2 upvotes, 0 direct replies (showing 0)
View submission: On what women want
This is nonsense. The author cherry picks quotes from another article to make it seem like a rape accusation was a smear piece. Having actually read the other article, this author conveniently leaves out the direct accusations of sexual assault.
By making a meal of dissecting the victims text messages from later in the (allegedly-abusive) relationship, and sprinkling in random irrelevancies about bdsm, they paint a picture of a woman who got in over her head and had sexual regrets. According to this article, the only real evidence of wrongdoing is intellectual nonsense involving nebulous consent. Apparently, we should be more upset that he is a deviant, and we are sexually failing as a society?
Again, the woman directly accused this man of sexually assaulting her, while she asked him to stop. The entire story is written in the article this one keeps referencing. Writing an article about consent and women’s agency in relation to these events, while neglecting to acknowledge this basic fact of the case, is either intentionally dishonest or stupid.
There's nothing here!