any place in which money couldnt buy her a degree and has shown to have low morals and zero people skills.

I have asked in almost every thread I can and every answer I get on her hiring seems to lead to some shady backroom deal.

If I could get the real answer on what led to her becoming CEO over the thousands of more qualified people in just this country I would be a happy man.

Comment by [deleted] at 06/07/2015 at 23:03 UTC

6 upvotes, 0 direct replies

Will you ban users who don't agree with specific speech/content guidelines?

Already happens in questionable subs like /r/gonewild , anyone who asked if they were going to participate in the blackout was banned.

Comment by rjcarr at 06/07/2015 at 21:59 UTC

7 upvotes, 1 direct replies

Why didn't she introduce her replacement to her important clients/mods?

Playing devil's advocate here, but when someone is fired (or terminated, or laid off, or whatever) you can't exactly ask them to set up a transition plan. That only happens when someone quits.

Often when someone is fired, especially in sensitive situations like I assume this was, they are immediately asked to gather their things and leave.

Now not anticipating the backlash of both AMA and reddit as a whole? Yeah, that was a huge fuck up.

Comment by KRSFive at 06/07/2015 at 22:20 UTC

39 upvotes, 1 direct replies

None of these questions will be addressed by ellen.

Comment by seth7garcia at 06/07/2015 at 22:09 UTC

19 upvotes, 0 direct replies

We're Sorry

Comment by Lazylion2 at 07/07/2015 at 00:01 UTC

15 upvotes, 0 direct replies

you forgot **communication**. the fact that it took her like 4 days to post this is a joke.

Comment by boobookittyfuck69696 at 07/07/2015 at 01:27 UTC

3 upvotes, 1 direct replies

PAID CONTENT:

She told me that because they got $50M last year they don't need to do this.

I assume she was referring to the Series B funding they got last Sept. Still won't say why Victoria Taylor was fired. Still won't really speak to banning subs that advertisers don't like, but the subs that have been banned did break site-wide rules so... who knows anything right now.

Comment by [deleted] at 06/07/2015 at 21:39 UTC*

62 upvotes, 1 direct replies

[deleted]

Comment by 1337BaldEagle at 06/07/2015 at 23:40 UTC

4 upvotes, 1 direct replies

I would gilled you but that would just support the issues you were talking about.

Comment by GraharG at 06/07/2015 at 21:42 UTC

4 upvotes, 1 direct replies

The average users don't care about moderator tools

actually you probably do care. mods leave = shitty reddit for all. What the mods need to happen is what you need to happen

Comment by Katzoconnor at 07/07/2015 at 06:06 UTC

3 upvotes, 1 direct replies

As much as I hate to gild something when Pao is in charge, I needed you to have a visible medal next to this to get convince scrollers to stop and *read what the fuck you were saying.*

Comment by quenishi at 06/07/2015 at 20:23 UTC

2 upvotes, 0 direct replies

Why didn't she introduce her replacement to her important clients/mods?

As a slight side note, in the case of a firing, you can't rely on the handover method to be as such. A shared calendar (and maybe inbox) would cover the firing eventuality though, where someone can quickly pick up the notes of their predecessor and carry on. Relying on a handover phase can go horribly wrong, when the person is fired/disappears/dies.

Comment by boarderman8 at 07/07/2015 at 01:39 UTC

3 upvotes, 0 direct replies

More importantly, **CAN I SELL MY UPVOTES FOR MONEY!!!!**

Comment by zirzo at 07/07/2015 at 16:54 UTC

2 upvotes, 0 direct replies

Phew, one can only hope these points were raised by board members in the past week if not in the past year

Comment by [deleted] at 07/07/2015 at 13:09 UTC

2 upvotes, 0 direct replies

Not foundation, user-owned cooperative using Loomio or LiquidFeedback to make decisions.

Comment by aazav at 07/07/2015 at 01:42 UTC

2 upvotes, 0 direct replies

The average users DO care about the subreddits that the moderators supervise.

Comment by [deleted] at 07/07/2015 at 00:32 UTC

2 upvotes, 1 direct replies

"For yishan and kn0wing" you mean Ellen and kn0thing?

Comment by kbuis at 07/07/2015 at 05:23 UTC*

1 upvotes, 0 direct replies

PAID CONTENT: Will AMA and other reddit subs have content paid by sponsors? **Will you disclose if reddit receives money for specific corporate posts to receive higher placement/votes?** How far are you willing to go to monetize reddit?

FTC rules would require them to disclose this, so I'd be shocked if they didn't.