1 upvotes, 0 direct replies (showing 0)
View submission: On what women want
He picked her as the object of his abuse because she had nothing, he pressured her and manipulated her into scenarios where she would be even more vulnerable, and made sure she would be too afraid to say no, either afraid of being hurt physically, afraid of being fired which for her would mean having no place to live, no money and no friends. She already had no family and nowhere else to turn for help. Then, when she "consented" to some mild sexual touching he escalated that sexual contact until eventually it turned into extreme brutal rape and sexual contact in front of a child which is so disturbing I can't even begin to imagine what the fuck is wrong with him. Then, because she needed him for a place to live, because he owed her money for nannying his kid, she was afraid to displease him. She needed him to at least pay her what he owed her before she could leave. If she left she wouldn't even have an address for him to mail her a check, it would be leaving to live on the street. He knew what he was doing when he texted her about their relationship being consensual that she could never deny it in a text, because he made sure she was completely reliant on him before raping her. The idea that it's anti feminism not to take her at her word when she texted him ignores all the ways that her abuser planned that too! He wants you to think he has every reason to think she consented because he planned it so that she wouldn't be able not to consent. If she can't say no, she can't say yes. Coerced consent is never consent.
There's nothing here!